im glad ur back, its good to kno u didnt die on us :)

welcome back..Glad that good stuff happened to ya

ah so thats where you went.

Welcome back! *Hugs*

YOU'RE HERE! :D :D :D

wow. didnt know you left. im horrible. D:

:O

yeah I know

You're in more good hands coming back bud.

Welcome back man.

Great to see you being back, must have been lonely for you, but everything is okay now right?

Glad to have you back around here! :D

Sweet, you're back! Can't wait to see the new art! :D

Great to have you back mate.

He lives!!

Welcome back! Looking foward to seeing your new artwork.

Welcome Back

I am so happy to have you back!

That was the most epic "I'm back" message ever :O

How was your vacation at jail?

http://www.mcso.us/PAID/BookingDeta.....z111umalndlQ==

http://www.shadowscope.com/archives....._the_pooch.php

I love trolls.

I love stories

It was fantastic. Regardless of what happened, the real truth NOT the fabricate and assumed truth, and putting the hypocrites aside, I still have thousands of people who love and care for me. So it's all good

By calling him a hypocrite doesn't that imply he'd have to have had hundreds of sexual encounters with dogs too?

Thousands?

Millions ;)

WOAH FUCK.
um I'm just wondering, how did they possibly count all those times??? Like, did he video tape all of the times he did it?
I'm so confused and scared.

You came back!!!
<33333
I thought you died! D':

Nope. I am alive, well, and happy Do not be worried. New things are to come in due time.

SUPER welcome back, wuffie!!! We MISSED ya so much!!!

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/1250384/ all I'm gonna say.

fear the journal! hahaha this is so funny :3 dogfackazz :3

Do they let convicted dog rapists in the marines? I thought even they had some standards.

Don't worry, we do. I doubt this guy is seriously a Marine; he sounds more like a motarded poolee or something. But if he is, just find his unit and toss them that happy little mugshot page.

Bring a camera though, I want to see him get beat the fuck up.

You know, to be honest, I don't much care that he had sex with a dog. It was insanely stupid to video tape it, though. Like, hey, you want to do something in the privacy of your own home, whatever, cool, fine. People smoke pot all the time and it's illegal in most places anyways. Whatever. I don't see everyone video taping themselves smoking pot and letting everyone know so that they can call the police, though. If you're going to do something illegal, by all means try, but don't be stupid enough to record it. And certainly don't tell a soul until the day you die.

Uh raping animals is not comparable to smoking weed. You don't RAPE your bong, or inflict injuries like this sicko did to his dog. I find it hard that so many people can turn a blind eye to such disgusting abuse.

I was just saying it was stupid that he bothered to record it and share it. If you do something illegal, why set yourself up? Why not just cut to the chase and do it right in front of a police station and get it over with?

Because people are dumb and don't think they'll get caught.

I was referring to your first line

I don't really care that he did it.

Hence my point. barf

I'd give a fuck if I saw proof the animal had signs of physical injury or behavior suggesting emotions of intimidation or other signs of emotional or mental duress. I don't put my personal philosophies or morals on people's heads and expect them to care, so I won't simply hate him for having done something on the mere basis that it was done. I try not to think with my gut instinct like that.

Well there is actually a news article(posted above I think) stating that Rocky needed treatment for injuries :/ A male dog yanno, raping a dog's ass is never going to end well for the dog. Think about it

I think it was this link? http://www.shadowscope.com/archives....._the_pooch.php I don't think I saw any information that said the dog was injured. Someone (unknown | May 19, 2009 10:54 PM) actually posted, "We have also been notified that the dog involved was not injured," although the person posting was anonymous and could've been anyone (even a friend of the guy), so no one actually reliable or with reliable sources said anything about injuries. If I saw something that said the dog actually was injured, then I'd change my mind and say it was pretty horrible to do.

http://www.pet-abuse.com/cases/15469/OR/US/ Here's the article I saw, for proof. TBH though, if you really knew anything about dog psychology, you'd realise that having sex with your pets = rape, they can't consent and they're naturally willing to please(taken advantage of hardcore) That kind of behaviour messes them up, mentally(dominance issues woo) if not physically(shockingly, dog anatomy is not meant to accommodate human anatomy at all). It's all abuse.

That link's from April 30th. It only said the dog will be examined for any injuries and, if it had any, they will be treated. It doesn't say it absolutely did have injuries. The poster from the link I gave above claimed that it was uninjured the following month, suggesting that it didn't have any injuries upon inspection. I would need to see something that says it actually was shown to be injured after proper inspection to know, but it seems that it wasn't.

The idea that animals can't consent is a standard argument. Most of it's based on assumption, probably mainly the theory that an animal would only ever have sex with a human being to please its owner out of fear or loyalty. There are plenty of well-known cases of dogs humping people's legs or random objects and even of homosexuality in animals with other animals, the point of mentioning this being that they clearly do enjoy sexual activity just for the sake of doing it. Therefore, I think there must be some ability for an animal to desire sex for the heck of it without really caring about what it's from.

Although you can't ask if a dog wants to have sex directly, there are ways for a dog to express it not wanting to have sex if approached with it, and it will use those methods of expression if it really doesn't want to participate, even against its owner. I'll use an example of one particular event you might actually know about. Last year, a furry had his videos of him and his dog leaked all over Lulz.net. From the descriptions given by people who saw it, he was attempting to force his dog to mount him by grabbing its neck, legs and the scruff of its neck, it repeatedly tried to back away and also wasn't aroused. He eventually gave up after awhile and just turned the camera off. The purpose of explaining this is that animals can and have expressed obvious disinterest in sex through their behavior and won't always act only to make its master happy. This doesn't answer the following, however: Will a dog sometimes submit to sex just to appease? If so, how often? Might the answers differ from breed to breed, perhaps depending on breed's genetic tendencies or natural differentiating intelligence? I don't know, but whatever the answers may be, it doesn't invalidate that if a dog does have the ability to show obvious signs of a lack of consent as I described, then it probably has the ability to show signs of consent that isn't for appeasement and the owner in the previous description most likely chose to ignore those signs. Also, at least as far as I know, it's legal to have sex with someone that doesn't speak the same language as you, even if neither of you can understand a single word, so long as she's of legal age. Body language is enough to assume consent or no consent. A person doesn't have to know much about behavioral zoology, psychology or sociology to pick up on the common sense signs. To really know if Wildwulf was negligent on those signs would probably require viewing the videos he took, which is illegal, so we can't. The police wouldn't care, since it's not relevant to their case. All that matters for them is if he did or didn't do the deed, not the animal's behavior, so that would probably go largely unreported on a police report. Thus, the fact that it's illegal makes it hard to do validating research. We're simply told that we're supposed to believe an animal can never consent and that we don't need controlled, double/triple-blinded tests or peer-reviewed evidence from unbiased sources.

As for the anatomy, I would like to restate the dog has not been proven to be injured, but actually seems to not have been. The average pit bull penis is about eight to nine inches (I just picked that random fact up from Google: http://www.stinkyjournalism.org/lat.....updates-91.php) while the average American male's is about six inches. Both are biologically meant to be stuffed inside vaginas and yet gay human males don't have severe anal injuries 100% of the time they have intercourse, so I would assume that even a male dog's anatomy could potentially accommodate for a human male's, given sufficient lubricant is used and the dog's physical size isn't too small.

...Just to clarify, since I just now noticed that LOL BOTH EVENTS HAPPENED THE SAME YEAR, the "example furry" I talked about was not Wildwulf. I just don't like pointing out names, since it's underhanded.

As a final addendum, since I missed explaining this as my post was already about the size of the Great Wall of fking China, which made me just want to post quickly, let me explain more about your link, as it's fairly important and silly that I didn't mention it. They said it would be treated for injuries before it was examined, which is what made me probably assume they meant it would be treated if it had any. It says also that WW admitted to assaulting his dog over 400 times, however, it doesn't actually clarify that it was sexual assault, as per his legal charges, since the animal abuse charges were dropped, probably suggesting the dog had not actually been beaten, underfed, not given clean water, or harmed during the act of intercourse. The pet abuse article is even from the *same day* he was arrested, so chances are they just assumed it had injuries. If it did have injuries of any kind and if WW was to blame, he would have been sentenced with more than sexual assault of an animal and it would've been more than a misdemeanor, it probably would've been a felony. I thought you'd probably bring it up again, so I thought I'd just clarify that here.

I'm not even arguing about it, heard it all before

ive heard of these bits and pieces of knowledge but seeing as people look at the differences and ot facts and hypocritily bash it regardles of logic fact or things that make it not as bad as they personally want to see it as.

i wouldn't worry about people replying to this anyways most would justify hate because they deeply hate it but if they were real logical people who horde knowledge like myself they would know that this is all true just cause ya hate doesn't mean its wrong just ideologically a mindbuster.

BONGS = LIVING THINGS.

I learn something new everyday, here on FA.

ive heard of someone doing that to some poor animal before. its very fucked up.

Probably because so many people turning a blind eye to it are just protecting one of their own kind. Just like pedophiles probably protect other pedophiles....I bet you $10 that everyone who tried to cover this guy's ass is fucking their household pets or hopping fences to get at someone else's.

Ahaha ^This. *brofist to matted-jack*

I did not miss your gay cartoon dog porn.

Oh you'll be gone soon.

Glad you're back.

i hope you rot in satins asshole while you are eating maggots you sick fuck!


YOU DONT DO THAT TO ANIMALS!!!! YOU FUCKING PRICK OU NEED TO DIE RIGHT NOW SO THAT HAPPENS

do us all a favor and remove yourself from the gene pool

whoever received this, disregard it. it was aimed towards dogfucker. damn phone internets.

please do us a favor and remove yourself from the genepool

lol wtf u were in presion dont lie to these people u sick @#$@ rapeing your dog in the ass over 400 times and admitted it so ya get lost you sick ass http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/1601963/ to show proff to all that dont believe

My quick version of things: I don't find it wrong to have *willing* sex with any creature. But I DO find it wrong to *rape* and actually do harm. That's horrible and retarded, whatever anyone here will say. So I support in your getting banned and not having a pet again... at least for many years. Learn to respect life!

Haha this only proves this whole fandom is fucked in some way.

honestly I won't welcome him back, but at the same time IDGAF.

I think he needs a longer vacation.

Back in prison. And out of the marines.

And....he's BANNED!!! AGAIN!!!!

You just got owned and I approve of it.
Have a nice rest of your life, you sick and oh so fucked up part of the human race.

From the balls of my pet poodle to the arse of a Pekingese
You shouldn't be proud to claim the title, of "convicted for bestiality".

Lotta haters on here.

If the dog received injuries, that's a damn shame and I feel sorry for him. You should be and have been more careful.

As for being a zoophile, there happens to be a lot of good and cool people who are. There's nothing wrong with it. There's also nothing wrong (in my opinion anyway) with other sexual fetishes / orientations / whatever you want to call them, as long as murder and non-consensual torture / ACTUAL rape isn't involved. The line between rape and consent is a fine one, though. Especially in the eyes of the law.

What I'm trying to say is, don't be ashamed of who you are. People are quick to judge what they don't understand, and there will always be haters out there. Just gotta give them the finger and keep moving on. If they threaten you, protect yourself. A lot of people think that ALL "deviants" are weak psychos that deserve bad things to happen to them, when they couldn't be further from the truth.

Also on a side note...love your porn. :3

Stay safe dude. Keep your friends close and look out for each other.

Ah.