YouTube Embedding
15 years ago
You can now embed videos on FA with the [yt] tag. Like the feature? Thank
yak! He's the man =3Mini FAQ
Q: Why YouTube, but not images?
A: Because YouTube videos follow a fairly strict quality guideline as far as acceptable content. Since journals can not be rated for mature/adult, too many people would either post mature work, RL porn (unacceptable on FA) or other images that can potentially violate FA policies.
FA can be used in a SFW environment, but an [img] tag could be devastating to that effect.
Q: It's not working. HAAAALP!
A: Either A) embedding is disabled for the video or B) you're using the embed code. You should link to the video URL itself, such as:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5juKWgeLNwM
[YT] Tag Limitations: [yt] videos will only display if you have the journal itself open. They will not display on userpages, in journal list views or in comments or notes.
Edit: sorry for the journal repost, had to fix something.
FA+

Great to see another awesome feature added to FA, thanks for the tip Dragoneer
Did not need!
"OMG my car doesn't work today"
Then a day later; "Oh it's fine now LOL"
Now everyone will have this lame ass crap in their journals. "I went to work today and got promoted, here's a video that doesn't pertain to anything."
BOOO!
*arg* Frustrating.
i can see a sudden burst of journals will occur in the next 24 hours X3
excellent feature though, tis awesome ^_^
c'est la vie
it work?
how can you explain this?
its not working for me
Maybe a new way to show art by video or make art with movies
You need to -vix- your spelling too xD
awesome saucewith mustard.
awesome work !
Also, how do you imbed images again, or can we do that? x:
Imagine yourself in a need to ask your friend a simple yes or no question, and your friend is occupied with something at the moment. Will you stand around all day and wait for him to finish before asking, or will you ask your question now and be on your way? FIFO doesn't work in real life.
YouTube's videos follow a strict TOS and ratings system.
Would be kind of nice to put a small amount of thumbnails in a journal or such referring to pieces within FA.
Or, what about journal maturity ratings if there wouldn't be a way to block out individual thumbnails?
I dunno, would probably be a nightmare to code, I have no clue, just suggestions. ^^
Just because people like it, doesn't make it necessary, much as while this youtube thing isn't necessary, people like it.
See how that works?
You're a genius, you caught me. Lawdy lawdy.
You claim it's not a vital feature, however, neither is the search function. It's simply a function of convenience.
To question if something on a site is vital, while throughout the rest of the site are functions and features that are themselves unnecessary is a bit silly. Both from a logical, and a semantic standpoint.
No, the search function is in no way necessary. It's a convenience, it doesn't make it any less nice to have. Just because this site feature exists, doesn't mean it is required to be used, just as you don't have to use the search.
You're complaining about a feature design in the name of convenience while trying to claim the necessity of another feature whose existence is purely for convenience.
Embedding videos is a convenience, as are most of the functions on this site like italics, [b]bold[/i], and text colours, for example.
You are making an argument about an unnecessary function on a site full of unnecessary functions.
Shall I rattle off a list of things that this site doesn't need to run or do you get the point now
Just because 90% of the people on the site didn't ask for it, doesn't make it any less nice to have for the people who do compulsively post links to videos.
You can find every single picture on this site by browsing. The search just makes it easier to find specific things. This site ran for, what? Four years without a search function. People complained, but they could manage.
You don't understand the difference between "Necessary" and "Man, that would make this thing I would like to do a lot easier".
I really would like to know what makes you think I'm white knighting for anyone? I was pointing something out, not defending anyone.
And torment? Please. I'm thoroughly enjoying watching you flip a shit over this conversation.
I've never spoken to 'Neer, 'nor Yak, so defending either of them would be silly. I just like pointing out people's stupidity in an attempt to either discuss the matter to an end, or, if that fails, giggle as the person gets mad about a pointless argument and see how long I can keep it going.
AKA, you been trolled.
There's a difference between trying to defend your position and not paying attention to the other person. Perhaps before you spout off about hypocrisy, you should check your own prattle first.
Lol, u mad.
that is all :3
? XD
Video link has to be the URL, not the embed code.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5juK.....layer_embedded
Cheers :3
lastunusedname In the immortal words of Ralph Wiggum, "go banana!". 6 4 months ago
I asked if he could do it, and he did it... in like record time. =D
I await hundreds of journals with Rick rolls. Too bad I actually like the song :P
A bad feeling about being able to post videos on journals?
Just don't watch them if you don't want to...?
Thanks for asking Yak to do this out of curiousity (oh and Yak, if by any chance you're reading this, thank you to you too for the coding).
why do i feel 50% cringe-full, and 50% elated
So by you people, I mean everybody else in the rest of the world.
Weirdo.
Also, you're flaming at a person who actually didn't know if you were aware that the tags didn't work.
The rule being: Don't feed the trolls.
Also you should probably know that Bobskunk is a pretty big deal around here! He has many leather bound books, and his den smells of rich mahogany.
Trust me, it works. 2 minutes or less.
So uh
Punish the people who do this?
Why limit all of us because of a few horny little spacks?
MY
FUCKING
GOD
[ralph]
Go banana!
[/ralph]
Since everyone feels the need to talk about what they don't like about the current journal system...I actually use the nuke and global remove buttons quite liberally. I'm just agitated by "comissions" journals. Now if there were a way an artist could specifically tag those and you could opt-into or opt-out of them, that'd be great.
[yt]videourl[/yt]
thankies for the new addition!
I wonder if there will be other video service available soon? like blip
Can you clarify, please?
I mean... I can link to xtube in journals... from what Dragoneer said before it was A-OK to do so. However, with what he said in this journal, I wonder if it is still OK
YouTube's videos follow a strict TOS and ratings system."
so i guess Xtube in journals is kinda not allowd
I'm trying to get a response if it means links are not allowed (because it's not on his site and not a problem)... He said int he past (when the fursuit issue came up) that you could post clean pics of your suit, then link to your adult pics in the description or in a journal.
Shouldn't you folks be taking care of other demands from the users, such as returning commission info pages, and the ability to delete comments? I know it requires tons of coding, but we've been wanting these for so long that we've got penis envy.
sweet, thank you
Oh! And a small text box on our pages so we can write a short message in it!
Youtube on FurAffinity! Thank you, thank you, thank you! "Hops"
I just tested, everything works!
and YAY SIAMESE CATS!!! :V
Thank you.