I don't quite understand the fuss tbh, it's not something I'm interested in and I know this stuff has been banned on FA - but with cub shit being even more removed from actual CP than loli shit I find it weird to think that this is something someone would recommend cutting ties over.

Maybe that's just me though, I have very little 'fantasy' type things I draw the line at due to my own (in part quite disturbing) interests.

Imho saying cub porn = pedophile is on the same level as saying furry = zoophile. It's an easy connection to draw but it's still a bit of an unfair blanket accusation to make.

(*cough* queue me having defended an actual pedo here lol)

I agree with you on the furry doesn’t equal zoophile thing. But when it comes to cub and child I think there’s quite a bit of difference to the other point.
Furries are, in terms of body shape, different from basic animals and changed to be more humanoid, and can speak the same form of language in order to give consent.
With a childlike one however, making it more “human” doesn’t make it able to consent, as it’s still a child.

Just wanted to say my piece, take care!

Cub porn is the furry equivalent of CP, the characters are made to look like children or babies and things like that. Cub falls into the same categories as CP and Loli stuff, just the children happen to be anthro animal children instead of actual children or anime style children.

If it was anything else it would probably be different because I'm a pretty tolerant person about people having their kinks, but porn representing children furry or not is a big nope.

Have sex with consenting adults, watch and make porn of consenting adults, but leave children far away and out of it