FA+
Shop
ho-ly shit, california...
3 years ago
https://twitter.com/JeremyRedfernFL.....11451964915712
SB-107 Gender-affirming health care.: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/.....202120220SB107
"3424. (a) A court of this state has temporary emergency jurisdiction if the child is present in this state and the child has been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because the child, or a sibling or parent of the child, is subjected to, or threatened with, mistreatment or abuse, or because the child has been unable to obtain gender-affirming health care or gender-affirming mental health care, as defined by paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 16010.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code."
ok, this is just getting straight up EVIL at this point. this has NOTHING to do with PROTECTING children!
how much more crystal can it be said that this is CHILD ABUSE? yeah, let's just take away peoples children and put them into "gender-affirming health care NO MATTER WHAT THE CHILD'S PARENTS SAY ABOUT IT OR WANT FOR THEIR CHILDREN!
here's the full section: "3424. (a) A court of this state has temporary emergency jurisdiction if the child is present in this state and the child has been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because the child, or a sibling or parent of the child, is subjected to, or threatened with, mistreatment or abuse, or because the child has been unable to obtain gender-affirming health care or gender-affirming mental health care, as defined by paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 16010.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(b) If there is no previous child custody determination that is entitled to be enforced under this part and a child custody proceeding has not been commenced in a court of a state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, a child custody determination made under this section remains in effect until an order is obtained from a court of a state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive. If a child custody proceeding has not been or is not commenced in a court of a state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, a child custody determination made under this section becomes a final determination, if it so provides and this state becomes the home state of the child.
© If there is a previous child custody determination that is entitled to be enforced under this part, or a child custody proceeding has been commenced in a court of a state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, any order issued by a court of this state under this section must specify in the order a period that the court considers adequate to allow the person seeking an order to obtain an order from the state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive. The order issued in this state remains in effect until an order is obtained from the other state within the period specified or the period expires.
(d) A court of this state that has been asked to make a child custody determination under this section, upon being informed that a child custody proceeding has been commenced in, or a child custody determination has been made by, a court of a state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, shall immediately communicate with the other court. A court of this state which is exercising jurisdiction pursuant to Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, upon being informed that a child custody proceeding has been commenced in, or a child custody determination has been made by, a court of another state under a statute similar to this section shall immediately communicate with the court of that state to resolve the emergency, protect the safety of the parties and the child, and determine a period for the duration of the temporary order.
(e) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting subdivision (a) that the grounds on which a court may exercise temporary emergency jurisdiction be expanded. It is further the intent of the Legislature that these grounds include those that existed under Section 3403 of the Family Code as that section read on December 31, 1999, particularly including cases involving domestic violence."
SB-107 Gender-affirming health care.: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/.....202120220SB107
"3424. (a) A court of this state has temporary emergency jurisdiction if the child is present in this state and the child has been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because the child, or a sibling or parent of the child, is subjected to, or threatened with, mistreatment or abuse, or because the child has been unable to obtain gender-affirming health care or gender-affirming mental health care, as defined by paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 16010.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code."
ok, this is just getting straight up EVIL at this point. this has NOTHING to do with PROTECTING children!
how much more crystal can it be said that this is CHILD ABUSE? yeah, let's just take away peoples children and put them into "gender-affirming health care NO MATTER WHAT THE CHILD'S PARENTS SAY ABOUT IT OR WANT FOR THEIR CHILDREN!
here's the full section: "3424. (a) A court of this state has temporary emergency jurisdiction if the child is present in this state and the child has been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because the child, or a sibling or parent of the child, is subjected to, or threatened with, mistreatment or abuse, or because the child has been unable to obtain gender-affirming health care or gender-affirming mental health care, as defined by paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 16010.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(b) If there is no previous child custody determination that is entitled to be enforced under this part and a child custody proceeding has not been commenced in a court of a state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, a child custody determination made under this section remains in effect until an order is obtained from a court of a state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive. If a child custody proceeding has not been or is not commenced in a court of a state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, a child custody determination made under this section becomes a final determination, if it so provides and this state becomes the home state of the child.
© If there is a previous child custody determination that is entitled to be enforced under this part, or a child custody proceeding has been commenced in a court of a state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, any order issued by a court of this state under this section must specify in the order a period that the court considers adequate to allow the person seeking an order to obtain an order from the state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive. The order issued in this state remains in effect until an order is obtained from the other state within the period specified or the period expires.
(d) A court of this state that has been asked to make a child custody determination under this section, upon being informed that a child custody proceeding has been commenced in, or a child custody determination has been made by, a court of a state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, shall immediately communicate with the other court. A court of this state which is exercising jurisdiction pursuant to Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, upon being informed that a child custody proceeding has been commenced in, or a child custody determination has been made by, a court of another state under a statute similar to this section shall immediately communicate with the court of that state to resolve the emergency, protect the safety of the parties and the child, and determine a period for the duration of the temporary order.
(e) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting subdivision (a) that the grounds on which a court may exercise temporary emergency jurisdiction be expanded. It is further the intent of the Legislature that these grounds include those that existed under Section 3403 of the Family Code as that section read on December 31, 1999, particularly including cases involving domestic violence."
Imagine what would happen to a doctor who, having diagnosed a patient with anorexia nervosa, then schedules them for gastric bypass surgery to affirm their mental image of themselves.
and they keep claiming this is to help kids and save lives.
yeah, we're just going to outright TAKE your kids, put them on hormone therapy, mutilate their bodies, sterilize them, and we don't give a damn what you, their parents, say or try to do to stop us. cause we have the LAW on our side!
i stopped giving a damn about a lot of "laws" back when i first started pirating video games and other stuff via the internet when i was a kid. and there's a growing sentiment among gamers now that digital piracy is justified and the morally correct thing to do as a direct result of what companies keep doing.
but this...this is just wrong. i doubt those pushing this law even view kids as people. they just view them as fing play things to chop up and do whatever they want with. they don't care about their well being or their safety or parents...
this is a law that needs to be fought against, not simply ignored. with a law like this and that transgender bill of rights being pushed, this country is, VERY quickly becoming a DANGEROUS place for children. not just unsafe but full on dangerous.
edit: this is not the country i grew up in. i did not grow up in a country where it was outright DANGEROUS to be a child within its borders like this.
Yea, California is a special brand of stupid.
"The bill additionally would prohibit law enforcement agencies from making, or intentionally participating in, the arrest of an individual pursuant to an out-of-state arrest warrant based on another state’s law against receiving providing, receiving, or allowing a child to receive gender-affirming health care. The bill would prohibit the extradition of an individual charged with violating another state’s law that criminalizes allowing a person to receive or provide gender-affirming health care."
California has nothing but contempt for the laws of other states. They'd like to run the country, if they could. Can they count on your vote? Don't worry, you won't have to show ID. Your ballot will arrive pre filled out.
"Don't worry, you won't have to show ID. Your ballot will arrive pre filled out."
and you're implying a mail-in ballot, correct? lol yeah, i saw how those were used in 2020 to help install biden into office. i don't live in california or vote but even if i did, i would not be supporting that method of voting for things.
that push for voted ID is a good thing that will hopefully make the election process more secure and hopefully that and removing mail-in ballots will help prevent another 2020 election event from happening.
we need less rigged votes and elections in this country while the democrats want to keep such things rigged in their favor.