Since you make a big deal about not wanting to support illegal activities, does that also mean you are opposed to any materials that depict actions such as bestiality, murder, rape, assault, drug use, money laundering, underaged drinking, piracy, etc and think they should be removed from the site?

As a followup question, how does your stance on what ought to be removed due to depicting illegal actions apply across legal domains?

funny thing to also ask yourself

he is going against something "illegal"
yet he himself is doing an illegal act. as an american, freedom of speech of given;however, slander is made illegal

this man/woman/shemale is slandering the entire cub community with this group. cubs, babyfurs, parentfurs and caretakers

find it funny how he calls all of us pedophiles, when i have never fapped to cub porn, nor ever will.

funny, in trying to "fend off" an "illegal" act... he himself creates one heh...

have fun with the account :3 it'll probly get banned soon; old news is very old news

*last comment was towards the group. not you sweety*

Still keeping an eye on you- and all I can say is, I can see youre having a lot of luck so far over this...

I only have these questions:

1.) Okay, pedophilia is wrong. But that leads to the question, do you think that ALL babyfurs / cub artists are pedos? The answer would be obvious, but let me go further...

2.) I give you who is a well known baby fur artist. And if you look- and I mean, really LOOK at his work, I personally have NEVER seen ONE example of his cubs in ANY kind of sexual activity / pose / situation.

But it also begs the question- would you ban him, and similar artists like him, even if he is the cleanest artist imaginable?

Then further, what is stopping others from banning by this example alone- that is to say, okay, babyfur is banned, then- if I don't like vore, I should go out and ban that...or, someone wants to ban fat furs...another bans...then another...

You see where that leads right?

3.) Finally- like I said before- you dont HAVE to look at it. Its only an image, and at best a fictional situation that has no direct impact unless the person (the viewer) receiving said image decides to ACT upon it...which, granted, I've seen a lot of crazy things, but that would be a LOT to take in to set any sane person off like that!

Just being a devils advocate here bud, thats all :3