FA+
Shop
AI Art - Opinions, Commentary and a Strawpoll
3 years ago
Here be bad dragons!
TL;DR: AI Art is not art and it steals from real artists, however I want to share a bunch of AI generated fat/inflation/slob fetish porn I "made". Give thoughts, opinions and insults as you deem necessary.
To begin with; my stance on AI art and the controversy surrounding it.
Whether we like it or not, fully automated images are going to be the future of art, or at the very least a part of it- though that's not a statement of its quality or ability, more the fact that technology is advancing and AI will inevitably get incredibly good at making what could be considered "real" art, although that seems a ways away.
What many coders and computer engineers have been able to do with Stable Diffusion and other such visual output engines is nothing short of amazing- teaching an AI to make an image based on prompts with arguable effectiveness, so of course it would only become a matter of time before something troublesome would be caused by it, and with many datasets containing artists' works without their permission without as much as an opt-out or a polite reminder that became reality. All of that without mentioning the fact that there are people peddling AI art as real art.
My stance on this? AI Art is really interesting, but has many problems. Not only the above moral and legal issues, but with the output of these AI being very flawed and soulless calling it art is almost a slap in the face of human creativity- even of my type, making disgusting fetish pornography with AI causes many details to become distorted or muddied, not to mention that sometimes the output is completely incomprehensible and confused.
So why am I making this? What point am I trying to get to?
Well, as it turned out a month or so ago I heard that Novel AI had made a very good Anthro-model AI, basically being able to make a lot of furry stuff. So, being bored and having some cash to throw at a subscription, I gave it a go and began to throw in some prompts and holy hell it can make some surprisingly good fetish smut.
Without giving too much away, Novel AI's furry engine is good with fat, inflation and hyper, not to mention having a decent amount of experience with scat and filth. However, it struggles with strange anatomy- full body inflation, hyperfat blobs- and cannot do gas effects (farts, stink, but can do sweat/musk surprisingly).
My question to you is this; would you be opposed to me posting what I have made?
I didn't make what I made for anyone but myself, but I feel it would be wasted if I didn't show it off. I want to show off my very niche machine-made fetish porn for little more than getting peoples' rocks off as it did my own.
I obviously won't spam it all as individual pictures, maybe only the highlights of the most presentable of the lot and keeping the rest in an online drive folder for you all to ogle at.
To begin with; my stance on AI art and the controversy surrounding it.
Whether we like it or not, fully automated images are going to be the future of art, or at the very least a part of it- though that's not a statement of its quality or ability, more the fact that technology is advancing and AI will inevitably get incredibly good at making what could be considered "real" art, although that seems a ways away.
What many coders and computer engineers have been able to do with Stable Diffusion and other such visual output engines is nothing short of amazing- teaching an AI to make an image based on prompts with arguable effectiveness, so of course it would only become a matter of time before something troublesome would be caused by it, and with many datasets containing artists' works without their permission without as much as an opt-out or a polite reminder that became reality. All of that without mentioning the fact that there are people peddling AI art as real art.
My stance on this? AI Art is really interesting, but has many problems. Not only the above moral and legal issues, but with the output of these AI being very flawed and soulless calling it art is almost a slap in the face of human creativity- even of my type, making disgusting fetish pornography with AI causes many details to become distorted or muddied, not to mention that sometimes the output is completely incomprehensible and confused.
So why am I making this? What point am I trying to get to?
Well, as it turned out a month or so ago I heard that Novel AI had made a very good Anthro-model AI, basically being able to make a lot of furry stuff. So, being bored and having some cash to throw at a subscription, I gave it a go and began to throw in some prompts and holy hell it can make some surprisingly good fetish smut.
Without giving too much away, Novel AI's furry engine is good with fat, inflation and hyper, not to mention having a decent amount of experience with scat and filth. However, it struggles with strange anatomy- full body inflation, hyperfat blobs- and cannot do gas effects (farts, stink, but can do sweat/musk surprisingly).
My question to you is this; would you be opposed to me posting what I have made?
I didn't make what I made for anyone but myself, but I feel it would be wasted if I didn't show it off. I want to show off my very niche machine-made fetish porn for little more than getting peoples' rocks off as it did my own.
I obviously won't spam it all as individual pictures, maybe only the highlights of the most presentable of the lot and keeping the rest in an online drive folder for you all to ogle at.
