FA+
Shop
Is vore only for the kink, or for all people munching?
2 years ago
Keep Your Promises, Especially To Yourself.
Bit late considering some people get eaten in an earlier book, but it did occure to me...
Does a story get a vore warning if there's no lewdness or kinks or... anything?
See, if I tag it 'vore' people will expect 'oh munchy-chan, nom me!' and tongue swirling and pred/prey stuff, 'mwuhahaha, my lunch today, I shall talk to it and growl at it' etc etc.
Buuuuuuut that never really happens in my stories (usually) instead its more like... potato chips that happen to have an opinion.
So you see my catch-22 here. On the one hand, yes its a carniVORE action going on... but its certainly not 'VORE' the kink activity everyone would expect. (And cannibalism is just innacurate since I'm reasonably sure I never had any of the (spoilers) eat their own species)
Was the Sarlacc eating Boba Fett Softcore vore? (Since he got out without lasting harm in at least one continuity)
Does a story get a vore warning if there's no lewdness or kinks or... anything?
See, if I tag it 'vore' people will expect 'oh munchy-chan, nom me!' and tongue swirling and pred/prey stuff, 'mwuhahaha, my lunch today, I shall talk to it and growl at it' etc etc.
Buuuuuuut that never really happens in my stories (usually) instead its more like... potato chips that happen to have an opinion.
So you see my catch-22 here. On the one hand, yes its a carniVORE action going on... but its certainly not 'VORE' the kink activity everyone would expect. (And cannibalism is just innacurate since I'm reasonably sure I never had any of the (spoilers) eat their own species)
Was the Sarlacc eating Boba Fett Softcore vore? (Since he got out without lasting harm in at least one continuity)
But again, with Jurassic Park the target audience wouldn't even assume any fetisized scenery or topic. So I would go with the first option here.