FA+
Shop
My rating for "Strange World" (2022)-Journal 1/3
2 years ago
General
FIREFOXES ARE NOT LITERALLY, "FOXES ON FIRE", AND I'M NOT A BEAR!!
Remember- International Red Panda Day is the 3rd Saturday of September.
Visit: http://redpandanetwork.org/get-invo.....red-panda-day/ for more info.A note: I will be migrating to personal journaling on Weasyl. I will post on FA, news and references more often.
If interested on my thoughts, desires and plans, go to my account there: https://www.weasyl.com/~excelsior30
( Related Journal: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11212492/ )
...and you want to make your journal pop? go here:
https://www.furaffinity.net/view/55619625/ Siskel & Ebert: Split thumbs-Siskel would give up, Ebert would give down
Former ISU rating scale: 4.4/6
Grade: C
This movie would be a combination of Moana, Zootopia, Fantastic Voyage and even Osmosis Jones in here, but I can think that an episode of "The Stone Protectors" and/or "Digimon: Tamers" on TV would fit in here. Put them together, and you've got-A DISAPPOINTING, CONFUSING MOVIE.
I was reluctant to go and see as there were some feelings that this movie was not going to be good, but it did pique my interest as it was, I can admit, better than Chicken Little, but not by much. It would seem that when one does see the second half of the movie, and one notices Avalonia, it would not be fitting for what Earth would be. I would have thought WALL-E was clear enough about what it should be for Earth in reality than this one when it starts to gel in your mind if you sleep on it.
Of course, if it is that one does think and thinks too much about the movie, and if it were that children do have advanced minds on their learning abilities (and some are starting to learn faster at an early age!), they would think that this is not feasable. For furries, this movie would be a little bit to the interest of
Vore-Furs as there was one vore scene of a pink pterodactyl-looking creature, but I feel we should be more oriented with the BIG area for us to enjoy vore overall as there was the one place where there is acid.
Overall, I would have thought that this was earth that there were referring to, but to relate to how it can be in reality, invasive species can be detrimental to the ecosystem can hurt MANY beings on the planet, and there are some that we do not know about that look harmless, but if left unchecked, they could ransack like a parasite behind our back (no pun intended when you see the end). We can see that then, the antagonist that we were looking for is not a moving being, but the aformentioned parasite that we would say to us in ecological symbiosis, "commensalite."
Disney put a big gamble in putting in LGBTQIA+ here, and it was just a small trace of the overall story, but in some case, although it is starting to be widely accepted, it may not be needed, and I could figure that it could hurt Disney as there are the Islamic places that could shun the whole movie altogether, especially Iran if it ever goes there.
There were so many things that would not be out of line, like the dog Ledgend trying to open the door, but Splat can do it, them not knowing about the being they are on in the first place and there would not be any recollection of a large flood, or having potential quakes or a sound from the turtle/tortise. And what about then, how did they get on there when you see the ending, a shrink ray?? And how then did they get the technology to get hover materials in the first place?
When one does see the so-called immune system and other "Beings" you would of imagine the attacking cells would be macrophages, but they would have made them more realistic, and it should have been a little like Osmosis Jones and we could have understood Splat better to know what the people would go through.
I know the action was good, but when you see the overall plot, you'd be confused. I could have thought they would have done a much better job having to make this clearer and to have all of the humans be more aware of what they are living on, and it is a span of nearly 30 years?? Something bad would have happened within that timespan. The characters were not really memorable, and the mostly CGI designs of the people would be a bit unreal. If it were that there would be the man watching the movie as a rating if you ever see the San Francisco Chronicle newspaper's entertainment division ( https://www.sfchronicle.com/ picture: https://i0.wp.com/www.americantheatre.org/wp-content/uploads/chronicle-little-man.png?w=403&ssl=1 ), he would be quietly sitting down, but to me, he would be a bit of a mope, but not like sleeping. I would not get this to my collection. To put it worse, as I have seen this on the death day of Walt Disney (Dec. 15, 1966), he would not be pleased, and if he does have that "rolling in his grave" mentality, he would do so a bit.
So this does make me keep up to date with all the Disney Animation Studios movies that I have ever seen, and there are 62 now on its 100th anniversary of its existence. Well for me to see Strange World this late in its anniversary, I wished I saw Wish first so to me, their anniversary to my eyes would end delightfully, but it did not at all-I did not sleep well, I hardly got positive vibes from it, and I will eventually forget this-quite a waste of time to me. This does explain how I ranked the movie:
62: The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1 star- !PUKE)
61: Treasure Planet (2 stars)
60: Saludos Amigos (1 star, but deserves better.)
59: Atlantis: The Lost Empire (From here it is 2 stars, definitely.)
58: The Emperor's New Groove
57: Melody Time
56: The Rescuers Down Under (1990 sequel)
55: Meet the Robinsons
54: The Great Mouse Detective
53: Chicken Little
52: Dinosaur (From here it is 3 stars and would likely want to get in my collection.)
51: Fantasia 2000
49: Lilo & Stitch
48: The Sword in the Stone
47: Fun and Fancy Free
46: Oliver & Company
45: Pocahontas
44: The Adventures of Ichabod & Mr. Toad (From here it is 4 stars.)
43: Hercules
42: Home on the Range
41: 101 Dalmatians
40: The Black Cauldron
39: The Rescuers (1977)
38: Cinderella
37: The Little Mermaid
36: Fantasia (1940)
35: The Aristocats
34: Moana
33: Robin Hood
32: Tangled
31: The Fox and the Hound
30: Alice in Wonderland
29: Frozen II
28: Wreck-it Ralph
27: Aladdin
26: Big Hero 6
25: Ralph Breaks the Internet" (Wreck-it Ralph 2)
24: Encanto
22: Mulan
22: Raya and the Last Dragon
21: Make Mine Music (From here it is 5 stars. The very best!)
20: Peter Pan
19: Dumbo
18: The Jungle Book
17: The Princess and the Frog
16: Pinocchio
15. Frozen
14: Tarzan
13: Sleeping Beauty
12: The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh (1977)
11: Bolt
10: Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
9: Brother Bear
8: The Three Caballeros
7: Winnie the Pooh (2011)
6: Bambi
5: Beauty and the Beast
4: Zootopia / Zootropolis
3: Wish
2: Lady and the Tramp
THE BEST ONE: The Lion King
Although I did say "LIKELY" to put in my collection, it is not a done deal that I will take it, but by how you see my rating, it is likely not going to happen, and my posterity will not have it if they depend on me on buying, but this is not worth watching again, and I'd throw it in the trash if they would not want to watch the movie anymore-under me, it is not worth reselling, donating or be put in the Little Free Library booth. ( https://littlefreelibrary.org/ )
Did they get this idea from a notable Kia commercial in 2020??: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Med64mqAb5c
Former ISU rating scale: 4.4/6
Grade: C
This movie would be a combination of Moana, Zootopia, Fantastic Voyage and even Osmosis Jones in here, but I can think that an episode of "The Stone Protectors" and/or "Digimon: Tamers" on TV would fit in here. Put them together, and you've got-A DISAPPOINTING, CONFUSING MOVIE.
I was reluctant to go and see as there were some feelings that this movie was not going to be good, but it did pique my interest as it was, I can admit, better than Chicken Little, but not by much. It would seem that when one does see the second half of the movie, and one notices Avalonia, it would not be fitting for what Earth would be. I would have thought WALL-E was clear enough about what it should be for Earth in reality than this one when it starts to gel in your mind if you sleep on it.
Of course, if it is that one does think and thinks too much about the movie, and if it were that children do have advanced minds on their learning abilities (and some are starting to learn faster at an early age!), they would think that this is not feasable. For furries, this movie would be a little bit to the interest of
Vore-Furs as there was one vore scene of a pink pterodactyl-looking creature, but I feel we should be more oriented with the BIG area for us to enjoy vore overall as there was the one place where there is acid.Overall, I would have thought that this was earth that there were referring to, but to relate to how it can be in reality, invasive species can be detrimental to the ecosystem can hurt MANY beings on the planet, and there are some that we do not know about that look harmless, but if left unchecked, they could ransack like a parasite behind our back (no pun intended when you see the end). We can see that then, the antagonist that we were looking for is not a moving being, but the aformentioned parasite that we would say to us in ecological symbiosis, "commensalite."
Disney put a big gamble in putting in LGBTQIA+ here, and it was just a small trace of the overall story, but in some case, although it is starting to be widely accepted, it may not be needed, and I could figure that it could hurt Disney as there are the Islamic places that could shun the whole movie altogether, especially Iran if it ever goes there.
There were so many things that would not be out of line, like the dog Ledgend trying to open the door, but Splat can do it, them not knowing about the being they are on in the first place and there would not be any recollection of a large flood, or having potential quakes or a sound from the turtle/tortise. And what about then, how did they get on there when you see the ending, a shrink ray?? And how then did they get the technology to get hover materials in the first place?
When one does see the so-called immune system and other "Beings" you would of imagine the attacking cells would be macrophages, but they would have made them more realistic, and it should have been a little like Osmosis Jones and we could have understood Splat better to know what the people would go through.
I know the action was good, but when you see the overall plot, you'd be confused. I could have thought they would have done a much better job having to make this clearer and to have all of the humans be more aware of what they are living on, and it is a span of nearly 30 years?? Something bad would have happened within that timespan. The characters were not really memorable, and the mostly CGI designs of the people would be a bit unreal. If it were that there would be the man watching the movie as a rating if you ever see the San Francisco Chronicle newspaper's entertainment division ( https://www.sfchronicle.com/ picture: https://i0.wp.com/www.americantheatre.org/wp-content/uploads/chronicle-little-man.png?w=403&ssl=1 ), he would be quietly sitting down, but to me, he would be a bit of a mope, but not like sleeping. I would not get this to my collection. To put it worse, as I have seen this on the death day of Walt Disney (Dec. 15, 1966), he would not be pleased, and if he does have that "rolling in his grave" mentality, he would do so a bit.
So this does make me keep up to date with all the Disney Animation Studios movies that I have ever seen, and there are 62 now on its 100th anniversary of its existence. Well for me to see Strange World this late in its anniversary, I wished I saw Wish first so to me, their anniversary to my eyes would end delightfully, but it did not at all-I did not sleep well, I hardly got positive vibes from it, and I will eventually forget this-quite a waste of time to me. This does explain how I ranked the movie:
62: The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1 star- !PUKE)
61: Treasure Planet (2 stars)
60: Saludos Amigos (1 star, but deserves better.)
59: Atlantis: The Lost Empire (From here it is 2 stars, definitely.)
58: The Emperor's New Groove
57: Melody Time
56: The Rescuers Down Under (1990 sequel)
55: Meet the Robinsons
54: The Great Mouse Detective
53: Chicken Little
52: Dinosaur (From here it is 3 stars and would likely want to get in my collection.)
51: Fantasia 2000
>>50: STRANGE WORLD<<
49: Lilo & Stitch
48: The Sword in the Stone
47: Fun and Fancy Free
46: Oliver & Company
45: Pocahontas
44: The Adventures of Ichabod & Mr. Toad (From here it is 4 stars.)
43: Hercules
42: Home on the Range
41: 101 Dalmatians
40: The Black Cauldron
39: The Rescuers (1977)
38: Cinderella
37: The Little Mermaid
36: Fantasia (1940)
35: The Aristocats
34: Moana
33: Robin Hood
32: Tangled
31: The Fox and the Hound
30: Alice in Wonderland
29: Frozen II
28: Wreck-it Ralph
27: Aladdin
26: Big Hero 6
25: Ralph Breaks the Internet" (Wreck-it Ralph 2)
24: Encanto
22: Mulan
22: Raya and the Last Dragon
21: Make Mine Music (From here it is 5 stars. The very best!)
20: Peter Pan
19: Dumbo
18: The Jungle Book
17: The Princess and the Frog
16: Pinocchio
15. Frozen
14: Tarzan
13: Sleeping Beauty
12: The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh (1977)
11: Bolt
10: Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
9: Brother Bear
8: The Three Caballeros
7: Winnie the Pooh (2011)
6: Bambi
5: Beauty and the Beast
4: Zootopia / Zootropolis
3: Wish
2: Lady and the Tramp
THE BEST ONE: The Lion King
Although I did say "LIKELY" to put in my collection, it is not a done deal that I will take it, but by how you see my rating, it is likely not going to happen, and my posterity will not have it if they depend on me on buying, but this is not worth watching again, and I'd throw it in the trash if they would not want to watch the movie anymore-under me, it is not worth reselling, donating or be put in the Little Free Library booth. ( https://littlefreelibrary.org/ )
Did they get this idea from a notable Kia commercial in 2020??: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Med64mqAb5c
I am a member of these: 
Am also part of 
californiafurs, 
norcalfurs and 
bayfurs -PROUD!
Here is a list of draws I'm supposed to do: http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/5715571/
Note the age-YEAR: 1983; Birthday is March 3, 1/2 birthday is Sept. 2
IF YOU'RE 16-18, I MAY INTERACT. ANY YOUNGER, ONE WARNING TO NOT TALK TO ME-AFTER, YOU'RE BLOCKED FROM VIEWING MY PAGE. 
californiafurs
norcalfurs
bayfurs