The reason work is broken
2 years ago
https://picarto.tv/SimonAquarius for my livestreams, everyone's invited
https://www.patreon.com/simonaquarius to support my comic on Patreon
https://www.patreon.com/simonaquarius to support my comic on Patreon
Everyone needs to work, that's the reason.
Mosquitos need to drink blood to breed, malaria took advantage of it. Work is the same way, work can be a good or neutral so long as it's not a given that people will apply for any job whatsoever. The more certain it is that people will work for the worst people at the worst companies no matter how bad things get, then things will get worse with time.
And if the companies making the most money are doing so by taking advantage of their workers in ways that damages workers physical and mental health, by cutting wages and safety, by encouraging workers to break the company rules to get the job done on a schedule the company decided without them, then every other company will need to do the same to compete.
Easiest way to fix this, make work optional. You could technically work from home as a freelancer, you don't have to work at a company. Companies exist to direct clients, to determine the objective of the client, and to get workers to collaborate to complete that objective and delivering it to the client. A company is just a chain linking clients/customers to producers and workers through indirect means, without the workers or producers, there is no company, and the more links in the chain the less efficient the company. So, a freelancer is the most efficient job out there, but you have to connect directly with clients which is harder to deal with.
Chains like these have benefits. Twitch streaming is more popular than direct streaming, because they make it easier to connect with people than a direct connection between streamer and viewer, but mainly it's the payment system. Small donations below $15 can be refunded at a loss to the streamer, leading to people gaming the system and costing a producer of content a lot of money at no cost to the client. Basically trolling. If people do this on Twitch, then Twitch will take the loss instead, and the streamer doesn't have to deal with it. Twitch is also in a better position to deal with people who do this than a streamer who doesn't have time or the automated systems to deal with it and also stream.
In short, companies reduce the non-work a worker would otherwise need to do if they were dealing with the client.
A more complex fix for work would be to completely automate what companies do, and then have all workers become freelancers working for this automated system. So instead of Twitch taking a cut of what you make, or a corporation diverting the income you could have gotten if you'd done the same work alone, you would now be paid almost the full amount while the AI that solved problems you didn't even know existed only takes enough funding to pay for its server costs and energy.
Mosquitos need to drink blood to breed, malaria took advantage of it. Work is the same way, work can be a good or neutral so long as it's not a given that people will apply for any job whatsoever. The more certain it is that people will work for the worst people at the worst companies no matter how bad things get, then things will get worse with time.
And if the companies making the most money are doing so by taking advantage of their workers in ways that damages workers physical and mental health, by cutting wages and safety, by encouraging workers to break the company rules to get the job done on a schedule the company decided without them, then every other company will need to do the same to compete.
Easiest way to fix this, make work optional. You could technically work from home as a freelancer, you don't have to work at a company. Companies exist to direct clients, to determine the objective of the client, and to get workers to collaborate to complete that objective and delivering it to the client. A company is just a chain linking clients/customers to producers and workers through indirect means, without the workers or producers, there is no company, and the more links in the chain the less efficient the company. So, a freelancer is the most efficient job out there, but you have to connect directly with clients which is harder to deal with.
Chains like these have benefits. Twitch streaming is more popular than direct streaming, because they make it easier to connect with people than a direct connection between streamer and viewer, but mainly it's the payment system. Small donations below $15 can be refunded at a loss to the streamer, leading to people gaming the system and costing a producer of content a lot of money at no cost to the client. Basically trolling. If people do this on Twitch, then Twitch will take the loss instead, and the streamer doesn't have to deal with it. Twitch is also in a better position to deal with people who do this than a streamer who doesn't have time or the automated systems to deal with it and also stream.
In short, companies reduce the non-work a worker would otherwise need to do if they were dealing with the client.
A more complex fix for work would be to completely automate what companies do, and then have all workers become freelancers working for this automated system. So instead of Twitch taking a cut of what you make, or a corporation diverting the income you could have gotten if you'd done the same work alone, you would now be paid almost the full amount while the AI that solved problems you didn't even know existed only takes enough funding to pay for its server costs and energy.
FA+


bobingabout
WhiteChimera
Samhat1
MrSandwichesTheSecond
War profiteering is big business. This is no secret. But it's a great example of how destruction is used to circulate money through the economy. Without the US Military Industrial Complex, the economy would grind to a halt.
Because of this we need a new economic paradigm. And no, not communism. That's just a fantasy wrapper to sell totalitarianism.
For example, a worker who overachieves can cause their co-workers to need to perform better in order to keep their jobs, but if the first worker dies from overwork, does that mean everyone else can slow down, or will the boss question why they are individually less productive than last quarter?
And what happens if there's a goldilocks zone for work where harm is minimal? What if machines not only make achieving a perfect balance possible, but also not require nearly as many people to reach the goal? What if making every single person need to work is the problem?
Finding the balance wouldn't be easy, but it's there, it even exists in nature. The great oxygen catastrophe nearly ended all life because too much carbon dioxide turned into oxygen and the planet froze. If other lifeforms can break the balance of nature, why can't human society have its own balance, have its own excesses?
Capitalism failed in 1929 because of OVERPRODUCTION. It sounds crazy, but farmers literally were producing too much food that the price for food crashed and they couldn't repay their loans for the land and equipment. This happened nearly a hundred years ago! And we've only gotten more productive since! Socializing the agriculture industry was required to transition past an agrarian economy. Likewise we need to start restructuring other sectors if we're going to do anything more than pointless busywork.
Or we start producing problems!
Problems you can sell to other people, other societies!
Problems that'll accumulate over time and will demand more and more attention, more and more workforce!
It's one of those non-recommendable ideas I have in my sarcastic moments.
You know, things with a future that'll affect ALL and EVERYONE.
Or, well, at least a lot more people than all other issues before did...