(Skip to the bottom if youy only want to read the account update)


(FA/babyfur drama)
Most ABDL are probably gonna leave this platform (or not cause this is a repeatable pattern from this community.) But my ABDL art will still be uploaded here since I don't involve minors in my content what so ever.

But since I been silent on the whole FA babyfur drama waiting till it's natural conclusion. I can say I generally side with FA trying to hard moderate babyfur content cause this content in this community has crossed lines multiple times. Not saying people are pedos or anything cause I have no fucking clue what people's intention are. But what I think is important is judging the actions of people. And if your someone who engages in only adult only, you've seen images where the child leans far to close to sexual or just is. Fuck intentions. What someone is looking will always speak louder then what you say.

Now not to say FA is not in wrong doings. Some images taken down where absolutely taken down unfairly and FA is take the full L. While also for an entire year+ not being specific in details on what is considered ban worthy. Even to this new 2.7 revision please explain how the judging criteria on what counts as *mental regression*, I can understand if the character has the literal brain capacity of minor. Don't need to explain why NSFW of that is bad. But what about hypnosis? This has been consistent problem with the rules since some of it was vague from the beginning. But I will say now we are very close to what I think fair and understandable rules with the recent 2.7 revision

As for the pokemon NSFW debacle. I also agree with the FA mods on this one, but my opinion on it only develop after I've seen the defenses for it. Now for 90% of defenses for why it's okay to sexualize these young looking mons are stupid pointless. I will say that the *old treecko* argument is the *1k loli* argument, when it comes to it. When were against NSFW of loli content nobody is looking at image from a artist on whether the character acts their age nor if the artist intentions was just to draw a adult but drew a child. At the end of the day, if looks like a little girl and you make it NSFW art of it. What am I suppose to say huh... and this applies to Pokemon to. Just because a Toxel, a Smoochums, Rilou, Totodile, acts like adult does that make it fair to whip out the NSFW art of them, no. This is such a double standard that is so obvious that some of ya'll argue like literal loli cons. I get the stance of evolution is not a full indicator of if a Pokemon is older but almost nobody does anything to make them look older. Like bare min at least I can see that the old Treecko looks older jeez...

That's pretty much coverage on this topic... and it's all cancer to look at jesus christ. I'm about done with this whole thing drama and hopefully for the best, but I have my doubts


(Update on account)
So will still post ABDL content on this account. I should be fine since all I draw is adult content. But will using this account as full art dump. So yes I will drop my fatfur and ABDL (or any other future kinks) here. More graphic content will posted on specific accounts so I don't gross out the larger audience. Mainly the ABDL art, but clean pamps will always here. But there will be increase in fatfur content going forward.