"State's rights!"
To do what? To do what motherfuckers?

Well, that'd normally be the case, but they've deluded themselves into thinking that America is teh sux and that a 6-times bankrupt businessman will be able to run the American economy anywhere other than into the ground. But hey, at least he's not "woke"! Because, y'know, better being transphobic pieces of shit dying with no public healthcare than live in a, GASP, SOCIALISM.

I couldn't write more one-dimensional cartoon characters if I tried.

The mirror in question:


Side note that free healthcare is and has been just as poor performing as paid, this is self-admitted by those that have to live with it and the only benefit anyone ever comes up with is the fact that it is free.

Also assuming everyone is transphobic now, gg.

Is this what they mean when they call someone a glowie fed.

As for what this journal refers to, you repeatedly insulted people's intelligence because you believe they're mindless racists for being upset at the death of a roughly popular pet (alongside another) including those who had no apparent political affiliation. This is the reason that you were blocked and the only person blocked by the one who made the submission. You appear to only have went there to start trouble, and since you don't get to 'troll' anymore, now not only changed your PFP, but wrote this journal as well.
Seems legit.

Oh hey, it's one of the transphobic pieces of shit that I was referencing! Yeah, you. Don't pretend like you didn't refer to me by masculine pronouns with intent in the containment post that you crawled out of. I'd block you but I want to see how you'll respond (or fail to respond) to this (because unlike anyone else thus far, I'm actually backing up my word with articles and research that are properly sourced):

"Side note that free healthcare is and has been just as poor performing as paid" source?

"Also assuming everyone is transphobic now, gg." actually, most Americans were disenfranchised and didn't vote [1] (with only about ~29% voting for Kamala Harris, or ~30% voting for a six-times-bankrupt [2] misogynist thinking that the six-times-bankrupt misogynist would be "good" for the economy thanks to how much propaganda the American's biggest media corporations that are owned by conservatives trotted out [3] - about 40% just didn't believe either candidate could do anything to help fix America, and they'd be right if it weren't for the fact that Trump actively makes America worse [4]). I was specifically only referring to that small ~30% of Americans who fell for the pro-Trump propaganda, who voted for Trump, as a lot of them are, in fact, quite transphobic. It's amazing how you think that just because Kamala Harris lost to Trump that this somehow represents the entire American demographic when you couldn't be any more wrong... Well, this does track for conservative furries, so it's obvious why you lot are all-in on Trump.

SOURCE 1: https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/op.....lic-alienation
SOURCE 2: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new.....-t-add-n598376
SOURCE 3: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-r.....bout-fox-news/
SOURCE 3b: https://www.statista.com/statistics.....iewership-usa/
SOURCE 4: https://www.epi.org/blog/the-trump-.....t-more-slowly/
SOURCE 4b: https://www.investopedia.com/unempl.....sident-8637843

And I never called anyone racist LMAO, but hey thanks for showing your hand. But yeah, I called you all smoothbrains because you couldn't or wouldn't read and mentally digest what I was putting out, you couldn't or wouldn't accept that responsibility is ultimately with the "pet" owner and his seven years of negligence is what caused the deaths of the animals because if they were vaccinated and properly licensed then they wouldn't have been euthanised to be tested for rabies, and you constantly and continually disparaged the woman who reported the "pet" owner as a "thot" and despite me regularly reminding you that this sort of rhetoric is sexist and misogynistic that you somehow interpreted it as me trying to turn it into an argument about gender... Because the person who reported him is a woman? You're ridiculous, holy shit.

"You appear to only have went there to start trouble" because calling out right-wing propaganda by a cryptofascist that has no sources is to "start trouble", what an absolute joke. You're all such wannabe victims, it's pathetic. Grow the fuck up and grow some thicker skin. And then stop being liars and uneducated propaganda apologists and get the fuck out (and I mean this truly and sincerely in more ways than you probably realise, seriously, get the fuck out while you still can).

I think we can all see who is coping and seething here, and it ain't whoever you are talking about. https://youtu.be/a8MZBUoQt68

Amazing, a "no u" is really your only rebuttal and you're still wrong. :'3