FA+
Shop
The cover-ups of the Epstein files cover-up (P1)
5 months ago
General
Hello everyone. Because in these last two weeks many things were, or still are, going on, which were, or continue to be, ignored by the general public (depending on when this diary is published) because of the use of highly effective and misleading distraction tactics, without irony, made by Donald Trump (current president of the United States), his associates, the Democratic Party (as odd as it may sound to some) and most of the news media (especially those belonging to hegemonic media).
And for those who want to know, yes, the distraction tactics have to do with the multiple announcements, made by the Trump administration, of the “supposed” release of the Epstein files, which, predictably, ended up being an act of distraction-cover-up in itself as well. However, because this topic will be longer as in regular cases, it will be divided into several parts; please, keep that in mind everyone.
But before I get to the first part of this topic, as is almost always the case, I'll leave some disclaimers below at everyone's discretion:
Disclaimer 1: Any act of denial and refutation against any data, statements and proof mentioned or presented in this journal based on mentions, suggestions or uses of information sources coming from and/or promoted by hegemonic media (US, UK and others), social media, Wikipedia (including variations thereof as well), Fact Checkers and any entity pertaining to and/or related to the oligarchy, may be ignored and/or taken with great skepticism by any reader, in case he/she so desires. The reasons are based on the absence of credible, reliable and/or truthful information, whether in part or in whole, from the aforementioned sources/entities/groups/organizations due to many of the controversies and/or scandals associated with them.
Disclaimer 2: The use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" per se, or similar to that, which is linked to what it means in the entertainment media and/or the hegemonic media as a primary method of denial and/or disapproval of the content of this note, as well as the sources attached to it, will not be taken as truthful either.
Disclaimer 3: The owner of this journal doesn't have any kind of personal adherence (personal/selfish reasons), contractual (legal reasons) or constitutional (constitutional reasons) with political figures, political parties, social organizations/entities and/or countries/nations based on the use of political agendas and/or any kind of activism that causes damage to material goods, the environment and/or towards other human beings (whether physical or psychological) for any reason that is considered unjustified after being first analyzed based on reason and ethics, with the sample or presence of compelling evidence corresponding to the cases mentioned above. The rejection of such agendas and/or activism will be even higher and forceful in cases that imply going against human nature in terms of any harm, deprivation, destruction and deterioration of the individuality of the human being and/or any society composed of human beings for unjustifiable reasons.
That being said, the first part of this topic will be to cover the basics of the scandal of the “supposed” release of the Epstein files during the Trump administration, and everything related to it. And to do just that, below I will leave to everyone with several short videos made by Coffeezilla, sorted by publication date and number, with their respective title and link to said video:
1) The very first costumed superhero got a pulpy new beat 'em up! - The Phantom
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUvWTro5BiE
2) white house responds to missing epstein footage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKMXIlM6dZs
3) the story keeps changing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gbf6C5XWK7w&rco=1
4) the worst coverup of my lifetime
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyZA2KKmRXw
5) "raw" epstein footage was modified
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZUg5E8ctaM
Note: In order to avoid unnecessary confusion and/or frustration, it is recommended to watch the videos in the sequence presented above.
Now, for those who expect me to say something (about) the content of each one of the Coffeezilla videos (presented above in the journal), I have some bad news about that; it's not going to happen. Instead, what I'm going to do is to use just one and only one of the clips from just one of the Coffeezilla videos to prove that what I said in the first two paragraphs of this journal (at the top), is a quite realistic fact for sure.
Why do it that way, some may ask. Simple, because that's all I need to throw out any opinion or argument one has, or one may come up with, as an excuse with the purpose(s) of deflecting, nitiating, exculpating and/or justifying what was done by the Trump administration surrounding the release of the Epstein files to the general public; nothing personal by the way.
That said, the video I choose is the one called “white house responds to missing epstein footage”, the second (2) in the list of videos above. And the clip in question, would be everything between minute 0:12 and minute 0:53 respectively.
For this case, the procedure to follow is not so complicated since it is based on pointing out, analyzing and explaining separately the things that most people did not notice or see (about) the clip corresponding to the video I selected. And without anything to add about it, just below, I will begin to expose my points of this case:
Things that people, for the most part, did not notice or see (about) from the “white house responds to missing epstein footage” video (between 0:12 and 0:53 respectively):
1) The fact that one cannot see the face of the woman asking questions to Donald Trump, and his entourage, while everything was being recorded with a camera. And I say that because seeing the reactions of that person, at the same time she was asking Donald Trump questions, would have been useful to get information from her through her body language. A minor issue, but it was fair to point it out anyway.
2) The fact that Donald Trump agreed to be recorded with a camera to then “pretend” to answer questions about the Epstein files scandal, i.e., execute his ridiculous and painfully distracting act, to the general public. Yes, a pretty obvious issue, I know, but it was fair to point it out too.
3) The fact that U.S. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, seemed extremely relaxed, indifferent and stoic, almost without looking directly into the camera, during the whole procedure. Even more curious, when one takes into account that he was able to maintain such behavior even when his boss “made his move”, which is quite remarkable since he knew there was going to be a camera recording in that place.
4) The fact that the US Attorney General (Donald Trump's administration), Pam Bondi (I think that's her name), agreed to be recorded with a camera, to then show practically no sign of fear or concern, at the moment her boss was executing his "distraction maneuver", so to speak. Which is even worse, since, when one observes her body language, one sees that at the beginning of such a maneuver she seemed happy for a few moments, even to the point of smiling briefly (minute 0:24), to act unconcerned and (almost) stoic after that. Clarifying that all that I said before, happened while, in a subtle way, she avoided looking directly into the camera.
5) And finally, to put it in a serious way, and without any kind of irony and ridiculousness, there is the fact that I could detect practically almost no trace of stupidity in the behavior of those involved in such a maneuver (including Donald Trump, sadly). Which makes a lot of sense when one takes into account that deceits with such a degree of complexity, or similar, clearly require the executors to have a sufficient level of self-control and intelligence to understand, follow and execute the instructions and commands one receives for such ends; even more so if such instructions and commands come from “people above one”, so to speak.
There you have it, folks; all the arguments I made above, about the piece of footage I chose as an example, from point 1 to 5, especially for what is underlined, is the additional evidence you need that the supposed release of the Epstein files, during the Trump administration, was not only an act of cover-up ( as silly, cruel and evil as it was), but a huge act of distraction as well. However, because I understand the way human beings act in general, I am almost certain that some of my readers must have doubts about one of my arguments; in this case, the argument contained in the paragraph corresponding to point 5, for which I am prepared as well.
And for those people, I want to clarify that, my argument in the point 5, was not and never was with the purpose of stating or suggesting that those who appear in that piece of footage were geniuses and/or masters of crime, when it is obvious that they never were to begin with. My point, actually, was to emphasize, as well as briefly explain, that I never expected anything remarkable or impressive, in terms of human intelligence of course, from any of those involved in such a distracting maneuver in the first place; that's what I really wanted to communicate.
So, yeah, that would be all I have to show and say in this first part. In the next journal, it will explore, in more detail, what other things happened during, or in between, these two weeks. And for those of you wondering why I made no mention of the Democratic Party in this part, don't worry about that, as in the following parts, I plan to talk about them as well; believe that!
Well, that's all for today, I hope everyone found this journal interesting and informative, and with nothing more to add, I can only say: sorry for the inconveniences caused, until next time, greetings to all and have a nice day/night to all of you.
And for those who want to know, yes, the distraction tactics have to do with the multiple announcements, made by the Trump administration, of the “supposed” release of the Epstein files, which, predictably, ended up being an act of distraction-cover-up in itself as well. However, because this topic will be longer as in regular cases, it will be divided into several parts; please, keep that in mind everyone.
But before I get to the first part of this topic, as is almost always the case, I'll leave some disclaimers below at everyone's discretion:
Disclaimer 1: Any act of denial and refutation against any data, statements and proof mentioned or presented in this journal based on mentions, suggestions or uses of information sources coming from and/or promoted by hegemonic media (US, UK and others), social media, Wikipedia (including variations thereof as well), Fact Checkers and any entity pertaining to and/or related to the oligarchy, may be ignored and/or taken with great skepticism by any reader, in case he/she so desires. The reasons are based on the absence of credible, reliable and/or truthful information, whether in part or in whole, from the aforementioned sources/entities/groups/organizations due to many of the controversies and/or scandals associated with them.
Disclaimer 2: The use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" per se, or similar to that, which is linked to what it means in the entertainment media and/or the hegemonic media as a primary method of denial and/or disapproval of the content of this note, as well as the sources attached to it, will not be taken as truthful either.
Disclaimer 3: The owner of this journal doesn't have any kind of personal adherence (personal/selfish reasons), contractual (legal reasons) or constitutional (constitutional reasons) with political figures, political parties, social organizations/entities and/or countries/nations based on the use of political agendas and/or any kind of activism that causes damage to material goods, the environment and/or towards other human beings (whether physical or psychological) for any reason that is considered unjustified after being first analyzed based on reason and ethics, with the sample or presence of compelling evidence corresponding to the cases mentioned above. The rejection of such agendas and/or activism will be even higher and forceful in cases that imply going against human nature in terms of any harm, deprivation, destruction and deterioration of the individuality of the human being and/or any society composed of human beings for unjustifiable reasons.
That being said, the first part of this topic will be to cover the basics of the scandal of the “supposed” release of the Epstein files during the Trump administration, and everything related to it. And to do just that, below I will leave to everyone with several short videos made by Coffeezilla, sorted by publication date and number, with their respective title and link to said video:
1) The very first costumed superhero got a pulpy new beat 'em up! - The Phantom
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUvWTro5BiE
2) white house responds to missing epstein footage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKMXIlM6dZs
3) the story keeps changing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gbf6C5XWK7w&rco=1
4) the worst coverup of my lifetime
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyZA2KKmRXw
5) "raw" epstein footage was modified
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZUg5E8ctaM
Note: In order to avoid unnecessary confusion and/or frustration, it is recommended to watch the videos in the sequence presented above.
Now, for those who expect me to say something (about) the content of each one of the Coffeezilla videos (presented above in the journal), I have some bad news about that; it's not going to happen. Instead, what I'm going to do is to use just one and only one of the clips from just one of the Coffeezilla videos to prove that what I said in the first two paragraphs of this journal (at the top), is a quite realistic fact for sure.
Why do it that way, some may ask. Simple, because that's all I need to throw out any opinion or argument one has, or one may come up with, as an excuse with the purpose(s) of deflecting, nitiating, exculpating and/or justifying what was done by the Trump administration surrounding the release of the Epstein files to the general public; nothing personal by the way.
That said, the video I choose is the one called “white house responds to missing epstein footage”, the second (2) in the list of videos above. And the clip in question, would be everything between minute 0:12 and minute 0:53 respectively.
For this case, the procedure to follow is not so complicated since it is based on pointing out, analyzing and explaining separately the things that most people did not notice or see (about) the clip corresponding to the video I selected. And without anything to add about it, just below, I will begin to expose my points of this case:
Things that people, for the most part, did not notice or see (about) from the “white house responds to missing epstein footage” video (between 0:12 and 0:53 respectively):
1) The fact that one cannot see the face of the woman asking questions to Donald Trump, and his entourage, while everything was being recorded with a camera. And I say that because seeing the reactions of that person, at the same time she was asking Donald Trump questions, would have been useful to get information from her through her body language. A minor issue, but it was fair to point it out anyway.
2) The fact that Donald Trump agreed to be recorded with a camera to then “pretend” to answer questions about the Epstein files scandal, i.e., execute his ridiculous and painfully distracting act, to the general public. Yes, a pretty obvious issue, I know, but it was fair to point it out too.
3) The fact that U.S. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, seemed extremely relaxed, indifferent and stoic, almost without looking directly into the camera, during the whole procedure. Even more curious, when one takes into account that he was able to maintain such behavior even when his boss “made his move”, which is quite remarkable since he knew there was going to be a camera recording in that place.
4) The fact that the US Attorney General (Donald Trump's administration), Pam Bondi (I think that's her name), agreed to be recorded with a camera, to then show practically no sign of fear or concern, at the moment her boss was executing his "distraction maneuver", so to speak. Which is even worse, since, when one observes her body language, one sees that at the beginning of such a maneuver she seemed happy for a few moments, even to the point of smiling briefly (minute 0:24), to act unconcerned and (almost) stoic after that. Clarifying that all that I said before, happened while, in a subtle way, she avoided looking directly into the camera.
5) And finally, to put it in a serious way, and without any kind of irony and ridiculousness, there is the fact that I could detect practically almost no trace of stupidity in the behavior of those involved in such a maneuver (including Donald Trump, sadly). Which makes a lot of sense when one takes into account that deceits with such a degree of complexity, or similar, clearly require the executors to have a sufficient level of self-control and intelligence to understand, follow and execute the instructions and commands one receives for such ends; even more so if such instructions and commands come from “people above one”, so to speak.
There you have it, folks; all the arguments I made above, about the piece of footage I chose as an example, from point 1 to 5, especially for what is underlined, is the additional evidence you need that the supposed release of the Epstein files, during the Trump administration, was not only an act of cover-up ( as silly, cruel and evil as it was), but a huge act of distraction as well. However, because I understand the way human beings act in general, I am almost certain that some of my readers must have doubts about one of my arguments; in this case, the argument contained in the paragraph corresponding to point 5, for which I am prepared as well.
And for those people, I want to clarify that, my argument in the point 5, was not and never was with the purpose of stating or suggesting that those who appear in that piece of footage were geniuses and/or masters of crime, when it is obvious that they never were to begin with. My point, actually, was to emphasize, as well as briefly explain, that I never expected anything remarkable or impressive, in terms of human intelligence of course, from any of those involved in such a distracting maneuver in the first place; that's what I really wanted to communicate.
So, yeah, that would be all I have to show and say in this first part. In the next journal, it will explore, in more detail, what other things happened during, or in between, these two weeks. And for those of you wondering why I made no mention of the Democratic Party in this part, don't worry about that, as in the following parts, I plan to talk about them as well; believe that!
Well, that's all for today, I hope everyone found this journal interesting and informative, and with nothing more to add, I can only say: sorry for the inconveniences caused, until next time, greetings to all and have a nice day/night to all of you.
