FA+
Shop
"The Fallout" (Part 4)
3 months ago
General
Hello everyone, and welcome to the part 4 of this super-topic. To not waste time with recaps and clarifications, just below, in a separate section, I will put the previous parts, with their respective links, and the disclaimers corresponding to this one, also separately.
Parts prior to this one
Part 1: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11204491/
Part 2: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11208155/
Part 3: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11211973/
Disclaimers
1. Any act of denial and refutation against any data, statements and proof mentioned or presented in this journal based on mentions, suggestions or uses of information sources coming from and/or promoted by hegemonic media (US, UK and others), social media, Wikipedia (including variations thereof as well), Fact Checkers and any entity pertaining to and/or related to the oligarchy, may be ignored and/or taken with great skepticism by any reader, in case he/she so desires. The reasons are based on the absence of credible, reliable and/or truthful information, whether in part or in whole, from the aforementioned sources/entities/groups/organizations due to many of the controversies and/or scandals associated with them.
2. The use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" per se, or similar to that, which is linked to what it means in the entertainment media and/or the hegemonic media as a primary method of denial and/or disapproval of the content of this note, as well as the sources attached to it, will not be taken as truthful either.
3. The owner of this journal doesn't have any kind of personal adherence (personal/selfish reasons), contractual (legal reasons) or constitutional (constitutional reasons) with political figures, political parties, social organizations/entities and/or countries/nations based on the use of political agendas and/or any kind of activism that causes damage to material goods, the environment and/or towards other human beings (whether physical or psychological) for any reason that is considered unjustified after being first analyzed based on reason and ethics, with the sample or presence of compelling evidence corresponding to the cases mentioned above. The rejection of such agendas and/or activism will be even higher and forceful in cases that imply going against human nature in terms of any harm, deprivation, destruction and deterioration of the individuality of the human being and/or any society composed of human beings for unjustifiable reasons.
That said, and to get to the point, here is the first section of the subtopic dedicated to the main political parties in the United States, which contains general information about them, some of their members, and related topics:
Evidence that ratifies or refutes some of the things associated with the two main political parties in the United States (the Democratic Party and the Republican Party), as well as, occasionally, their relationship with other people (political figures or not), and Donald Trump as well.
1) The two main political parties in the U.S., regardless of the prominent political figures within them, have problems with financial corruption.
Evidence A.
Video made by Upper Echelon, on YouTube, in which he exposes the financial corruption present in the two main political parties in the US, the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, with their respective tittle and link:
Land of the Free, Home of CORRUPTION
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F108d1GqSXc
Links to the sources mentioned in the Upper Echelon video (just above):
• 01:24: https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-story/
• 01:28: https://es.scribd.com/document/5828.....Report-July-14
• 01:35: https://speakeremeritapelosi.house......newsroom/72022
• 01:39: https://www.journal-advocate.com/wp.....7/DUN22612.pdf
• 02:03: https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov.....2/20021438.pdf
• 02:09: https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/202.....1491659131628/
• 02:45: https://www.businessinsider.com/nan.....ts-2022-7?op=1
• 02:52: https://stockzoa.com/ticker/tsm/
• 03:03: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin.....n-visit-op-ed/
• 03:07: https://www.washingtonpost.com/tech.....eeting-taiwan/
• 03:44: https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov.....1/20018539.pdf
• 03:55: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/31/mic.....r-us-army.html
• 04:26: https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov.....1/20019004.pdf
• 04:37: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti.....i-to-slow-down
• 04:47: https://time.com/6168761/congress-b.....oly-antitrust/
• 04:54: https://nypost.com/2021/11/04/nancy.....-insiders-say/
• 06:38: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t20HLmbpMvs
• 07:30: https://www.aol.com/finance/rich-ma.....165536618.html
• 07:48: https://www.celebritynetworth.com/r.....ene-net-worth/
• 08:32: https://www.quiverquant.com/congres.....Greene-G000596
• 08:50: https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/at.....LQNTNVUI6ZEBI/
• 08:50: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/marj.....195932815.html
• 10:26: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg.....COMPS-9860.pdf
• 10:42: https://campaignlegal.org/update/pa.....ading-congress
• 11:16: http://pfds.opensecrets.org.s3.amaz.....%20%281%29.pdf
• 11:28: https://x.com/SenatorBurr/status/12.....08837479542786
• 12:28: https://indyweek.com/news/archives-.....bers-congress/
• 12:55: https://www.news9.com/story/5e790ac.....rading-scandal
• 13:06: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/.....-trades-258693
• 13:26: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/.....before-market/
• 13:44: https://www.businessinsider.com/geo.....g-2020-12?op=1
• 14:56: https://gettrumpmemes.com/
• 14:57: https://melaniameme.com/
• 14:59: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencie.....fficial-trump/
• 15:01: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/melania-meme/
• 15:07: https://www.justice.gov/pardon/medi.....5001/dl?inline
• 15:17: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/p.....s-fraud-scheme
• 16:21: https://www.justice.gov/pardon/pard.....iden-2021-2025
• 16:21: https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews......ecipients-.pdf
• 16:21: https://www.justice.gov/pardon/medi.....0206/dl?inline
• 16:42: https://abc7news.com/post/how-city-.....tion/15767057/
• 17:09: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/Pres.....leases/8522-22
• 17:35: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/p.....nk-secrecy-act
• 18:55: https://www.justice.gov/pardon/medi.....4996/dl?inline
• 19:01: https://www.bitmex.com/
• 19:48: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news.....ump-crypto-doj
Warning 1: The sources cited above still may have low levels of inaccurate and/or misleading information in general; readers discretion is advised.
Clarifications and explanations regarding the evidences presented in this segment (1).
I have almost nothing to say about this, except that the Upper Echelon video, which is shared and shown in this segment ( evidence A), plus the links to the sources mentioned in that video, serve very well as a starting point for this subtopic; that is all.
2) Almost all US presidents (intentionally or not) increased the country's debt.
Evidence A.
U.S. debt by president: dollar and percentage 2025
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/finance/us-debt-by-president.html
Highlighted fragments from the article above as evidence:
1- “During Barack Obama’s presidency, the U.S. total outstanding debt increased by almost $8.34 trillion, the biggest dollar increase of any president. In terms of percentage change, Abraham Lincoln’s term had the highest increase at 2,860%, increasing the U.S. debt from about $90.6 million in 1861 to $2.68 billion in 1865 when he was assassinated.”
2- “As of April 5, 2024, the national debt has grown by about $6.17 trillion, or 21.7%, since Joe Biden was inaugurated in 2021, according to the U.S. Treasury Department. In his first year in control of the federal budget from September 2021 to September 2022, the debt grew by about $2.5 trillion. In his second year, it grew by $2.24 trillion. The national debt has grown by $1.43 trillion so far this year.”
3- “From the beginning of Donald Trump’s presidency in 2017 to its end in 2021, the national debt increased by 40.43%, about $8.18 trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department. It rose the most from September 2019 to September 2020, when Trump spent $3.6 trillion on coronavirus pandemic relief.”
4- “George W. Bush, who also served two terms, increased the national debt by $6.1 trillion, about 105%, which comes out to an average of $3.05 trillion per term.
During Bill Clinton’s term from 1993 to 2001, the debt grew by $5.81 trillion.”
Warning 2: The source cited above, as evidence (A), still may have very low levels of inaccurate and/or misleading information; readers discretion is advised.
Clarifications and explanations regarding the evidences presented in this segment (2).
Nothing to clarify or explain about it that I haven't said before about the US debt, and related.
3) Every U.S. president, from 1953 to the present, has refused to show evidence that there is still gold in Fort Knox.
Evidence A.
Video made by reallygraceful, in which she talks about the history of Fort Knox, why it was built, the importance of gold, and some unanswered questions about why Fort Knox has not been audited since 1953, with its respective title and links:
What the Media Won't Tell You About Fort Knox
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTlFB_x8h0U
• https://rumble.com/v6szo8v-what-the-media-wont-tell-you-about-fort-knox.html
Links to most of the sources mentioned in the reallygraceful videos (same video, in fact):
02:57: https://www.foxbusiness.com/media/e.....-sen-rand-paul
03:01: https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/bus.....there/6157138/
03:05: https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereks.....-what-we-know/
03:09: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDYmDC97Uw8
03:39: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgbUTAWblRA
04:36: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXnqcPkUrEY
05:31: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-an.....225218892.html
06:55: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zo4b8ZPlzrw
08:31: https://x.com/RennickGBR/status/1891051795159429514?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1891051795159429514%7Ctwgr%5E01cee17785400c252ba2b8cdd0e8d8b91e811348%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Flets-do-it-rand-paul-supports-fort-knox-physical-audit-after-zerohedge-suggestion-goes
08:51: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixGAXme_qHI
Warning 3: The majority of the sources cited above (not all) still have medium levels of inaccurate and/or misleading information in general; readers discretion is advised.
Clarifications and explanations regarding the evidences presented in this segment (3).
About the reallygraceful 's video, in this segment (evidence A), there are two things I want to say:
1) For more context on the topic mentioned in that video, I recommend they go to the journal "US and its money problem (1)", made by me, and watch the video “THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN MONEY (Explained in 5-ish Minutes)” located there, also by reallygraceful.
2) Next I will put a comment that I found in the comments section of that video, which is quite accurate regarding the topic mentioned in it, as well as for any other topic that has to do with what is mentioned in that comment:
4) The two main political parties in the U.S. conned, and continue to con, the American people with the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as “Obamacare.”
Evidence A.
Obamacare: The Biggest Insurance Scam in History (October 30, 2013)
https://truthout.org/articles/obamacare-the-biggest-insurance-scam-in-history/
Highlighted fragments from the article above as evidence:
1- “A scam is a fraudulent operation designed to make money. A scam unfolds over time with a team of swindlers seeking to rob the victim without the victim ever knowing they have been scammed.
In Confessions of a Confidence Man, Edward H. Smith lists the “six definite steps or stages of growth in every finely balanced and well-conceived confidence game.” Let’s go through these six steps and see how the process of selling the ACA to the public fits.”
2- “1. Develop the Foundation
The foundation of a scam is the preparation done ahead of time to set up the scheme. In the case of the ACA, the foundation began with the health law passed by Massachusetts in 2006. The template was created by Stephen Butler of the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. The law was passed under a Republican governor, Mitt Romney.
The next task was to sell this idea to Democrats. The Robert Wood Johnson foundation gave a major assist when it made large grants to state health reform groups in 2008 to promote Massachusetts-style reform in their states, called the “public-private partnership” model.
To further sell the ACA, Roger Hickey, a longtime Medicare-for-all advocate of the Campaign for America’s Future (closely allied with the Democratic Party), took an idea from Jacob Hacker to create a new public insurance modeled after Medicare to ‘compete’ with private insurance. Hickey sold the model to progressive groups, and Hacker’s proposal was used by the Obama campaign.”
3- “2. The Approach
The approach is the way that the con artist gets in touch with the victim. The vehicle for the ACA con was the tech-savvy political campaign of Barack Obama. The candidate promised hope and change. Obama, who had supported single payer before running for president, was able to point to all of the problems in the US health care system and excite people with the potential of a new leader who understood the crisis and would fix it.
After his election, the campaign organized Health Care House Parties in December 2008. People were encouraged to invite friends and neighbors to their homes, and the Obama transition team provided the materials. The booklet that was used was tightly scripted to build support for the ACA rather than actually elicit citizen input on what kind of health system was desired.”
4- “3. The Buildup
In this stage, the victim is excited about the prospect and is filled with anticipation so their judgment is warped and caution is thrown away, setting them up to fall for the scam.
Throughout the winter and spring of 2009, the Obama administration gave the appearance of bringing all of the “stakeholders” together to work for health reform. The president held a White House Health Summit in March 2009, which included representatives from health insurance corporations, hospitals and pharmaceutical companies. The only groups that were not included, until there was a threat of protest, were those who advocate for Medicare for all. The single-payer advocates did not speak, but the insurance spokesperson opened and closed the White House summit.”
5- “4. The Convincer
The convincer for many who supported real health reform was “the Public Option.” The idea was that the law would force the uninsured to purchase insurance but would include the choice of a public health insurance plan. The public was told that this option would be more cost-effective than private insurance and, thus, less expensive, which would make it more attractive…
…What most people did not understand at that point was that the public option was not only a non-solution to the health care crisis but that it was not even destined to be in the final legislation. Senator Max Baucus reported in March 2009 that it was a “bargaining chip” to get health insurers to accept regulations. Glenn Greenwald exposed this more fully when the Democratic leadership in the Senate actively worked to keep the public option from being included in the Senate health bill. The public option was just part of the con.”
6- “5. The Hurrah
The Hurrah phase of a con involves some sort of crisis that must be overcome. This phase started in August 2009, when the Tea Party, backed by Americans for Prosperity (a Koch brothers front group), came out very aggressively against the ACA at local town halls. They called it “government-run” and opposed its fictional “Death Panels.” This served to energize the progressive groups to rally around the president and come out strongly in favor of the law. Rallies in favor of health reform were organized across the country.
Health reform advocates were activated further to support the law as the House and Senate struggled to come to consensus. As more aspects of the law that were important to health reform supporters were jettisoned, such as coverage for immigrants and inclusion of reproductive services, and the public option was whittled down to nothing, support for the law became a partisan statement of support for President Obama.”
7- “6. The In-And-In
The purpose of the final phase of the con is to make sure the victims do not realize they’ve been conned.
Obama signed the ACA on March 23, 2010. Immediately the marketing began. The three words we heard the most to describe it were “universal, affordable and guaranteed.” Of course, the ACA is none of those. But members told us personally that if they told the truth, they wouldn’t be re-elected.
Progressive groups started the work of explaining the advantages of the new health law to the public. The few positive aspects of the law were promoted without explaining the big picture. Overall, the ACA is similar to other neoliberal economic policies; it defunds and destroys our public health insurances and further privatizes health care…
…At the same time, leading single-payer advocacy groups fear further marginalization in their communities and so are afraid to tell the truth about Obamacare. The public has been so hoodwinked by the partisan debate between Republicans and Democrats, based on misinformation from both sides, that single-payer advocates are afraid if they tell the truth, their allies, many whom are Democrats, will push them away. So the truth has few emissaries, while the well-funded deceivers continue the ACA con.”
General note: Readers are advised to pay special attention not only to what is underlined and/or in bold in the fragments cited above (evidence A), but also to the words or phrases between quotation marks (“”); more context later on.
Clarifications and explanations regarding the evidences presented in this segment (4).
Because many already know that “Obamacare” is a scam, I decided to include multiple fragments of the article shared here (evidence A) based on how the scam was pulled off, since many don’t know how it happened in the first place. However, if anyone wants to know more about the “Obamacare” scam, all they have to do is go to the article shared as evidence in this segment; there’s nothing more to add.
So, that's all for today. The next section of this subtopic, regarding this super-topic, will be published in part 5; it's just that.
Well, I hope that the content of this part, or at least part of it, has been interesting and informative for everyone, and with nothing more to add, I can only say: sorry for the inconveniences caused, until next time, greetings and have a nice day/night to all of you.
Parts prior to this one
Part 1: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11204491/
Part 2: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11208155/
Part 3: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11211973/
Disclaimers
1. Any act of denial and refutation against any data, statements and proof mentioned or presented in this journal based on mentions, suggestions or uses of information sources coming from and/or promoted by hegemonic media (US, UK and others), social media, Wikipedia (including variations thereof as well), Fact Checkers and any entity pertaining to and/or related to the oligarchy, may be ignored and/or taken with great skepticism by any reader, in case he/she so desires. The reasons are based on the absence of credible, reliable and/or truthful information, whether in part or in whole, from the aforementioned sources/entities/groups/organizations due to many of the controversies and/or scandals associated with them.
2. The use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" per se, or similar to that, which is linked to what it means in the entertainment media and/or the hegemonic media as a primary method of denial and/or disapproval of the content of this note, as well as the sources attached to it, will not be taken as truthful either.
3. The owner of this journal doesn't have any kind of personal adherence (personal/selfish reasons), contractual (legal reasons) or constitutional (constitutional reasons) with political figures, political parties, social organizations/entities and/or countries/nations based on the use of political agendas and/or any kind of activism that causes damage to material goods, the environment and/or towards other human beings (whether physical or psychological) for any reason that is considered unjustified after being first analyzed based on reason and ethics, with the sample or presence of compelling evidence corresponding to the cases mentioned above. The rejection of such agendas and/or activism will be even higher and forceful in cases that imply going against human nature in terms of any harm, deprivation, destruction and deterioration of the individuality of the human being and/or any society composed of human beings for unjustifiable reasons.
That said, and to get to the point, here is the first section of the subtopic dedicated to the main political parties in the United States, which contains general information about them, some of their members, and related topics:
Evidence that ratifies or refutes some of the things associated with the two main political parties in the United States (the Democratic Party and the Republican Party), as well as, occasionally, their relationship with other people (political figures or not), and Donald Trump as well.
1) The two main political parties in the U.S., regardless of the prominent political figures within them, have problems with financial corruption.
Evidence A.
Video made by Upper Echelon, on YouTube, in which he exposes the financial corruption present in the two main political parties in the US, the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, with their respective tittle and link:
Land of the Free, Home of CORRUPTION
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F108d1GqSXc
Links to the sources mentioned in the Upper Echelon video (just above):
• 01:24: https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-story/
• 01:28: https://es.scribd.com/document/5828.....Report-July-14
• 01:35: https://speakeremeritapelosi.house......newsroom/72022
• 01:39: https://www.journal-advocate.com/wp.....7/DUN22612.pdf
• 02:03: https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov.....2/20021438.pdf
• 02:09: https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/202.....1491659131628/
• 02:45: https://www.businessinsider.com/nan.....ts-2022-7?op=1
• 02:52: https://stockzoa.com/ticker/tsm/
• 03:03: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin.....n-visit-op-ed/
• 03:07: https://www.washingtonpost.com/tech.....eeting-taiwan/
• 03:44: https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov.....1/20018539.pdf
• 03:55: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/31/mic.....r-us-army.html
• 04:26: https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov.....1/20019004.pdf
• 04:37: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti.....i-to-slow-down
• 04:47: https://time.com/6168761/congress-b.....oly-antitrust/
• 04:54: https://nypost.com/2021/11/04/nancy.....-insiders-say/
• 06:38: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t20HLmbpMvs
• 07:30: https://www.aol.com/finance/rich-ma.....165536618.html
• 07:48: https://www.celebritynetworth.com/r.....ene-net-worth/
• 08:32: https://www.quiverquant.com/congres.....Greene-G000596
• 08:50: https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/at.....LQNTNVUI6ZEBI/
• 08:50: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/marj.....195932815.html
• 10:26: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg.....COMPS-9860.pdf
• 10:42: https://campaignlegal.org/update/pa.....ading-congress
• 11:16: http://pfds.opensecrets.org.s3.amaz.....%20%281%29.pdf
• 11:28: https://x.com/SenatorBurr/status/12.....08837479542786
• 12:28: https://indyweek.com/news/archives-.....bers-congress/
• 12:55: https://www.news9.com/story/5e790ac.....rading-scandal
• 13:06: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/.....-trades-258693
• 13:26: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/.....before-market/
• 13:44: https://www.businessinsider.com/geo.....g-2020-12?op=1
• 14:56: https://gettrumpmemes.com/
• 14:57: https://melaniameme.com/
• 14:59: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencie.....fficial-trump/
• 15:01: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/melania-meme/
• 15:07: https://www.justice.gov/pardon/medi.....5001/dl?inline
• 15:17: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/p.....s-fraud-scheme
• 16:21: https://www.justice.gov/pardon/pard.....iden-2021-2025
• 16:21: https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews......ecipients-.pdf
• 16:21: https://www.justice.gov/pardon/medi.....0206/dl?inline
• 16:42: https://abc7news.com/post/how-city-.....tion/15767057/
• 17:09: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/Pres.....leases/8522-22
• 17:35: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/p.....nk-secrecy-act
• 18:55: https://www.justice.gov/pardon/medi.....4996/dl?inline
• 19:01: https://www.bitmex.com/
• 19:48: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news.....ump-crypto-doj
Warning 1: The sources cited above still may have low levels of inaccurate and/or misleading information in general; readers discretion is advised.
Clarifications and explanations regarding the evidences presented in this segment (1).
I have almost nothing to say about this, except that the Upper Echelon video, which is shared and shown in this segment ( evidence A), plus the links to the sources mentioned in that video, serve very well as a starting point for this subtopic; that is all.
2) Almost all US presidents (intentionally or not) increased the country's debt.
Evidence A.
U.S. debt by president: dollar and percentage 2025
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/finance/us-debt-by-president.html
Highlighted fragments from the article above as evidence:
1- “During Barack Obama’s presidency, the U.S. total outstanding debt increased by almost $8.34 trillion, the biggest dollar increase of any president. In terms of percentage change, Abraham Lincoln’s term had the highest increase at 2,860%, increasing the U.S. debt from about $90.6 million in 1861 to $2.68 billion in 1865 when he was assassinated.”
2- “As of April 5, 2024, the national debt has grown by about $6.17 trillion, or 21.7%, since Joe Biden was inaugurated in 2021, according to the U.S. Treasury Department. In his first year in control of the federal budget from September 2021 to September 2022, the debt grew by about $2.5 trillion. In his second year, it grew by $2.24 trillion. The national debt has grown by $1.43 trillion so far this year.”
3- “From the beginning of Donald Trump’s presidency in 2017 to its end in 2021, the national debt increased by 40.43%, about $8.18 trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department. It rose the most from September 2019 to September 2020, when Trump spent $3.6 trillion on coronavirus pandemic relief.”
4- “George W. Bush, who also served two terms, increased the national debt by $6.1 trillion, about 105%, which comes out to an average of $3.05 trillion per term.
During Bill Clinton’s term from 1993 to 2001, the debt grew by $5.81 trillion.”
Warning 2: The source cited above, as evidence (A), still may have very low levels of inaccurate and/or misleading information; readers discretion is advised.
Clarifications and explanations regarding the evidences presented in this segment (2).
Nothing to clarify or explain about it that I haven't said before about the US debt, and related.
3) Every U.S. president, from 1953 to the present, has refused to show evidence that there is still gold in Fort Knox.
Evidence A.
Video made by reallygraceful, in which she talks about the history of Fort Knox, why it was built, the importance of gold, and some unanswered questions about why Fort Knox has not been audited since 1953, with its respective title and links:
What the Media Won't Tell You About Fort Knox
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTlFB_x8h0U
• https://rumble.com/v6szo8v-what-the-media-wont-tell-you-about-fort-knox.html
Links to most of the sources mentioned in the reallygraceful videos (same video, in fact):
02:57: https://www.foxbusiness.com/media/e.....-sen-rand-paul
03:01: https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/bus.....there/6157138/
03:05: https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereks.....-what-we-know/
03:09: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDYmDC97Uw8
03:39: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgbUTAWblRA
04:36: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXnqcPkUrEY
05:31: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-an.....225218892.html
06:55: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zo4b8ZPlzrw
08:31: https://x.com/RennickGBR/status/1891051795159429514?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1891051795159429514%7Ctwgr%5E01cee17785400c252ba2b8cdd0e8d8b91e811348%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Flets-do-it-rand-paul-supports-fort-knox-physical-audit-after-zerohedge-suggestion-goes
08:51: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixGAXme_qHI
Warning 3: The majority of the sources cited above (not all) still have medium levels of inaccurate and/or misleading information in general; readers discretion is advised.
Clarifications and explanations regarding the evidences presented in this segment (3).
About the reallygraceful 's video, in this segment (evidence A), there are two things I want to say:
1) For more context on the topic mentioned in that video, I recommend they go to the journal "US and its money problem (1)", made by me, and watch the video “THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN MONEY (Explained in 5-ish Minutes)” located there, also by reallygraceful.
2) Next I will put a comment that I found in the comments section of that video, which is quite accurate regarding the topic mentioned in it, as well as for any other topic that has to do with what is mentioned in that comment:
“I am a retired lawyer.
There is a discovery rule of law that provides that when a party known to be in possession of evidence and has a duty to reveal such evidence and fails or refuses to permit discovery, then the judge is required to advise the jury that this failure or refusal to allow inspection of the evidence is taken to establish as a fact that such evidence either does not exist or that the evidence would prove the opposing parties claims.
In this case, the people have a right to know whether the gold is still there, and the failure or refusal of the government to allow inspection of the gold would be considered as proof the gold is not there. The administration could file a lawsuit to force the treasury department to prove the existence of the gold it claims is held for the people, but they will not do that since they already know the gold is not there and revealing that fact as a matter of public record would undermine the trust of the people in their government. All such sensitive matters are referred to as matters of national security. This is why there are so many secrets kept from the American people.
Moral: If they cannot provide evidence to disprove a conspiracy, it is probably true.”
robertperry4439 ~ YouTube user4) The two main political parties in the U.S. conned, and continue to con, the American people with the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as “Obamacare.”
Evidence A.
Obamacare: The Biggest Insurance Scam in History (October 30, 2013)
https://truthout.org/articles/obamacare-the-biggest-insurance-scam-in-history/
Highlighted fragments from the article above as evidence:
1- “A scam is a fraudulent operation designed to make money. A scam unfolds over time with a team of swindlers seeking to rob the victim without the victim ever knowing they have been scammed.
In Confessions of a Confidence Man, Edward H. Smith lists the “six definite steps or stages of growth in every finely balanced and well-conceived confidence game.” Let’s go through these six steps and see how the process of selling the ACA to the public fits.”
2- “1. Develop the Foundation
The foundation of a scam is the preparation done ahead of time to set up the scheme. In the case of the ACA, the foundation began with the health law passed by Massachusetts in 2006. The template was created by Stephen Butler of the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. The law was passed under a Republican governor, Mitt Romney.
The next task was to sell this idea to Democrats. The Robert Wood Johnson foundation gave a major assist when it made large grants to state health reform groups in 2008 to promote Massachusetts-style reform in their states, called the “public-private partnership” model.
To further sell the ACA, Roger Hickey, a longtime Medicare-for-all advocate of the Campaign for America’s Future (closely allied with the Democratic Party), took an idea from Jacob Hacker to create a new public insurance modeled after Medicare to ‘compete’ with private insurance. Hickey sold the model to progressive groups, and Hacker’s proposal was used by the Obama campaign.”
3- “2. The Approach
The approach is the way that the con artist gets in touch with the victim. The vehicle for the ACA con was the tech-savvy political campaign of Barack Obama. The candidate promised hope and change. Obama, who had supported single payer before running for president, was able to point to all of the problems in the US health care system and excite people with the potential of a new leader who understood the crisis and would fix it.
After his election, the campaign organized Health Care House Parties in December 2008. People were encouraged to invite friends and neighbors to their homes, and the Obama transition team provided the materials. The booklet that was used was tightly scripted to build support for the ACA rather than actually elicit citizen input on what kind of health system was desired.”
4- “3. The Buildup
In this stage, the victim is excited about the prospect and is filled with anticipation so their judgment is warped and caution is thrown away, setting them up to fall for the scam.
Throughout the winter and spring of 2009, the Obama administration gave the appearance of bringing all of the “stakeholders” together to work for health reform. The president held a White House Health Summit in March 2009, which included representatives from health insurance corporations, hospitals and pharmaceutical companies. The only groups that were not included, until there was a threat of protest, were those who advocate for Medicare for all. The single-payer advocates did not speak, but the insurance spokesperson opened and closed the White House summit.”
5- “4. The Convincer
The convincer for many who supported real health reform was “the Public Option.” The idea was that the law would force the uninsured to purchase insurance but would include the choice of a public health insurance plan. The public was told that this option would be more cost-effective than private insurance and, thus, less expensive, which would make it more attractive…
…What most people did not understand at that point was that the public option was not only a non-solution to the health care crisis but that it was not even destined to be in the final legislation. Senator Max Baucus reported in March 2009 that it was a “bargaining chip” to get health insurers to accept regulations. Glenn Greenwald exposed this more fully when the Democratic leadership in the Senate actively worked to keep the public option from being included in the Senate health bill. The public option was just part of the con.”
6- “5. The Hurrah
The Hurrah phase of a con involves some sort of crisis that must be overcome. This phase started in August 2009, when the Tea Party, backed by Americans for Prosperity (a Koch brothers front group), came out very aggressively against the ACA at local town halls. They called it “government-run” and opposed its fictional “Death Panels.” This served to energize the progressive groups to rally around the president and come out strongly in favor of the law. Rallies in favor of health reform were organized across the country.
Health reform advocates were activated further to support the law as the House and Senate struggled to come to consensus. As more aspects of the law that were important to health reform supporters were jettisoned, such as coverage for immigrants and inclusion of reproductive services, and the public option was whittled down to nothing, support for the law became a partisan statement of support for President Obama.”
7- “6. The In-And-In
The purpose of the final phase of the con is to make sure the victims do not realize they’ve been conned.
Obama signed the ACA on March 23, 2010. Immediately the marketing began. The three words we heard the most to describe it were “universal, affordable and guaranteed.” Of course, the ACA is none of those. But members told us personally that if they told the truth, they wouldn’t be re-elected.
Progressive groups started the work of explaining the advantages of the new health law to the public. The few positive aspects of the law were promoted without explaining the big picture. Overall, the ACA is similar to other neoliberal economic policies; it defunds and destroys our public health insurances and further privatizes health care…
…At the same time, leading single-payer advocacy groups fear further marginalization in their communities and so are afraid to tell the truth about Obamacare. The public has been so hoodwinked by the partisan debate between Republicans and Democrats, based on misinformation from both sides, that single-payer advocates are afraid if they tell the truth, their allies, many whom are Democrats, will push them away. So the truth has few emissaries, while the well-funded deceivers continue the ACA con.”
General note: Readers are advised to pay special attention not only to what is underlined and/or in bold in the fragments cited above (evidence A), but also to the words or phrases between quotation marks (“”); more context later on.
Clarifications and explanations regarding the evidences presented in this segment (4).
Because many already know that “Obamacare” is a scam, I decided to include multiple fragments of the article shared here (evidence A) based on how the scam was pulled off, since many don’t know how it happened in the first place. However, if anyone wants to know more about the “Obamacare” scam, all they have to do is go to the article shared as evidence in this segment; there’s nothing more to add.
So, that's all for today. The next section of this subtopic, regarding this super-topic, will be published in part 5; it's just that.
Well, I hope that the content of this part, or at least part of it, has been interesting and informative for everyone, and with nothing more to add, I can only say: sorry for the inconveniences caused, until next time, greetings and have a nice day/night to all of you.
