FA+
Shop
The cover-ups of the Epstein files cover-up (P2)
5 months ago
General
Hello everyone and welcome to the second part of this topic. As I can't waste time on recapitulations, as there is a lot to do, for the newbies, just below I will put the link to the journal of the first part (p1) for those who need to know what this topic is about, as well as the context of it:
Part 1: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11179469/
But first, I will leave some disclaimers below for everyone's discretion:
Disclaimer 1: Any act of denial and refutation against any data, statements and proof mentioned or presented in this journal based on mentions, suggestions or uses of information sources coming from and/or promoted by hegemonic media (US, UK and others), social media, Wikipedia (including variations thereof as well), Fact Checkers and any entity pertaining to and/or related to the oligarchy, may be ignored and/or taken with great skepticism by any reader, in case he/she so desires. The reasons are based on the absence of credible, reliable and/or truthful information, whether in part or in whole, from the aforementioned sources/entities/groups/organizations due to many of the controversies and/or scandals associated with them.
Disclaimer 2: The use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" per se, or similar to that, which is linked to what it means in the entertainment media and/or the hegemonic media as a primary method of denial and/or disapproval of the content of this note, as well as the sources attached to it, will not be taken as truthful either.
Disclaimer 3: The owner of this journal doesn't have any kind of personal adherence (personal/selfish reasons), contractual (legal reasons) or constitutional (constitutional reasons) with political figures, political parties, social organizations/entities and/or countries/nations based on the use of political agendas and/or any kind of activism that causes damage to material goods, the environment and/or towards other human beings (whether physical or psychological) for any reason that is considered unjustified after being first analyzed based on reason and ethics, with the sample or presence of compelling evidence corresponding to the cases mentioned above. The rejection of such agendas and/or activism will be even higher and forceful in cases that imply going against human nature in terms of any harm, deprivation, destruction and deterioration of the individuality of the human being and/or any society composed of human beings for unjustifiable reasons.
Now, for those of you who were wondering what other things happened in these two weeks (three in fact, at the time of publishing this journal) from what was mentioned and shown in the first part, don't worry about that, as today I have two news to share, which will be quite useful for this topic. But before I start, I want to clarify that the news for this topic are going to be in form of regular news articles, and not video-based, as in so many previous cases; sorry for that.
That said, the news in question has to do with the approval of the bill by the U.S. Senate (more than three weeks ago), and its repercussions for the citizens of said country in terms of health care and the economy, which are very bad news by the way. And as far as how to proceed with this, that would be addressing the news about the health care system first, and the news about the economy latter. So, with nothing more to clarify, let's get on with it.
About the news of the bill passed in July, 2025, and the way it affects the U.S. health care system
How the “One Big, Beautiful Bill” Targets Medicare and Medicaid
https://govfacts.org/explainer/how-.....-and-medicaid/
Fragments highlighted from the news above:
1- “The 940-page law fundamentally changes how Medicare and Medicaid work, affecting more than 130 million Americans who rely on these programs. There’s a gap between what supporters promised and what budget experts say will actually happen.”
2- “The biggest change requires most adults under 65 who got Medicaid through Obamacare expansion to work, train, or volunteer for at least 80 hours per month. Miss the requirement, and you lose your health coverage.”
3- “The policy hits hardest on the 2.6 million adults with disabilities who get Medicaid but don’t qualify for federal disability benefits. These people often can’t work consistently due to health problems, but they’re not automatically exempt from the work requirement.”
Warning 1: The fragments quoted above are from a source, which may still have low levels of inaccurate and/or misleading information; reader discretion is advised.
Arguments and opinions regarding this news article:
In terms of abuse of authority and transgressions of any kind by any U.S. government towards their citizens, as in the case mentioned in the news article above, I have very little to say about it that I haven't done in cases before this one, across multiple newspapers.
About this particular news article, on the other hand, all I can do is to point out what one shouldn't lose sight about all of this, i.e., what is underlined by me in those fragments. But, if I were to add one more thing about it, which would be without offense by the way, it would be that, the vast majority of citizens in that country, from now on, are going to have to deal with all of that while “ play on Nightmare! difficulty instead of Ultra-Violence difficulty”; just saying.
About the news of the bill passed in July, 2025, and the way it affects the U.S. economy
Senate Bill Would Add at Least $3.3 Trillion to Debt, Budget Office Says
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/29/.....core-debt.html
Fragments highlighted from the news above:
1- “The sprawling tax and health care bill that Senate Republicans are trying to pass would add at least $3.3 trillion to the already-bulging national debt over a decade, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said on Sunday, putting a far higher price tag on the measure than some of the party’s fiscal hawks had indicated they could stomach.”
2- “With roughly $29 trillion in debt currently held by the public, the budget office had already expected the government to borrow another $21 trillion over the next decade, meaning the Republican bill would make an already-dire fiscal forecast worse. And the initial estimate of a cost of $3.3 trillion for the Senate bill is an undercount, because it does not include additional borrowing costs which could push the bill’s overall addition to the debt closer to $4 trillion.”
3- “Republicans* are using a special process, called reconciliation, to steer past “Democratic opposition” in the Senate. Reconciliation imposes a number of additional rules on lawmakers, though, including that they cannot add to the debt in the long-term. Waving away the cost of the 2017 tax cuts would allow Republicans* to make them permanent while still technically conforming to the Senate’s rules.”
Note about the third fragment (paragraph in italics): For anyone reading said fragment, especially for what is underlined in it, it is advisable to reread it, while replacing the words with an asterisk (*), in this case, the word “Republicans”, with the words “Democratic Party Collaborators”; more context later.
Warning 2: The fragments quoted above are from a source, which has medium levels of inaccurate and/or misleading information; reader discretion is advised.
Arguments and opinions regarding this news article:
In a similar manner as I had commented and opined regarding the above news article, I have very little to say about it, as the most important things one needs to know about the U.S. debt have already been covered in previous journals. Basically, everything I underlined, in the fragments quoted above, is what one needs to know with respect to that news article.
Also, for those who are wondering, why the third fragment of that news article was marked in the way it is seen there, and with that accompanying note, the answer is quite simple and obvious in fact. And the answer to that... is based... on the enormous... unequivocal... fact... that the vast majority... of the Democratic Party members (politicians)... of the United States... *breath* remained almost completely silent... *breath* when all that was going on... *deep breath* while the news media covered their asses as well... *large deep breath* Hmm, yeah, I think it's due to that.
Oh, it's that, and the huge fact that the Democratic Party, from that time to this day (date of publication of this journal), continues in silent mode, even when Donald Trump, and his administration, distracts the general public with their nonsense, while he mocks the entire planet with the cover-up of the Epstein files, and more...! Sooo, I think that counts too.
Ahem. So, yeah, that's all I have for today, which means that this is the end of part 2. Part 3, on the other hand, will be with the purpose of covering a particular incident/controversy that occurred on Twitter almost two weeks ago; that's the only hint I can give you of what's to come.
Alright, I hope everyone found this journal interesting and informative, and with nothing more to add, I can only say: sorry for the inconveniences caused, until next time, greetings to all and have a nice day/night to all of you.
Part 1: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11179469/
But first, I will leave some disclaimers below for everyone's discretion:
Disclaimer 1: Any act of denial and refutation against any data, statements and proof mentioned or presented in this journal based on mentions, suggestions or uses of information sources coming from and/or promoted by hegemonic media (US, UK and others), social media, Wikipedia (including variations thereof as well), Fact Checkers and any entity pertaining to and/or related to the oligarchy, may be ignored and/or taken with great skepticism by any reader, in case he/she so desires. The reasons are based on the absence of credible, reliable and/or truthful information, whether in part or in whole, from the aforementioned sources/entities/groups/organizations due to many of the controversies and/or scandals associated with them.
Disclaimer 2: The use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" per se, or similar to that, which is linked to what it means in the entertainment media and/or the hegemonic media as a primary method of denial and/or disapproval of the content of this note, as well as the sources attached to it, will not be taken as truthful either.
Disclaimer 3: The owner of this journal doesn't have any kind of personal adherence (personal/selfish reasons), contractual (legal reasons) or constitutional (constitutional reasons) with political figures, political parties, social organizations/entities and/or countries/nations based on the use of political agendas and/or any kind of activism that causes damage to material goods, the environment and/or towards other human beings (whether physical or psychological) for any reason that is considered unjustified after being first analyzed based on reason and ethics, with the sample or presence of compelling evidence corresponding to the cases mentioned above. The rejection of such agendas and/or activism will be even higher and forceful in cases that imply going against human nature in terms of any harm, deprivation, destruction and deterioration of the individuality of the human being and/or any society composed of human beings for unjustifiable reasons.
Now, for those of you who were wondering what other things happened in these two weeks (three in fact, at the time of publishing this journal) from what was mentioned and shown in the first part, don't worry about that, as today I have two news to share, which will be quite useful for this topic. But before I start, I want to clarify that the news for this topic are going to be in form of regular news articles, and not video-based, as in so many previous cases; sorry for that.
That said, the news in question has to do with the approval of the bill by the U.S. Senate (more than three weeks ago), and its repercussions for the citizens of said country in terms of health care and the economy, which are very bad news by the way. And as far as how to proceed with this, that would be addressing the news about the health care system first, and the news about the economy latter. So, with nothing more to clarify, let's get on with it.
About the news of the bill passed in July, 2025, and the way it affects the U.S. health care system
How the “One Big, Beautiful Bill” Targets Medicare and Medicaid
https://govfacts.org/explainer/how-.....-and-medicaid/
Fragments highlighted from the news above:
1- “The 940-page law fundamentally changes how Medicare and Medicaid work, affecting more than 130 million Americans who rely on these programs. There’s a gap between what supporters promised and what budget experts say will actually happen.”
2- “The biggest change requires most adults under 65 who got Medicaid through Obamacare expansion to work, train, or volunteer for at least 80 hours per month. Miss the requirement, and you lose your health coverage.”
3- “The policy hits hardest on the 2.6 million adults with disabilities who get Medicaid but don’t qualify for federal disability benefits. These people often can’t work consistently due to health problems, but they’re not automatically exempt from the work requirement.”
Warning 1: The fragments quoted above are from a source, which may still have low levels of inaccurate and/or misleading information; reader discretion is advised.
Arguments and opinions regarding this news article:
In terms of abuse of authority and transgressions of any kind by any U.S. government towards their citizens, as in the case mentioned in the news article above, I have very little to say about it that I haven't done in cases before this one, across multiple newspapers.
About this particular news article, on the other hand, all I can do is to point out what one shouldn't lose sight about all of this, i.e., what is underlined by me in those fragments. But, if I were to add one more thing about it, which would be without offense by the way, it would be that, the vast majority of citizens in that country, from now on, are going to have to deal with all of that while “ play on Nightmare! difficulty instead of Ultra-Violence difficulty”; just saying.
About the news of the bill passed in July, 2025, and the way it affects the U.S. economy
Senate Bill Would Add at Least $3.3 Trillion to Debt, Budget Office Says
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/29/.....core-debt.html
Fragments highlighted from the news above:
1- “The sprawling tax and health care bill that Senate Republicans are trying to pass would add at least $3.3 trillion to the already-bulging national debt over a decade, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said on Sunday, putting a far higher price tag on the measure than some of the party’s fiscal hawks had indicated they could stomach.”
2- “With roughly $29 trillion in debt currently held by the public, the budget office had already expected the government to borrow another $21 trillion over the next decade, meaning the Republican bill would make an already-dire fiscal forecast worse. And the initial estimate of a cost of $3.3 trillion for the Senate bill is an undercount, because it does not include additional borrowing costs which could push the bill’s overall addition to the debt closer to $4 trillion.”
3- “Republicans* are using a special process, called reconciliation, to steer past “Democratic opposition” in the Senate. Reconciliation imposes a number of additional rules on lawmakers, though, including that they cannot add to the debt in the long-term. Waving away the cost of the 2017 tax cuts would allow Republicans* to make them permanent while still technically conforming to the Senate’s rules.”
Note about the third fragment (paragraph in italics): For anyone reading said fragment, especially for what is underlined in it, it is advisable to reread it, while replacing the words with an asterisk (*), in this case, the word “Republicans”, with the words “Democratic Party Collaborators”; more context later.
Warning 2: The fragments quoted above are from a source, which has medium levels of inaccurate and/or misleading information; reader discretion is advised.
Arguments and opinions regarding this news article:
In a similar manner as I had commented and opined regarding the above news article, I have very little to say about it, as the most important things one needs to know about the U.S. debt have already been covered in previous journals. Basically, everything I underlined, in the fragments quoted above, is what one needs to know with respect to that news article.
Also, for those who are wondering, why the third fragment of that news article was marked in the way it is seen there, and with that accompanying note, the answer is quite simple and obvious in fact. And the answer to that... is based... on the enormous... unequivocal... fact... that the vast majority... of the Democratic Party members (politicians)... of the United States... *breath* remained almost completely silent... *breath* when all that was going on... *deep breath* while the news media covered their asses as well... *large deep breath* Hmm, yeah, I think it's due to that.
Oh, it's that, and the huge fact that the Democratic Party, from that time to this day (date of publication of this journal), continues in silent mode, even when Donald Trump, and his administration, distracts the general public with their nonsense, while he mocks the entire planet with the cover-up of the Epstein files, and more...! Sooo, I think that counts too.
Ahem. So, yeah, that's all I have for today, which means that this is the end of part 2. Part 3, on the other hand, will be with the purpose of covering a particular incident/controversy that occurred on Twitter almost two weeks ago; that's the only hint I can give you of what's to come.
Alright, I hope everyone found this journal interesting and informative, and with nothing more to add, I can only say: sorry for the inconveniences caused, until next time, greetings to all and have a nice day/night to all of you.
