FA+
Shop
"The Fallout" (Part 1)
3 months ago
General
Disclaimer 1: Any act of denial and refutation against any data, statements and proof mentioned or presented in this journal based on mentions, suggestions or uses of information sources coming from and/or promoted by hegemonic media (US, UK and others), social media, Wikipedia (including variations thereof as well), Fact Checkers and any entity pertaining to and/or related to the oligarchy, may be ignored and/or taken with great skepticism by any reader, in case he/she so desires. The reasons are based on the absence of credible, reliable and/or truthful information, whether in part or in whole, from the aforementioned sources/entities/groups/organizations due to many of the controversies and/or scandals associated with them.
Disclaimer 2: The use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" per se, or similar to that, which is linked to what it means in the entertainment media and/or the hegemonic media as a primary method of denial and/or disapproval of the content of this note, as well as the sources attached to it, will not be taken as truthful either.
Disclaimer 3: The owner of this journal doesn't have any kind of personal adherence (personal/selfish reasons), contractual (legal reasons) or constitutional (constitutional reasons) with political figures, political parties, social organizations/entities and/or countries/nations based on the use of political agendas and/or any kind of activism that causes damage to material goods, the environment and/or towards other human beings (whether physical or psychological) for any reason that is considered unjustified after being first analyzed based on reason and ethics, with the sample or presence of compelling evidence corresponding to the cases mentioned above. The rejection of such agendas and/or activism will be even higher and forceful in cases that imply going against human nature in terms of any harm, deprivation, destruction and deterioration of the individuality of the human being and/or any society composed of human beings for unjustifiable reasons.
Hello, everyone. Today's topic is quite special, as it will be:
• the culmination of a theme that was started several months ago,
• the end of a schedule,
• a reboot,
• and a super-topic.
But before I begin, there are three things I want to do first, in the sequence shown below:
1. Explain and clarify the points mentioned at the beginning of the topic (excluding disclaimers, of course) to give the reader information and context about them.
2. Explain and clarify to the reader how this topic will be developed, in terms of ordination and content.
3. Establish rules and/or additional clarifications for the purpose of advising, informing, and warning the reader about the content presented in this topic.
Explanation and clarification of the four points mentioned at the beginning of the topic.
With the purpose of covering more ground, in less time, it is necessary to clarify that the first, second, and third points (in descending order, from top to bottom) are based on the fact that this topic is the reboot of the third and final part of the topic “The United States and its problem with money,” which had to do with a scheme started about six months ago based on the same topic. As for the reboot itself, including the title change, that was because I wanted the topic to be aligned with the new scheme, rather than the old one.
The super-topic thing, in the fourth and last point (mentioned at the beginning of the topic, above; in descending order, from top to bottom), on the other hand, is because this one will be much more extensive compared to other previous extensive topics, which are few, by the way. Basically, this topic will have an estimated six parts in total, and that is because the volume of information contained in it far exceeded what was originally anticipated when the old schedule was still on the table; sorry for the inconveniences.
For more context on the topic “The United States and its problem with money,” in this small section, separate from the rest of the topic, I will leave you the links to the journals corresponding to parts 1 and 2:
Part 1: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11068188/
Part 2-1: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11071966/
Part 2-2: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11086555/
Explanation and clarification of the development of the topic in terms of ordination and content.
The structure of the super-topic will have two main subtopics and a conclusion; that is, two large sections (subtopics) and a small section at the end (conclusion). In terms of sequence and content, the first of these subtopics will be dedicated to ratifying or refuting some of the things associated with Donald Trump, in a general way, as well as his relationship with the two main political parties in that country (the Democratic Party and the Republican Party), in some occasions, through the use of multiple pieces of evidence.
The other subtopic, in this case , the second one, will be dedicated to ratifying or refuting some of the things associated with the two main political parties in that country (the Democratic Party and the Republican Party), as well as their relationship with Donald Trump, in some occasions, in a similar way to the first one. And finally, in third place, the conclusion of the super-theme itself, which will contain my arguments, opinions, the occasional revelation/twist, and other related things about what has been shown and shared in the subtopics of it; that would be the whole explanation, by the way.
Advices, warnings, and additional information about the content of the topic, in form of rules and/or clarifications.
• The super-topic will contain content based on publicly available information, which is (for the most part) accessible and reliable, but which could be considered controversial by certain individuals; reader discretion is advised.
• In terms of evidences, the subtopic dedicated to Donald Trump per se, that is, the first one, will not mention any of the executive orders made by him during his administration (2025). Not to mention that mentioning them as evidence will make the subtopic dedicated to him more redundant and extensive than it is necessary.
• The information presented in this super-topic, in each one of its parts, is the minimum and indispensable amount that one needs, or will need from now on, to understand the context of everything related to the political spectrum in the United States, and countries linked to it, in general.
• Whatever the individuals mentioned and/or shown in this super-topic (political figures or not) have done in media or platforms of a public nature, whether based on make announcements, comments/messages of any kind, conferences, interviews, statements, treaties, agreements, presentations or advertising, regardless of their trustworthiness and credibility, is and will continue to be their responsibility, as it is based on their own actions. Not to mention that any act based on ignoring, omitting, and/or concealing information from the general public, based on the above, may be, or will be, considered as a lack of transparency (partial or total), as well as trust, towards the latter, regardless of the wishes of said individuals.
• Any public act carried out by the individuals mentioned and/or shown in this super-topic (political figures or not) may be, or will be, mentioned, criticized, and/or judged by the public, whether deserved or not. Not to mention that the general public may use such acts as evidence, regardless of the desires of the supporters and/or followers of such individuals, in the case that it is proven that they were made with malevolent intents. And regardless of whether one likes such a statement or not, it is intrinsically based on human curiosity, common sense, responsibility, and impartiality, which must be respected.
• The owner of the publications of this topic, i.e., me, does not know nor has any relationship of any kind with the people named in the information showed and shared in this super-topic, whether they are political figures or not.
• Any act of petition or demand made to the owner of the publications of this topic, i.e., me, based on divulging or sharing additional information regarding the information shared/showed here will be immediately ignored and denied.
• The owner of the publications of this topic, i.e., me, advises any reader to read, or re-read as many times as necessary, the disclaimers present in the parts of said topic, in case there are any doubts or internal conflicts about the content of the same with respect to the position of the owner of the same.
After saying all that, and as mentioned earlier, the first of the subtopics to be developed will be the one about Donald Trump...
My excitement: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLTZctTG6cE
Evidence that ratifies or refutes some of the things associated with Donald Trump, as well as, occasionally, his relationship with other people (political figures or not), and political parties in the United States as well.
1) Donald Trump, for the most part, always used dirty and/or fraudulent tactics (legal or otherwise) to get rich.
Evidence A.
The 1990 Playboy Interview With Donald Trump
https://www.playboy.com/read/playboy-interview/playboy-interview-donald-trump-1990/
Highlighted fragment from the article above as evidence:
“No insomnia, no gnawing worries. “Pressure,” he surmises, sipping an iced Coke, “doesn’t upset my sleep,” a standard four hours nightly. “I like throwing balls into the air–and I dream like a baby.” Three hours later, blond hair marshaled, he announces, with standard chutzpah, his seven-and-a-half-billion-dollar bid to gobble down the nation’s premiere airline, American.
On the strength of his 120-dollar-a-share bid, the stock vaults from 16 dollars to 99 dollars. The 43-year-old billionaire, who owns huge blocks of American Airlines stock, smiles broadly. A week later, with the market tumbling 190 points, he withdraws his offer, perhaps temporarily.
Despite some reports that insinuated his American raid was only cardboard, a ploy to rattle up his stock, Trump stares into space: “Nope. I want it.”Yup. If it’s the best, and it’s for sale, Donald Trump’s stomach begins to growl.””Evidence B.
The 1990 Playboy Interview With Donald Trump
https://www.playboy.com/read/playboy-interview/playboy-interview-donald-trump-1990/
Highlighted fragment from the article above as evidence:
“He captured troubled Saudi financier Adnan Khashoggi’s onyx-and-gold-plated yacht for a mere $29,000,000–now it’s worth $100,000,000. Then he bought the Eastern Shuttle for $365,000,000 and transformed it overnight into the Trump Shuttle, complete with comfortable cabins and stewardesses rustling in virgin wool and pearls.”Evidence C.
The 1990 Playboy Interview With Donald Trump
https://www.playboy.com/read/playboy-interview/playboy-interview-donald-trump-1990/
Highlighted fragment from the article above as evidence:
“Ah, well. To be young, blond and a billionaire. It doesn’t seem to matter. The most daunting entrepreneur since the Astors, Vanderbilts and Whitneys, Donald John Trump has made his “art of the deal” work—not just for making money but for crushing adversaries, too. Case in point: Merv Griffin.
Ten months after Griffin bought Trump’s Resorts International Inc. for $365,000,000, for which Trump had paid $101,000,000 the year before, Griffin found himself holding a busted balloon.
Not only had he inherited the hotel-casino’s $925,000,000 debt but he embarrassingly had to report first-half losses of $46,600,000. There’s now talk of a possible bankruptcy for Merv and a possible lawsuit against Trump. Looking beyond his one-billion-dollar Taj Mahal opening in Atlantic City next month, Trump has plenty to consider.”Evidence D.
Video made by Coffeezilla on his alternative YouTube channel, voidzilla, in which he exposes Donald Trump's scam with his memecoin, with its respective title and link:
trump memecoin is insane
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zjBj194el8
Link to one of the sources mentioned in the Coffeezilla video:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9vmym2jvy9o
Warning 1: The source cited above still contains low levels of inaccurate and/or misleading information; readers discretion is advised.
Links to websites about the sources mentioned in the Coffeezilla video:
• https://crypto.news/how-many-offici.....-total-supply/
• https://www.reuters.com/technology/.....on-2025-01-20/
Warning 2: The sources cited above still contain low levels of inaccurate and/or misleading information; readers discretion is advised.
Clarifications and explanations regarding the evidences presented in this segment (1).
I don't have much to clarify, except that the fragments corresponding to the article “The 1990 Playboy Interview With Donald Trump,” in the evidences A, B, and C, were intended to inform the reader of the “dirty business” and/or frauds committed by Donald Trump many years ago. Not to mention, that the evidences mentioned previously fit well with evidence D, in the sense that he never renounced using such deceptive and fraudulent tactics, even in recent times; that is all I wanted to clarify.
And before closing this part and retiring for today, I want to apologize again; this time for how long it is, but since this is a quite extensive topic, the basic information, as well as the clarifications and rules, had to be included in it, for obvious motives. The next part, part 2, on the other hand, will be easier to follow than this one, but no less extensive, as it will be based mainly on showing and sharing the rest of the general information of the subtopic started in this part; keep that in mind from here on out please.
Okay, that would be all for today. I hope that the content of this part, or at least part of it, has been interesting and informative for everyone, and with nothing more to add, I can only say: sorry for the inconveniences caused, until next time, greetings and have a nice day/night to all of you.
