FA+
Shop
WTF... [UPDATE]
2 months ago
General
[UPDATE] I was told that it was the mods here on FA that removed the art piece in question. I stand corrected on that. But I also saw his reply on BlueSky, so yeah. (Sorry, I forgot the link)- https://imgur.com/a/artists-response-l5qWEsR
***
For the last couple of days, I've been effected by the death of Charlie Kirk. It shocked me when I found out Wednesday night of his passing, and that night, I cried and tried to send in a prayer for him as well as for his wife and children, who are now fatherless and will grow up without him in their lives.
The next day, as I watched videos on Youtube about what had happened, I saw some of the most disgusting things:
People on the far left, celebrating his death, thru Twitter/X and Tik-Tok.
What the actual fuck?
Why? Even if you didn't like him and even down right hated him, why celebrate his death? Why?
I don't care what he was in the world of politics. I don't care if those on either side saw him as a fascist, bigot, or just a mean person with hateful words that hurt. He was a loving father and husband, first.
A LOVING FATHER & HUSBAND, FIRST.
But what was worse than celebrating his death thru social media, was that someone celebrated his passing thru their artwork:
Just yesterday on FurAffinity, I saw one of the artists I watch post a pic of a certain Sonic character with a sniper weapon in a lay-down sniper pose, smoke coming from barrel. I immediately knew right away what the context was. I commented they were sick, and then I immediately block them. I just checked back on their page today, and the art piece in question was deleted.
This was an artist I watched for years, and they had the audacity to make a Sonic art piece that in context shows a character with a sniper weapon in snipping pose, having took the shot, taking out their target, and knowing what that art piece represents, and then delete it to cover their tracks.
No. Just. NO.
Even thru art, celebrating an innocent person's death is sick. It's sin. And it's just plain wrong.
Now, if this artist's drawing wasn't meant to represent unaliving someone IRL, and was just posted at the wrong time being a misunderstanding, they should've explained that immediately. But because they deleted the piece and didn't say anything, this tells me otherwise. Now, I still love this person's art and art style, and I pray that he repents and apologies and seeks redemption for this act. But until then, I cannot and will not watch them anymore.
Finally, I want to say this:
I don't care what side you are, politically. All are welcomed here on my DeviantART, FurAffinity, InkBunny, and Discord, as along as you are civilized and mature. But if you go as far as celebrate the death of a person who was just exercising his right to free speech and open dialog, and I find out about it, I want nothing to do with you.
Enough said.
RIP Charlie Kirk.
Please find peace in the Here After.
***
For the last couple of days, I've been effected by the death of Charlie Kirk. It shocked me when I found out Wednesday night of his passing, and that night, I cried and tried to send in a prayer for him as well as for his wife and children, who are now fatherless and will grow up without him in their lives.
The next day, as I watched videos on Youtube about what had happened, I saw some of the most disgusting things:
People on the far left, celebrating his death, thru Twitter/X and Tik-Tok.
What the actual fuck?
Why? Even if you didn't like him and even down right hated him, why celebrate his death? Why?
I don't care what he was in the world of politics. I don't care if those on either side saw him as a fascist, bigot, or just a mean person with hateful words that hurt. He was a loving father and husband, first.
A LOVING FATHER & HUSBAND, FIRST.
But what was worse than celebrating his death thru social media, was that someone celebrated his passing thru their artwork:
Just yesterday on FurAffinity, I saw one of the artists I watch post a pic of a certain Sonic character with a sniper weapon in a lay-down sniper pose, smoke coming from barrel. I immediately knew right away what the context was. I commented they were sick, and then I immediately block them. I just checked back on their page today, and the art piece in question was deleted.
This was an artist I watched for years, and they had the audacity to make a Sonic art piece that in context shows a character with a sniper weapon in snipping pose, having took the shot, taking out their target, and knowing what that art piece represents, and then delete it to cover their tracks.
No. Just. NO.
Even thru art, celebrating an innocent person's death is sick. It's sin. And it's just plain wrong.
Now, if this artist's drawing wasn't meant to represent unaliving someone IRL, and was just posted at the wrong time being a misunderstanding, they should've explained that immediately. But because they deleted the piece and didn't say anything, this tells me otherwise. Now, I still love this person's art and art style, and I pray that he repents and apologies and seeks redemption for this act. But until then, I cannot and will not watch them anymore.
Finally, I want to say this:
I don't care what side you are, politically. All are welcomed here on my DeviantART, FurAffinity, InkBunny, and Discord, as along as you are civilized and mature. But if you go as far as celebrate the death of a person who was just exercising his right to free speech and open dialog, and I find out about it, I want nothing to do with you.
Enough said.
RIP Charlie Kirk.
Please find peace in the Here After.
Question: who was this artist? I am curious.
I actually talked to the artist in question and they told me it wasn't at all related to the situation.
Take the left at their word, if they say they want you dead, they want you dead.
Thats what socialism demands.
Leftists dehumanize because they want this to be the norm, just like the nazis and commies before them.
Only in america can you have hands clean of blood and be called worse than hitler, you ever
stop to notice that?
Socialists will name you worse than their own icons while wanting you dead for having the nerve to just
speak the truth.
Just words. Not violence, Just words.
The left are the baddies in this and every scenario.
It's rich hearing this kind of drivel from someone who draws nazi art btw.
Its the left's fault this has happened, the left is utilizing the very fascist tactics they decry because they cant handle the fact that there are people
who dont agree with them on every single trivial little thing.
Sorry pumpkin, but there really is only 2 genders and borders should be secure, you dont get to kill people for disagreeing and then claim victimhood.
Oh sure, sounds so right wing and politically convenient.
You can get more blatantly fascist than that. These people are BEWILDERED that we can see *right through them* and are lashing out and trying to displace their own sins onto us, calling us evil for simply pointing out that they're mourning an actual Nazi.
People are happy because Charlie was never going to face any consequences for what he did and the world is better off without him
The answer is zero, France came closest, they managed to throw them out for a while with a general strike, until the Nazis came rolling across the border a few years later
I don't care if you're left, right, conservative, liberal. You do NOT kill a man because he has different opinions from another person. Each and everyone of us has our own opinions in this world. And the fact that folks are celebrating his death I say: Congratulations....we now know you are human waste and scum of the earth. Hell you're not even human at all.
I may not have agreed with some of his stuff but those were his opinions.
I very much dislike this Kirk. I hate him but I do not condone violence, political or not, towards anyone.
Yeah, it's disgusting that he got executed like that, but whatever happened to "personal responsibility"!?
The guy practically dared people to kill him, called pretty much all other races, religions & orientations garbage undeserving of life.
He called empathy a useless disease.
He claimed random gun massacres are necessary.
There's no shortage of video clips of him saying these things.
He reaped what he sowed.
And 0R0's pic got deleted by mods, it's still up on other sites.
He doesn't enjoy the death but does mock the hypocrisy of it all.
BTW the Right mocked the executions/attempts on Liberals twice as hard (Mr Pelosi hammer-head, tied up Joe, governor fired mansion, the 2 dead Dem Reps, etc.), selective failure of memory there.
What goes around comes around.
That Pandora's Box is wide open now, though not even hope is left.
BTW if you keep hiding comments that disprove you, it's just making everybody post what you hide everywhere else, not good for your rep.
He considered gay people criminals worthy of the death penalty under "God's perfect law." He had backwards, barbaric beliefs and spreading those beliefs, supporting politicians who want to enact those beliefs, helped create a world where someone with even more backwards and barbaric beliefs than his own decided that Charlie Kirk was too soft and he ought to be taken out.
Still, what has happened during that week proves just how broken we really are as both a people and a nation.
I respect you fully on this matter. It's just wow.
I believe in what Charlie Kirk says and I feel I don't know how he could have the patience of a saint. All the times he was accousted, well, let's just say it would have been bad for others.
May he rest in peace.
His views on acceptable casualties of gun violence to retain the 2nd Amendment. Especially in light of school shootings.
There are mothers and fathers out there who have lost their children to gun violence, and Charlie advocated against control, accepting that some people may die to retain the 2nd Amendment rights.
To him, children being shot was actually OK.
I don't know about you, but a loving father wouldn't say that. A loving father would reflect this sort of violence on his own family, thinking "I don't want my kids to die to a unstoppable gunman someday!" But no, his views on empathy suggest that he 100% believed gun-deaths were fine.
He reaped what he sowed. It's simple as that. The view of non-conservative people on this whole thing would be wildly different if he had not been such a vile human being in life.
BTW, where was your journal when the two Democrats were killed earlier this year? Or when all the school shootings happened?
It makes people think what your actual focus is.
Actual words.
Also starting a line with "Once again u leftists" makes you seem like, idk, a cunt? Don't be a cunt - if "u rightists" even know what it means to not be one.
https://x.com/JulieBorowski/status/1966964219145855149
In all seriousness, though, a journal like this shows a fundamental misunderstanding of what is being celebrated. I don't wanna live in a world where people feel the need to do a political violence, to take a well-off father from a wife and children. I don't want to live in a world where vigilance about gun violence is the norm...
However, this is a world Charlie Kirk the political commentator fervently wished upon us, where he climbed a pile of bones to scream about how weak people are for not adding more to the pile of bones and that they should give him money to stand there and scream.
so, no, I'm not happy that someone was ended from atop his lectern built on the misery and suffering of others, and that his family will suffer for this.
I'm happy that there was but one gun death on that campus that day. that through surgical use of the violence Charlie Kirk's rhetoric endorsed shows the folly of uplifting yourself from atop the pile of graves you've stomped upon.
Feel free to condemn the rhetoric of artists, but at least ask yourself why before making a call-out post.
This isn't the form I want that comeuppance to be in. Political violence is a symptom of an ailing republic.
... but it is a form of comeuppance.
I'm desperate enough for some sort of solace to where I can at least... take a moment to know that one of the core pillars to the hate and bigotry in this world has been at least shaken.
because this is a nuanced situation.
I condemn Political Violence.
Political Violence happens. Regularly.
If I have to live with this thing I condemn, because my condemnation will not make it go away, then yes. "What goes around, Comes around."
Begrudgingly.
now, can you please block me and get on with your day?
The sheer amount of insane people advocating for even more violence is disturbing, and Bluesky(however you spell it) have had to ban a ton of people which ironically enough is heavily Left-leaning, and they had had enough of the unhinged rhetoric. Reddit is just as bad as BS.
https://x.com/SarahsJustHere/status/1966541002509783059
We all have kinks grow up
"Actually, Kirk was huge in to dehumanizing."
"Proof!?>"
"Proof."
"Well that shit doesn't matter."
I'm getting tired of seeing this replay over and over again on this thread. You're a better lizard than I.
Racism is bad
Killing babies is bad
First they deny it happened
Them you prove them wrong
Then, they say that it was OKAY that it happened!
They build these boogeymen to spread lies and i think theyre all culpable.
You don't have any right to call anyone demonic while championing a cause that's demonic by its very nature. SHAME on you.
Nazi furs FUCK OFF!!
"If we stop talking that's when political violence starts"_Charlie Kirk
there not people.
this i just..all kinds of messed up.
fair enough! I can safely discard you as inferior trash!
To the Right, Charlie Kirk was "normal"; a loving father and husband, a reasonable leader, whatever. The idea that Kirk was anywhere close to morally reprehensible is so laughable that the Left's thoughts on him range from hilarious to concerning to revolting.
The Left, meanwhile, knew Charlie Kirk as one of THE worst neonazi thoughtleaders, responsible for stoking the hate machine that is the Alt-Right. I'm sure there's a list of quotes out there within easy reach, about how he thought empathy was a sin (newsflash it's at the core of Jesus's teachings), how he demonized minorities, how he claimed that school shootings were "an acceptable price to pay" for gun rights, et cetera. (I wonder, if his children heard him say that, how they would've felt about him, if a school shooter showed up at their school...)
And the thing is, that's ALL the left knew him for, and NONE of it is what the Right thinks of when they think about him. (Or worse, they agree with it, ech; granted, getting people to agree with it was his goal, so.) The left didn't even think about the idea that he might have married or had kids; why would they want to look into such a thing? It's like asking if Voldemort banged. And on the flip side, the Right weren't the ones keeping a detailed, itemized list of every reprehensible thing the guy ever said or did, able to be pulled up at the drop of a hat.
So yeah. Of course the Left and Right are having night and day reactions to the guy's death. The Kirk y'all know and the Kirk we knew are like, two different people.
(But also, hope Asmodeus has him on a slow broil in the pits below. Gets the flavor out more, y'know?)
NAZI FURS FUCK OFF
bz-lr
diaperrealisticblood
^
|
block these, if youd be so kind.
Of all the many, many victims of political violence these past few years, victims whose deaths his work contributed to, he has gotten by far the most attention and sympathy, and deserved it the least.
Oh also
NAZI FURS FUCK OFF!
Nazis belong in the ground
Want to see a win? Try to respond to this comment.
Grow up and learn real introspective or learn to keep your mouth shut.
https://cosmicbook.news/ghost-of-yotei-dev-drew-harrison-fired-charlie-kirk-comments
To be honest with you, I don't talk about political violence and politics a lot because its not my thing. I don't care what sides people are today. None of my concern.
I can't wait for you to try and tell them that you're "one of the good ones."