Lashing out?
    a month ago
            Some moons ago, a certain user that’s widely known as abusive and derogatory was called a derogatory term for mentally deficient….  It rhymes with that thing you do to an engine’s timing when it’s too advanced…..
Anyway, that individual has recently been acting out in many many threads and gathering complaints and blocks.
Now I receive a warning from FA staff about using slurs against other users?
“ Code of Conduct: 2.6 Do not engage in malicious content.
Do not make derogatory use of caricatures, slurs, nor disparaging remarks about others' race, ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status, sexual orientation or similar, or make maliciously misleading statements about cultures, religions, etc. This does not apply to fictional works when used as part of a narrative.
You have done this by referring to another user as a r*****. “
I’ve got one guess who the afflicted person is, and suspect that as they’re approaching permanent ban for their outrageous behavior have begun to point fingers at others to deflect from their own actions.
                    Anyway, that individual has recently been acting out in many many threads and gathering complaints and blocks.
Now I receive a warning from FA staff about using slurs against other users?
“ Code of Conduct: 2.6 Do not engage in malicious content.
Do not make derogatory use of caricatures, slurs, nor disparaging remarks about others' race, ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status, sexual orientation or similar, or make maliciously misleading statements about cultures, religions, etc. This does not apply to fictional works when used as part of a narrative.
You have done this by referring to another user as a r*****. “
I’ve got one guess who the afflicted person is, and suspect that as they’re approaching permanent ban for their outrageous behavior have begun to point fingers at others to deflect from their own actions.
 
 FA+
 FA+ Shop
 Shop 
                            
It's almost like the FA Gods have a private agenda that curries favor towards 'Some,' while actively suppressing/censoring/banning 'Others,' isn't it?
Surely I can't be correct in this observation, could I?
The scariest thing about this person is in my honest opinion if they do get ostracized from any given community that they will lash back in very real ways.
I’m not a religious man, but I pray that those that need help, get it before they hurt themselves or others!
Again, if this is the same person I'm thinking about they're not much younger than my parents and have demonstrated an almost juvenile stubbornness to 'win' arguments and 'own' others. Telling others they're cowards for blocking them and going out of their way to respond to them is quite classy, I'd say. At this point I don't care if they get 86'd from the site, I'm done debating with them as they're unwilling to listen to anything even remotely approaching reason.
That said, I will say that reporting someone can be effective(at least in my experience). I had an ex who was basically cyberstalking me here and spinning up alt accounts to circumvent my blocking her. I reported her accounts and they banned her despite an obvious left-wing political bias in her comments.
And if the mods are actually doing their job, they’d be watching this journal an know who im referring to as well…
Im fairly certain they aren’t though, as is proven by your story of your ex!
At the very least they suspended my ex's alt accounts; she hadn't been on her main ones in many years so I'm pretty certain she realized that I'd blocked her. I recall that she saw my YouTube recommendations pointing me towards centrist and conservative content and she started harping on me to watch hard-left socialist/borderline communist content. That wasn't the reason I kicked her to the curb, but it was a contributing factor. :P
"No. Nuh-uh. No it's not. That's not true. No. You're stupid."
They want you to post reputable sources, but any source shown isn't going to be reputable unless it's from a source that they approve of. When grilled for their reputable sources, they don't show any. Because I or you have to educate ourself or yourself. They can't be bothered. It's just true because they said so.
Incredibly childish and/or trollish behavior in my opinion, and it probably can't be fixed.
Madman¡Mamdani and his rhetoric.I blocked that person years ago so they attacked me on one of the Journal's poster's comment and called me a bigot. What bigoted thing did I say? After all, the political candidate I mentioned has publicly avowed being antisemitic. I made a complaint to the Immoderators and received the response "Thank you for letting us know! I have investigated your issue and have taken all appropriate action based upon Fur Affinity's community guidelines," which means they deleted the offensive remark. The person who owns the Journal has already blocked him. Slap on the wrist; he was still active the next day.As to BLM…
ALL LIVES MATTER!
Yes racism is real, however at this point it’s largely aimed at the white man…. (At least here in America)
Seriously the 14 times released black man who stabbed that girl to death on the train was heard muttering “got that white girl” as he walked away leaving her to bleed out.
I have black, Hispanic, Asian and middle eastern friends whom I love and would jump in front of a bullet for….
However some would call me a bigot because I don’t support BLM and feel that the train stabber should face the death penalty….
I think we're both in the same cattle car, my friend...
And blesiingss to them