i'm about to loose it
a week ago
Your welcome to browse my favourites 🔞NSFW/SFW only adults for communication & interaction In notes & replies thankyou for your understanding
SexualCommentsWelcome
CreepyCommentsWelcome


our content has been removed because it violates our rules which state:
Upload Policy, Section 2.8 - Content Lacking Artistic Merit
Content lacking artistic merit is not permitted on FA, and includes such items as:
• Photography focusing on body parts without creative content.
• Placeholder content with empty documents or blank submissions.
• Text-only imagery.
• Content modified to be generally unviewable through use of filters, blurring, or censorship.
Upload Policy, Section 3.3 - Indecent Photography
Photography depicting nudity or physical contact with nudity (exposed buttocks, breasts, bulges, outlines of genitalia, etc.), indecently-clothed models (undergarments, diapers, lingerie, etc.) is not allowed. Exceptions may be made for swimsuits worn in public locations, such as a pool or beach, but not activities such as breastfeeding.
#62089585, Adult-only comfort content
This is a Warning Notice (1st Level Offense).
While we allow for a great deal of artistic and literary freedom, we must ask that your content abide by Fur Affinity's guidelines.
If you are uncertain as to why this content was removed or believe it was done so in error, open a Trouble Ticket under the issue "Dispute Administrative Action" with the content's title and date of removal.
Please note that repeated violations of site rules may result in further administrative action, such as a suspension of your account. Content uploaded before administrative action was taken is not exempt from further administrative action. As such please take this opportunity to review your account to ensure your content is in compliance with site policies.
I feel under constant scrutiny here. Bad experiences keep piling up, and it’s left me feeling unwelcome — even stalked or watched — simply for being myself.
Upload Policy, Section 2.8 - Content Lacking Artistic Merit
Content lacking artistic merit is not permitted on FA, and includes such items as:
• Photography focusing on body parts without creative content.
• Placeholder content with empty documents or blank submissions.
• Text-only imagery.
• Content modified to be generally unviewable through use of filters, blurring, or censorship.
Upload Policy, Section 3.3 - Indecent Photography
Photography depicting nudity or physical contact with nudity (exposed buttocks, breasts, bulges, outlines of genitalia, etc.), indecently-clothed models (undergarments, diapers, lingerie, etc.) is not allowed. Exceptions may be made for swimsuits worn in public locations, such as a pool or beach, but not activities such as breastfeeding.
#62089585, Adult-only comfort content
This is a Warning Notice (1st Level Offense).
While we allow for a great deal of artistic and literary freedom, we must ask that your content abide by Fur Affinity's guidelines.
If you are uncertain as to why this content was removed or believe it was done so in error, open a Trouble Ticket under the issue "Dispute Administrative Action" with the content's title and date of removal.
Please note that repeated violations of site rules may result in further administrative action, such as a suspension of your account. Content uploaded before administrative action was taken is not exempt from further administrative action. As such please take this opportunity to review your account to ensure your content is in compliance with site policies.
I feel under constant scrutiny here. Bad experiences keep piling up, and it’s left me feeling unwelcome — even stalked or watched — simply for being myself.
I'm sorry this gives you anxiety, and I agree sometimes a deletion can be heavy handed, but I genuinely think on that one, you potentially did violate a rule even if you did not intend it.
But keep on mind, there are many babyfurs among the staff as well so it's not like they understand. They just need to walk a super tight tightrope. RL content is always risky unfortunately.
If the context is clearly non‑sexual — e.g., cosplay, fashion, medical, or comfort‑wear — then it falls under their General or Mature guidelines rather than Adult/fetish rules.
That’s why you’ll sometimes see RL photos of these items on FA without issue, while others get removed — it’s all about whether the image crosses into sexual/fetish territory as defined in their policy. and also
Here’s how that could look, fully aligned with their current policy:
---
## **FA Clothing & Wetness Classification**
*(Based on existing FA rules — “as long as it is not sexualised”)*
| **Item / State** | **Allowed Rating** | **Conditions (per FA rules)** |
|
|
|
|
| **Onesies (any type)** | General / Mature / Adult | Allowed at any level of coverage or design, as long as it is not sexualised. Context can be comfort‑wear, medical, comedic, or fashion. |
| **Diapers – Dry** | General / Mature / Adult | Not sexualised. Context clearly non‑fetish. |
| **Diapers – Mild Wetness** | Mature / Adult | Not sexualised. Accurate tags and rating. |
| **Diapers – Heavy Wetness** | Mature / Adult | Not sexualised. Accurate tags and rating. |
---
**Why this works within FA’s rules:**
- FA already allows RL photos of clothing items like onesies and diapers if they’re **not sexualised**.
- Wetness levels only affect the rating, not whether the item is allowed.
- Onesies are treated the same as any other clothing — the deciding factor is *context*, not the garment itself.
If FA implemented this, it would make it crystal clear that **onesies are always allowed** under their current policy, and that wetness levels only change the rating, not the permission.
If