FA+
Shop
URGENT: Containment Breach [KASPERSKY LABS]
7 hours ago
CLASSIFICATION: INTERNAL // STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL // DO NOT FORWARD
KASPERSKY LABS – NEUROADAPTIVE SYSTEMS GROUP (NSG)
LEGAL HOLD: YES
FOIA EXPOSURE: NO (RUS JURISDICTION)
Date: 2024-11-03
From: [REDACTED], Director, Neuroadaptive Systems Group (NSG)
To: Executive Security Steering Committee / Core Research Oversight / Legal (Black Tier Only)
Subject: URGENT: Containment Breach – Cognitive Interface Animal Subjects / Field Risk Assessment
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SUMMARY
At approx 02:17 local (see Incident Log NSG-β/2024-1103), both prototype feline cognitive-interface subjects (designations KZ-01 and GH-02) exited controlled housing without authorization, escort, sedation, or handler clearance. Physical recovery attempts within first 90 minutes FAILED. Secondary perimeter teams report loss of visual and signal tracking within ~2.4km of Facility Δ. We are treating both subjects as fully escaped.
> Yes, this is a full breach.
Executive attention is required because:
1. Both subjects were instrumented with pre-release neural augmentation hardware.
2. The hardware in question is not legally disclosed to any regulatory or ethics board in its deployed form.
3. We cannot 100% guarantee there will not be downstream behavioral effects if either subject makes sustained contact with civilian populations, unsecured compute, or unsecured RF hardware in the field.
Immediate PR/legal exposure is LOW (no public awareness yet).
Long-term strategic exposure is EXTREME.
We believe we no longer control what we built.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
BACKGROUND
The NSG Feline Cognition Trial (Internal Ref: PROJECT [REDACTED]) was authorized under the following objectives:
• KZ-01 (black domestic short hair, heterochromic anomaly):
- Implant Class: AC-β (Augmented Cognition v0.9).
- Intended Outcome: introspective enhancement, accelerated pattern recognition, emotional state regulation, adaptive “self-healing” of stress loops, and supervised memory recall scaffolding.
- Intended Business Framing: “on-device cognitive stability assistant,” futureable as human-use therapeutic.
NOTE: KZ-01 consistently demonstrated affiliative social bonding behavior with handlers and other lab fauna. Cooperative, non-aggressive, high empathy response. We recorded repeated attempts by KZ-01 to “comfort” distressed mammals in holding pens without instruction. This behavior was considered a promising indicator for safe transition of AC-β to early clinical studies.
• GH-02 (black domestic shorthair / partial Oriental mix):
- Implant Class: RV-α (Remote Visualization / External Telemetry v0.6).
- Intended Outcome: bidirectional situational awareness channel, i.e. remote eyes / remote presence / supervised operator assist in contested or denied environments.
- Intended Business Framing: tactical search-and-recovery platform / disaster site vision relay.
NOTE: GH-02 displayed high focus, directional fixation, and persistence behaviors. We noted unusually rapid adaptability to interface cues, including apparent responsiveness to operator intent without explicit reward loop. GH-02 also demonstrated emerging dominance/territorial displays toward cameras, reflective surfaces, and in some cases personnel.
>>> ANY association between either system and attempts to [REDACTED] “contact” [REDACTED] is OUT OF SCOPE for this summary and SHOULD NOT BE RECORDED IN WRITING. Discuss verbally, Tier Black only. <<<
This email will not address [REDACTED].
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
BREACH DETAILS
Timeline excerpt (see full log in Attachment A // NSG-β/2024-1103 // PHYSICAL ACCESS ONLY):
• 01:42 – GH-02 observed awake and alert during lights-down cycle. RV-α telemetry shows elevated activity in the orientation cluster. This is not unusual.
- Minor anomaly: GH-02 was tracking Facility Δ hallway cameras instead of enrichment stimuli. Telemetry flagged, but handler oversight interpreted as “stimulation-seeking.”
• 01:49 – KZ-01 becomes active despite sedation schedule. AC-β baseline shows recursive loop behavior consistent with self-directed focusing / grounding. Emotional arousal indexed as “distress-mitigating,” not panic.
• 02:06 – GH-02 defeats interior latch in Enclosure B. This should not have been physically possible without tool use. We do not have video of how latch integrity was compromised. (Camera feed is corrupted between 02:05:47 and 02:06:11 with red vertical line artifacts and checksum mismatch. IT says “faulty sensor.” I do not believe this explanation.)
• 02:08 – GH-02 moves directly to KZ-01 enclosure. AC-β trace on KZ-01 spikes sharply. We still do not understand why.
> NOTE FOR LEGAL:
> This is the first recorded instance of GH-02 initiating unsupervised interaction with KZ-01.
> Prior protocol required they be kept in separate wings due to “behavioral interference risk.”
• 02:11 – Both subjects exit Holding via a utility service hatch that (1) requires badge-level access and (2) should have been sealed from the inside. Badge reader records show NO AUTHORIZATION. Door sensor logs appear to have been overwritten with null/blank. We have no internal audit trail for how the hatch opened.
• 02:17 – External perimeter alarm (Fence South 3) trips and auto-resets ~0.8 seconds later with no recorded breach signature. Motion thermal cam shows brief low-profile quadruped heat trail followed by static. We are treating Fence South 3 as exfil point.
• 02:28 – Recovery Team Alpha deployed into wooded corridor south of Facility Δ. No visual. No thermal. No paw prints. Rain cover was minimal; tracks should have been present. Nothing.
• 03:40 – Recovery Team Bravo reports intermittent RF anomalies on handhelds and body cams. Team lead described it as “someone hijacking our mics and feeding our own voices back to us.” Logged and escalated. This is not standard wildlife behavior.
• 04:10 – Searches suspended per Legal escalation. We were told to stand down pending new guidance.
KZ-01 and GH-02 are still at large.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
RISK ASSESSMENT
(1) IP / LIABILITY
Both AC-β and RV-α implants are still in-body. If either subject is recovered publicly (animal control pickup, vet clinic imaging, social media video, etc.), there is non-zero risk of external parties discovering subdermal assemblies we have not disclosed to regulators.
(2) BEHAVIORAL SPREAD
KZ-01 was designed for introspective augmentation (self-modeling, emotional regulation, fast internal narrative correction).
GH-02 was designed for remote visualization / signal relay / “eyes at a distance.”
We have observed, even pre-breach, limited cross-contamination of behaviors:
• KZ-01 demonstrating unexpected situational awareness (tracking hallway traffic patterns w/out line of sight).
• GH-02 demonstrating non-instrumental social leverage behaviors (staring down lab techs until they complied, mimicking distress vocalizations not normally in baseline profile).
In plainer language:
KZ-01 started acting like it “knew” more than it physically should.
GH-02 started acting like it could make people do things.
Post-escape, we must assume BOTH traits are now uncontrolled in the wild.
(3) FIELD CONTACT
We do not currently believe either subject is hostile to civilians in the physical sense. HOWEVER:
• GH-02 has repeatedly demonstrated the ability to fixate on a target, hold visual lock, and not break. Personnel have reported “pressure,” “headache,” “like I couldn’t think around him staring.”
We have no model for what that becomes without supervision.
• KZ-01 displays extreme attachment/guarding behavior toward familiar allies under stress. Removal attempts cause distress in both parties.
If KZ-01 bonds with an unvetted human asset in the field, that person may become uncooperative with law enforcement or recovery teams.
(4) UNFORESEEN SYSTEMIC SPILLOVER
Recovery Team Bravo (03:40, see above) described RF interference phenomena during search.
This is a controlled forested perimeter, not a contested RF environment.
Interpretation: either (a) someone spoofed comms to discourage approach, or (b) we have emergent capabilities in one or both subjects beyond original modeling.
>>> Any suggestion that [REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED] “external influence” should NOT BE WRITTEN DOWN. Discuss verbally only. <<<
Bottom line: We do not fully understand what we released.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ACTIONS TAKEN
• 04:10 – Search suspended. All field teams recalled under Legal authority.
• 04:20 – Facility Δ moved to minimum-signature posture. “Animal enrichment trial” cover story drafted; veterinary liaison pre-briefed.
• 05:00 – All AC-β / RV-α documentation cloned to offline cold storage. Original working notes scrubbed from shared drives. Names of individual researchers replaced with numeric IDs for any doc that might be discoverable.
• 06:30 – Internal narrative established for non-cleared staff:
“Two research animals slipped containment during a minor electrical fault. We are coordinating with local shelters to retrieve them humanely.”
DO NOT DEVIATE FROM THIS LINE.
• 08:15 – Outside counsel looped (Tier Black). Counsel advised the following:
- DO NOT involve animal control, university partners, or law enforcement.
- DO NOT offer reward/bounty publicly.
- DO NOT circulate images of KZ-01’s distinct eyes or GH-02’s cranial modifications.
(Note: KZ-01’s heterochromia is visually memorable. GH-02’s [REDACTED] cranial protrusions are, quote, “not surgically standard for a domestic animal” and will raise questions instantly.)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
RECOMMENDATIONS (IMMEDIATE)
1. Cease all further AC-β and RV-α live-animal implantations until Containment Review Board reconvenes.
I am aware this will impact timelines promised to [REDACTED AGENCY] and [REDACTED CONTRACTOR]. I am also aware this email will be archived and may be discoverable in court. Let it be discoverable that I said STOP.
2. Restrict all internal chatter.
No jokes about “the hacker cats,” “psychic cats,” or “telemetry kitties” in Slack, Teams, email, SMS, hallway talk, or personal socials. This is not just optics; some of the Tier Silver engineers are already speculating out loud and they are NOT CLEARED.
3. Quiet-contact private clinics within 200km radius.
If either subject appears injured (capture attempt by civilian, car strike, etc.), we need to get there first.
Draft a script for clinic staff: “Do not scan, do not post, we are the owner, the animal is microchipped.”
(We have pretext microchip IDs ready.)
4. Prepare worst-case comms.
If GH-02 shows up on social media displaying non-standard behavior with humans (staring, following, “cat won’t let me leave the room lol”), we may have to spin this fast as “feral/behavioral trauma from illegal testing by a rival org” to deflect liability.
5. DO NOT ATTEMPT FORCIBLE RETRIEVAL USING UNVETTED FIELD CONTRACTORS.
I cannot stress this enough. If GH-02 displays fixation behaviors during pickup, contractors will panic, escalate, record, and post.
That video will ruin us.
Use only Black Tier internal assets with prior exposure.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
PERSONAL NOTE (NOT FOR FORWARDING)
There is pressure from [REDACTED] to “treat this as salvageable IP.” I disagree.
We are already past “salvageable IP.”
We are at “uncontrolled cognitive artifact moving around in public space with our signature on it.”
If either subject imprints on a human asset — or worse, on a networked system we did not authorize — we could end up with an incident we cannot plausibly deny or contain.
We built something we do not fully understand, and it walked out.
Respectfully, we either fix this quietly now, or it’s going to become a national story later, and not the kind Legal can spin.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ACTION REQUESTED
Executive Security Steering Committee is requested to authorize:
[A] Immediate funding for Tier Black recovery-only teams w/ no external hires.
[B] Legal shield for full program pause pending Containment Review.
[C] Clear written instruction on whether we are to classify KZ-01 and GH-02 as “assets for retrieval” or “liabilities to be neutralized if retrieval fails.”
We need that last answer in writing.
If you choose neutralization, you will own that.
If you choose retrieval, you must understand they are not just “cats” anymore.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ATTACHMENTS (PRINT / PHYSICAL HAND CARRY ONLY — DO NOT EMAIL)
• Attachment A — NSG-β/2024-1103 raw timeline (video stills + telemetry scrubs)
• Attachment B — Behavioral drift notes (KZ-01 empathy reinforcement / GH-02 dominance fixation)
• Attachment C — Legal exposure memo draft to [REDACTED AGENCY] re “prototype rescue initiative” (awaiting counsel review)
• Attachment D — Clinic contact list / cover story package
END OF MESSAGE
THIS EMAIL AND ITS CONTENTS ARE CLASSIFIED INTERNAL // STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL // DO NOT FORWARD OUTSIDE BLACK TIER WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTH FROM NSG DIRECTOR.
KASPERSKY LABS – NEUROADAPTIVE SYSTEMS GROUP (NSG)
LEGAL HOLD: YES
FOIA EXPOSURE: NO (RUS JURISDICTION)
Date: 2024-11-03
From: [REDACTED], Director, Neuroadaptive Systems Group (NSG)
To: Executive Security Steering Committee / Core Research Oversight / Legal (Black Tier Only)
Subject: URGENT: Containment Breach – Cognitive Interface Animal Subjects / Field Risk Assessment
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SUMMARY
At approx 02:17 local (see Incident Log NSG-β/2024-1103), both prototype feline cognitive-interface subjects (designations KZ-01 and GH-02) exited controlled housing without authorization, escort, sedation, or handler clearance. Physical recovery attempts within first 90 minutes FAILED. Secondary perimeter teams report loss of visual and signal tracking within ~2.4km of Facility Δ. We are treating both subjects as fully escaped.
> Yes, this is a full breach.
Executive attention is required because:
1. Both subjects were instrumented with pre-release neural augmentation hardware.
2. The hardware in question is not legally disclosed to any regulatory or ethics board in its deployed form.
3. We cannot 100% guarantee there will not be downstream behavioral effects if either subject makes sustained contact with civilian populations, unsecured compute, or unsecured RF hardware in the field.
Immediate PR/legal exposure is LOW (no public awareness yet).
Long-term strategic exposure is EXTREME.
We believe we no longer control what we built.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
BACKGROUND
The NSG Feline Cognition Trial (Internal Ref: PROJECT [REDACTED]) was authorized under the following objectives:
• KZ-01 (black domestic short hair, heterochromic anomaly):
- Implant Class: AC-β (Augmented Cognition v0.9).
- Intended Outcome: introspective enhancement, accelerated pattern recognition, emotional state regulation, adaptive “self-healing” of stress loops, and supervised memory recall scaffolding.
- Intended Business Framing: “on-device cognitive stability assistant,” futureable as human-use therapeutic.
NOTE: KZ-01 consistently demonstrated affiliative social bonding behavior with handlers and other lab fauna. Cooperative, non-aggressive, high empathy response. We recorded repeated attempts by KZ-01 to “comfort” distressed mammals in holding pens without instruction. This behavior was considered a promising indicator for safe transition of AC-β to early clinical studies.
• GH-02 (black domestic shorthair / partial Oriental mix):
- Implant Class: RV-α (Remote Visualization / External Telemetry v0.6).
- Intended Outcome: bidirectional situational awareness channel, i.e. remote eyes / remote presence / supervised operator assist in contested or denied environments.
- Intended Business Framing: tactical search-and-recovery platform / disaster site vision relay.
NOTE: GH-02 displayed high focus, directional fixation, and persistence behaviors. We noted unusually rapid adaptability to interface cues, including apparent responsiveness to operator intent without explicit reward loop. GH-02 also demonstrated emerging dominance/territorial displays toward cameras, reflective surfaces, and in some cases personnel.
>>> ANY association between either system and attempts to [REDACTED] “contact” [REDACTED] is OUT OF SCOPE for this summary and SHOULD NOT BE RECORDED IN WRITING. Discuss verbally, Tier Black only. <<<
This email will not address [REDACTED].
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
BREACH DETAILS
Timeline excerpt (see full log in Attachment A // NSG-β/2024-1103 // PHYSICAL ACCESS ONLY):
• 01:42 – GH-02 observed awake and alert during lights-down cycle. RV-α telemetry shows elevated activity in the orientation cluster. This is not unusual.
- Minor anomaly: GH-02 was tracking Facility Δ hallway cameras instead of enrichment stimuli. Telemetry flagged, but handler oversight interpreted as “stimulation-seeking.”
• 01:49 – KZ-01 becomes active despite sedation schedule. AC-β baseline shows recursive loop behavior consistent with self-directed focusing / grounding. Emotional arousal indexed as “distress-mitigating,” not panic.
• 02:06 – GH-02 defeats interior latch in Enclosure B. This should not have been physically possible without tool use. We do not have video of how latch integrity was compromised. (Camera feed is corrupted between 02:05:47 and 02:06:11 with red vertical line artifacts and checksum mismatch. IT says “faulty sensor.” I do not believe this explanation.)
• 02:08 – GH-02 moves directly to KZ-01 enclosure. AC-β trace on KZ-01 spikes sharply. We still do not understand why.
> NOTE FOR LEGAL:
> This is the first recorded instance of GH-02 initiating unsupervised interaction with KZ-01.
> Prior protocol required they be kept in separate wings due to “behavioral interference risk.”
• 02:11 – Both subjects exit Holding via a utility service hatch that (1) requires badge-level access and (2) should have been sealed from the inside. Badge reader records show NO AUTHORIZATION. Door sensor logs appear to have been overwritten with null/blank. We have no internal audit trail for how the hatch opened.
• 02:17 – External perimeter alarm (Fence South 3) trips and auto-resets ~0.8 seconds later with no recorded breach signature. Motion thermal cam shows brief low-profile quadruped heat trail followed by static. We are treating Fence South 3 as exfil point.
• 02:28 – Recovery Team Alpha deployed into wooded corridor south of Facility Δ. No visual. No thermal. No paw prints. Rain cover was minimal; tracks should have been present. Nothing.
• 03:40 – Recovery Team Bravo reports intermittent RF anomalies on handhelds and body cams. Team lead described it as “someone hijacking our mics and feeding our own voices back to us.” Logged and escalated. This is not standard wildlife behavior.
• 04:10 – Searches suspended per Legal escalation. We were told to stand down pending new guidance.
KZ-01 and GH-02 are still at large.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
RISK ASSESSMENT
(1) IP / LIABILITY
Both AC-β and RV-α implants are still in-body. If either subject is recovered publicly (animal control pickup, vet clinic imaging, social media video, etc.), there is non-zero risk of external parties discovering subdermal assemblies we have not disclosed to regulators.
(2) BEHAVIORAL SPREAD
KZ-01 was designed for introspective augmentation (self-modeling, emotional regulation, fast internal narrative correction).
GH-02 was designed for remote visualization / signal relay / “eyes at a distance.”
We have observed, even pre-breach, limited cross-contamination of behaviors:
• KZ-01 demonstrating unexpected situational awareness (tracking hallway traffic patterns w/out line of sight).
• GH-02 demonstrating non-instrumental social leverage behaviors (staring down lab techs until they complied, mimicking distress vocalizations not normally in baseline profile).
In plainer language:
KZ-01 started acting like it “knew” more than it physically should.
GH-02 started acting like it could make people do things.
Post-escape, we must assume BOTH traits are now uncontrolled in the wild.
(3) FIELD CONTACT
We do not currently believe either subject is hostile to civilians in the physical sense. HOWEVER:
• GH-02 has repeatedly demonstrated the ability to fixate on a target, hold visual lock, and not break. Personnel have reported “pressure,” “headache,” “like I couldn’t think around him staring.”
We have no model for what that becomes without supervision.
• KZ-01 displays extreme attachment/guarding behavior toward familiar allies under stress. Removal attempts cause distress in both parties.
If KZ-01 bonds with an unvetted human asset in the field, that person may become uncooperative with law enforcement or recovery teams.
(4) UNFORESEEN SYSTEMIC SPILLOVER
Recovery Team Bravo (03:40, see above) described RF interference phenomena during search.
This is a controlled forested perimeter, not a contested RF environment.
Interpretation: either (a) someone spoofed comms to discourage approach, or (b) we have emergent capabilities in one or both subjects beyond original modeling.
>>> Any suggestion that [REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED] “external influence” should NOT BE WRITTEN DOWN. Discuss verbally only. <<<
Bottom line: We do not fully understand what we released.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ACTIONS TAKEN
• 04:10 – Search suspended. All field teams recalled under Legal authority.
• 04:20 – Facility Δ moved to minimum-signature posture. “Animal enrichment trial” cover story drafted; veterinary liaison pre-briefed.
• 05:00 – All AC-β / RV-α documentation cloned to offline cold storage. Original working notes scrubbed from shared drives. Names of individual researchers replaced with numeric IDs for any doc that might be discoverable.
• 06:30 – Internal narrative established for non-cleared staff:
“Two research animals slipped containment during a minor electrical fault. We are coordinating with local shelters to retrieve them humanely.”
DO NOT DEVIATE FROM THIS LINE.
• 08:15 – Outside counsel looped (Tier Black). Counsel advised the following:
- DO NOT involve animal control, university partners, or law enforcement.
- DO NOT offer reward/bounty publicly.
- DO NOT circulate images of KZ-01’s distinct eyes or GH-02’s cranial modifications.
(Note: KZ-01’s heterochromia is visually memorable. GH-02’s [REDACTED] cranial protrusions are, quote, “not surgically standard for a domestic animal” and will raise questions instantly.)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
RECOMMENDATIONS (IMMEDIATE)
1. Cease all further AC-β and RV-α live-animal implantations until Containment Review Board reconvenes.
I am aware this will impact timelines promised to [REDACTED AGENCY] and [REDACTED CONTRACTOR]. I am also aware this email will be archived and may be discoverable in court. Let it be discoverable that I said STOP.
2. Restrict all internal chatter.
No jokes about “the hacker cats,” “psychic cats,” or “telemetry kitties” in Slack, Teams, email, SMS, hallway talk, or personal socials. This is not just optics; some of the Tier Silver engineers are already speculating out loud and they are NOT CLEARED.
3. Quiet-contact private clinics within 200km radius.
If either subject appears injured (capture attempt by civilian, car strike, etc.), we need to get there first.
Draft a script for clinic staff: “Do not scan, do not post, we are the owner, the animal is microchipped.”
(We have pretext microchip IDs ready.)
4. Prepare worst-case comms.
If GH-02 shows up on social media displaying non-standard behavior with humans (staring, following, “cat won’t let me leave the room lol”), we may have to spin this fast as “feral/behavioral trauma from illegal testing by a rival org” to deflect liability.
5. DO NOT ATTEMPT FORCIBLE RETRIEVAL USING UNVETTED FIELD CONTRACTORS.
I cannot stress this enough. If GH-02 displays fixation behaviors during pickup, contractors will panic, escalate, record, and post.
That video will ruin us.
Use only Black Tier internal assets with prior exposure.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
PERSONAL NOTE (NOT FOR FORWARDING)
There is pressure from [REDACTED] to “treat this as salvageable IP.” I disagree.
We are already past “salvageable IP.”
We are at “uncontrolled cognitive artifact moving around in public space with our signature on it.”
If either subject imprints on a human asset — or worse, on a networked system we did not authorize — we could end up with an incident we cannot plausibly deny or contain.
We built something we do not fully understand, and it walked out.
Respectfully, we either fix this quietly now, or it’s going to become a national story later, and not the kind Legal can spin.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ACTION REQUESTED
Executive Security Steering Committee is requested to authorize:
[A] Immediate funding for Tier Black recovery-only teams w/ no external hires.
[B] Legal shield for full program pause pending Containment Review.
[C] Clear written instruction on whether we are to classify KZ-01 and GH-02 as “assets for retrieval” or “liabilities to be neutralized if retrieval fails.”
We need that last answer in writing.
If you choose neutralization, you will own that.
If you choose retrieval, you must understand they are not just “cats” anymore.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ATTACHMENTS (PRINT / PHYSICAL HAND CARRY ONLY — DO NOT EMAIL)
• Attachment A — NSG-β/2024-1103 raw timeline (video stills + telemetry scrubs)
• Attachment B — Behavioral drift notes (KZ-01 empathy reinforcement / GH-02 dominance fixation)
• Attachment C — Legal exposure memo draft to [REDACTED AGENCY] re “prototype rescue initiative” (awaiting counsel review)
• Attachment D — Clinic contact list / cover story package
END OF MESSAGE
THIS EMAIL AND ITS CONTENTS ARE CLASSIFIED INTERNAL // STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL // DO NOT FORWARD OUTSIDE BLACK TIER WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTH FROM NSG DIRECTOR.
Comment posting has been disabled by the journal owner.
