Bluesky or Twitter?
a day ago
General
Well, in discord and here, they told me about Twitter's problems. For me, Twitter is definitely seen as a place for promotion (even sfw), but in BlueSky, you don't seem as noticeable. What do you think, and what are the hidden pitfalls?
FA+

bluesky all the way
But maybe Bluesky has a few more features like Keyword blocking....but just like FA it doesn't matter when people dont properly tag shit.
IDK, It REALLY doesn't matter...but I guess Twitter would be better overall.
Bluesky I guess is good if you wanna HYPER-curate stuff...but I do think Twitter is better.
https://www.clickguard.com/blog/twitter-spam-bots/
https://viterbischool.usc.edu/news/.....thriving-on-x/
https://mashable.com/article/x-twit.....s-fake-traffic
This is just a few of many examples of Grok, Twitter's AI:
https://bsky.app/profile/steamboath...../3lti2m6njoc2z
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/elon-m.....dia-rcna244749
Just to mention, the man in that last link, owns Twitter. A man who uses neo-N*zi websites as sources owns Twitter. Just want to reiterate that until I can't speak anymore.
This is their latest TOS update, giving any AI software all the abilities to use your art without your consent:
https://bsky.app/profile/bruces.bsk...../3ma6q6alfo226
Bsky is not the perfect platform, of course they deal with their own bullshit. I'm not saying Bsky is automatically better in every way. But people have to be aware that Twitter is not the platform it was even five years ago. It's an AI, corporate, ad-filled, antisemitic cesspool.
To anyone reading this, is your precious furry porn REALLY worth supporting everything I just mentioned? Almost every artist you follow is more active on other platforms these days. There's a reason why people are speaking out about NOT being on that platform. Delete your Twitter.
A lot of it's traffic is also bots. It's certainly getting worse and worse over the months but as long as artists don't only post on X it's less bad.