SoFurry is back... and it's awful
2 months ago
General
Ugh... another massive UI redesign that's difficult to navigate and broken as hell in my web browser of choice. I can't edit my profile, half the menus don't work, and I can't clear out my messages. Plus, they're doing that thing where they try to force WEBP images everywhere with encoded filenames that disassociate the art with the artist.
It's almost as bad as DeviantArt!
Seriously, I don't care if it's still in beta and they have bugs to fix. For heaven's sake, people... a basic web gallery isn't that hard, and it shouldn't be this much of broken mess even on launch. The site was offline for more than 4 months, with updates exclusively on social media and no info on the front page, and... this is the result?
I knew there was a reason I retired from web development years ago. Kids these days have no f***ing idea how to do anything right.
At this point, we should be thankful FA is still so old-fashioned. If any more "improvement" were to happen around here, I'd really be set to lose my mind.
It's almost as bad as DeviantArt!
Seriously, I don't care if it's still in beta and they have bugs to fix. For heaven's sake, people... a basic web gallery isn't that hard, and it shouldn't be this much of broken mess even on launch. The site was offline for more than 4 months, with updates exclusively on social media and no info on the front page, and... this is the result?
I knew there was a reason I retired from web development years ago. Kids these days have no f***ing idea how to do anything right.
At this point, we should be thankful FA is still so old-fashioned. If any more "improvement" were to happen around here, I'd really be set to lose my mind.
FA+

Although I don't mind the webp format, it's more efficient than jpeg (just don't try to recode jpeg into it) and by now well-supported by my "unimportant, useless nerd OS", so I should expect no less from the world-class OS everyone uses, rrrright?
Also, I've found that WebP isn't actually any better than JPEG. The way it works is to filter the image before compression, which is kind of cheating (you can do exactly the same thing with regular JPEGs by using the JPEGli encoder). That's why if you re-save a WebP over and over, the image turns into a blurry mess, while JPEG will only deteriorate if you edit the data before resaving it. From a technical perspective, WebP is awful, which is why it hasn't caught on, and WebP 2.0 will be a failure, too.
I miss Yiffstar, which then became SoFurry. I went there for stories and now they want to be like some sort of phone app image archive.
What's really annoying is when a site loads the text and images on a page - and then blanks the entire page because the browser doesn't support some new obscure scripting thing that isn't really important for anything anyways!
I started doing web development back in 1996, so... I've seen a lot of crap over the decades. It's sad that even after 30 years, now that the web is extremely mature, things still don't work because people just don't want them to.
Though yes, am aware of the existence of PaleMoon. (And Basilisk, and the several branches of MyPal, and SeaMonkey, and I guess I should also acknowledge the existences of Supermium and maybe Thorium...)
Sounds like you have a lot of lost knowledge you could put into practice if you're willing to be part of their team.
I'm sure it would be a huge time commitment and a pain. But it might feel more satisfying in the long run to make a difference for the site.
It does seem like, for all the talk of furries being IT nerds, there's not a one among them who's capable of putting together and running a functioning website. Or at least zero overlap between the ones who could and the ones who want to.
I said to a friend I don't think SF is long for this world as the redesign is the worst. At this rate it doesn't have another reincarnation left in it and I think even Toumal might just let SF die next time so even if it doesn't break down on it's own it won't last as there won't be enough people there to warrant it.
Toumal is already paying for the upkeep of the site out of his own pocket and struggling to the point they lost their last host because he couldn't afford to pay it anymore.
These days I mostly work on emulators and legacy tools. I don't care about web technology anymore.
The only person who is even slightly competent on the SF team is the co owner who is half the age of Toumal and codes as a hobby. The rest of the staff know only the most basic coding and their skills are out of date. If you don't see things from their point of view or do things their way then they aren't interested. The whole site is held together with bad decisions, half thought out ideas and what change Toumal finds under the couch that month. Everyone on the staff at SF were rejected from admin roles on other sites either due to lack of knowledge or toxic attitude.
SF is a paper tiger, the tech they use and jargon sounds impressive on paper but doesn't work as is poorly implemented and every shortcut known to man will be used. That paper tiger just folds.
The site had real coders on it but Toumal drove them all off with his half thought out ideas and poorly implemented design changes. No decent web guy would touch him or the site. Even the few decent ones that stumble into SF don't hang around on the staff for long. Toumal is a real diva and his bad calls will have you overworked and hated. Best to keep your fingerprints off the train wreak that is SF. I know. Toumal comes off as nice but it is a front.
You don't get a pass for treating people like something you stepped in just because you don't get paid for your time.
Sofurry's business model is so bad the site haemorrhages money far greater than any other site to the point Toumal is struggling to pay the bills. Other sites either make enough to keep the lights on or lose so little it is only small shortfall.
If trolling was stopped like it is on other sites and they stopped trying to reinvent the wheel then the site wouldn't be so dead or have such a poor name.
Both FA and IB came after their first site yet both sites have over taken them.
No other site jerks it's members around as bad as SF.
I appreciate how FA is old and new at the same time, even the current layout isn't full of modern bloat.
HTML was just a rebadge of a markup system originally designed for government documents, because that made it faster to implement. The guy who created Javascript regularly brags about how it was created in 10 days (which is obviously more important that making sure it is good). I remember the early browsers that allowed any cookie to be read by any web site, because nobody even remotely considered the need for security.
It's always been a mess. Nerds are usually really bad at designing anything and rarely listen to feedback from end users.
I have come to believe recently that the HTML standards themselves are part of the problem. Somewhere during the way-too-long gap between HTML 4 and 5, web developers got so used to hacking together barely-functional workarounds for missing features that it became part of the culture and HTML 5 was built with the assumption that it would stay that way and the best thing to do would be to make everything as vague and open-ended as possible. Two good examples of this are forms and media players. <audio> and <video> tags don't allow for any simple customization via CSS; instead you have to either build the whole thing yourself out of JavaScript or stick with the default. Text entry fields like the one I'm typing in now are no more advanced than they were in the '90s, despite the obvious desire to support some kind of formatting, so every WYSIWYG text editor is a bespoke JavaScript nightmare.
Aside from the bad visual design, they are relying on data attributes and Javascript to handle links, which is entirely wrong. Hyperlinks are supposed to be, you know, hyperlinks.
Just par for the course for modern web developers. They know what they are doing, they just... don't care.