Pay upfront comissions
15 years ago
Just a small rant from someone who has been burned alittle bit by this style of commission.
While I understand 100% WHY you want a pay upfront...life can intervene with your work when you take on said commissions. Im not calling anyone out on this...its just sad that I see alot of artists that I would like to commission larger pieces from (rather more expensive pieces from) that want full payment upfront. To me thats no guarantee that I will receive the product I want (or at all).
I love the pay on completion...as a customer. But to you the artist that is also completely unfair.
My prefered method of payment is actually a half and half solution. for inks and colors this works well..sketches well they tend to be in the cheap range and pay up front isnt such an issue (IMO). But for colors and inks...I suggest the pay half upfront...sketch is shown for approval. Once approved then payment is rendered in full, and artist then finishes the piece.
This way neither parties really get burned. Artist gets paid atleast half even if a customer bails in the process. And the customer can guarantee that they will receive a product..
thats just a personal rant, not telling anyone to change their methods or pointing fingers at all. Just a rant
....
and alittle pout *chuckles*
While I understand 100% WHY you want a pay upfront...life can intervene with your work when you take on said commissions. Im not calling anyone out on this...its just sad that I see alot of artists that I would like to commission larger pieces from (rather more expensive pieces from) that want full payment upfront. To me thats no guarantee that I will receive the product I want (or at all).
I love the pay on completion...as a customer. But to you the artist that is also completely unfair.
My prefered method of payment is actually a half and half solution. for inks and colors this works well..sketches well they tend to be in the cheap range and pay up front isnt such an issue (IMO). But for colors and inks...I suggest the pay half upfront...sketch is shown for approval. Once approved then payment is rendered in full, and artist then finishes the piece.
This way neither parties really get burned. Artist gets paid atleast half even if a customer bails in the process. And the customer can guarantee that they will receive a product..
thats just a personal rant, not telling anyone to change their methods or pointing fingers at all. Just a rant
....
and alittle pout *chuckles*
FA+


Some artists seem to work better with a carrot too, but that's just my opinion.
If you're not sure about paying everything up front for a full color work, ask if you can pay for a sketch, and then upgrade to color later. That way, you can pay in two parts, and depending on how quickly the sketch gets done, you'll have a rough idea of how seriously the artist takes his/her work.
and hey im all for 100% upfront...just really dont prefer it. As I said was just a rant from someone who has been burned (still waiting on a certain commission 7 years later lol)
you never did ask me for money for that picture yeah drew for me for the first FAU...heh i still have that pic floating around my room ^^
It's a risk, but that's a decision for the artist to make, but it isn't >unfair< at all. Just a matter of whether the artist is able or willing to do it that way.
Personally, I really would prefer payment upon completion. It's just not as much of an option for me. If I don't need money, I'm not taking commissions, and if I need money, I generally need it when I take the commission. XD
I consider myself a very poor example for an artist doing work for pay. Sometimes I have valid excuses, but too often there really just isn't any good excuse. I'm lucky in that every customer has been inordinately patient and still pleased with the final result regardless of the amount of wait they had (not counting two commissions I terminated and refunded, or commissions still in progress). My customers are still always pleased, but I am by no means a good example. I'm trying to be better about that.
But I do try to let people know up front that I am slow to deliver. So, as much as it is the artist's choice whether to gamble with payment upon completion, it's also a buyer's choice whether to make the same gamble on an artist.
Any time what is being sold is not a set pre-made product, this is going to be the case. Either buyer or seller makes a gamble with the transaction. More often than not, it's going to be the buyer taking the chance.
I understand you're just voicing your opinion, not really even complaining at all, and that's cool of you. It's just sorta one of those things that is what it is. ^_^;;
(I'm not the 7 year old commission you're waiting on am I? I'm not sure we've known each other THAT long and am preeeeeeetty sure I haven't had any outstanding commissions THAT old, but... I'm paranoid and sometimes forgetful. XD)
That is, obviously, all kinds of facetious. X3
Cons aren't an option for me presently. But for what it's worth, you would be the only reason I would go to FA:U if I could. *hugs*
I think the best compromise would still be pay up front but on a per section basis, so if you want a sketch you pay for the sketch, if you want coloured then you pay for the sketch and when done it's shown for adjustment then you pay for the inks, then when that's done you pay for the colour.
But yeah, that's a bit of a generalisation, I'm fine with paying upfront, like the guy above me, i'm terrible with money, i'd hate to get to the end and realise I can't afford it. :P
Some of the artists who require full payment up front are pretty lenient about it too, allowing me to make payments for large commissions that cost far more than I can usually pay for in one shot (like several large real media commissions that ran between $100-$300 each.) Granted they usually don't start until I've either mostly paid or paid in full, but I've never had a problem working with that.
I must agree though that the half and half way is certainly one of the better ways!
However, I want to give my customers the vision that's in their head of the commission they're asking for. That being said, I do an approval system. When I get the sketch or base line image done, I send it in for approval. Once I get that appoval, the work is over half done and I generally ask for half the payment then, for a few reasons: Firstly, commissioners oftentimes change their mind and it's not fair to me to invest my time and work only to be told "OOHH SORRY I HAET IT, NO PAYMENT FUR U". That's why I do the approval system too. There are no surprises about what my customers get at the end of the day. Secondly, I have bills to pay. They don't WAIT until the end of the month when my commissioners get paid. They demand payment or they get things like lawyers involved. Ten bucks may not seem like much to most people, but that puts gas in my gas tank. I don't generally take full payment up front because I can't guarantee when it'll get done.
Most artists are fulfilling multiple roles. I haven't run into anyone thrives solely off commissions alone. They're moms, dads, sisters, brothers, children, workers for whatever job they're pulling off, and if they're a responsible adult, they also have things like housework, homework (in the case of collegiate folk), shopping, bill paying and have family and pets to care for. Art work has to take a back seat for a lot of these. And yes it's a pain to someone who commissions them, but you have to see it realistically. How many hours of the day do they invest in their artwork?
>_o I dunno. I honestly think people can be really too hard on fartists.