FA+
Shop
Bias? What bias?
15 years ago
So I thought of something funny today. This was left unscathed in my gallery: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/1110094/
Now, if you don't already see what's funny about that, lemme tell you. The whole argument against my art belonging here is that because someone else contributed to my art by making some of the models I use (even if heavily modified by me), the art is not "mine."
See where I'm going? All I did with that pic is color an awesome piece of gift art that
glassjawboxer did for me. That picture is like 99% him and 1% me, why is that safe? The same could be said for any collaborative work, surely only the guy who put in the most "effort" should be able to post it, right? It isn't the other guy's work then after all, right? Or maybe neither one can claim ownership and it shouldn't be allowed to be posted at all!
But no, all those things are perfectly a-ok. Because it's "art."
Bias? What bias?
Now, if you don't already see what's funny about that, lemme tell you. The whole argument against my art belonging here is that because someone else contributed to my art by making some of the models I use (even if heavily modified by me), the art is not "mine."
See where I'm going? All I did with that pic is color an awesome piece of gift art that
glassjawboxer did for me. That picture is like 99% him and 1% me, why is that safe? The same could be said for any collaborative work, surely only the guy who put in the most "effort" should be able to post it, right? It isn't the other guy's work then after all, right? Or maybe neither one can claim ownership and it shouldn't be allowed to be posted at all!But no, all those things are perfectly a-ok. Because it's "art."
Bias? What bias?
heavy duty texture work is ALSO needed to keep them off yew too, I learned that years ago! they can hate it but yew modify the bases, re texture them as well and do your OWN posing they have no reason to take it down anymaor, means longer times on pieces but who's trying to spam FA with renders anywhozzle?http://www.furocity.com/home/
http://www.furocity.com/home/
http://www.furocity.com/home/
http://www.furocity.com/home/
http://www.furocity.com/home/
http://www.furocity.com/home/
I recommed you to read other admins' ED articles as well.
Again I don't agree with the rules concerning 3D models, but I do see their reasoning. *shrug*
Maybe if you did cub porn in your 3D art instead of what you were doing. The FA admins seem to love cub porn. /Joke
The underlying argument of the rule that took down my art, as explained to me, is thus: if the work isn't mostly by you, it isn't yours and it can't be posted (that is almost verbatim). Now, whether or not my art was mostly mine... I'm not even going to get into that... But... Why this should only apply to 3D images and not to traditional art seems hypocritical and worth calling out.
I'd just like to know what the motivation behind this is. Who really cares if someone posts a bunch of images of the Krystal model, unaltered and with stock poses? What damage does that do to the community?
What do you feel the reasoning is behind it?
Suffice it to say, even if all you use is Poser, you can do a lot more than just reposition models.
At any rate, I've had four years worth of work pulled down. You'll have to afford me at least a couple weeks of bitterness, no? :P
....
....
...... good point
Try again.