FA+
Shop
Moving to Ink Bunny
15 years ago
General
[[ COPIED AND POSTED FROM deviantART JOURNAL - some things typed may seem awkward as I'm too lazy to change up the links ]]
As some of you may have known, Fur Affinity has a cub porn ban. This means we can no longer upload arts that contain under 18 years of age looking character in sexual/sexual implicated situations.
Sexual implicated arts like http://segamew.deviantart.com/art/P.....ling-178423969 and http://segamew.deviantart.com/art/C.....sion-177488115 are borderline and are at risk for removal.
The uncensored versions art such as http://segamew.deviantart.com/art/P.....utsu-165742718 and http://segamew.deviantart.com/art/S.....umbs-156482372 are not allowed because of the way I draw the characters gives off the impression of underaged characters.
We all know (comic) canonly, a 46-year old Sonic looks like a 16 year old Sonic. Because we told FA staff about this, any Sonic character in a sexual act with another char drawn in the <b>canon</b> style WILL be deemed as underaged and subjected to removal.
Me and a few (many) other people have been fighting this ban, trying to reason with the staff since November 24. We've been putting up with anti child porn types who tell us to change our style or to stop drawing Sonic porn. We've also been called pedophiles by these OTHER furries.
I've also had it with the rules clarification that states that Digimon porn are 100% safe. I'm not the only one who sees this as completely unfair and doesn't help FA's standing at all when they're trying to make the site suitable to be picked up by another payment processor. If you are up to date on your knowledge on Digimon, you know why this is unfair.
I've had it with my posts and other peoples' posts on their forum being deleted if we question anything about Digimon. Had it with the closure of different discussion topics about the cub porn ban. They make it so it's impossible to talk about cub porn ban at all. I really want to believe that they don't want to enforce the ban on us at all, but it's getting harder and harder to believe that with all this censorship.
I know I'm leaving bits and pieces of info that will leave you folks clueless. Anyway if you're curious about my InkBunny name, it's SEGAMew. Hmm yeah I've been slacking in the art department because I've been focusing my energy so much on FA. They won't hear any of our suggestions, soooo I guess they can do without the traffic of the "cub porn artists".
(FYI: Most of the "cub porn artists" draw 18+ year old chars).
As some of you may have known, Fur Affinity has a cub porn ban. This means we can no longer upload arts that contain under 18 years of age looking character in sexual/sexual implicated situations.
Sexual implicated arts like http://segamew.deviantart.com/art/P.....ling-178423969 and http://segamew.deviantart.com/art/C.....sion-177488115 are borderline and are at risk for removal.
The uncensored versions art such as http://segamew.deviantart.com/art/P.....utsu-165742718 and http://segamew.deviantart.com/art/S.....umbs-156482372 are not allowed because of the way I draw the characters gives off the impression of underaged characters.
We all know (comic) canonly, a 46-year old Sonic looks like a 16 year old Sonic. Because we told FA staff about this, any Sonic character in a sexual act with another char drawn in the <b>canon</b> style WILL be deemed as underaged and subjected to removal.
Me and a few (many) other people have been fighting this ban, trying to reason with the staff since November 24. We've been putting up with anti child porn types who tell us to change our style or to stop drawing Sonic porn. We've also been called pedophiles by these OTHER furries.
I've also had it with the rules clarification that states that Digimon porn are 100% safe. I'm not the only one who sees this as completely unfair and doesn't help FA's standing at all when they're trying to make the site suitable to be picked up by another payment processor. If you are up to date on your knowledge on Digimon, you know why this is unfair.
I've had it with my posts and other peoples' posts on their forum being deleted if we question anything about Digimon. Had it with the closure of different discussion topics about the cub porn ban. They make it so it's impossible to talk about cub porn ban at all. I really want to believe that they don't want to enforce the ban on us at all, but it's getting harder and harder to believe that with all this censorship.
I know I'm leaving bits and pieces of info that will leave you folks clueless. Anyway if you're curious about my InkBunny name, it's SEGAMew. Hmm yeah I've been slacking in the art department because I've been focusing my energy so much on FA. They won't hear any of our suggestions, soooo I guess they can do without the traffic of the "cub porn artists".
(FYI: Most of the "cub porn artists" draw 18+ year old chars).
Does this mean I can't post my Tonismal story here??? ;~;
look up SEGAMew XD
Just putting their foot down and doing something is actually the best way out, as crappy as that may sound.
Everything can be poked holes into.
Personally, I don't see how sonic even qualifies as remotely "human enough" as he should be protected as a "chibi" or "stylized" character like it was promised in the very first thread but I guess that went out of the window as soon as a certain someone (who is the one whom you should be thanking for this) posted that glorious "age list" which, despite having established that announced age doesn't weigh as much as looks, suddenly counts.
But hey, apparently no one wants to hear that now so what do I know.
There's just nothing we can do about that.
Pointing at gatomon won't get your sonic unbanned, it'll get gatomon banned and, by extension, poke- and digimon are up for that "gut feeling judgement" everything else is. Aka flip a coin, see if you're lucky.
In fact, I totally expect something like that in the near future due to all the whining that goes into that direction.
All our options are now limited to nothing but getting more shit banned (cause if anything, that age list has proven, it actually works if it only "makes enough sense") and I don't wanna contribute to that.