FA+
Shop
leaving
15 years ago
General
Edit: I wrote a couple minor things poorly and I want to clarify them, so the originals will be italicized and additions will be bolded because I don't know if FA has strikes uhhh <__>. This isn't due to post-post discussion, I just reread it and came off a bit more aggressive than I wanted to sound. I intended to make my post seem like I'm not omniscient and I actually didn't know everything before I ever posted anything, but that's now how I think I came off.
I'm gonna be leaving due to the recent FA fiasco; a bit late, I know, but that's because I don't really come here much anyway.
MY reason is because of the out supposition that the webmaster is basically protecting animal abusers. That basically makes FA a safe place for them. As we all know, 99.9% of the people who are on this site aren't those people, and there are actually tons of p awesome dudes/ettes. However, I don't want my art or my name to be associated with a site moderated by someone who would may be believed by anyone to be protectingthat kind of behavior from the proper authorities, and I certainly don't want to seem like I support it.
SORRY IF THIS WAS LIKE well known shit by chance, by people who actually pay attention to this stuff, (and if it was, shame on you,) but I don't really leave my hole of a webpage to the rest of FA much except that I know that I myself have seen a few select people post stuff like I PUT A DOG DICK IN MY BUTT TODAY (thanks wtffa) without ban.
Sorry again to my watchers and double sorry to my recent watchers, I've got one badge to crank out which will be done within 48 hours, and then it's hasta la vista. You can continue to follow my works at my DA, of the same name. http://suguro.deviantart.com/
I'm gonna be leaving due to the recent FA fiasco; a bit late, I know, but that's because I don't really come here much anyway.
MY reason is because of the out supposition that the webmaster is basically protecting animal abusers. That basically makes FA a safe place for them. As we all know, 99.9% of the people who are on this site aren't those people, and there are actually tons of p awesome dudes/ettes. However, I don't want my art or my name to be associated with a site moderated by someone who would may be believed by anyone to be protectingthat kind of behavior from the proper authorities, and I certainly don't want to seem like I support it.
SORRY IF THIS WAS LIKE well known shit by chance, by people who actually pay attention to this stuff, (and if it was, shame on you,) but I don't really leave my hole of a webpage to the rest of FA much except that I know that I myself have seen a few select people post stuff like I PUT A DOG DICK IN MY BUTT TODAY (thanks wtffa) without ban.
Sorry again to my watchers and double sorry to my recent watchers, I've got one badge to crank out which will be done within 48 hours, and then it's hasta la vista. You can continue to follow my works at my DA, of the same name. http://suguro.deviantart.com/
I'm sorry, but you're taking comments and notes out of context without having the whole story behind it. If you choose to go, I respect your opinion, but FA does not protect animal abusers.
And yes I read your response, and a large chunk of the following discussions, but not all of them admittedly. (I DID read a lot of it, but there's a ton there and I don't really care about the security holes part, I take care to make sure my personal information is secure on my own.) And this line from you, is what finalized my decision: "Bestiality/zoophiles who practice in real life get one warning, and only one. And if people push it too far, then we cut them off on the site."
I was under the impression that zoophiles were immediately banned. I don't have any tolerance for that. If it were me, though it isn't, I would also report them to authorities.
I'd say sorry for all the work that this is causing you, and I am sorry about the security part of it. But not the rest when I doubt your morals.
I was under the impression that zoophiles were immediately banned. I don't have any tolerance for that. If it were me, though it isn't, I would also report them to authorities. ::: It's also their job to investigate and prevent bestiality. You could even let them do it for you.
But it's hard to take a direct stance on things like this, especially with users admitting to doing drugs, piracy and other serious issues. We try not to take a morale stance, because if we ban one, we ban them all. Instead, we give people warnings. This isn't the place.
If they disregard that they perma-banned.
I also meant to clarify that there is no reason to ban them all. You don't have to ban piracy and drug use and bestiality if you don't want to. Not every break of TOS leads to a ban, much like not every law leads to prison. You have different rules and procedures for someone who spams a whole bunch, or for someone who sexually harasses someone. You can have a zero-tolerance policy, or you can warn people and let them get quiet about it.
This is my of the argument that I posted here. People are taking things out of context without knowing the full background. Leave if you will, I will respect that, but I won't stand to be accused of protecting zoophiles without airing my side of the story.
is also unanswered here: http://community.livejournal.com/fu.....34443#t3734443 right in front of the reader's face every time.
There are several dozen unanswered questions that people have, but only the ones that can be easily answered or are FA-flattering have been.
December 29th, 2010 09:01 PM
Boss Nigger responded
December 29th, 2010 09:03 PM
Faster than a speeding "FIRST REPLY" poster