http://www.cloud9living.com/images/.....R-LOS-0017.jpg

Various armies had realistic 3D simulator for over 40 years. This photo is probably very old as actual sims are REALLY more impressive.
Everything you are talking about actually exists... But it's probably not profitable actually as it's too expensive for most people.
Armies used really expensive simulators since 70's ' ( and before ... ) because, even if a simulator is really expensive, it's not as expensive as a plane ( 200M $ "only" for a F-22 plane I think ) Just search on youtube, you'll find impressive videos, because people are actually working on it... Using real guns in a game ( not even joking ) , playing in a sphere that allows you to run, strafe and all and reproducing the movements in the game ... while staying at the same place, in front of the screen, etc.

im not talking flight or vehicle i mean actual person simulator where you as a single person can interact with virtual objects. not just sit and press buttons or such i mean beyond that

That... exists, in some different ways. I saw hologram stuff that people can modify by touching it, modeling stuff, etc. There's possibility to use captors to make your fingers for instance evolve in a virtual world and make you able to interact with virtual things, and I think there's actually some projects that would allow a machine/computer to interact with the nerves/brain to simulate senses, for instance...
Nothing is done yet, and all that stuff is REALLY expensive. But the idea is not new... It's just that since 80's, a lot of people are thinking about it.
Time is the key. And all the stuff I said ( the sphere, the captors, and all ... ) are the bases of the whole thing.

oh i know. the technology is slowly getting there but they are using it in a level they made to expensive for the public. and it is actually quite slow in response and only is used on a screen i want to go beyond a flat screen i already know ho w to remove the tv or monitor from the equation.

i know all about machines that interact with the nerves system an brain. im not going that far as to connect to the insides of any body my level goes before cybernetic

my understanding of this technology makes it simpler than spheres an captors those are nice but they ar bulky and actually am expensive direction for them to go. like i said before the technology i speak of is simpler and been around much longer 70s an 80s they started using this same stuff im thinking of but ditched it because the direction the populous wanted in technology wasnt going that direction yet. those spheres and captors are super fancy sensors you dont need fancy jus multiple of the basic ones. to do the same job. heck we have such technology in toys that interact with people and the room around them and they are much smaller than those spheres and chapters

simply put they are catching up with what ive known for a long long long time and its time get involved.

they are slowly hitting today what ive already known before i had reached high school i knew where they were and they were in the idea for the sitting design of no physical interaction. jus mental an Sutton pushing.

the equipment necessary actually is quite cheap. and is used in stuff as common as a video game or even your microwave heck even a simple basic cell phone uses the same technology i see necessary. the earliest radio wave remote control before ir or blutooth technology you can have a solo human being interact with a virtual world from rotating your head walking to heck even picking up objects and moving them . simulators like that those are just basic stuff physical interaction with the virtual. that means actual moment of the body not A device determining variables of the object you are in moving i mean you moving and that object with you.

Using the best most recent example it sounds like you mean full virtual reality along the lines of Tron Legacy. Full immersion in a virtual environment, no interfaces, no systems and visual devices between you and it.

it is possible but my research is just the beginning. i do not know how to get the wind controls or temperature but i can get the rest. graphic level has been around since the games of Myst. as the Japanese have proven we have the ability to do high quality realistic digital people easier than here in the states. sadly i dont know there secret.

Well it's kind of an unspoken rule that Japan has the best gaming technology. No one ever says that though cause there are alot of crazies left around that'll tire your ear on how japs are america's enemy and how they'll never buy anything foreign. Anyway prior to kinect, but they might just take Kinect to the next level.

yeah^^ but video interaction is still flawed it is great but the interaction is still limited your direction is still only where your screen is placed int eh room.

Yeah but they've almost eliminated a physical interface that the wii and playstation are limited by. Your reaction is delayed by your response time, hitting the right button or not, consecutive button press reactions.

well the wii has those buttons do to the technology of the time wich they released and the age group they originally wanted to accommodate as well as the ability to compete with other gaming systems by having a simple remote in case you do not desire to play a game utilizing such movements. but they could totally remove the pointer if they so chose fit being all it is is just a screen orientation device . simply put designed to show you where you are pointing at the screen everything else does not require the sensor bar whatsoever. you could unplug it and still have the same range and movements just not be able to point at the screen and see your pointer or it acknowledge it.

( excuse me, I had to disconnect )

I don't think you could run a virtual simulator with low end sensors, processors and all.
Only making a fluid and realistic picture on a simple flat screen is expensive... Even if you make it with sensors and all, you'd need a really powerful computer to handle that, and by computer, I mean super calculator ... And because of the "basic " sensors, everything would be really imprecise.

I'll just leave that here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_reality
http://www.dansdata.com/gz016.htm

you think to complicated. if it took a high processor then why would the xbox 360's knect exist or wii or ps3 movie interaction technology exists on such a small device. theses devices utilize basic understanding of such technology now if it requires such heavy and advanced technology such things as these would not be in such a small device. and so available to the public. your research is outdated by at least 2 decades.

Wii sensors are a good joke, as kinect, and the whole Iphone stuff. You would need more sensors in a virtual reality, with more "reception" zone, which would be REALLY more accurate. Kinect is, well, a gadget.
Whereas Wii is supposed to be " accessible ", sensors used by professional to make, for instance, movements in video games are some WAY MORE evolved stuff.

I think you know the difference between http://www.siteselection.com/issues.....mages/lead.jpg and http://img.jeuxvideo.fr/photo/03277.....oto-kinect.jpg, and between http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3397.....59c2ec478f.jpg and http://www.fredzone.org/wp-content/.....ii-505x406.jpg

like i said you are still thinking way to complicated. theses things are basic and i said that earlier they are just the simple understanding and just a light touch on the idea.

back in the 80s an 90s they started experiments with the technology and in the direction of gaming but what was popular was the simple gaming so it was abandoned. there was more than even utilized today by these simple gaming platforms. video interaction has been around scene the 80s nintendo wanted to do something like the wii back when they started the NES but wasnt popular yet. what do you think the power glove was. arcade game systems already utilized the same interactive software we are now using today just not all the graphic levels.

your understanding of sensors is very little . early tv wireless remotes didn't even utilize radio frequencies nor utilizing batteries. the technology was used from late 40s till some time in the 70s. simple analog technology which has been replaced by digital devices. but the frequencies are the same at least the majority of them . of course if you study Nicoli Tesla you will discover our current level of technology is still utilizing the same stuff used during the late 1800swe are just making it smaller and smaller now of days and the level of technology he knew our current world has barely even touched. though due to his lax of record keeping we will probably take a very long time to reach. wireless technology he utilized went far beyond what we have today and many witnesses journals testify to the same things. so if you know it as to being out of reach or extremely expensive you have much to learn. if a mechanical glove can be used to move a robotic arm in the exact manor then what stops us from being able to do the same in digital. and that technology has been around for ages. that is what nintendo was going to do with the nes. game system like the virtual boy had begun something like virtual reality but obviously it was popular and phased out by the end of the yr due to limited graphics it had but that also was the limits of 3d graphics for that time. not all 3d graphics but low cost levels of graphics. it also was battery powered and used way to much battery power and a regular power source was not easy to acquire. due to the populous non desire for this gaming system the mas movement to the technology was pushed back. ofcourse with touch screen technology the spark was relit. and once again attempting to move this direction. ofcourse you would know this from your understanding of these things right?

yup an yet is still the tip of the iceburg not even hitting it all the way