FA+
Shop
Round TWO: OVER (+feedback thread!)
14 years ago
So here we are at last. Round Two is over!
Sometime today the judges will receive a note with links to the entry and they can start the judging.
Like lawt time, no more entries will be accepted for the judging, but you can obviously still submit them. They won'tb e judged, but we'll still fave and host a link to your entry.
If there are any remarks or ideas about thingswe should change the next round, feel free to do so here. We're constantly trying to improve the contest and for that we need your feedback.
Whether or not you have entered this or the previous contest, again, if you have any sort of idea you think might come in handy, please don't hesitate to say something! :3
Sometime today the judges will receive a note with links to the entry and they can start the judging.
Like lawt time, no more entries will be accepted for the judging, but you can obviously still submit them. They won'tb e judged, but we'll still fave and host a link to your entry.
If there are any remarks or ideas about thingswe should change the next round, feel free to do so here. We're constantly trying to improve the contest and for that we need your feedback.
Whether or not you have entered this or the previous contest, again, if you have any sort of idea you think might come in handy, please don't hesitate to say something! :3
Also, shouldn't the title of this journal be "Round Two: OVER"?
Well, it appears I wasn't very much awake when making the journal.
Thanks for mentioning that, it's corrected now.
As for the next planet, we're still discussing the next round as we might spice things up and change the way planets are chosen.
I still have to suggest this to my colleague, so there are no concrete plans yet.
I can say that a 'waterworld' is one of the possible choices for the next round though.
What changes are you thinking of making? Or is that on a need to know basis? :P
And awesome on waterworld =D
For example one persons 5 could be "great" while anothers could be "god-like". One persons one could be "needs work" while anothers could be "utter shit".
For me I used:
5 = Amazing
4 = Good
3 = Meh
2 = Needs work
1 = Bad
I think by making your own standard chart, judging could be smoother, and more consistent.
Even if we make a standardized chart or system, people's opinions will always differ no matter what.
That's the reason we picked 4 judges: To get different views on the same artwork and from those 4 get the average score.
Looking at round one's results, the judge's scores were consistent based on their point of view, which gave us a nice and pretty fair final score for each.