bf3 is beat, hands down

I like both :o

BF3, totally. But If I were in your shoes I'd o for Saints 3 or Skyrim~

But yes, BF3 of those two.

Battlefield.

I hear MW3 is not living up to expectations at all. Besides, Battlefield is more tactical and (at least for me) that'd more fun than just running in there and shooting.

i will say Bf3 is probably better in terms of grapichs and such (only say probably becuase i havent played the game) its also probably harder to level up im already like level 48 >.> but i like it :3 you just cant really play to late or the try hards start playing >.> and i have to say the campaign is pretty cool :3

It isn't too hard to level up :p I'm at level 42. Modern Warfare 3 is easy to get XP and level up I've heard :p

oh it is so increadible easy D: it took me six days to do what took me a yr in world at war. by monday im going to be 1st prestige most likly XD

how are you at 42 already :|

I top the chart almost every game :p

Mines help too :p

I would imagine that it would be easy. The level cap is 80, the highest of any CoD installment as far as I know, so faster level ups are almost required to keep the time it takes to max out on par with the other games.

Well Battlefield doesnt have exploding children, so I dont know if thats a factor, but I'd definitely go with Battlefield 3 anytime. :P

Only played the beta for BF3 an I own MW3 and i have no complains for the most part...Just the amount of campers.

U know Im at BF 3, thats where I get raped and stuff ;p
i will get MW3 too, but dunno when. wanna play the storys end and im curious for that survival mode :)

survival mode is AWESOME! :D

That is the first time I've seen someone talking about wanting to know the story in MW. I've never even heard fanboys talk about it. O.o

Well Im a story related guy and since I played the first and second part, i wanna know how the third ends :)

I like both as well. MW3 more so for fast paced killing, and Battlefield for slower paced, tactical teamwork

I haven't played Battlefield 3, and I rarely play shooters altogether. I have played MW3, and I actually enjoy it. The learning curve for non-players isn't too steep, and I can mange to get kills in multiplayer, even if I still get killed alot. I can't compare the two, but I do enjoy playing MW3.

I have played both and battlefield 3 has way more replay value and fun than modern warfare 3 hands down and they also have doc coming out for bf3 including 4 new maps 3 new vehicles and 10 yeah 10 new weapons

I like MW3 more than BF3 :D

BF3 is better hands down. Both have different styles of gameplay, but the best thing MW3 has going for itself is an amazing story mode.

Normally I'm kinda more of a Battlefield man, but the commercial put me way off when it said "Is it real? Or is it Battlefield 3?". And, I have to say, MW3 does not look that bad.

Bad Company 2 is better than both. DAT M9

Battlefield 3 :D
I like call of dudy, but they're trying 'too hard' to make their games different and new.
Battlefield keeps things simple and enjoyable

Haha Modern Warfare 3 is all but different and new :p it's the same as Modern Warfare 2, just more polished

They're actually... trying?

Each new installment fro the series feels more like a glorified expansion pack more than a new game :/

They're still fun to play for a month or so before they start to wear on me.

BF3 is the best. CoD is just there to recycle old stuff

BF3.

Neither. Not a fan of shooters.

Battlefield 3

I will let you know when I get both games, starting with MW3 on tuesday or so.

Battlefield, more realistic.

I like zombies. :P

I say it depends on you if you like long matches with tons of people running around go BF3 if you like small short games with smaller teams go MW3 im more of a cod person not that i dont like BF3 but BF3 just dose not get me hyped when im playing :/

BF3 looks more realistic but we are playing to have fun so i pick MW3 over BF3 and MW3 has decently good graphics much improved from mw2 actually.

Battlefield has more to offer

MW3 all the way!!

I suppose it also comes down to preference. I don't play online shooter games, but I enjoy the genre. Since BF3 is all online multiplayer, I'd probably prefer MW3 better. Everyone I've talked to has told me how amazing BF3 is, but honestly I probably would never play it.

Modern Warfare was an amazing game, MW2 was kinda meh, iffy, and Black Ops was not all that appealing to me. I'm hoping that MW3 will make the franchise worth playing again.

I've played both and for offline and local MP play, MW3 hands down, absolutely no contest. Online? BF3 is so much better. There you go.

That said, I own MW3 and sold my BF3 because I have a lousy internet connection.

BF3!! Shooting down a helicopter has never felt so good!

I wish I liked both of them, but Call of Duty is my personal favorite because it's faster than the other.

I think that they're both great games. They are very different so if someone can only get one I would advise them to find a way to try both. In the end end it all comes down to personal preference. I'd get both but I don't have access to a console or a decent PC.

Battlefield 3 easily, wont even be buying MW3 just a waste of money.

Battlefield 3. I refuse to touch Modern Warfare 3.

BF3 be the shit yo

"I honestly prefer the callenge of BF3. The realism in the game is epic, and the graphics are super sexy. And above all, the fact that I can't hear little whiny bitches scream at me during multi-player is probably BY FAR the best aspect. Although the Campaign is pretty damn awesome, as well."

Mw3 !!!

but bf3 for grapichs

for me i hate bf3 loll

I've gotta say bf3

Modern warfare is always the same shit, different story lines, but that's all. You're basicly buying the same game three times, since most people get online to play.

I'm with xbox 360 :p

Battlefield 3. I've been a fan of the franchise for as long as I can remember. I would like to play MW, but I suck at console FPS games, and you can't rent a PC game.

The whole thing about BF3 is capturing realism, and I was amazed at how well they did it. The happenings in the campaign were fully believable, and the multiplayer is huge.

I've pretty much always been a MW person, but I decided this time around to give BF3 a try. So far I'm only mediocre on the happy scale. I'm not sure if it's that my computer can't handle it (not really likely, I have a pretty good set up, though it isn't the hard core top of the line) or that I don't have a good enough internet connection but it's rather choppy and not everything loads right. it sucks to be repeatedly shot by someone that literally isn't there on your screen, but ten seconds later on the kill cam they finally show up. I also really hate the kill cam, showing the guy that shot you seems like a waste to me and defeats the purpose for snipers and the like.

It sounds like it might be more of a internet issues. These things are usually called "lag kills."

Thanks, that's what I figured it was but it still makes it kind of disheartening because this is the best internet I can get.

One thing that might help with your internet connection is actually lowering your graphic settings a bit and make sure that you're not running any other programs in the background that require internet access. And if you have wifi, make sure any other computers/laptops aren't doing the same or better yet shut them down.

I already have my graphics on the lowest possible and I'm running off a cable, thanks for the tips though.

Personally I'm going to have to say BF3. For 3 main reasons.

One: Better emotions. I know, it probably sounds kind of odd... But I mean come on, soldiers, regardless of how much training they've had, aren't some robot that can shoot and kill dozens of people in a matter of seconds and NOT feel something. With MW3, it felt well...stale. And quite frankly, unrealistic in almost every sense.

Two: Better online gaming. I'm so sick and tired of listening to heavy-breathing 25yr old guys thinking they're a demi-god because they reached w/e level cap there is in 30 hours straight all because they know how to blindly wave an automatic boom-stick at a general direction of someone else and claim one kill after another. With BF3, IMHO, you actually have to aim and work with other players to achieve your ultimate goal. There's no "Look at me! I'm standing in a single room with only one door way with my giant boom stick pointed right at it." It's more like, "Look at me! I'm standing in this corner and I'm going to fuc-*BOOOOOOM!* ...Wait...what? What happened to the wall that was just here? Wait...I'm dead!"

Three: BF3 is fresh... It's new... It's something else other than freaking Modern Warfare. I'm sorry but I gotta rant about this for a bit. I am just so fucking sick and tired of hearing all these whiny fan-boys bitch and moan and whine and complain and mewl about Modern Warfare and how it's the greatest game every and they always use MW2 as a ruler for how "epic" another shooter game is. All I ever seem to hear are these following comments, "O.M.G. It's NOTHING like MW2!"(as a negative not a positive) or "O.M.G. It's TOO MUCH like MW2." I mean...really? By no means is MW2 the first shooter of its kind, nor is it the only shooter of its kind. And I'm sorry to say people but MW2 isn't exactly all that great either nor original. And people are now starting to say the above things about Black Ops...

I'm just really glad that BF3 finally came out and I can finally enjoy a shooter that's more tactical and not just "Okaaay...time to kill a bunch of n00bz for the 30,000,000,000,000th time. 8D"

why i hate battlefeild 3 reasons
one: dying way to many times by noobs in prone
two:i feel like i acomplish nothing when i level up or unlock weapon attachments
three:this was made perposly better on the pc and the consle get down graded because of it and no 64 players no dedicated severs no stupid glichtes in multi they shoved all the bad stuff onto consles because call of duty was more consle based then pc the two companys where having a flame war call of duty won my heart for three reasons
One:the campain is a milloin times better then battlefeilds even though its forgettible
two:it feels better when i unlock things andd extra modes extra verity a cool elitle system and facebook intergrated
3:i didn't experince the stupid problemns i faced in other titles where noobs are not that much of a problemn with the right gun unlike battlefeild where it feels like forever before you get a good gun even then you get sniped constantly and shotguns and snipers are ovepowered where call of duty balnced it
so i'm glad cod came out butb glad bf3 came out as well more or less i felt eqaul with the games both fun one was more addicting though call of duty mw3 sorry thats just my honest oppion

Those are valid reasons but I'm going to have to call you out on reason #3. The battlefield franchise has always been a major PC game to begin with. Saying/using #3 as a negative against BF3 I feel is a little uncalled for. Imagine if you will that Gears 2 (or 3) came out on both the 360 and the PS3, and while both games looked the same graphics wise on both consoles, say the 360 users got a free map pack DLC or dedicated online servers where the PS3 users got no kind of incentive. Why would they do this? Well it might be simply because the Gears franchise started out on the 360 and it's basically a "reward" for those loyal 360 users.

And glitches wise, each console is going to have it's own set of different glitches no matter what game it is.

As for graphics, well any game that comes out on the PS3 and 360 and PC, will generally look better on the PC simply because PC's are able to handle better graphics because they can be upgraded.

Also with the dedicated servers, IMHO one reason why the PC version of BF3 got dedicated servers is mainly do to hackers. Even when games are set up on Steam's servers, hackers can easily slip in and ruin a multiplayer game for everyone where as with consoles, it's much, much harder to hack, next to impossible. That being said though, I'm not sure why they decided to have the major difference in online players numbers. My best bet would be that most PC users would have rigs that could handle that amount of information/strain on their graphics cards with the added players than consoles would be able to because regardless of the difference in graphics, for consoles this is quite a large step-up graphics wise.

wow i'm going to call you out on graphics and how many times you said it discusted me on how the moder generation only cares about the fucking graphics not how fun it is or how the rewards systemm feels or how passed it is to me bf3 is a slow passed game for people who don't like fast games or are total graphic whores thought some might not be thats mostlikly the case the reason i hate battlefeild aslo is your unable to mute anyoning as hell gamers who thinks its funny to make revolting noises

Did I ever say that graphics are a deal breaker for me and video games? No. I still have a PS2 and several games for it because I don't care about the graphics, only the game play value such as Freedom Fighters, Spartan Total Warrior, etc. And the same is said for this generation of games. I too have a PS3. Do I have BF3 for the PS3? No. Is it because of graphics? Not really, no. It's money. BF3 for the PS3 is $60 where as with the PC it's $50. Do I have a rig that can play it on full settings? Yeah if I wanted to blow up my PC in 2 hours. Do I think the graphics are better on the PC than on the console? Well yeah, duh. But for me graphics don't really play a final role in whether or not I should get a game.

For me BF3 has a realistic story line and even though the campaign story itself doesn't have much replay value, the game play of it does more so than MW3 because, as the makers of MoH: Airborne said, most FPS games are like roller coasters. Everyone is going to experience the same thing.

BF3 is much more an open world experience than MW3 is as well as several other FPS games. This has been their trade mark. This has what made them so fiercely popular when BF2 came out, as well as BF: Bad Company 1&2 as well as having semi-destructible environments. This being said, yes their maps are larger and yes things go at a noticeable slower pace than MW3 where the maps are much more defined or what I like to call, "Open Arena."

As for your voice issues, if I'm not mistaken I think you can independently control the volume of voice chatter in the options menu. I should remind you though that the issue of annoying users using voice chat to do annoying things isn't restricted just to this one game. It happens in pretty much all games.

All of this being said though. I *PERSONALLY* like BF3 over MW3. If you like MW3 over BF3 then that's your preference and I'm not here to change that. I'm just simply stating a few facts and a few of my own opinions. There's no need to get hot headed over this.

thought i have to say bf3 campaign is a huge chilche i mean i heard nucealer bomb way to many times in fps otherwise i have no problemns with the minor glichtes in campaign

I'm going with both games. Battlefield is really nice to play. The destroyable walls and all this things are very cool and it's over all pretty realistic.
But i also bought MW3 cause i want to know how the story ends after i played the previous 2 Games of Modern Warfare. And yeah, i'm really curious about the Survival Mode in it.

Hard to compare the two as they are VERY different in a lot of different ways.

In Battlefield 3 its VERY team oriented. Though you can be a baller and be on top of your team in kills, you can still lose VERY badly. You also might go 15 - 30 seconds depending on the map without seeing an enemy.

Modern Warfare 3 is pretty much every man for himself. You normally wont go 10 seconds without running into the enemy. Also Xbox Live bro's like to shit talk about their "skill" and base every ones "coolness" off how many kills they get. Plus the shit talking really is top notch.

I have both and love both for different reasons. They play VERY different. As many people have said, BF3 plays a lot slower than MW3.

MW3 is my "I just wanna kill shit quickly and talk shit online about how I had sex with some other players mom last night" game.

BF3 is my "I still wanna kill shit... I just wanna be more stealthy and my kills have to be earned." game.

I feel like i'm a chelsea fan in an Manchester united bar

Battlefield... MW3 is for stupid people. Don´t get it.
Actually, get skyrim instead.

mw3 because bf3 is for stupid people who like slow pased games put i'm viva pinyata 3 all the way across the skyrim

Battlefield 3 all the way.

All of those saying that MW3 is faster paced, sometimes that's true. Battlefield 3 on TDM and the map Grand Bazaar can be fast paced as well. I've been a battlefield fan since Battlefield 2, and prior to playing that I played the original Modern Warfare, and thought that was the best game ever, until I played Bad Company 2.

Another thing is: VEHICLES!!! Holy shit, this makes the game much better because who doesn't want to fly a jet? YOu got Tanks, LAVs, APCs, Jeeps, Jets, and Helicopters running around the place. You've also got an AA Turret at each main base on conquest.

Camping a building is a bad idea! The walls can be blown out AND the building can come down. Take that CoD campers.

Better Scopes/Sights/Attachments for your weapons. You can put a flashlight on and then go blind your enemy in close quarters, or put a laser module on and blind people at a distance. The IRNV (Thermal) Scope actually WORKS. YOu don't see everything in nearly the same color BARELY being able to see anything (MW2)

SUPPRESSIVE FIRE! This is one of the big ones. If you are behind cover and getting shot at, your vision blurs making it harder to see and aim. I'm sick of people in CoD getting shot at and then killing me with a single shot. The fuck?

KNIFE KILLS: These are redone to make it harder because in real life, you can just slash someone across their body armor and kill them, that vest is designed to take a bullet. You now actually ahve to come up behind someone to get a knife kill. Which also brings me to this: I'm sick of someone knifing me from TEN FUCKING FEET AWAY, and getting a kill, or even when I'm out of their FoV. In CoD you also can't do anything when someone starts the "knifing animation". You're dead and nothing you can do about it, unless you had a grenade in your hand.

Grenade kills are a shit ton harder to get because it is based on a REAL LIFE explosion using the SAME type of ammunition, not a stick of dynamite. There is also no such thing as a "n00b tube", you have to be able to aim. to get a kill.

Weapon Sounds: I love to hear a weapon sound that is either TRUE to the weapon's sound, or comes damn enar close. It sound like the guns in CoD were made using a synthesizer with heavy bass. It sounds like utter shit.

Realistic movement is so much fun. I hate how you have to wait until you get to a barrier to press a button JUST to jump over the barrier. In BF3 you can jump a bit before the barrier if you're sprinting and you'll be over that barrier. You can dive a LOT better and getting a kill while getting up from prone is hard to do.

Reviving teammates is a ton of fun :3

Multiplayer: It's fun as hell and SERVER BASED!!!! CoD games are on the Live network (totally shit) and PLAYER HOSTED. Which means if the host has shitty internet, you're fucked. If your host is on the other side of the earth, you're probably fucked.

Storyline: It's pretty brutal.

NOW

I won't completely hate on Modern Warfare BECAUSE the story is actually good for a multiplayer-focused game. I won't buy CoD games anymore but I wouldn't mind playing the story to see what's going on and how it pans out.

near*

None.

But online-wise, BF3

For a sure fact Battlefield 3 is gonna win this contest, the reason is because of how much in reality and comparison it is in how weapons work for real life, call of duty has never done any of this crap, they say how much more hard work they are doing to making it better and they still show no progress at all, I played all the campaign in both. BF3 has it for sure, multiplayer wise and campaign, for BF3 we have weapons and VEHICLES...COD doesnt they only have shooting and eliminating the enemy, the same old boring shit again and again. Call of Duty did good when they released the 2nd MW, but a release on a third one is just the part where they fucked themselves over, it goes to show how much they are struggling to keep the game in popularity, BF3 picked up that popularity without trying and its got 80 game nominations for the VGAs, so for a definate fact they are winning this shit hands down.

... I'm not one for shooters, but BF3 looks to be something I'd play if I was. MW3 looks old and not in a good way.
Still, I wish RPGs had the kind of love here that shooters do. Sadly, all the RPG love is hogged by Japan (South Korea for MMORPGs), while America is lucky for a bone thrown once a year.

I play MW3 on xbox 360, not played battlefield so can't comment xD
But my boyfriend plays BF3 on the PC, it was his birthday present from me.

So we both shoot noobs and enjoy it :P

Even though I haven't really played a whole lot of BF3, it gives such a greater feeling of accomplishment when you beat the enemy team, there really is a sense of teamwork with your squad when trying to do something, but it's not like you can do everything on your own or even with just your squad, everyone needs to really pull together to beat the enemy team. With MW3, at least in my opinion, that feelings of teamwork isn't really cemented as well, I normally just wind up feeling like no one has my back and I'm really just on my own, then again I don't always get a group of friends together to play with. XD

But honestly I think both games are great and fun to play, but I enjoy BF3 a bit more just cause of the sense of accomplishment and teamwork you get from your squad.