I have a 1024x768 screen, and get 3 rows of 4 thumbnails. I used to get 3 and a half rows of 5. So, a little less fit on my screen now. On the other hand, I can now actually see them. The older smaller ones were always too hard for me to see. So, I am very happy with the change. Being able to see 12 at a time is way better than not being able to see 15 at a time. :)

Ideally, they'd make it an option to choose either small or large, but I suppose that would require twice the storage space, as they'd need to keep both in their cache.

Or for smaller thumbnails just set height="n%" width="n%" in the html and feed it different values of n for different sizes (100 for 200x200px, 75 for 150x150px, 50 for 100x100px, 150 for 300x300px, etc.), and just default to 100 unless the user changes it.

Oh, just found out, seems there's actually a bunch of sizes being generated...

100x100
120x120
150x150
200x200
300x300

...but it's defaulting to 200x200 with no option to switch it.

(Maybe I can get someone to write a greasemonkey script to fix that...? If you look at the code, apparently it's using 200 in the thumbnail name to specify 200x200, so just making the script change that to 120 should mostly fix it I guess?)

Seems like that should work, so long as no other page formatting is dependent on the thumbnail size remaining at default. It would still be nice to see an option added to our account settings, That way, everyone could simply select from one of the five or six existing sizes, with no need to run any extra scripts. I like the larger thumbs, but if I move over to my older system that has an 800x600 display, I'd definitely want to set a smaller size in that case, perhaps 120x120. If I bought a new monitor with 2560x1440 resolution, I'd probably set my thumbs to 300x300. With my current 1024x768 screen 200x200 or 150x150 seem best for me. There are so many different display devices, that no one size is best for all.