FA+
Shop
Worried about TOS and site rules....
13 years ago
Due to recent news of fursuits being banned for being "suggestive" I'm really very worried about what I can and can't post here.
I do everything in my power to make the images as clean as possible. Lets face it, latex is tight!
But, I'll air brush out any bumps or buldges to make them clean and now i'm worried about even posing in a fashion that maybe considered "to adult".
I quoted sometime ago on one of my images.
"Some peoples fursonas are not furry or scaly. Some peoples fursonas are made of rubber. I don't see why those furs should be prosecuted for being made out of something different."
Whilst latex may not be everyone's cup of tea, it is what it is. No different to those into herms and scat.
To each there own.
You can't accept one fetish and look down on another. (Granted there are a few obvious exceptions to that rule)
Now, my worry comes from not only weird and wonderful latex costumes and poses.
But I had planned on taking photos of an inflatable rubber diaper we made for a client. (Like the ones posted here http://www.furaffinity.net/view/7072501/, but white with pink frills)
Because I was worried about that images being just the costume piece itself over a zentai. I thought i'd make the new image more furry by wearing a fursuit under the inflatable pants.
(not my thing, but I thought it would be more relevant to the site and those into it would get a kick out of it.)
The TOS clearly states the following.
Clothing - All models featured in photography must be appropriately dressed, wearing both top and bottom garments. Underwear, bras or diapers are not considered acceptable articles of clothing. Clothing designed for explicit or implicit sexual themes are prohibited. Costumes, props, masks, jewellery and other worn items are permitted provided they meet the site's General rating (are work safe, rated for all users/ages).
So, does that mean the image wouldn't be ok because it isn't considered appropriately dressed?
I just wanted to make the piece seem more furry and relevant to the site, but being less furry and over generic purple body is actually more acceptable?
I really am trying to follow all the rules, I do love this site and I don't want to step on anyone's toes. I'd hate to get suspended or an image remove for not being ok.
So do I or Do i not upload fursuits using some of Squeak Latex's gear?
I do everything in my power to make the images as clean as possible. Lets face it, latex is tight!
But, I'll air brush out any bumps or buldges to make them clean and now i'm worried about even posing in a fashion that maybe considered "to adult".
I quoted sometime ago on one of my images.
"Some peoples fursonas are not furry or scaly. Some peoples fursonas are made of rubber. I don't see why those furs should be prosecuted for being made out of something different."
Whilst latex may not be everyone's cup of tea, it is what it is. No different to those into herms and scat.
To each there own.
You can't accept one fetish and look down on another. (Granted there are a few obvious exceptions to that rule)
Now, my worry comes from not only weird and wonderful latex costumes and poses.
But I had planned on taking photos of an inflatable rubber diaper we made for a client. (Like the ones posted here http://www.furaffinity.net/view/7072501/, but white with pink frills)
Because I was worried about that images being just the costume piece itself over a zentai. I thought i'd make the new image more furry by wearing a fursuit under the inflatable pants.
(not my thing, but I thought it would be more relevant to the site and those into it would get a kick out of it.)
The TOS clearly states the following.
Clothing - All models featured in photography must be appropriately dressed, wearing both top and bottom garments. Underwear, bras or diapers are not considered acceptable articles of clothing. Clothing designed for explicit or implicit sexual themes are prohibited. Costumes, props, masks, jewellery and other worn items are permitted provided they meet the site's General rating (are work safe, rated for all users/ages).
So, does that mean the image wouldn't be ok because it isn't considered appropriately dressed?
I just wanted to make the piece seem more furry and relevant to the site, but being less furry and over generic purple body is actually more acceptable?
I really am trying to follow all the rules, I do love this site and I don't want to step on anyone's toes. I'd hate to get suspended or an image remove for not being ok.
So do I or Do i not upload fursuits using some of Squeak Latex's gear?
In terms of content ratings, I don't see why an image that is set as non-G could justifiably be pulled for not being G. Granted that doesn't mean an opinionated mod (if any exist here) won't pull it, but It seems reasonable.
If absolute WORST comes to worst, you could always just post waste-up pics on your non-squeak account and link us to the corresponding page on the business site. That way you could still keep us updated. :)
Basically, if it's an admin's fetish or the fetish of a site sponsor, it'll be pretty much guaranteed to be allowed/tolerated. Favouritism is rampant...