Week #5 - FurAffinity's Moderator/Admin's Prob. Management
13 years ago
General
Don't Hate It, Debate It!
Our fifth week's topic will be on:
FurAffinity's Moderator/Admins Quality of Problem management How would you rate the Mods and Admins on this site? Do you get your problems dealt with quickly or is there a long wait? Do you believe that theres a delay on TT's because of personal issues or they are getting so many submitted? Are the mods, in your opinion, slacking off or working as hard as they can? Do they make unfair rules/changes to the site? Is it their right as a privately owned website to do what they please or should they be doing what the majority of the community demands because this site is surviving on donations? Do they mods and Admins involve their feelings too much or too little? I want a clean debate everyone. i know this can be a touchy subject. Last time, we didnt have much of debate so if someone where to humor me and take an opposite stance on someones opinion and start a proper debate that would be lovely. Follow the rules, tho.
IM GONNA SAY THIS RIGHT NOW: I DO NOT WANT ANY CALL OUTS HERE. PLEASE DO NOT USE ANY MODERATORS OR ADMINISTRATORS USERNAMES ON THIS JOURNAL. THANK YOU AND PLEASE ENJOY THIS DEBATE.
--
Here are some related web/news articles to folks who want to educate themselves on the subject:
((Can not really pin point any news articles on this but please feel free to note me with something or things written by folks on here about this subject))
--
As moderator of this page, ill will not be voicing my opinion on this topic. i will be taking the neutral grounds.
once again as a reminder:
1) NO Name Calling
2) NO Personal Attacks
3) NO Trolling
4) NO Arguments/Starting Arguments with no probable reasoning
5) Keep to the topic at hand
6) Cite your reasoning
7) Make sure you write out your opinion properly so all of us can read it with ease
8) and most importantly: HAVE FUN!
feel free to link this to anyone whom you think would be interested in this topic
debate will end next Friday. feel free to keep discussing it after then but remember: dont beat a dead horse.
this journal will be archived at a later date.
I will be watching a few groups each week that are related to the topic at hand. If anyone is interested, please check the "Is Watching" list.
Now please proceed with the debate!! ~
A DEBATE CAN NOT BE STARTED IF YOU DON'T LET SOMEONE ELSE KNOW VIA A REPLY WHAT YOUR OPINION IS
FurAffinity's Moderator/Admins Quality of Problem management How would you rate the Mods and Admins on this site? Do you get your problems dealt with quickly or is there a long wait? Do you believe that theres a delay on TT's because of personal issues or they are getting so many submitted? Are the mods, in your opinion, slacking off or working as hard as they can? Do they make unfair rules/changes to the site? Is it their right as a privately owned website to do what they please or should they be doing what the majority of the community demands because this site is surviving on donations? Do they mods and Admins involve their feelings too much or too little? I want a clean debate everyone. i know this can be a touchy subject. Last time, we didnt have much of debate so if someone where to humor me and take an opposite stance on someones opinion and start a proper debate that would be lovely. Follow the rules, tho.
IM GONNA SAY THIS RIGHT NOW: I DO NOT WANT ANY CALL OUTS HERE. PLEASE DO NOT USE ANY MODERATORS OR ADMINISTRATORS USERNAMES ON THIS JOURNAL. THANK YOU AND PLEASE ENJOY THIS DEBATE.
--
Here are some related web/news articles to folks who want to educate themselves on the subject:
((Can not really pin point any news articles on this but please feel free to note me with something or things written by folks on here about this subject))
--
As moderator of this page, ill will not be voicing my opinion on this topic. i will be taking the neutral grounds.
once again as a reminder:
1) NO Name Calling
2) NO Personal Attacks
3) NO Trolling
4) NO Arguments/Starting Arguments with no probable reasoning
5) Keep to the topic at hand
6) Cite your reasoning
7) Make sure you write out your opinion properly so all of us can read it with ease
8) and most importantly: HAVE FUN!
feel free to link this to anyone whom you think would be interested in this topic
debate will end next Friday. feel free to keep discussing it after then but remember: dont beat a dead horse.
this journal will be archived at a later date.
I will be watching a few groups each week that are related to the topic at hand. If anyone is interested, please check the "Is Watching" list.
Now please proceed with the debate!! ~
A DEBATE CAN NOT BE STARTED IF YOU DON'T LET SOMEONE ELSE KNOW VIA A REPLY WHAT YOUR OPINION IS
FA+

The admins here do what they can but I feel there is no consistency among them. For example, I can report cub porn to one admin and they will say. It's not cub they say so in the desc. Yet another admin will say, Its been removed and the artist has been warned.
I feel that the first users to be looked at to become admins or mods should be VETERAN users. The admins keep this site going for free its not like they gain from it so I feel that they get to much flack sometimes.
I think this site is running -ok- but I KNOW it could be much better. I mean unlike most sites, the admins here actually TELL US about upcoming updates and possible changes. Not many sites do that, instead they just do it and piss off alot more people that way.
Personally though I think that the admins need to focus LESS on the LOOK of the website and focus MORE ont he MECHANICS of this website. I mean so what it looks pretty? If it runs like crap then its not going to be worth the gamble to try it out.
I feel liek the user's opinions are not take seriously UNLESS its the opinions the admins share in common with them. For example.
Lots of users were against the bigger thumbnails, but there was alot that likes them. Since the admins like them its almost like we were being told to stfo or gtfo if we said we don't like the idea. I hate the thumbnails so I'm glad they let us choose the size however, that COULD have been avoided if they let us have that option int he first place.
So for a TL;DR version
FA is a good website and has a simple design which is good. The admins are a lil sketchy in some areas, but not to bad, needs improvement. Upgrades to the sites performance should be #1 priority, not the layout of the site in order to make it look pretty. I feel the admins need to keep a NEUTRAL attitude when dealing with YAY'S and NAY'S.
Those are my 2 cents.
Take nothing here personal as when a person is speaking about mods/admins they refer to them as a whole or section. Not one individual person. View this as a way to see how people actually feel about the moderator community. Just as the Furry Fandom has a bad rap so do you mods. Some things are stigmas and hypothetical scenarios while others might be facts. Not that im saying there are/arent things wrong with the mods here but no one is perfect and one bad apple can ruin a bunch.
Nothing specific, just stating an opinion. No facts but several wild assertations. Zero context.
Sure, the administration isn't perfect. We do try, and strive, and sometimes we mess up a few things. But "The mods have an extremely obvious bias to them. They tend to be hypocrites, banning some people who do a minor offense and do nothing to someone who is obviously breaking rules."
There's no context, no explaning what the 'bias' is. This is a good example of most of non-specific-issue complaints I see aboutt he administration, and most of the ones about a specific issue? It comes down to they disagree with the administration, THEREFORE the administration is wrong/evil/biased. I recently had an issue with Glitch Art furs - They wanted a second opinion on if their work was acceptable by the AUP or not. I went through many clauses of the AUP to support the arguement that it is, indeed, not - and that while I personally see a few *specific* cases where it could be okay, that isn't the opinion of the administration as a whole, just mine - and that until stated otherwise, they shouldn't post any glitch art."
The user then posted a journal saying "Hey guys it's okay if you do x, y, or z!" with x y and z being the examples/situations I said I personally thought might be okay. I then took down the journal with the notice of "Please do not elaborate or expand on FA's rules without explicit permission from the administration."
I got yelled at for curtailing 'free speech'.
*shakes his head*
That's just one example, and I can't go into too many others because of Admin/User Confidentiality. But that is the trend - the admins are evil and biased because they don't agree with me. The inverse is true - the admins are fair and just and awesome because they agree with me.
If you can point out, kindly, when someone is making a logical fallacy then with all do respect please point this out to them.
Even though they may or may not be making a good argument they are still stating their opinions and thats what this is all about. Please copy-paste this to them! you make some good arguments and use great examples. take this opportunity to defend yourself against all negative stereo types here.
- No reasoning why this debate would be interesting.
- Using an interjection at the end which could suggest that you don't take this debate serious at all.
hes aight :D
However...I could be wrong, but it seems they are a bit lacking in the technology department. I mean, just look at this site. Technologically, it's stuck in 1997. Some updates would be nice.
Evidence of this is recently in the past monthes they have been interactive in improving the site. The beta site was running improvements that the admins could achieve in a short time that the community asked for specifically. I recall when i first came to this site two years ago. There were Denial of Service attacks every week and the site was hacked at least once a month. That hasn't happened for a long while. One can't say the trolls have moved on, because furries are always hated by a growing number of people. Obviously, there aren't as many holes in the system as dissenters like to claim.
The administration has also snipped members that haven't done their job. Members have applied and been denied. When looking for another admin, they look for experience. There is a standard to upkeep.
From this, evidence points to the administration attempting their job with a passion. In many cases they succeed without approval. There is also thought put into who becomes a part of the administration. Can we ask anymore from them?
Now, I do admit that we watch some accounts more than others, but that is reserved for people who tend to be habitual offenders of the same violation. Some see this as us picking on them, but it is only reasonable when viewed as an overall issue. We simply want to ensure that as many accounts as possible stay within the aup, and if there are accounts which stray outside the a up often, we try to keep an eye on them to help them maintain policy without gathering too many simultaneous corrective actions.