What is it to be a furry?
13 years ago
Welcome to Bo-san's Journal! =D Some people tell me I'm a furry, but I say I'm not technically a furry because I don't feel like I follow a furry philosophy or a furry lifestyle. But people then they tell me that drawing anthro characters and having a FA gallery makes me a furry.
Well, then, what is it to be a furry exactly? Maybe I'm a furry and I don't know.
Let's open a discussion about it. =3
Well, then, what is it to be a furry exactly? Maybe I'm a furry and I don't know.
Let's open a discussion about it. =3
FA+

So yes, since you are drawing anthro characters, I assume you like them/have an interest in them, thus making you a furry.
But I would say yes, that would -generally- make you a furry, at least if you like Bowser and Swat Kats specifically because they are animal characters.
At least that is my personal view.
What furry is at it's base is 'an interest in anthropomorphic animals'. Individuals can build on that to suit their tastes and styles or what have you. Some may get involved in a specific fandom in this fandom/next to this fandom like MLP, but it's not a requirement. The base requirement is that interest and probably not minding the craziness of the fandom at times. A fursona can be a staple of being a furry, but is not an official requirement because sometimes...people just don't know what fits them and don't want to be one of those people who jumps from 'sona to 'sona.
There are people with that interest who try to wedge themselves away from the fandom because they can't stand how it can be sometimes, or don't want to be wrapped up with the negative stereotypes. And that's fine, to not want a label. But sometimes it's easier to just say 'at the base, yes, I am', and leave it at that.
Even with that said, it's a minor thing in the grand scheme of life.
If you call yourself gay, you don't have to emerge on the case (ie. show off or tell the world or ONLY have a gay group of friends).
I respect your point of view though. Each to their own! So do you believe you're a furry? Technically not. So without the technicalities you are not, correct? xD
What to think? 'o'
Just like the cake..
You will always define yerself! an others will define ya by what they feel is the most suitable catagory their minds can accept.
*guruwolf will now return ta meditatin'* ;)
I'm not sure myself and it gets hard to explain to my family and "normal" friends what is a furry and what is being a furry. I just knew that I liked more the animal/furry characters more in each media I liked. I found about the furry community. Found some artwork and stories I loved, made friends, and here I am. :)
Nothing at all
You don't have to label yourself as a furry just cause "someone says so" its label that's all it is. But it starts out small and then grows to be a part of who u are in ur everyday life style.
I don't consider myself a furry either, it's just something I do to improve my art, along with liking anthros and plushies. u3u
Can't say I'd ever involve myself in the furry fandom any other way aside from drawing them or getting my own fursuit based on cosplay interests. o~o;
I think what MAKES someone a furry, is whether they actually classify themselves as one on their own. :/
"someone that likes anthropomorphic or human like animals"
And that's usually about all I need to say. :v
I have always been interested in mythic beings anthropomorphic or not i found them having lives, Sex, stories and the like was only natural that this made me a "furry" mainly due to the fact i adore werewolves and had given many mack stories and would view them no different as any fictional human.
To me that is a furry if you see anthropomorphic beings as just as normal as another fictional yet none the less human charter you are furry, if you think of werewolves and wookies along side human as a race rather than a species you are a furry to me.
A furry fan (or "furry" for short) is a person who likes anthropomorphic animals. You don't have to like any specific one and are free to dislike certain characters. Everyone has preferences, it doesn't really matter.
Being a furry is having an animal[or anthromorphic] persona that you and other such people identify with. Its such a vague term that it encompasses a lot of people in it, and they themselves choose to exclude themselves. the remainder out of that vague definition is a furry.
Its no deeper, than what makes a person who likes anime an otaku, and a person who likes star trek a trekkie.
however, I kind of think of it as going down the rabbit hole- pun not intended- the further down you get the more other people and yourself identify you as such.
it's weird like that. there are only the conditions by which you set, I think. XD but I have no idea.
The fandom DOES NOT have a ideological or moral premise. Seriously, there have been multiple serious attempts to give this fandom a direction that only ended in epic failure. Such as the Burned Fur fail to get rid of all the porn and perverts that ended in such colossal disaster, it gave the fandom the impetus to galvanize its hedonism FOREVER. Even Anonymous's attempts to destroy furry fandom were in vain. Anonymous, the final boss of the Internet, could eviscerate the multi-billion corporation of Scientology but couldn't put much of a dent in furry fandom. Anonymous made the mistake of believing furries were WORTH fighting against and they paid the price for their foolishness!
A LONG LONG LONG time ago, when the Internet was a young thing, furry fandom was different. The Internet used to be a difficult thing to get into: and only tech savvy nerds could find, and then, find amusement in hunting down all the little fragments of furry art spread out on individual artists' websites. As long long ago, each furry artist had to make their own webpage. Or share over USENET (even more obscure).
For better or for worse, it took a very specific type of nerd to put up with that much inefficiency and user-unfriendliness of the old fandom. It was a blessing as well as a curse because the annoying-ness and tedium of checking every furry artists' website every week for updates kept the riff-raff out as well as making the fandom extremely cliquish, insular, and self-protective. Furries, who were predominantly tech savvy back then, due to the cumbersome old Internet, found more in common with each other than today's distilled and mass-marketed fandom.
Contrary to what others may say, furry fandom is not what you make it. It's what everyone makes it. That's why people shouldn't take it so seriously anymore. When you mix every color together, you get the black murky waters of indecisiveness and the undefined and the formless. Again, copy-pasted for emphasis, the fandom DOES NOT have a ideological or moral premise.
Some foolish people say it should have an ideal or some goal, but to do that, you have to wrest control of the fandom away from all the nerds to who depend on furry fandom not meaning anything so that they can masturbate to whatever dark fantasies they want to without being guilt-ed that they're spooging all over anything that means anything (I could mention humanity's piss-poor treatment of its own sexuality and false hostile polarization between its sexuality and self-actualization, but that's a never-ending encyclopedia that can never be fully addressed). Read: the fandom is a small eddie just off the coast of the mainstream that people from that mainstream swirl around in for a brief time before heading back out into the morass, yet happens to still exhibit the properties of profound resistance to being defined. Furry fandom has accomplished, to a higher degree than any other subculture I've encountered, of being a custard that refuses to be nailed to the wall.
Furry fandom's rocket fuel is apathy and beer. Enjoy!
There's no definite measurement of when a person crosses over from non-furry to furry, although I'm pretty sure each person has their own idea of what makes a furry, furry. You may think you're not a furry, but according to another person's measurement, you might already fall into that label.
people that draw furry/kemono and have an account on fa/sofurry (or whatever) are, indeed furries,
it doesn't mean that you need to act like a dog (you do, I know) most people at this site acts like their animal choose.
some others are:
cute
kind
jerks
pervs
mad
nasty
sick
cherish
like to be under the spot light
hate to be under the spot light
etc etc in no particular order
1) has a natural positive disposition towards animals
2) sees the animal world as being superior/simpler to the current human world/society they live in, and
3) expresses that view in artistic ways to a greater or lesser degree through drawing, writing, music, hobby crafts, and is
4) generally a non-common non-conformist individual who fluctuates between being “I’d rather be alone” and a party animal who flits from one group activity to another whether the group is ten people or just a close friend.
If you enjoy creating the type of conceptual art used for video games that doesn't mean you have to be a gamer or even like video-games. You don't have to be a geographer to appreciate paintings of landscapes and natural formations. I view furry the same way. If it's something you enjoy that's fine--some people are really into it and that's cool too-- but theres no law that says you have to take it with you when you log off the site if you don't want to.
but since I get into FA and Furry, my human drawing skill is going better, and I learn many poses too...
so maybe I kinda like you, a Furry Artist, but not totally 100% draw furry...
My fiend says that its anyone who likes, or draws furry... but thats too large of a range I think.
For me I draw furries, i have a fur character... and yet I STILL dont feel like a furry.
I guess what makes you furry is if you feel furry? Haha maybe?
I don't have a serious answer at the moment. Groggy.
There has been people who only draw furries but they don't say that they're furries. Like, they only like drawing them, but they are not furries in their living. People who draws wolves, but doesn't perform nor act like one, I guess.
I don't know. Being interested in furries does not always make you a furry. Still, it's really difficult to not assume that you are a furry when you have a gallery full of furry drawings.
It depends on the level of how much interested in furries you are, I guess. If you say "you like werewolves = you are a furry", then... many would be, I don't know.
It's really a wide topic in a matter of "interest".
Being a furry to me is seeing that some part of yourself relates to an animal aspect.
For example I'm a werewolf so I see myself as loyal but I also see myself needing to have a pack or friends.
I also want to be strong and powerful.
I think really if you think your a furry well then your a furry but if not well your not .w.
But with a world of open sexuality, people have started connecting dots they weren't afraid of connecting before. The real question is: When talking about furry, are we talking about a fetish - or what most people who use the term offensively really imply: a disorder?
As with any form of fandom, there are different levels of interest ranging from mild curiosity to extreme devotion. You could own a 'fur suit' and never have viewed any anthropomorphic pornography in your life, but people are still going to think your sexual interest is the difference between you and the people wearing suits in Disneyland for the kids. The extremes are what has set the definition and now people are just trying to draw a line.
As for me, my opinion is that if the term furry is meant to be understood as a fetish, you should weight it against a real fetishism. I happen to have a real fetishism and it might be a form of disorder, but I have never once felt the same way about anthropomorphism. To me, anthropomorphism it is merely a hobby and a fantasy; therefore, I am not a furry.
When I created a blog based on furry artwork, I specifically avoided using the word furry. The word is has just been diluted in the same way as other overused words, such as "awesome". It's just unclear what it really means, and I just use the word "anthropomorphism" instead. While it's a long word it doesn't leave any confusion, such as "I'm an anthropomorphic hobby artist". No unnecessary or unclear implications, it's loud and clear.
Like any fandom, you don't have to identify as a member to be a member, and no one should get upset if you deny being a member. It's all for fun.
I think that the feeling many people get about it being their true self actually comes from the modern tendency to confuse the things that you like with who you are as a person. Fandoms can have the same effect that cliques do in high school. . .people begin to believe that the things they enjoy (playing football for instance) are what makes them a unique person and these feelings are amplified (ironically) by the more people just like them they surround themselves with. Just my two cents.