yeaaaaah, I can read just fine, thanks. My sentence is still valid. You can be grossed by something specific, but shouting that out loud is just like attacking the people who like it. And since she is a furry who has furry porn on their fav artwork list, you can say that's at least a little hypocrit. So please, unless you're not vegan, don't complain about people eating meat.
You are the only one promoting this issue though most of the time MLP porn isn't even Anthro, it's feral. Let's go down morality lane and see where bestiality is OKAY? It's not. It's a sick practice that some people, which I do not condone in anyway who VIEW the porn, have a liking to. even if I don't condone the people, it is not something you throw around.
Granted you could bring up the proved point that furry porn, anthropomorphic animal porn, can be considered bestiality as well. Just so we are clear on the differences of that clarification, Furries are on TWO legs as the ponies are on FOUR in almost all the porn shots. I don't like how MLP has become a plague on the internet, though I like the OLD GENERATIONS of MLP. Those are the OLD GENERATION, not the regurgitated anime things you see now.
So no, your comment was un-needed and is still extremely invalid since she wasn't directly attacking anyone, just voicing her OPINION. I guess when you voice opinions here on FA, you OBIVIOUSLY are ATTACKING someone. x:
Stop being Butthurt and move on. That's the MATURE thing to do.
First of, sorry about my English level, it may not be good enough to have a nice and civilized argument.
Yes, she posted her opinion. On a PUBLIC FORUM. Her journal has a comment session for some reason. As I said, you can be grossed out by ANYTHING, from beans to homosexuals, from European Union's Central Bank policies towards the credit crisis to pedophiles. Your moral is different from mine and mine is different from my best friend's. That's wonderful. I'm just saying, if you post a Journal for all your watchers to read and comment, you may misplease someone. I'm not butthurt by her comentary, god, no, my life on the interwebs would be pathetic if I got myself into a fight with everyone who hates or dislikes stuff I like. Everyone have it's own taste as much as everyone have theirs own morals.
On the other hand, the term "anthropomorphic" doesn't refers just to the human body's anatomy. A door can be, in fiction (literature, cinema, cartoons...), anthropomorfic just from gaining the ability to talk. Bambi is a good example. Bambi is an anthropomorfic creature, even though his body's anathomy is the same as real deer because of the his eyes, the way his mouth moves, in sumum, stuff bambi does that just human beings do. That's used on art since it's creation to enrich the instantaneous relation between spactator and artpiece. Animals don't express emotions as strongly as we do. Animals don't have an ego so well built as humans egocentrically do. MLP characters, on the other hand, they do have all that, even though their anathomy don't assemble to human's anatomy. That's what most furry artists do as well! But they make the other way: they put animal characteristics to improve the human's sex appeal instead of putting human sexual connotations on an animal's anathomy.
TL/DR: It's NOT bestiality. Saying it is you're validating furry haters who call us all zoophiles =)
It's fine. Your English is actually more articulate than most people that have it for a first language, unfortunately.
Also, I am validating nothing nor do I care at this point.
This argument is going off into a tangent that it shouldn't.
All I am saying is that she was staying an opinion about a genre of porn, not porn as a whole.
There is a difference.
I personally do not like anything porn related when dealing with a Children's Television show....so I am with her at this point.
This doesn't mean I hate porn.
Hell I even draw it myself sometimes when I feel up to it.
Well to be honest i'm a big bothered by it as well, i mean i know people would probably disagree with me, but isn't that a form of bestiality? Most of it isn't even anthro in any way. And I thought this was a kids show lol.
Yeah, I'm not too crazy about the porn (or clop, as they call it) simply because of the fact that it is a kids show and something I watch to keep me happy. I do fave some of the work here though, because some people who draw it have a style or perspective that is interesting to me.
I don't mind the more anthro-nized MLP porn.. but when they draw them exact to the show on four hooves.. its disgusting I guess. Also some guy.. makes plushie MLP characters.. with a vagina.. now thats just fucking wrong.
She said MLP porn, just an FYI. x:
Even a 3 year old could read that one sentence correctly.
Granted you could bring up the proved point that furry porn, anthropomorphic animal porn, can be considered bestiality as well. Just so we are clear on the differences of that clarification, Furries are on TWO legs as the ponies are on FOUR in almost all the porn shots. I don't like how MLP has become a plague on the internet, though I like the OLD GENERATIONS of MLP. Those are the OLD GENERATION, not the regurgitated anime things you see now.
So no, your comment was un-needed and is still extremely invalid since she wasn't directly attacking anyone, just voicing her OPINION. I guess when you voice opinions here on FA, you OBIVIOUSLY are ATTACKING someone. x:
Stop being Butthurt and move on. That's the MATURE thing to do.
Yes, she posted her opinion. On a PUBLIC FORUM. Her journal has a comment session for some reason. As I said, you can be grossed out by ANYTHING, from beans to homosexuals, from European Union's Central Bank policies towards the credit crisis to pedophiles. Your moral is different from mine and mine is different from my best friend's. That's wonderful. I'm just saying, if you post a Journal for all your watchers to read and comment, you may misplease someone. I'm not butthurt by her comentary, god, no, my life on the interwebs would be pathetic if I got myself into a fight with everyone who hates or dislikes stuff I like. Everyone have it's own taste as much as everyone have theirs own morals.
On the other hand, the term "anthropomorphic" doesn't refers just to the human body's anatomy. A door can be, in fiction (literature, cinema, cartoons...), anthropomorfic just from gaining the ability to talk. Bambi is a good example. Bambi is an anthropomorfic creature, even though his body's anathomy is the same as real deer because of the his eyes, the way his mouth moves, in sumum, stuff bambi does that just human beings do. That's used on art since it's creation to enrich the instantaneous relation between spactator and artpiece. Animals don't express emotions as strongly as we do. Animals don't have an ego so well built as humans egocentrically do. MLP characters, on the other hand, they do have all that, even though their anathomy don't assemble to human's anatomy. That's what most furry artists do as well! But they make the other way: they put animal characteristics to improve the human's sex appeal instead of putting human sexual connotations on an animal's anathomy.
TL/DR: It's NOT bestiality. Saying it is you're validating furry haters who call us all zoophiles =)
Also, I am validating nothing nor do I care at this point.
This argument is going off into a tangent that it shouldn't.
All I am saying is that she was staying an opinion about a genre of porn, not porn as a whole.
There is a difference.
I personally do not like anything porn related when dealing with a Children's Television show....so I am with her at this point.
This doesn't mean I hate porn.
Hell I even draw it myself sometimes when I feel up to it.
It was a nice argument thanks for being polite. It's a rare thing on this website
Just a humble debate.
Than again...I was into MLP before it was mainstream.
NONHIPSTER KTHX. ):<
Then again, Rule 34 shows no mercy, EVER.