FA+
Shop
Difference and sameness
13 years ago
General
Facing this again, it's beginning to fascinate me
To identify yourself as different, is it so much the cooardination of non judgement, or that you're better somehow than others? Wouldn't identifying yourself as different comply you do not know yourself well enough to understand the reality of another person?
Recently, I've been mocked extremely hard by some who've pronounced some very disdainful comments towards me. One friend even acting pronouncingly above me, when years ago he was one of the friendliest people I ever met. He kept me added online after many break ups, but he'd throw comments of how 'horrible I was', how much 'above me in personality' he was, and far more. I've had numerous others too.
Imo, there is such a polarity of there being 'Difference as in non judgement' and difference coardinating to 'You're less than me, but we're all different, I know where you'll mess up'
Still, I've noticed there are people in this world who, admittedly like myself once, have superiority complexes. After years or months of being ridiculed, they remedy themselves by looking at all their good traits despite the bad ones and consider themselves different or special.
Now, this one hits home for me. Because, what is causing the pain really there? The truth in saying is said to hurt. Particularly I see this as true. Those people who really have been ridiculed and been hurt by it are often facing what I feel is a very psychological context of their character which they blatantly ignore and avoid. The then exaggeration of their strengths, and not fixing the problem then deduces arrogance and once realizing their strengths so highly, they're above others.
My own belief in sameness of everyone relies on these factors -
That everyone can do what another person can do, wether they're disabled or not, or that rationale can suggest the still human ethicacy or flawity inherent still in mankind, which can be fixed
That everyone can relate, or else, why is it truthfully you dislike the person so much? Isn't it really you dislike the truth of yourself? Truly you feel you have to chuck them out of your life seemingly for this case, feeling they're a blow to your lack of self esteem?
Otherwise, it's amusing how 'difference' presents itself. Is it really just due to a lack of self knowledge? What really makes the person feel offended by you or him? In truth, how can we say, anyone in this world is meant to cause anyone suffering, or is any less than anyone else?
Let us emphisize actually on that factor. Billions upon billions of human beings can consider themselves above others seemingly ridiculing the behaviour of that person and calling them bad. In truth, we were all genetically coded the same, since we all came from the same exact thing, and God created man to prosper.
Now, in truth, does this then make that person that is 'seemingly bad' a demon? Someone from hell? A subservient or the antichrist? How exactly is the person 'bad' and how truly does he denote suffering for others, simply by being himself? It is in truth people inherently think this person is born 'bad' and less than anyone else? I think yes. To be honest I think it perpetuates such a unease in the world it is why we as humans are so paranoid about the state of affairs in the world, driven into a state of fear and anger about the motivations of man.
So imo, if the truth hurts, if seemingly by nature when someone gives us a opinion of ourselves that we believe is simply not true or hurts us, particularly, we cannot say the person is 'bad' or we should stay away from? Because by rationale they're not the cause of our suffering. They simply speak words and seemingly we believe in ourselves this man is a threat to our survival or well being? I believe in these cases to avoid suffering we'll run for the hills.
But seemingly that person or event does keep coming back. It makes logical sense why now, right?
Imo, I then deduce in this that everyone can relate. It makes perfect sense. A true reaction of innocent difference in opinion would be distant confusion of someone's opinion to us, which probably is only so inherent in the youth.
It then goes on to music too, particularly, is music then evil? It is worldwide, something so common, it has been common for thousands of years. Do you truly believe that a genetic factor then makes people different? What really is the object doing other than existing? If someone can't stand the sight of trees, is the tree then considered evil? No, the tree is innocent and as much on the platform of existence than anyone or anything else.
Truly, I believe we're driven off from each other from really not wanting to see the truth of ourselves, for the truth hurts so deeply. I do not believe in difference of people for the fact, it is but your belief system that denotes something as 'bad', because the object, this thing is merely existing. It is music made by a fellow human being, a thing created by nature a couple billions of years before the cultivation of your existence; by no means imo does it even make sense since man has been around for billions of years, this thing suddenly is prone to causing pain and suffering for someone? Where in evolution, would genetics preplanned it as 'useful' to the survival of man to 'avoid this thing', haven't we truly forgotten the development of evolution was to avoid extinction, not feign weakness?
Sensitivity imo I've noticed too can be attributed again to this rectification of the truth. A real reaction of difference in opinion once more is confusion. 'What? What is he saying?' and a true and honest moral show of it. But otherwise, we find ourselves hurt? Why? Once more the person couldn't be or done something bad, and if so, why not analyze why he did it? I see it as the distrust of the motivation of man being the real reason why. Someone who has never been violent or never understood his violent nature, would question a person for his violence. Why? He would ask. Man is but a creature of knowledge and the unknown scares him. We cannot be a society that languishes on difference when this inherently would scare us. We're a society and culture and species that feasts for knowledge of that which we do not understand. We're attracted more or less to mystery and fantasy. It is why and how man touched fire and realized he was burnt.
So in this truth, we're all inherently the same, mystery I think is just fascinating and leads us to believe we're alienated from them but I ask for the communitity to speak of where I maybe having holes in my truth so I may study your own comments.
Let us not forget ladies and gentleman, all the anger and despiritness you feel with someone, all that anger, is inherently fear. Because anger is the source of all suffering, anger is brooded from differences you feel around you; also your anger is a fight or flight response naturally inherent to you. So what are you truly fearing when simply 99.9% of the time, there is nothing to fear? Wake up I say. Wake up to the truth!
Thank you.
To identify yourself as different, is it so much the cooardination of non judgement, or that you're better somehow than others? Wouldn't identifying yourself as different comply you do not know yourself well enough to understand the reality of another person?
Recently, I've been mocked extremely hard by some who've pronounced some very disdainful comments towards me. One friend even acting pronouncingly above me, when years ago he was one of the friendliest people I ever met. He kept me added online after many break ups, but he'd throw comments of how 'horrible I was', how much 'above me in personality' he was, and far more. I've had numerous others too.
Imo, there is such a polarity of there being 'Difference as in non judgement' and difference coardinating to 'You're less than me, but we're all different, I know where you'll mess up'
Still, I've noticed there are people in this world who, admittedly like myself once, have superiority complexes. After years or months of being ridiculed, they remedy themselves by looking at all their good traits despite the bad ones and consider themselves different or special.
Now, this one hits home for me. Because, what is causing the pain really there? The truth in saying is said to hurt. Particularly I see this as true. Those people who really have been ridiculed and been hurt by it are often facing what I feel is a very psychological context of their character which they blatantly ignore and avoid. The then exaggeration of their strengths, and not fixing the problem then deduces arrogance and once realizing their strengths so highly, they're above others.
My own belief in sameness of everyone relies on these factors -
That everyone can do what another person can do, wether they're disabled or not, or that rationale can suggest the still human ethicacy or flawity inherent still in mankind, which can be fixed
That everyone can relate, or else, why is it truthfully you dislike the person so much? Isn't it really you dislike the truth of yourself? Truly you feel you have to chuck them out of your life seemingly for this case, feeling they're a blow to your lack of self esteem?
Otherwise, it's amusing how 'difference' presents itself. Is it really just due to a lack of self knowledge? What really makes the person feel offended by you or him? In truth, how can we say, anyone in this world is meant to cause anyone suffering, or is any less than anyone else?
Let us emphisize actually on that factor. Billions upon billions of human beings can consider themselves above others seemingly ridiculing the behaviour of that person and calling them bad. In truth, we were all genetically coded the same, since we all came from the same exact thing, and God created man to prosper.
Now, in truth, does this then make that person that is 'seemingly bad' a demon? Someone from hell? A subservient or the antichrist? How exactly is the person 'bad' and how truly does he denote suffering for others, simply by being himself? It is in truth people inherently think this person is born 'bad' and less than anyone else? I think yes. To be honest I think it perpetuates such a unease in the world it is why we as humans are so paranoid about the state of affairs in the world, driven into a state of fear and anger about the motivations of man.
So imo, if the truth hurts, if seemingly by nature when someone gives us a opinion of ourselves that we believe is simply not true or hurts us, particularly, we cannot say the person is 'bad' or we should stay away from? Because by rationale they're not the cause of our suffering. They simply speak words and seemingly we believe in ourselves this man is a threat to our survival or well being? I believe in these cases to avoid suffering we'll run for the hills.
But seemingly that person or event does keep coming back. It makes logical sense why now, right?
Imo, I then deduce in this that everyone can relate. It makes perfect sense. A true reaction of innocent difference in opinion would be distant confusion of someone's opinion to us, which probably is only so inherent in the youth.
It then goes on to music too, particularly, is music then evil? It is worldwide, something so common, it has been common for thousands of years. Do you truly believe that a genetic factor then makes people different? What really is the object doing other than existing? If someone can't stand the sight of trees, is the tree then considered evil? No, the tree is innocent and as much on the platform of existence than anyone or anything else.
Truly, I believe we're driven off from each other from really not wanting to see the truth of ourselves, for the truth hurts so deeply. I do not believe in difference of people for the fact, it is but your belief system that denotes something as 'bad', because the object, this thing is merely existing. It is music made by a fellow human being, a thing created by nature a couple billions of years before the cultivation of your existence; by no means imo does it even make sense since man has been around for billions of years, this thing suddenly is prone to causing pain and suffering for someone? Where in evolution, would genetics preplanned it as 'useful' to the survival of man to 'avoid this thing', haven't we truly forgotten the development of evolution was to avoid extinction, not feign weakness?
Sensitivity imo I've noticed too can be attributed again to this rectification of the truth. A real reaction of difference in opinion once more is confusion. 'What? What is he saying?' and a true and honest moral show of it. But otherwise, we find ourselves hurt? Why? Once more the person couldn't be or done something bad, and if so, why not analyze why he did it? I see it as the distrust of the motivation of man being the real reason why. Someone who has never been violent or never understood his violent nature, would question a person for his violence. Why? He would ask. Man is but a creature of knowledge and the unknown scares him. We cannot be a society that languishes on difference when this inherently would scare us. We're a society and culture and species that feasts for knowledge of that which we do not understand. We're attracted more or less to mystery and fantasy. It is why and how man touched fire and realized he was burnt.
So in this truth, we're all inherently the same, mystery I think is just fascinating and leads us to believe we're alienated from them but I ask for the communitity to speak of where I maybe having holes in my truth so I may study your own comments.
Let us not forget ladies and gentleman, all the anger and despiritness you feel with someone, all that anger, is inherently fear. Because anger is the source of all suffering, anger is brooded from differences you feel around you; also your anger is a fight or flight response naturally inherent to you. So what are you truly fearing when simply 99.9% of the time, there is nothing to fear? Wake up I say. Wake up to the truth!
Thank you.
