Third Year Contest Winners!
12 years ago
Feel free to forward questions to http://www.formspring.me/zsisron
Well folks! :D It’s been a long wait… but now I proudly announce to you the winners of 2012’s Mesmer’s Contest! :D Starting tonight I shall gradually contact each winner and begin getting prizes sorted out with them. We actually have two more places for prizes after these but those will be determined after the initial prizes have been sorted. :D
So…
*Drumroll*
The winners are! :D
As well we have two more winners... but we are still deciding between them so we will announce them abit later. :)
I'll begin contacting the winners one after another and assigning artists to the winners. <: And after that I'll start sending off the critiques people asked for as well.
Anyway, I'll spruce up this journal tomorrow morning. ;3; For now... sleep!
So…
*Drumroll*
The winners are! :D
1st place: The Eye by Frostborealis (On Sofurry) - Artist chosen:
spelunkersal
2nd Place: Insidious Assistance by
emeraldcistern - Artist Chosen:
noiserut
3rd Place: Greatest Acquisition by
damaratus - Artist Chosen:
tokifuji
4th Place: Fast Impression by
burst - Artist Chosen:
moodyferret
5th Place: Unwind by
bucephalus - Artist Chosen:
majorra
6th Place: Submissive Dragon by
darkend
7th Place: Elephant Tears by
LataCorneil
8th Place – All in the Mind
raul
9th Place – Simultaneous Past by
reservedrodent
10th Place: Camp Sleepaway by
joshualazarus
11th Place: Oiled and Ready by
lactose
As well we have two more winners... but we are still deciding between them so we will announce them abit later. :)
I'll begin contacting the winners one after another and assigning artists to the winners. <: And after that I'll start sending off the critiques people asked for as well.
Anyway, I'll spruce up this journal tomorrow morning. ;3; For now... sleep!
FA+

spelunkersal
emeraldcistern
noiserut
damaratus
tokifuji
burst
moodyferret
bucephalus
majorra
darkend
LataCorneil
raul
reservedrodent
joshualazarus
lactose
Congrats to you for placing! I should mention 3-5 was hard to break apart and scale. XD
I remembered I have a sofurry account, so I may post my story over there, but in any event the contest has the freedom to post the stories I submitted.
This also has to be one of the most realistic inductions I've read in this competition; seems like you took a number of standard steps from self-induction and meditative yoga, and turned it into a playful & sexy script. Here's to informative reading! (Take note, readers!)
Elephant Tears was a fun story to write, once I sat down and actually got it written. It started off a bit rough because I wasn't terribly sure where I was going with it. I still didn't know until I got to the end. LOL
If anyone is interested in reading it, let me know. I can post it here and at SoFurry. Right now, it doesn't exist online.
I feel a little bad at not placing anywhere though in my second shot at this. Still, I guess there were a lot of entries and some high quality of writing, so I suppose I shouldn't take it as me being a bad writer.
If you look at the winning entries though, some of the aspects which make them stand out is that they dedicate quite a bit to world and character building. These are both extremely difficult skills to master, so it makes sense that they get a bit of a nod in that regards. Your story has excellent focus on sensuality and the actual act of the seduction, but the characters, their world, and location are of less consequence. That's not a bad thing; if someone wants a quick erotic scenario, that kind of story is perfect! But in the scope of a writing competition, it makes sense to award those who have showcased their abilities of those other bits as well.
Best of luck in the next round!
And, for the record, I do have a Furaffinity, too :-P
And a big thanks to all those who contributed, even if you didn't win; your story is still someone's favorite, so keep 'em coming!
They are fappable, but is that what makes them win?
Part of the challenge of writing in this competition was not only writing a good story, but one that was tailored to what the judges wanted, and they went into a lot of detail about that when the contest was announced. Even if a story may seem "better" in your eyes, the judges may have found something lacking in the ones you like or something more they preferred in some of the other stories. The fact that the judges are friends, or may not native speakers of the English language, does not change the fact that they were the ones who got to decide the winners. To suggest that they are somehow less qualified for judging the material is presumptuous and a tad rude. The judges even introduced themselves at the start of the competition, which meant that every writer was on equal grounds when it came to understanding who they were and what kind of content they would be looking for. I'd even say that this particular contest was far less nebulous in its rules and requirements than some of the other ones that I've seen. I can tell you that as I wrote my story for this contest that I went back to the contest journal and kept making sure that I was also including the elements that were desired and outlined there.
I don't think that it was easy for the judges to decide on things this year or the previous years for that matter. I can certainly tell you that it wasn't merely whether the story was "fappable" that decided whether it placed or not. If you look back at the original announcement you'll certainly see everything else they were taking into consideration and "sexually stimulating" wasn't really on the list (but it may have helped if it was written well).
I understand that Zsisron and the judges can choose to judge the contest by their opinion, but that at least should be stated clearly before hand if it is to be that way. because "Stories will be judged by the use of hypnosis, grammar, pacing, story development, and use of description." apparently was not the case since a few 'loser' stories could easily beat the lower placed stories on the winner's list. I don't mean to complain, but I feel it necessary on the behalf of people who deserved to win, not just by my opinion, but again even just grammatically and the way they were written. That is why I am even talking about this, because in terms of winning it should be at least added "The judges hold the right to pick stories as winners that appeal to them" because apparently that was the case in some of these.
Everything that you have stated above is still your opinion. You believe that your friend's piece had greater merit than some of the winning pieces. That is an opinion, and one that you are allowed to have, but had no bearing on the judges thoughts as to what they chose best met the constraints that they had chosen for the competition. I believe that the judges made it clear as to what they wanted, and as they were the ones who make the final call on the pieces, the goal was to appeal to them, not to you. It is very possible that they saw something that didn't fit with what they were looking for, or perhaps even found grammatical errors that you may otherwise have overlooked.
Additionally, it isn't necessary to complain on behalf of those writers, as if they are truly skilled in the written language they can present their own particular arguments for their works.
You're starting to build your house upon sand, are you saying there were not stories with better English and writing than these?
Again, I am flustered at the fact that some of these stories were clearly picked by opinion rather than stated conditions. You cannot tell me honestly that this was solely won on writing skill and plots.
My standing point is not that there were stories that didn't place that potentially had better English and grammar; rather that it was up to the judges to decide what pieces best fit what they were looking for. Once again, it's what they wanted to see, not what you wanted to see. Their decision making took time, and I'm pretty sure that they took many things under consideration before making the decision. And yes, the end result was partially subjective. Just as you thinking your friend's piece is better is also subjective, even when you include grammar rules. If you remove grammar, there is still the need to fit the rest of the judging constraints, that of "pacing, use of hypnosis, story development and use of description." If your friend happened to have tight grammar, but lacked elsewhere in the judges subjective opinion, then that may be a reason they failed to place.
Some stuff like grammar can be determined through rules and objectivity. However, some of the other constraints of the contest were subjective and could only be determined based on the opinion of the judges. Any writer going into this competition was aware of that. Those that somehow couldn't derive that from the rules were either naive, presumptuous, or failed to ask the right questions from the start.
And as Damaratus pointed out, your comment is phrased in a predominantly demeaning and immature tone. "...I don't think you were fair to some of the authors who wrote much better stories, it's not even my opinion." That's definitely an opinion, but moreover, if there is a particular story which you feel had overlooked merit, why not speak of the positive aspects of that story, rather than condemn the decisions of the judges? Perhaps you might inspire them to give a story an honorable mention through a well-argued statement of support, but making accusations, and being critical of the winners (who did a fantastic job regardless), is not a constructive approach.
"it's not even my opinion" vs. "this is NOT just my opinion" - I now see what you originally intended to say, though by omitting the word "just" from your original phrasing, you excluded yourself, making the statement incorrect.
I do certainly agree that quoting things out of context is immature! I did not do any such thing though; I quoted your statement exactly as it was conveyed, which apparently included the omission of a key word, so that the interpretation was not as you intended.
Perhaps you should move past English 101. As I've taught graduate level courses on the subject, I can assure you there is some wonderful emphasis on the importance of semiotics as you go further on.
(Next time though... )