Being Disabled VS Chronicly ill.
12 years ago
General
Remember that having chronic and genetical deseases that still keeps you having a full life, doesnt make you disabled. Do not mistake these terms. A person can have multiple chronic illneses but still can function normally. Being disabled, literaly means, being disabled from a typical lifestyle. If you can work, walk to the store, take responcibility of other people or just do what healthy people can do, be thankful that you arent disabled. Being disabled is not an achievement, its a label to let you know that person needs more help than a typical person. It is NOT fun being disabled and you should NOT take advantage of it for your own favors, like going on dissability just so you couldnt work and you could get free money. But if you are indeed disabled, do not be afraid of telling them, awareness is a good way to go, this is why I made this group.
Taking incapacity exam is a good way to be a verified disabled.
Taking incapacity exam is a good way to be a verified disabled.
FA+

I have a circadian rhythm sleep disorder that is considered a disability by the Social Security Administration. But I can still walk to the store, maintain personal hygiene, and perform many of the actions of a typical lifestyle. I can function like non-disabled individuals when I'm awake, but the problem is the times at which I'm awake. Autism, for example, is also a disability, even when it only has social and occupational implications.
Disability is a phenomenon that is not exclusive to physical impairments. An individual can be disabled in many ways, and in my opinion, it is unfair to say "This disability is less severe than this other disability. Therefore it's not a disability at all."
This page is fucked up if you really think that just because your sick your whole life your not disabled.
Being "disabled" and therefore being on "disability" means that you suffer from a disease or condition which prevents you from having equal access to the same opportunities for gainful employment as others. As society is all about money, disability just means you lack the same ability to make money that others have. Disability is not a black and white definition. Having a so-called "disabling condition" does not mean you do not have the same ability to make money. If, for example, you are a stock broker and suffer from a debilitating genetic condition that causes intense pain, but you are one of 8 Americans who receive medical cannabis from the Federal Government (true story folks!), you are not disabled because the cannabis allows you to function normally so you can continue to sell stocks. However; if you are a construction worker who was diagnosed with this same condition you could not work because you could not function under the influence of cannabis sufficiently to perform your job, and your condition would make you far to susceptible to injury. A condition which is disabing for one is not disabling for another.
No one can judge disability except the Social Security Administration, competent doctors who have reviewed the patient's case, and the legal system. This is because "disability" is a legal status and has nothing to do with medical condition except as it interacts with your own work experience and education. The whole point of disability was that we, as a nation, decided that those who, through no fault of their own, cannot take care of themselves through normal gainful employment, ought to have the opportunity to at least have some food to eat, which is why some 2 million Americans received the equivalent of $2.00/hour to make up for the fact that they cannot work to support themselves.
To anyone else wishing to comment on this journal, try reading it first. There is nothing in this journal to suggest judgment of disability. There is only an attempt to differentiate between disability and chronic illness, granted it isn't done very well. Nevertheless, nothing in the journal suggests anything to justify the rude commentary above.