Into the Storm
11 years ago
I think Into the Storm has to be the biggest cinematic dichotomy I've personally encountered. When there were tornadoes on screen, it was spectacular. Those were at least visually the most lifelike tornadoes ever depicted in a movie, and the scenes were staged really well (except the finale.... those who have seen it know what I'm referring to). But in between storms... AAAUUUUGH!!! Some of the most amateurish tripe I've seen in a movie of that scale. I spent all of those moments chanting "BRING ON THE TORNADOES" in my mind. Overall, a weak, slipshod mess of a movie that manages to look unbelievably good.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_C.....28filmmaker%29
EF5s are nasty sons of bitches, and even an EF3 CAN move big planes around, but pick them up like that? That's 735,000 pounds of aircraft. Not gonna happen. They'd get shredded long before they were picked up. (Rather reminded me of the scene in Twister where the EF5 was picking up 18-wheelers right in front of Our Heroes, but they in their little pickup kept driving merrily along).
I think the ending got spoiled for me when I watched the video footage of the El Reno tornado, which was a real 2.5 mile wide twister. At that point the "funnel" simply loses definition and becomes indistinguishable from a rain curtain. (I think, as well, the El Reno tornado was rain-wrapped during its peak development, making it even worse, and being a good part of why all the chase teams lost the plot on it).
I'll see it when it comes out on DVD.
Why did they take shelter near external doors, especially when they established this movie took place in Oklahoma, one of the most weather savvy states in the US?
To the movie's credit, it was one of the first time I saw an animated multi vortex tornado, which I thought looked pretty cool (and an awful like this twister.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUAoCDS-vMg (subvortices surrounding the vehicle)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxN2FQdYEZ0 (there window shatters from a subvortex)
They'd have made natural actors for this movie.
They thought the subvortex crossing the road in front of them was the main tornado (that sounds familiar). But even so, they shouldn't have been that close, especially on a day when (according to Storm Data) storms were moving close to 60MPH.
I was in one of those jams myself on I-70 in Salina KS on April 14 2012. Again, it was mostly locals that had been watching news coverage on TV and decided to drive out to see a tornado. None of these people were around prior to the storm's arrival in Salina. It was a headache for anyone on the road, as well as local law enforcement. I'm of the very strong opinion that if you can't/won't do the forecasting yourself, you shouldn't chase. It's not safe for the individual, for others, and it cheapens the efforts of those who actually put the work in to see storms.
If you like really badly made bad weather movies, I have to, uh, "recommend" (and I use the word advisedly) Devil Winds. Meanwhile, I'll have to see if I can locate (or already have) a copy of Night of the Twisters. And I'll probably recommend both for Smithees if they haven't already been nominated.
And to add to the list of impracticalities, let's add movies like Storm Chasers: Revenge of the Twister (ACTUAL TITLE) & Atomic Twister.