FA+
Shop
Pagan science
11 years ago
While watching some rather frustrating videos of atomic principles on khan academy, it struck me how ambiguous the word Energy is, and how interchangeable are the words Energy and God. Both are potentially amorphous until specific observable phenomena occur.
Energy could possibly be defined in its most fundamental state as: "That which influences or generates a phenomena or change by the action of the same by which such phenomena or change may be measured by the same." And I apologize for making it sound like Neuton wrote it, it's just how it came out.
Now a Cristian scientist might use the word Energy in place of the word God, to say "There is no energy but energy and all things that are, are from energy and from no other than energy." Of course if you did say this around a group of real scientists, you would be viewed as an imbecile. Because no scientist worth his salary would agree that the only form of energy that really matters is energy undefined.
Conversely, someone like a JW might try and argue that all forms of energy are merely not only just energy, but are in fact just God, without further defining what that means or how it works. And the JW's do get a lot of doors slammed in their faces for saying this because they sound just as imbecilic.
The pagans such as the Egyptians recognized, much in the way modern science does, that this Energy/God manifests in various perceivable forms. They gave names and personalities to these Gods/Energies and even described the interaction of them at various levels. Yes, the Kemetics did also have a monad called Aten (He which is all), but it was only popular for a short time to worship Him.
All deities are perceptual representations of otherwise undefined aspects of (energetic) phenomena. Sometimes these are more poetic than scientific, but still they are more tangible to the mind than mere (monarchical) monotheism. And even those people that deny the subsequent manifestation of demi-Gods, are not satisfied with the amalgamation of respectable and hierarchical understanding.
Energy could possibly be defined in its most fundamental state as: "That which influences or generates a phenomena or change by the action of the same by which such phenomena or change may be measured by the same." And I apologize for making it sound like Neuton wrote it, it's just how it came out.
Now a Cristian scientist might use the word Energy in place of the word God, to say "There is no energy but energy and all things that are, are from energy and from no other than energy." Of course if you did say this around a group of real scientists, you would be viewed as an imbecile. Because no scientist worth his salary would agree that the only form of energy that really matters is energy undefined.
Conversely, someone like a JW might try and argue that all forms of energy are merely not only just energy, but are in fact just God, without further defining what that means or how it works. And the JW's do get a lot of doors slammed in their faces for saying this because they sound just as imbecilic.
The pagans such as the Egyptians recognized, much in the way modern science does, that this Energy/God manifests in various perceivable forms. They gave names and personalities to these Gods/Energies and even described the interaction of them at various levels. Yes, the Kemetics did also have a monad called Aten (He which is all), but it was only popular for a short time to worship Him.
All deities are perceptual representations of otherwise undefined aspects of (energetic) phenomena. Sometimes these are more poetic than scientific, but still they are more tangible to the mind than mere (monarchical) monotheism. And even those people that deny the subsequent manifestation of demi-Gods, are not satisfied with the amalgamation of respectable and hierarchical understanding.
