I agree, as a babyfur myself, I think messy and wet should be tagged as mature. Some of it isn't suitable for kids to see.

Yes it certainly should be.

well kids poop their diapers right? so err..im not sure that it should be mature cause well its just a normal every day occurrance if your a baby. I dunno it depends on the context and the extremity I guess

^ yeah I agree on this one.

It's one thing if it's simple and cute, and actually babyish... But I guess I moreso mean babyfurs/littlefurs with like REALLY OVERTLY MESSY behinds. Like when that's the main focus of the picture. I just... I don't want to see a picture when I'm in SFW browse that's dominated largely by a messy diaper, as the main focus of the picture.
:c

I agree in the sense that it's being portrayed as an adult, or sexual scene, yes by all means.
I think that cubs with wet diapers are fine, but overly messy, soiled, and sexual themed diapers should be mature.

Hyper wetting and hyper pooping in diapers should be marked as mature I mean I don't see a problem with messy/wet pics unless it's the hyper. I've seen one artist on here who refuses to use those tags and just uses a general tag and just blocks people who have concern that their diaper pics may be considered mature

I think I know who you're talking about. :I
Actually I know two of them.

XD yeah I don't mean to be rude about the person but most people on this site marks them either adult or mature. I don't think it's fair to the other people if they can get away with it.

Raynuh-Nicole hit the nail on the head, in my opinion.

Thanks for the support :p

Kinda depends for me, like for actual cub characters I would go with general, if it's an adult char then general if clean, wet/messy is mature, hyper or if it involves sexual stuff, then adult.

I think it would depend on how the picture is portraying it I suppose.

100% agree with you.

I don't think messing automatically should be labeled mature or adult. It really depends on how sexualized the pic is. If you think all messy pics should be tagged, then don't the vanilla people have a right to say ALL diaper pics should be tagged mature/adult? Just because some people fetishize it doesn't mean the pic itself is fetishistic. As an example, I don't find  komi's pics fetishistic at all. They're all very innocent pics. On the other hand, there are artists where the messing was clearly drawn one-handed, if you know what I mean.

Tagged as mature. I dont want to see that if im in the SFW site. Heck I dont want to see messy diapers anywhere. If I hit the SFW button I want to be able to hand my phone to my friends. Im pretty sure they dont want to see messy diapers either. Wet diapers aren't as bad but I'm pretty sure people dont want to see them the same way they dont want to see messy diapers.

I think the default answer to most questions in an intellectual property course I took in college applies here: It depends. I've seen a small handful (fewer than a dozen) of pictures that only imply messy diapers while showing nothing, which I would consider safe for SFW status. In other words, SFW status is virtually never safe. Usually, as long as nothing extreme, gross, exposing or sexual is involved, I tend to consider a mature rating reasonable for messy pictures. Anything beyond those parameters I consider adult- easily, but for something that infants do, I consider an adult rating just a pinch steep.