Oral sex, stronger cause of cancer than smoking.
16 years ago
General
Well, HPV virus caught through oral sex, anyway:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6639461.stm
Have a nice day.
FA+

I swear, it was the hardest thing in the world to keep from making sucking jokes.
Thanks.
I finally had a reason to revel in being very single,
and now you've made me feel horribly alone once again.
Smoking is cheaper and less stressful.
Unless you regeraly use a hooker or have 5 min sex breaks in the closet during your lunch break
Since I was too ugly and unpopular to get a partner.
I hate when people totally mutilates my comments, leaving me speachless :<
But tbh, there is almost always someone "anyone" can tag along with
You asked me.
No, there isn't, not for me, not any more.
The Elephant Man is famous, and has many followers.
I'm so unattractive, even my vibrator needs viagra to stay hard.
It was a metaphor.
Not even viagra would work if it were used in a room with me.
I belong to the
Bureau of
Unofficial
Groups
Living in
Yumeria
B-U-G-L-Y
At least you're not gay though, eh?
Disagree all you like, but it's true.
Womens Institute. Pay up.
Me too.
In any case, it is a medical fact that if you live long enough, you WILL get cancer. For example, almost 100% of men get prostate cancer but in many cases they die from old age before it becomes threatening.
You only live once... and in my case, I will die at a young age in a horrible car accident so none of this is relevant anyway. =)
Prostate cancer is still a huge danger,
in France, on average, it kills one man every hour.
I'd rather die with a partner than live alone.
That's all most men ask of a woman, and it's too much to ask.
Women, on the other hand, always want a man who is utterly flawless.
Imagine a big pile of money, with a 32-year-old Brad Pitt standing next to it.
So, a pitt full of money is what the ladies want these days? I guess I can't compete, after all, I can dress myself and my work has never been about impersonating anyone else....
and worst of all, you would actually appreciate a woman, and understand the value of someone wanting to be with you.
I once had someone cheat on me, because they thought I would cheat on them one day. I wouldn't. The worst part of it was that even though I was willing to forgive, to accept, to move on, and still to be with them, they ended up abandoning me for their new lover. Then they cheated on that new lover, dumped them, dated their newer one, then cheated on them with the lover they had after me, then dumped the previous one, and are now dating the person they had originally cheated on me with. It should have been obvious, after a couple of weeks when I was first dating them, they told me that they had already had a relationship, which hadn't ended until a few days after they had started dating me.
I have discovered another large factor in what women want. Convenience. Now, I believe that there's two kinds of love. There's a sort of celestial angelic love, which goes way beyond anything normal or conventional, the kind of love that only four of five people in the world will have ant any one time. For the purposes of this discussion though, it's irrelevant, and I wont go into detail. The other kind of love is the ordinary husband/wife kind. I've taken a lot of crap for my opinion that this is nothing more than a feral mechanism of pair-bonding, based on the survival instincts of humans as a breed of animal. As such, I also believe that a calculated approach, using logics and mathematics, is a valid way to attain this kind of love. In grossly oversimplified terms; money + charisma + popularity = a man to be fallen in love with. But a big, and a decisive factor in the equation is convenience. The reason that the person I mentioned in the first paragraph cheated on me was because their affair was convenient. They lived closer together than I did. Just 10 or so days ago, a "friend" who had originally been interested in me in that way (first one in more than a year - they had not seen a photo of me) then went off and started dating someone else. I guarantee they couoldn't possibly be as nice as I was, would have nowhere near as much respect for them or the relationship as I would, would never work as hard to please them as I would have done, and so on. But they ended up pairing off, and allegedly falling in love, with someone, just because they lived closer than I do, and have more money. They literally chose to fall in love with them, instead of me, because of convenience.
Human pairing is more of a mechanism for species survival than anything. However, the need to feel loved and or wanted, and respected is natural for a thinking organism's well being. It is easier to face problems with a partner, often, than it would be without one.
Granted pairing imparts it's own set of problems, but they can be worthwhile and may even strengthen the individuals (and their bond) as a result.
I have seen the starry eyed love, and it's kind of frightening. I don't think I'd choose that kinda thing for myself. I don't want someone I couldn't live without, I am self contained. I do not need a woman to "complete" me, but I'd love to share my life with a woman, who, similarly self contained, would love to share her life with me.
Those who would cheat on you would lose much, I'd say. I can feel for you. More often than not, I am overlooked just because I am not what society would deem ideal.
I am not rich, not particularly good looking, and I speak my mind and make my opinions based on thought and not on the leading of some other person (like the news folks, or political parties).
Too bad there's a big ocean between us, I'd like to meet you.
Likewise.
I am in, quite possibly the most inconvienient relationship at the moment. We live in different countries and we can't contact each other at will. Its been a strange journey....