DISCUSSION: Should humans and ferals be accepted?
16 years ago
This affects what will be allowed, so please state your opinion on this matter.
Although rare on FurAffinity, there are a few human or human-like characters featuring extra appendages. Also, there's a considerable numbers of ferals (non-anthro animals) shown to have more appendages than the original species (such as displacer beasts and chimeras).
Question is, should this kind of content be allowed on this club? If yes, should they be called real multifurs, or just be an acceptable exception?
Although rare on FurAffinity, there are a few human or human-like characters featuring extra appendages. Also, there's a considerable numbers of ferals (non-anthro animals) shown to have more appendages than the original species (such as displacer beasts and chimeras).
Question is, should this kind of content be allowed on this club? If yes, should they be called real multifurs, or just be an acceptable exception?
FA+

On "ferals", however, I'm completely in favor of including them. I'm comfortable with calling them "multifurs" as well, since they meet some of the basic requirements (fur, extra limbs past the baseline)
Yes to humans, no to ferals.