Your thoughts: Gender labels in TF artwork
6 years ago
This is probably a little thing but, as we progress as a society, I think the little things will matter. I spend an inordinate amount of my life worrying if I've been an inadvertent asshat and that's the origin of this question.
For years now, when posting a pic of someone turning into something of the opposite gender, I've chosen "transgender". For years in general, this was the preferred term for this type of TF. However, it means something different these days.
You may have noticed that FA now has more options on its gender drop-down to more reflect these changes (no pun intended). However, the hard part for me, is what to use as a label for TFs involving gender change so as to convey information without causing offense.
Or, could we just assume that things have multiple meanings here and If I choose "Trans(Female)" for my current monthly drawing nobody will assume I'm making a statement about real people in transition from M to F?
For years now, when posting a pic of someone turning into something of the opposite gender, I've chosen "transgender". For years in general, this was the preferred term for this type of TF. However, it means something different these days.
You may have noticed that FA now has more options on its gender drop-down to more reflect these changes (no pun intended). However, the hard part for me, is what to use as a label for TFs involving gender change so as to convey information without causing offense.
Or, could we just assume that things have multiple meanings here and If I choose "Trans(Female)" for my current monthly drawing nobody will assume I'm making a statement about real people in transition from M to F?
I dunno. In some respect it is a simple thing and it others it is more complicated. The best way is to try to find a simple compromise that works for you.
At least make use of tags (like TFTG and MTF/FTM/MTH/FTH/etc).
That said, I haven't looked into what all the gender drop-downs are. If it's something that's truly more descriptive to what you're doing - and it's not any more trouble to select, then I'd go with that. Not because someone might be offended at the other use (because I can assure you, someone will get offended at this use too) - but if it's truly a better description of the situation.
But I'd agree on having a "Transformation" tag for these sorts of pictures.
I think the simplest solution would be to use the "TF/TG" category for type in places where you would've used the "transgender" category under gender before
Because we're talking about physical switches in a fantasy setting, I don't have any problem with the term "transgender" being used to describe what's going on.
Before, you could mark the gender for a piece as "transgender". This meant, to most, that the gender of main subject of the piece changes. No specifics on what it changes from or to - it could be male to female, female to male, male to herm, herm to female, whatever. But it changes.
Now there's a lot of specifics. There's "intersex", "herm", "transgender (male)", "transgender (female)", and "non-binary". And the usual male and female and such, of course. It's nice that they're allowing more specificity, but the problem with being so specific is that it makes it even more problematic when something doesn't quite fall into one of the available selections.
It also can make things more confusing, not less. If I have a picture of someone midway through a male-to-female transformation, is that a male (the startform), a female (the endform), or an intersex (because it's only partially complete)? Maybe it should be a transgender (female) because a transgirl can be thought of as a girl who was originally a man. But then what if the change was nonconsentual? Maybe it should be transgender (male) because he winds up as "a man in a woman's body".
In short, I don't mind the new tags they added. I just wish they hadn't removed the more generic "transgender" cover-all label when they did.
-United