FA+
Shop
Why's So Much Vore in My "Sally Acorn Large Breasts" Sear...
5 years ago
I just want to masturbate to normal pictures of Princess Sally with perky and bra-accentuated DDD+ tits or whatever my preferred cup size is. I don't wanna see anything kinky or weird... Unless it's her being strapped down to a table and pussy-milked... Or her doing a femboy Elias or Tails which the artist defiantly and obviously did NOT age up... I mean, basically, no blood or rape or violence or eating even being implied or impending. I just want to see sexy Mobian teenage royalty in tight crop tops and daisy dukes showing off.
But evidently, some of you don't share my exclusionary and refined masturbatory tastes, and it's trivially annoyed me and dissuaded me from further searches on FA for the aforementioned pics of Sally sporting overflowing blouses and lingerie. There is only one fair and wise remedy for this: ban all vore smut and wage a holy war on furries I presume are dangerous and immoral despite having never met them and never intending to.
Some of you will inevitably remonstrate by insisting a functional blacklist be be implemented years after everyone else managed to. My response is: Blacklists are for morally indolent cowards who refuse to intervene in the masturbatory habits of fellow furverts in fits of trauma and righteous fury after encountering deviancy that deviates from their own. We can't allow ourselves to spend our entire allocated masturbation and porn search time each day on masturbating and collecting porn we WANT to see! It would be an intolerable clusterfuck if we stayed out of each others' ways and didn't rallty the troops on Twitter.
I applaud Dragoneer for refusing to allow us to comfortably shield ourselves from others' vast furry pornographical collections and portfolios all these 15 or so years. We'd be a much darker place if we didn't wage war on each other for problematic porn usages and didn't have the extremely pretentiously named "Minor Protection Squad" to report mispresumed or actual depictions of fictional pedophilia to (BTW, do we report actual and real-life pedophilia to that same squad, or does someone else deal with actual crimes?). I'm sure he relishes the assorted insults and impeachments of his character on Twitter and here because every righteous person loves gratuitous ingratitude for their ambiguous policy revisions and the subsequent enforcements that injure and affront both sides.
But evidently, some of you don't share my exclusionary and refined masturbatory tastes, and it's trivially annoyed me and dissuaded me from further searches on FA for the aforementioned pics of Sally sporting overflowing blouses and lingerie. There is only one fair and wise remedy for this: ban all vore smut and wage a holy war on furries I presume are dangerous and immoral despite having never met them and never intending to.
Some of you will inevitably remonstrate by insisting a functional blacklist be be implemented years after everyone else managed to. My response is: Blacklists are for morally indolent cowards who refuse to intervene in the masturbatory habits of fellow furverts in fits of trauma and righteous fury after encountering deviancy that deviates from their own. We can't allow ourselves to spend our entire allocated masturbation and porn search time each day on masturbating and collecting porn we WANT to see! It would be an intolerable clusterfuck if we stayed out of each others' ways and didn't rallty the troops on Twitter.
I applaud Dragoneer for refusing to allow us to comfortably shield ourselves from others' vast furry pornographical collections and portfolios all these 15 or so years. We'd be a much darker place if we didn't wage war on each other for problematic porn usages and didn't have the extremely pretentiously named "Minor Protection Squad" to report mispresumed or actual depictions of fictional pedophilia to (BTW, do we report actual and real-life pedophilia to that same squad, or does someone else deal with actual crimes?). I'm sure he relishes the assorted insults and impeachments of his character on Twitter and here because every righteous person loves gratuitous ingratitude for their ambiguous policy revisions and the subsequent enforcements that injure and affront both sides.
