A thorny question on foxy gender labeling...
4 years ago
With some frequency, I'll see an artist who I'd like to get something from, but they'll have a whole line in their description about how "if your character is described with slurs like herm, futa, shemale, trap, etc, you aren't allowed". So, that leaves me, as someone whose fox IS, in fact, a full, both sexes fully functional hermaphrodite to match their gender fluidity, rather flummoxed. What is the current "acceptable" way for them to self identify? I would like to use less harmful language where I can, but I have no idea what to use in place of the above. Or am I just inherently too problematic for these artists because my idealized self can't naturally exist? (you know, unlike anthro foxes in general. 🙄)
FA+







I think folks are usually more upset about sexual or derogatory connotations on terms than the words themselves.
As for the rest of them, if someone is *Self-Identifying* as something, it's inherently not a slur because it's positive to that person, which by denying them that identification, is marginalizing them and demonizing them just the same as any other group that might care to do the same thing for more malicious reasons. By focusing on the wording instead of the actual people, on the terminology that offends them instead of the very lives they are supposedly supporting, it shows a deep and saddening kind of hypocrisy.
The other problem is that the keywords constantly change because those selfsame people will see 'bad' people using the new word derogatorily and just abandon it, give it over to the ones they're supposedly trying to protect the marginalized group from without even trying to stop it or reclaim it, and gradually every word belongs to the chuds and hecklers and there is less and less left for the actual people who might be comfortable using whatever term or another to identify themselves.
Edit: An apology for how long that got, I've always been frustrated because when 'Trap' got removed and 'femboi' seems to suddenly not apply if you have more curves than a wooden plank, the only way to describe the kind of person my 'sona is became "A cisgendered but especially feminine individual who is comfortable presenting as female at times for reasons of sexual attractiveness or just because traditionally female garments are cuter" because genderfluid doesn't work when your gender itself is solid and stable despite the back and forth of other elements of the self and presentation.
I personally think that some of these um... trigger warnings, I suppose? They're predicated on people using the words against them maliciously, and in the moment of reaction, they forget that the people they're talking to are not said people. I want to give the benefit of the doubt, but I need said same benefit given to me as well.
And I say this as someone who has been corrected rather sharply in the past about this sort of thing myself. It's not fun, but I do my best. >O<;
The thing I enjoy about playing myself like this is the juxtaposition of being pretty solidly a boy and yet doing the very non-boy thing of... getting knocked up. Calling myself intersex or trans in those scenarios acknowledges that gender is a spectrum (which, obviously, it is) wheras I more like propping up this imaginary gender binary and then feeling it get smashed.
But I can't rightfully say that the term is blanket OKAY to use - especially considering I myself am a guy whos pretty comfortable being cisgender, and am in a way fetishizing an aspect of what is for some people, a foundational part of who they are. I'm kinda coming from a pretty huge place of privilege. I'm not gonna begrudge anybody who takes issue with the term - I'll explain why I particularly use it in a self-identifying way, and if I ever do find a term I think fits better I'd probably shift to using it - but at the end of the day I think the best thing you can do is just explain why you identify that way to anyone who might have an issue with it, acknowledge that their reasons are valid, and obviously don't apply labels to people they aren't already using themselves. You can't please everyone, but as long as you're comfortable with how you self identify and you're not advocating putting others down, I think you're fine.
to my knowledge "Altersex" was created from within the trans community.
"Intersex" is a different thing, having anatomical features of biological male and female but not -complete- of either.
Trans and intersex people find "hermaphrodite" to be dehumanizing as it is a term usually used for invertebrate anatomy and it has been historically used with derision when referring to people.
I don't really want to touch the others x.x