Discussion: Bomb Girls VS Girls with Bombs
4 years ago
General
This year for April Fool's, I'm doing things I haven't done before or in a great while. While I continue on what that means art-wise, let's have a discussion about the two kinds of sexy explosive potentials you'd find with a fetish like mine. To make things clear, there is no wrong answer to this discussion. This is a matter of preferences and I'm biased in this regard. I'd like to explain what I like and you can tell me what you like. Perhaps we can both find new appreciation for both.
Also, this is assuming my personal taste of cartoon physics with subjects living unharmed and not the logical result of the real world. Do not try anything suggested in this journal or my gallery at home.
First things first, what's the appeal of either? One, I'm a hopeless romantic with over-the-top expectations. A blastwave of heat and force enveloping the body during orgasm is what I'd call "over-the-top". Second is that I find power sexy. Power can come in many forms, but one that's measured in a unit called "megatons" is undeniable.
In the matter of Bombgirls and Girls with Bombs, I admit that I like the latter a lot more. I heard once in an argument about real VS fake boobs that the girl with the fake breasts obviously wants them more. I think that's part of it. I tend to like it when the person in the picture likes it, so anyone being willingly around them and ready for the blast interests me more than a being who just happened to be born into the potential scenario.
Second is adjustability. Bombgirls only have one kind of explosion. Being able to add or subtract to the equation makes it more flexible. Do you want a one dynamite stick "quickie", an all night long pile of ordinance, or something in between? Plus it can help set the tone and setting. Someone wanting private time in a bunker shows bashfulness for their loud fascination, while fireworks on stage show more of an exhibitionism nature.
Now for what I think is the main strength of Bombgirls: the personal aspect of carrying the power every moment of every day. It makes aspects of their lives more interesting seeing how they live, what kind of job they would work, is their explosive nature a blessing or curse, do they like exploding, and more. Then you get into the sexy territory and how they interact with one or more romantic partners. You can throw all sorts of curveballs like what their trigger is, how well can they control it, etc.
I could go on, but I'd like to keep it brief enough that I don't chicken out of posting this. Please tell me what you think about either of these, what you like, why, and maybe there's a third side to this I never considered. Hope you all have a good one!
Also, this is assuming my personal taste of cartoon physics with subjects living unharmed and not the logical result of the real world. Do not try anything suggested in this journal or my gallery at home.
First things first, what's the appeal of either? One, I'm a hopeless romantic with over-the-top expectations. A blastwave of heat and force enveloping the body during orgasm is what I'd call "over-the-top". Second is that I find power sexy. Power can come in many forms, but one that's measured in a unit called "megatons" is undeniable.
In the matter of Bombgirls and Girls with Bombs, I admit that I like the latter a lot more. I heard once in an argument about real VS fake boobs that the girl with the fake breasts obviously wants them more. I think that's part of it. I tend to like it when the person in the picture likes it, so anyone being willingly around them and ready for the blast interests me more than a being who just happened to be born into the potential scenario.
Second is adjustability. Bombgirls only have one kind of explosion. Being able to add or subtract to the equation makes it more flexible. Do you want a one dynamite stick "quickie", an all night long pile of ordinance, or something in between? Plus it can help set the tone and setting. Someone wanting private time in a bunker shows bashfulness for their loud fascination, while fireworks on stage show more of an exhibitionism nature.
Now for what I think is the main strength of Bombgirls: the personal aspect of carrying the power every moment of every day. It makes aspects of their lives more interesting seeing how they live, what kind of job they would work, is their explosive nature a blessing or curse, do they like exploding, and more. Then you get into the sexy territory and how they interact with one or more romantic partners. You can throw all sorts of curveballs like what their trigger is, how well can they control it, etc.
I could go on, but I'd like to keep it brief enough that I don't chicken out of posting this. Please tell me what you think about either of these, what you like, why, and maybe there's a third side to this I never considered. Hope you all have a good one!
Alex-Kitsune
~alex-kitsune
I prefer girls with bombs, I tend to agree with you on all your points, it's sexier when the person clearly wants it, especially with the breast blasters that adds to your point about the girl with fake breasts obviously wanting them, and yes the flexibility is nice, like in that one you drew with Lightning Dust (I think) jamming her breasts into a whole box of explosives.
Gunpowdergreentea
~gunpowdergreentea
OP
I think it was Powder Ruse jamming her tits in a box about to boom, but glad you enjoy my points. Anything you like about bombgirls, though?
Alex-Kitsune
~alex-kitsune
never really thought about them before
Quilava86
~quilava86
i love bomb anthros
Gunpowdergreentea
~gunpowdergreentea
OP
Any particular qualities you like?
Quilava86
~quilava86
fuse tail,big round bomb shaped tummy,massive perfectly round bomb tits
Beau the Glaceon
~speedbumpv-drop
Bombshells because I like 'em big~
Slime78
~slime78
You could perhaps combine them? Maybe a bombgirl wants to get even MORE powerful!
Gunpowdergreentea
~gunpowdergreentea
OP
There's some potential...
FA+