Just gonna leave this here
4 years ago
Title V: Obscenity and Pornography - Subtitle A: Child Obscenity and Pornography Prevention - (Sec. 502) Allows as an affirmative defense to the charge of virtual child pornography only that: (1) the alleged pornography was produced using only actual persons all of whom were adults; or (2) the alleged pornography was not produced using any actual minors.
Prohibits: (1) making a visual depiction that is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image of, or that is indistinguishable from an image of, a minor engaging in specified sexually explicit conduct; (2) knowingly advertising, promoting, presenting, distributing, or soliciting through the mails or in commerce, including by computer, any material that is or contains an obscene visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct or a visual depiction of an actual minor engaging in such conduct; (3) knowingly distributing, offering, sending, or providing to a minor any such visual depiction using the mails or commerce, including by computer, for purposes of inducing or persuading a minor to participate in an illegal act; and (4) knowingly producing, distributing, receiving, or possessing with intent to distribute a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that, under specified circumstances, depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is obscene, or depicts an image that is or appears to be of a minor engaging in such conduct and such depiction lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/108th.....enate-bill/151
Prohibits: (1) making a visual depiction that is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image of, or that is indistinguishable from an image of, a minor engaging in specified sexually explicit conduct; (2) knowingly advertising, promoting, presenting, distributing, or soliciting through the mails or in commerce, including by computer, any material that is or contains an obscene visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct or a visual depiction of an actual minor engaging in such conduct; (3) knowingly distributing, offering, sending, or providing to a minor any such visual depiction using the mails or commerce, including by computer, for purposes of inducing or persuading a minor to participate in an illegal act; and (4) knowingly producing, distributing, receiving, or possessing with intent to distribute a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that, under specified circumstances, depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is obscene, or depicts an image that is or appears to be of a minor engaging in such conduct and such depiction lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/108th.....enate-bill/151
Shasta-the-Wolf88
~shasta-the-wolf88
Okay thank you good to know this. 👍👍
MochaBeans
~mochabeans
OP
Because there are people defending it here and on twitter. There's this misconception that it's legal, it's not.

Yes, people argue it is legal in the US. I'm pointing out it's not. it's that simple.
Zhaleskra
~zhaleskra
That's just . . . wow. I don't even know what to say about that, actually. People are messed up.
FriskyWoods
~friskywoods
The fact that InkBunny is over ten years old illustrates what a toothless, constitutionally dubious, and unenforceable statute this thought crime law really is. And the fact that you would willingly subject someone to the horrors of prison for drawing a naked cartoon character says more about the kind of person you are than that artist. You are a disappointment.
MochaBeans
~mochabeans
OP
Frisky since I can't reply I'll put it here I have never once said that. If you look at previous journals I've specified.
FA+