I made a video thingy!
Posted 6 years agohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppPayBeq7rU
It's my own first made video on my own channel! ...and it's a response to a whiny "cringe" channel owner.
Everybody and their aunt must see this. It should be mandatory by law, even. Refusal to be charged with execution.
It's my own first made video on my own channel! ...and it's a response to a whiny "cringe" channel owner.
Everybody and their aunt must see this. It should be mandatory by law, even. Refusal to be charged with execution.
A video I helped with making
Posted 6 years agoOne Guy's Motivation for Opposing Bestiality
Posted 6 years agohttps://i.imgur.com/EsOYIly.png
Too many guys online love to trash talk about furries committing bestiality. They lace their shutting down of furries with righteous indignation about animal abusers being protected. These same guys will then brag and about wanting to hunt furries just like real animals. The cognitive dissonance in this should be readily striking to anyone who's not delusional. And this of course is beside their usual ranting against weak beta faggots and weak genetics. So this forum post by a guy is actually very revealing about these typical guys' motivations. Guys do not oppose bestiality because they care about animals. They oppose it just to get to the guy doing it, who is the "faggot".
In fact the behavioral track record of guys online is they want to trash environmentalism, animal rights and vegetarianism—causes they consider annoying, weird and for faggots—brag about eating loads of meat and using animal and polluting products, joke about casual animal cruelty... It's obvious these typical guys do not betray compassion for animals. Also, you only need to look at the recent coverage disparity between the Notre Dame cathedral fire versus the currently atmosphere-devouring Amazon rainforest fires, to see compassion for animals does not run in our default programming.
I would like to find more of these blatant postings if they're out there. This needs to be a very important point pushed back on these attackers that use bestiality-hunting as a narrative. Rob them of their righteousness, and put them of the spot. They are not genuine, and just mean to do harm to other guys.
(Archive of forum post's page for full context: http://archive.is/wVjti )
Too many guys online love to trash talk about furries committing bestiality. They lace their shutting down of furries with righteous indignation about animal abusers being protected. These same guys will then brag and about wanting to hunt furries just like real animals. The cognitive dissonance in this should be readily striking to anyone who's not delusional. And this of course is beside their usual ranting against weak beta faggots and weak genetics. So this forum post by a guy is actually very revealing about these typical guys' motivations. Guys do not oppose bestiality because they care about animals. They oppose it just to get to the guy doing it, who is the "faggot".
In fact the behavioral track record of guys online is they want to trash environmentalism, animal rights and vegetarianism—causes they consider annoying, weird and for faggots—brag about eating loads of meat and using animal and polluting products, joke about casual animal cruelty... It's obvious these typical guys do not betray compassion for animals. Also, you only need to look at the recent coverage disparity between the Notre Dame cathedral fire versus the currently atmosphere-devouring Amazon rainforest fires, to see compassion for animals does not run in our default programming.
I would like to find more of these blatant postings if they're out there. This needs to be a very important point pushed back on these attackers that use bestiality-hunting as a narrative. Rob them of their righteousness, and put them of the spot. They are not genuine, and just mean to do harm to other guys.
(Archive of forum post's page for full context: http://archive.is/wVjti )
Petition to add "forced to penetrate" to definition of Rape.
Posted 6 years agoIs this meant to identify with the boy, or the father?
Posted 6 years agohttps://cdn.discordapp.com/attachme.....98432768_n.png
Why is the father in these comics always some overworked, receding, colourless polo pocket shirt and khaki-wearing wage slave?
He looks like he's only allowed to bond with his son on birthdays—and he's just there for the cake blowout moment before he has to head back to the office.
Why is the father in these comics always some overworked, receding, colourless polo pocket shirt and khaki-wearing wage slave?
He looks like he's only allowed to bond with his son on birthdays—and he's just there for the cake blowout moment before he has to head back to the office.
A furry-trashing meme I found; incites fatherhood over boys
Posted 7 years agohttps://cdn.discordapp.com/attachme....._o_7251694.png
This is a meme I found spreading on a small discord server for a tight-knit video game mod I'm still a member of. This was amongst a rotation of furry-trashing memes that were making their rounds in the server's # shit-posting channel.
Something I want to quickly pick up on amongst the low-status nerdy gaming male trashing of furry that I saw, something I notice in general is nerds also tend to do this annoying (but also deeply disturbing and alarming thing) of bringing up fatherly-child neglect to explain away how boys could "turn" to furry; or incite the biological father's role to "be there for your son ('before it's too late!'—as is written in the image filename)"; or express any amount of displeasure towards sons who do not turn out to fit the mold of some archetypical Hank Hill type '50s robotic father's own likeness—a likeness they themselves tend to despise.
The discord server, by the way, is hung out by a same tight core of active users, who basically address each other as “fam” or “brother” (so...they treat it as their family to get away from their real families). (Also there's plenty of anime and cartoon related shit-posting to boot, as well as complaints about things, like the latest Diablo Immortal.)
My question is: what is the purpose of low-status nerds who do this?
This is a meme I found spreading on a small discord server for a tight-knit video game mod I'm still a member of. This was amongst a rotation of furry-trashing memes that were making their rounds in the server's # shit-posting channel.
Something I want to quickly pick up on amongst the low-status nerdy gaming male trashing of furry that I saw, something I notice in general is nerds also tend to do this annoying (but also deeply disturbing and alarming thing) of bringing up fatherly-child neglect to explain away how boys could "turn" to furry; or incite the biological father's role to "be there for your son ('before it's too late!'—as is written in the image filename)"; or express any amount of displeasure towards sons who do not turn out to fit the mold of some archetypical Hank Hill type '50s robotic father's own likeness—a likeness they themselves tend to despise.
The discord server, by the way, is hung out by a same tight core of active users, who basically address each other as “fam” or “brother” (so...they treat it as their family to get away from their real families). (Also there's plenty of anime and cartoon related shit-posting to boot, as well as complaints about things, like the latest Diablo Immortal.)
My question is: what is the purpose of low-status nerds who do this?
FA+
