FA+
Shop
A Fox's Tale Review
Posted 9 years ago"It's OK, Mama will take care of this!"
I like animation since I've entered the animation buisness on 2010. But, have you know that there's an Hungrain film called 'Vuk: Der Kliene Fuchs'? It was the most, if I haven't saw it, stupendous film in all Hungrain, as well on U.S.. After the success, they decided to do a sequel, called 'Kis Vuk', and was the most underated wonky film of all time, thanks to its dumb CG and voice acting.
This is the most clumsy sequel of the original 'Vuk'. First, the animation is dumb and boring, and yes, it will make you sleep. The designs are sucky, the most notable is Vuk/Little Jack, witch his design looked more like a fursuit design, and strongly resembling Majira Strawberry. The story is very painfully long, boring and thin for it's length. The voices are strongly poor, with their mouths being wonkingly out-of-sync. Unlike the original 'Vuk', you will feel sorry for Vuk here. The editing felt sloppy and lumpy, and yes, this film failed to capture the spirit of the original film. Not even Mama ™ could fix it! Heck, and I will tell you Mama is still one of the most greatest game characters ever! She crafts, garden, babysits, camp, and heck, she's even a stellar chef! Couldn't Mama ™ fix this animation disaster, into a more light-hearted flick with cel-shaded animation for the whole family to enjoy?
In short, skip this nasty sequel and put the original Vuk, or, if you want to free for the boring animation, play 'Cooking Mama'.
RATINGS:
Kis Vuk: 15% F-
Cooking Mama: 85% B+
© Furrysael_Returns
I like animation since I've entered the animation buisness on 2010. But, have you know that there's an Hungrain film called 'Vuk: Der Kliene Fuchs'? It was the most, if I haven't saw it, stupendous film in all Hungrain, as well on U.S.. After the success, they decided to do a sequel, called 'Kis Vuk', and was the most underated wonky film of all time, thanks to its dumb CG and voice acting.
THE BADThis is the most clumsy sequel of the original 'Vuk'. First, the animation is dumb and boring, and yes, it will make you sleep. The designs are sucky, the most notable is Vuk/Little Jack, witch his design looked more like a fursuit design, and strongly resembling Majira Strawberry. The story is very painfully long, boring and thin for it's length. The voices are strongly poor, with their mouths being wonkingly out-of-sync. Unlike the original 'Vuk', you will feel sorry for Vuk here. The editing felt sloppy and lumpy, and yes, this film failed to capture the spirit of the original film. Not even Mama ™ could fix it! Heck, and I will tell you Mama is still one of the most greatest game characters ever! She crafts, garden, babysits, camp, and heck, she's even a stellar chef! Couldn't Mama ™ fix this animation disaster, into a more light-hearted flick with cel-shaded animation for the whole family to enjoy?
In short, skip this nasty sequel and put the original Vuk, or, if you want to free for the boring animation, play 'Cooking Mama'.
RATINGS:
Kis Vuk: 15% F-
Cooking Mama: 85% B+
© Furrysael_Returns
FRED the Show Review
Posted 9 years agoThis is it, this is it, the WORST, LOWEST-RATED Nickelodeon show ever produced, next to 'Marvin Marvin'.
Fred Figglehorn, you've done it again!
Here i'm discussing the lowest-rated Nickelodeon show, FRED. As reviewed by Josh Strider as NUMBER 1 in his 'Top 10 WORST Nick Shows' video.
In short, this is it...the one that everyone is talking about, FRED the Show. Fred is a clumsy little dork with a soggy high-pitched voice, and like I said, the events and elements from YouTube CANNOT be on public broadcast! Not recommended. Put on either Jack C.'s 'Doodle Toons' cartoons, or the bitingly funny Homestar Runner.
RATING:
15% F-
© Furrysael_Returns
Fred Figglehorn, you've done it again!
Here i'm discussing the lowest-rated Nickelodeon show, FRED. As reviewed by Josh Strider as NUMBER 1 in his 'Top 10 WORST Nick Shows' video.
THE BAD
In short, this is it...the one that everyone is talking about, FRED the Show. Fred is a clumsy little dork with a soggy high-pitched voice, and like I said, the events and elements from YouTube CANNOT be on public broadcast! Not recommended. Put on either Jack C.'s 'Doodle Toons' cartoons, or the bitingly funny Homestar Runner.
RATING:
15% F-
© Furrysael_Returns
Home for Rent Review
Posted 9 years agoFour comedic aliens accidentally crashes down their ship and goes to earth to rent a house to get rid of the pesky humans they see, for fun!
If you haven't heard of two comapnies, Gaumont Multimedia and Xilam, you shall like this show. It's one of the best shows ever maded, and the best one for 1997. And its one of the few 1997 animated shows to be maded on digital coloring and shot on digital video, witch makes the quality impressive and resemble a modern show.
The animation is good, vibrant, fluid and clear. The characters are one of the goodest ones i've ever seen. And the alien's setting is very perfect. The story decently resembles the 'Bugs Bunny' cartoons, but on a clever, smart and in a very good way; the storylines are about Etno, Bud, Candy and Gorgeous in their house doing something random, until their fun is interrupted by a human, who visits them. They try to get rid of them on numerous, and often hilarious, attempts, and use the SMTV to transform themselves into something depending on their situation's theme, plan their transformation by 'visiting' the human, then they later continue their humorous attempts, and later, everything worked. The digital coloring on the Gaumont Multimedia cartoons is fine, and gives the Gaumont cartoons a fresh, colorful look. The voices from 5 people are nice, good, smart, and clever. The gags are well-paced and fitted on each cartoon's action. Iggy Pop's theme is wonderful, and well fitted to the actions.
In short, one of the other greatest 1997 shows of all time, and the other best thing Gaumont Multimedia (1997-2000) and Xilam (2002-present) had to offer. Fast-paced, funny, crazy, marged with beautiful animation and good editing and voices. This show, along with Oggy and the Cockroaches and Zig and Sharko, are one of the 3 Xilam classic treasures I will reccomend to you to watch.
Also, I wonder what the aliens are going to do next...
...are they're going to invade the furries and humans at a furry convention (Like MFF or Anthrocon)? Are they're going to invade Philadelphia and it's humans? Are they're going to invade the Zig and Sharko gang? Are they're going to invade a parade, or the Rio Olympic Games? Imagine these alien's situations on your heads...
RATING:
95% A+
XILAM ANIMATION
© 2016. All rights reserved
© Furrysael_Returns
If you haven't heard of two comapnies, Gaumont Multimedia and Xilam, you shall like this show. It's one of the best shows ever maded, and the best one for 1997. And its one of the few 1997 animated shows to be maded on digital coloring and shot on digital video, witch makes the quality impressive and resemble a modern show.
THE GOODThe animation is good, vibrant, fluid and clear. The characters are one of the goodest ones i've ever seen. And the alien's setting is very perfect. The story decently resembles the 'Bugs Bunny' cartoons, but on a clever, smart and in a very good way; the storylines are about Etno, Bud, Candy and Gorgeous in their house doing something random, until their fun is interrupted by a human, who visits them. They try to get rid of them on numerous, and often hilarious, attempts, and use the SMTV to transform themselves into something depending on their situation's theme, plan their transformation by 'visiting' the human, then they later continue their humorous attempts, and later, everything worked. The digital coloring on the Gaumont Multimedia cartoons is fine, and gives the Gaumont cartoons a fresh, colorful look. The voices from 5 people are nice, good, smart, and clever. The gags are well-paced and fitted on each cartoon's action. Iggy Pop's theme is wonderful, and well fitted to the actions.
In short, one of the other greatest 1997 shows of all time, and the other best thing Gaumont Multimedia (1997-2000) and Xilam (2002-present) had to offer. Fast-paced, funny, crazy, marged with beautiful animation and good editing and voices. This show, along with Oggy and the Cockroaches and Zig and Sharko, are one of the 3 Xilam classic treasures I will reccomend to you to watch.
Also, I wonder what the aliens are going to do next...
...are they're going to invade the furries and humans at a furry convention (Like MFF or Anthrocon)? Are they're going to invade Philadelphia and it's humans? Are they're going to invade the Zig and Sharko gang? Are they're going to invade a parade, or the Rio Olympic Games? Imagine these alien's situations on your heads...
RATING:
95% A+
XILAM ANIMATION
© 2016. All rights reserved
© Furrysael_Returns
The Oogieloves: The Big Balloon Adventure review
Posted 9 years agoThis is great example of what's everything wrong with children's entertainment, and this little piece of whale barf of a film is one of them.
This film, is an ultamate box-office bomb. Why? What about the creepy costumes, poor editing and songs, and obnoxious titular characters?
What is worsen is that people on IMDb are giving 10/10's to increase the freaking ratings!
This film is a good example of what is everything wrong with children's entertainment. First off, the costumes are preety creepy. They can range to high to nightmare when you first look at them. The colors are so bright and not in a cheerful way. Also, the songs are poorly sung, with one of the worst lyrics you'll ever hear. The plot is paper-thined, as it follows Goobie, Toofie and Zoozie searching for balloons for their pillow friend, Schluffy, because the dumb-villed talking vacuum cleaner, J. Edgar, accidentally flowed them to the sky! What an idiot! That makes no sense on a family movie! The performances are clumsy, bland and, like Bobsheaux said, ripping off 'Pee-Wee's Playhouse' (that's were Arnold makes his TV debut!) and Dr. Seuss, Cary Elwes as Bobby Woobly being the worst, because he's doing the pee-pee dance. Goobie, Toofie and Zoozie are one of the worst main characters everyone had everyone heard. They're morons (at times), obnoxious, and creepy-looking. The positive reaction of this movie on IMDb is notorious, and causing the ratings to increase. Here's an example:
(written by bigbossorochi)
'I was skeptical at first about this movie. I was blown away by the deep spiritual meanings and the existential quandaries found in The Oogieloves in the Big Balloon Adventure. If there is a better movie I have not seen it! The simplistic plot of the movie counterpoints to the inevitability of the struggles of man. The poetic undertones when the titular Oogieloves search for the magical balloons is just a metaphor for finding true love and happiness! Your children may not get all of the enriching symbolism in this movie but that's okay. Children will enjoy this magical journey and Parents will have their hearts touched by the beauty of this movie. 10 out of 10.'
REALLY PEOPLE?! This is the most insulting and annoying thing ever! Also, is it REALLY okay for children get of their theater seats and dance like bogous morons? That is not so good. You supposed to be STILL SITTING on a MOVIE THEATER! Not participating on clumsy stuff the Doofusloves ask you to! Parents will ALSO be insulted of their kids, and sometimes, asking them to sit back down.
In overall, you will be amazed of this movie. It's creepy, notorious, dissapointing, mind-insulting, bogous, revolting, disturbing, bland and annoying, Goobie, Toofie and Zoozie are obnoxious, and the film is marged by some stomach-churning editing and poorly-sung songs. Skip this trainwreck, and put on 'Hey Arnold!' or 'The Simpsons'.
RATING:
0% Z-
UPDATE:
On Wikipedia, I heard they've annouced two sequels after the failiure of this film, called 'The Oogieloves: The Big Family Adventure' and 'The Oogieloves: The Big Holiday Adventure'. I've also heard they're also making a TV series based on the film and sequels. We hope that they're going to be better than THIS film...
© Furrysael_Returns
This film, is an ultamate box-office bomb. Why? What about the creepy costumes, poor editing and songs, and obnoxious titular characters?
What is worsen is that people on IMDb are giving 10/10's to increase the freaking ratings!
THE BADThis film is a good example of what is everything wrong with children's entertainment. First off, the costumes are preety creepy. They can range to high to nightmare when you first look at them. The colors are so bright and not in a cheerful way. Also, the songs are poorly sung, with one of the worst lyrics you'll ever hear. The plot is paper-thined, as it follows Goobie, Toofie and Zoozie searching for balloons for their pillow friend, Schluffy, because the dumb-villed talking vacuum cleaner, J. Edgar, accidentally flowed them to the sky! What an idiot! That makes no sense on a family movie! The performances are clumsy, bland and, like Bobsheaux said, ripping off 'Pee-Wee's Playhouse' (that's were Arnold makes his TV debut!) and Dr. Seuss, Cary Elwes as Bobby Woobly being the worst, because he's doing the pee-pee dance. Goobie, Toofie and Zoozie are one of the worst main characters everyone had everyone heard. They're morons (at times), obnoxious, and creepy-looking. The positive reaction of this movie on IMDb is notorious, and causing the ratings to increase. Here's an example:
(written by bigbossorochi)
'I was skeptical at first about this movie. I was blown away by the deep spiritual meanings and the existential quandaries found in The Oogieloves in the Big Balloon Adventure. If there is a better movie I have not seen it! The simplistic plot of the movie counterpoints to the inevitability of the struggles of man. The poetic undertones when the titular Oogieloves search for the magical balloons is just a metaphor for finding true love and happiness! Your children may not get all of the enriching symbolism in this movie but that's okay. Children will enjoy this magical journey and Parents will have their hearts touched by the beauty of this movie. 10 out of 10.'
REALLY PEOPLE?! This is the most insulting and annoying thing ever! Also, is it REALLY okay for children get of their theater seats and dance like bogous morons? That is not so good. You supposed to be STILL SITTING on a MOVIE THEATER! Not participating on clumsy stuff the Doofusloves ask you to! Parents will ALSO be insulted of their kids, and sometimes, asking them to sit back down.
In overall, you will be amazed of this movie. It's creepy, notorious, dissapointing, mind-insulting, bogous, revolting, disturbing, bland and annoying, Goobie, Toofie and Zoozie are obnoxious, and the film is marged by some stomach-churning editing and poorly-sung songs. Skip this trainwreck, and put on 'Hey Arnold!' or 'The Simpsons'.
RATING:
0% Z-
UPDATE:
On Wikipedia, I heard they've annouced two sequels after the failiure of this film, called 'The Oogieloves: The Big Family Adventure' and 'The Oogieloves: The Big Holiday Adventure'. I've also heard they're also making a TV series based on the film and sequels. We hope that they're going to be better than THIS film...
© Furrysael_Returns
Pep's Birthday Surprise Review
Posted 9 years agoPutt-Putt and Pep's BIG snooze fest!
Another Junior Stinker from Atari, came out along with 'Life Is Rough when You Loose Your Stuff!'.
Like with 'Pajama Sam 4', this is EVEN worse than that game. We still have the painfully long, boring conversations like before, we still have the same, wonky lip-synching, what is worsen is the clumsy-looking screens, and re-used closeups.
Also, it is reconized by many to be the last Junior Adventure ever maded. And it's also an bland and moronic way to end the 'Junior Adventures' series.
The graphics? Still neat. The animation is bastly an improvement over 'Pajama Sam 4', a few of the music looks dazzling, and Putt-Putt's voice is kinda okay...but the problems are...
...the lip-synching is still off and it's still wonkier than before, especially in the beginning scene, where Putt-Putt says his first painfully long line. The conversations and cut-scenes are even worse. Like in Life is Rough when You Loose Your Stuff!, the conversations and cutscenes will cause players to die out of boredom and sleep from beggining to end, especially the scene where P.P. is going to get the food supplies. The voice acting, save for Michelle Thornson, is not good. For example, Rover's voice sounded like Mickey Mouse, witch is unfitting for 'Putt-Putt' at the time. Also, all of the music is not preety good, because the fools at Atari decided to re-use the music from 'Putt-Putt Saves the Zoo'. The screens are clumsy-looking. Like the music, Atari decided to re-use the screens from OTHER Putt-Putt games! Including:
1. The outskirts at Putt-Putt's house (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
2. The Zoo outskirts (the only difference here is that the Zoo is been replaced with the Feed Supplies, from Putt-Putt Saves the Zoo)
3. The Cartown Speedway Ad sign (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race. The only difference: the ad from the Cartown Speedway had been replaced with a sign saying 'Welcome to Cartown'.)
4. Smokey's house (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
5. Rover's Ice-Cream Kiosk (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
6. The 'Honk-the-Horn' cave (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
7. Toreble's farm (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
8. Outback Al's Zoo Kiosk (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
9. Mr. Baldini's Grocery Store! (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
10. Unknown place (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
11. Mrs. Widget's Toy Store (from various Putt-Putt games)
12. The Cartown Library (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
13. Putt-Putt's closeup (from Putt-Putt Travels Through Time)
Also, do you know that Atari just botched a classic Humongous game from 1993? That's right! They decided to botch Fatty Bear! This formula DOESN'T fit Putt-Putt at all! Also, you can change Putt-Putt's color in this game via magic wands, but when you change his color, he turns back to his trademark purple color imediatley! The dorks at Atari decided for players to NOT change his color! Ridiculous!
You done it again, Atari! You've botched up Putt-Putt, Pep, birthdays and Fatty Bear! For shame!
In overall, where's the goofiness? Where's the wit? Where's the charm? This game is not good. Wonky lip-synching, a dissapointing song, not-very-good voice acting, you can't change Putt-Putt's color, and, just like with 'Life is Rough when you Loose your Stuff!', do NOT play this game.
RATING:
45% F-
© Furrysael_Returns
Another Junior Stinker from Atari, came out along with 'Life Is Rough when You Loose Your Stuff!'.
Like with 'Pajama Sam 4', this is EVEN worse than that game. We still have the painfully long, boring conversations like before, we still have the same, wonky lip-synching, what is worsen is the clumsy-looking screens, and re-used closeups.
Also, it is reconized by many to be the last Junior Adventure ever maded. And it's also an bland and moronic way to end the 'Junior Adventures' series.
THE GOODThe graphics? Still neat. The animation is bastly an improvement over 'Pajama Sam 4', a few of the music looks dazzling, and Putt-Putt's voice is kinda okay...but the problems are...
THE BAD...the lip-synching is still off and it's still wonkier than before, especially in the beginning scene, where Putt-Putt says his first painfully long line. The conversations and cut-scenes are even worse. Like in Life is Rough when You Loose Your Stuff!, the conversations and cutscenes will cause players to die out of boredom and sleep from beggining to end, especially the scene where P.P. is going to get the food supplies. The voice acting, save for Michelle Thornson, is not good. For example, Rover's voice sounded like Mickey Mouse, witch is unfitting for 'Putt-Putt' at the time. Also, all of the music is not preety good, because the fools at Atari decided to re-use the music from 'Putt-Putt Saves the Zoo'. The screens are clumsy-looking. Like the music, Atari decided to re-use the screens from OTHER Putt-Putt games! Including:
1. The outskirts at Putt-Putt's house (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
2. The Zoo outskirts (the only difference here is that the Zoo is been replaced with the Feed Supplies, from Putt-Putt Saves the Zoo)
3. The Cartown Speedway Ad sign (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race. The only difference: the ad from the Cartown Speedway had been replaced with a sign saying 'Welcome to Cartown'.)
4. Smokey's house (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
5. Rover's Ice-Cream Kiosk (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
6. The 'Honk-the-Horn' cave (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
7. Toreble's farm (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
8. Outback Al's Zoo Kiosk (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
9. Mr. Baldini's Grocery Store! (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
10. Unknown place (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
11. Mrs. Widget's Toy Store (from various Putt-Putt games)
12. The Cartown Library (from Putt-Putt Enters the Race)
13. Putt-Putt's closeup (from Putt-Putt Travels Through Time)
Also, do you know that Atari just botched a classic Humongous game from 1993? That's right! They decided to botch Fatty Bear! This formula DOESN'T fit Putt-Putt at all! Also, you can change Putt-Putt's color in this game via magic wands, but when you change his color, he turns back to his trademark purple color imediatley! The dorks at Atari decided for players to NOT change his color! Ridiculous!
You done it again, Atari! You've botched up Putt-Putt, Pep, birthdays and Fatty Bear! For shame!
In overall, where's the goofiness? Where's the wit? Where's the charm? This game is not good. Wonky lip-synching, a dissapointing song, not-very-good voice acting, you can't change Putt-Putt's color, and, just like with 'Life is Rough when you Loose your Stuff!', do NOT play this game.
RATING:
45% F-
© Furrysael_Returns
Life Is Rough When you Loose your Stuff! Review
Posted 9 years agoA dissapointing, if not, mediocre attempt to restore the faithful spirit of Pajama Sam.
I still like Humongous Entertainment. They produced point and click/mobile games to the children with vibrant, colourful and smooth animations, imaginative music, and colorful backgrounds, but on these two games released on 2003, it was a M.E.S.S. (No, not the term 'Mess', goons! 'M.E.S.S.!')...this is Atari's first attempt to restore a classic He! point-and-click adventure franchise, let's talk about the last entry of the 'Pajama Sam' franchise, witch is called, 'Life is Rough when You Loose your Stuff!'.
'Life is Rough when you Loose Your Stuff!' is, by far, the most painfully long (because of the conversations), boring, distracting Junior Adventure everyone had ever seen. If you want a game where you can play an interactive dubbed film, look no further for 'Life is Rough when you Loose Your Stuff!' for shoddy animations, stupid and wonky lip-synching, bizarre voice acting (Sam's voice sounds different, witch sounded NOTHING like Palema Adlon.), and insane music.
The graphics here are still neat, thanks to it's YAGA engine, and to skip the cutscenes, you have to press the ENTER key.
Ok, where to start criticizing? First off, the past Humongous games features vibrant animation, that kids look like they're watching cartoons, but in this game, is shoddy, with some animation errors you can't see on a He! game, especially on the beggining scene, witch has the most dizziest screen shake you'll ever see on a He! game. The conversations here are painfully long, distracting and could die you from boredom and sleep from beggining of the conversation to the end of the conversation. The lip-sycnhing is a bit off, plus is wonky and stupid to see their mouths move like they're in a 1960's anime. Also, sometimes, their mouths don't actually move when they're saying, instead, their mouths are completely shut. The music is insane, most infamously, the song, witch was heavy criticized by Humongous fans alike, with some saying that the song's genre needs to be belonged on a Putt-Putt game, and NOT Pajama Sam. The plot of Sam getting his comic book back and meet Pajama Man is preety moronic, bland , boring, and lacks the original humor, wit and goofiness of the previous games. The voice acting is preety bizarre, bland, and cocky. Because A, Sam's voice isn't the same, B, some of dem voices are preety loud and obnoxious, and C, the sock's singing voice could grate your speakers. Why? You have the great Palema Adlon! You have PAJAMA SAM! These voices sounded NOTHING like 'Pajama Sam'! Also, the song, looked pretty out of place and infamously criticized to be the worst Humongous Entertainment song of all time. Why? The lipsyncing is decent and also annoying, and the sock's voice grates your ears. The song is, like the lipsynching, also annoying and should've been belonged on a Putt-Putt game instead of Pajama Sam.
In overall, long, boring, distracting, wonky, shoddy, out-of-place, stupid, bland, bizarre, clunky and cocky are the only words you need to describe about this game. Wonky lip-synching, shoddy animations, long and boring cutscenes, do NOT play it!
Also, for shame, Atari, you've bothced up Pajama Sam, Humongous Entertainment and it's fans and Palema Adlon. FOR SHAME!
RATING:
53% F-
© Furrysael_Returns
I still like Humongous Entertainment. They produced point and click/mobile games to the children with vibrant, colourful and smooth animations, imaginative music, and colorful backgrounds, but on these two games released on 2003, it was a M.E.S.S. (No, not the term 'Mess', goons! 'M.E.S.S.!')...this is Atari's first attempt to restore a classic He! point-and-click adventure franchise, let's talk about the last entry of the 'Pajama Sam' franchise, witch is called, 'Life is Rough when You Loose your Stuff!'.
'Life is Rough when you Loose Your Stuff!' is, by far, the most painfully long (because of the conversations), boring, distracting Junior Adventure everyone had ever seen. If you want a game where you can play an interactive dubbed film, look no further for 'Life is Rough when you Loose Your Stuff!' for shoddy animations, stupid and wonky lip-synching, bizarre voice acting (Sam's voice sounds different, witch sounded NOTHING like Palema Adlon.), and insane music.
THE GOODThe graphics here are still neat, thanks to it's YAGA engine, and to skip the cutscenes, you have to press the ENTER key.
THE BADOk, where to start criticizing? First off, the past Humongous games features vibrant animation, that kids look like they're watching cartoons, but in this game, is shoddy, with some animation errors you can't see on a He! game, especially on the beggining scene, witch has the most dizziest screen shake you'll ever see on a He! game. The conversations here are painfully long, distracting and could die you from boredom and sleep from beggining of the conversation to the end of the conversation. The lip-sycnhing is a bit off, plus is wonky and stupid to see their mouths move like they're in a 1960's anime. Also, sometimes, their mouths don't actually move when they're saying, instead, their mouths are completely shut. The music is insane, most infamously, the song, witch was heavy criticized by Humongous fans alike, with some saying that the song's genre needs to be belonged on a Putt-Putt game, and NOT Pajama Sam. The plot of Sam getting his comic book back and meet Pajama Man is preety moronic, bland , boring, and lacks the original humor, wit and goofiness of the previous games. The voice acting is preety bizarre, bland, and cocky. Because A, Sam's voice isn't the same, B, some of dem voices are preety loud and obnoxious, and C, the sock's singing voice could grate your speakers. Why? You have the great Palema Adlon! You have PAJAMA SAM! These voices sounded NOTHING like 'Pajama Sam'! Also, the song, looked pretty out of place and infamously criticized to be the worst Humongous Entertainment song of all time. Why? The lipsyncing is decent and also annoying, and the sock's voice grates your ears. The song is, like the lipsynching, also annoying and should've been belonged on a Putt-Putt game instead of Pajama Sam.
In overall, long, boring, distracting, wonky, shoddy, out-of-place, stupid, bland, bizarre, clunky and cocky are the only words you need to describe about this game. Wonky lip-synching, shoddy animations, long and boring cutscenes, do NOT play it!
Also, for shame, Atari, you've bothced up Pajama Sam, Humongous Entertainment and it's fans and Palema Adlon. FOR SHAME!
RATING:
53% F-
© Furrysael_Returns
Cooking Mama (2006) Review
Posted 9 years agoMama debuts to the whole crowd!
Cooking Mama! The first entry in the 'Mama' series, had come to your DS! Yes, this Japan game marks the first time a new character arived, is not either Little Motoko in the 1993's! But, one woman who likes to cook, garden, craft, babysit and camping, that name is MAMA. This everything woman has become a hit to the audience, and also debuted on this game. She is still one of my favorites characters of all time! Is this game good? Let's find out...
THE GOOD
This game is very good influence of the usage of the Nintendo DS touchscreen. Players could chop, dice, cook and more to the way of victory. Mama's animations will remind you of the 1960's anime's, they're preety good. Also, this game become the most popular games of all time, and won the 'Best of E3' awards, making Mama an award winner!
THE BAD
The only bad is the absence of tutorial.
In overall, Mama is still the woman we know and love with, and her first debut makes her an winner. And it's also the best influence of the Nintendo DS touch-screen. I'll Recommend it.
RATING:
85% B+
© Furrysael_Returns
Cooking Mama! The first entry in the 'Mama' series, had come to your DS! Yes, this Japan game marks the first time a new character arived, is not either Little Motoko in the 1993's! But, one woman who likes to cook, garden, craft, babysit and camping, that name is MAMA. This everything woman has become a hit to the audience, and also debuted on this game. She is still one of my favorites characters of all time! Is this game good? Let's find out...
THE GOOD
This game is very good influence of the usage of the Nintendo DS touchscreen. Players could chop, dice, cook and more to the way of victory. Mama's animations will remind you of the 1960's anime's, they're preety good. Also, this game become the most popular games of all time, and won the 'Best of E3' awards, making Mama an award winner!
THE BAD
The only bad is the absence of tutorial.
In overall, Mama is still the woman we know and love with, and her first debut makes her an winner. And it's also the best influence of the Nintendo DS touch-screen. I'll Recommend it.
RATING:
85% B+
© Furrysael_Returns
Teen Titans Go in: Finally a Lesson Review
Posted 9 years ago(This is my 2nd Teen Titans Go! rant on this site!)
Robin teaches us a good lesson of how planning your future is not a joke.
I still recommend the original Teen Titans and still don't like Teen Titans Go!, but this episode focuses on the Teen Titans learning a lesson of planning your future, and building some cash. Witch is true, because plannin' your OWN future is not a joke.
THE GOOD:
The animation (done in Adobe Animate) is still clean and colorful, and the music fits well with the action. Plus, the lesson that Robin teaches us a lesson of...HOW TO BUY RENTAL PROPETY AS A LONG TERM INVERSTMENT at the end and thoughout is so true, that he said that 'planning your own future is no joke' at the end, witch is also true. We also get an action scene of the Titans fighting over the badies, because the Titans have been moved! The voice acting is still great, because the original voice cast returned to voice the characters.
THE BAD:
There a few lines of dialouge that don't make sense. (i.e. 'Those are all garbage lessons! Except for the refrigerator one, that's good to know!')
In overall, this good Teen Titans Go! episode really shows the lesson of how planning your future is not a performacing joke. If you want to know about rental propety, watch this episode over and over again, if you like to rent a building of your own, or go to a library and know more about equity and renting, though I still don't recommend the modern 'Teen Titans', this episode is the one I will reccomend, for your future.
Rating:
Episode: 80% B-
Show: 49% F-
© DC Comics
© Furrysael_Returns
Robin teaches us a good lesson of how planning your future is not a joke.
I still recommend the original Teen Titans and still don't like Teen Titans Go!, but this episode focuses on the Teen Titans learning a lesson of planning your future, and building some cash. Witch is true, because plannin' your OWN future is not a joke.
THE GOOD:
The animation (done in Adobe Animate) is still clean and colorful, and the music fits well with the action. Plus, the lesson that Robin teaches us a lesson of...HOW TO BUY RENTAL PROPETY AS A LONG TERM INVERSTMENT at the end and thoughout is so true, that he said that 'planning your own future is no joke' at the end, witch is also true. We also get an action scene of the Titans fighting over the badies, because the Titans have been moved! The voice acting is still great, because the original voice cast returned to voice the characters.
THE BAD:
There a few lines of dialouge that don't make sense. (i.e. 'Those are all garbage lessons! Except for the refrigerator one, that's good to know!')
In overall, this good Teen Titans Go! episode really shows the lesson of how planning your future is not a performacing joke. If you want to know about rental propety, watch this episode over and over again, if you like to rent a building of your own, or go to a library and know more about equity and renting, though I still don't recommend the modern 'Teen Titans', this episode is the one I will reccomend, for your future.
Rating:
Episode: 80% B-
Show: 49% F-
© DC Comics
© Furrysael_Returns
Horton Hears a Who! by Dr. Seuss Review
Posted 9 years agoA person is a person, no matter how small, that this movie rocks, and so are we dock and laugh with Horton and the Whos!
A sweet trip down memory lane, that this is the kind of movie Dr. Seuss fans are asking! This was a box success!
THE GOOD:
The animation is super neat, for starters, and the 2D animation on Horton's imagination where he's fighting monkeys and going as fast as lightning to Mount Nool is so superb, that keeps the best english anime dubs. The music is heartwarming, and not as creepy as the Gene Deitch Tom and Jerry cartoons, especially that awesome song near the end. The music also fits the action, too. The voice acting is great to dazzling. Jim Carrey is great as Horton, and he didn't ruin the character, since Mike Myers had destroyed The Cat in the Hat as a crude, vomiting, belching, and biliah character. The film nostalgically keeps the comedic plot of the book. And there's no potty humor after all.
THE BAD:
There's a few scenes that don't make sence.
In overall, this nostalgic film keeps the witty plot of the book, it's dazzingly animated, keeps the Dr. Seuss rhyming, beautifully voice acted, and keeps the message: 'A Person is a Person, No Matter How Small'. Worth watching and i'll highly recommend it.
Rating:
95% A+
© Blue Sky Studios
© Dr. Seuss Enterprises
© Furrysael_Returns
A sweet trip down memory lane, that this is the kind of movie Dr. Seuss fans are asking! This was a box success!
THE GOOD:
The animation is super neat, for starters, and the 2D animation on Horton's imagination where he's fighting monkeys and going as fast as lightning to Mount Nool is so superb, that keeps the best english anime dubs. The music is heartwarming, and not as creepy as the Gene Deitch Tom and Jerry cartoons, especially that awesome song near the end. The music also fits the action, too. The voice acting is great to dazzling. Jim Carrey is great as Horton, and he didn't ruin the character, since Mike Myers had destroyed The Cat in the Hat as a crude, vomiting, belching, and biliah character. The film nostalgically keeps the comedic plot of the book. And there's no potty humor after all.
THE BAD:
There's a few scenes that don't make sence.
In overall, this nostalgic film keeps the witty plot of the book, it's dazzingly animated, keeps the Dr. Seuss rhyming, beautifully voice acted, and keeps the message: 'A Person is a Person, No Matter How Small'. Worth watching and i'll highly recommend it.
Rating:
95% A+
© Blue Sky Studios
© Dr. Seuss Enterprises
© Furrysael_Returns
Gene Deitch's Tom and Jerry Review
Posted 9 years agoThe usual cat-and-mouse hijinks, but on a creepy and sadistic way.
O Gene Deitch, what have you forsaken us? This franchise of 12 cartoons, isn't good. Why? Let's find out...
THE GOOD:
The only good one is 'The Tom and Jerry Cartoon Kit'.
THE BAD:
Where to start? The animation in the H-B and Chuck Jones cartoons are great, simple, and crisp like a cookie. But in Gene Deitch's take on normal Tom and Jerry is poor, awful, wretched, and terrible. Tom Cat and Jerry Mouse is wonkily drawn, and Gene's direction style does NOT fit 'Tom and Jerry'. The music on the Filmation (an improvement over the Gene Deitch ones), H-B and Chuck Jones' cartoons were good, well paced and (for the Filmation ones) well synthesided. But on Gene's cartoons were creepy, horrifying and very sadistic. Heck, Filmation's synth music is better than the Gene ones, because is tamer, but this type of music is horrifying. The sound effects in the HB, Filmation and Chuck Jones cartoons are good, and a feast to your ears, but here is bizzare, somewhat horrifying, ear-bleeding and could your stomach churn. Also, some of these sounds are very poorly placed, especially the pirate's peg-leg on one short. And, all 12 stories does NOT fit Tom and Jerry. Tom and Jerry on a safari? Tom and Jerry in space? Jerry spoofing the MGM logo? Tom and Jerry in Greek? Tom and Jerry performing 'Carmen'? WHAT?! Also, in all of these 12 abominations, you'll be sorry for poor ol' Tom. Jerry's behaviour is not good, because he treats Tom Cat like his owner, and sometimes sadistic, cruel and mean to him. The gags and violence are not funny. It's sickening, and disturbing, like in the 'Sorry Safari' (sure is sorry, all right!), witch has a lion roaring in the beggining, with one of the most FRIGHTNING roars you'll ever hear. And all of the 12 stories, like I said, does NOT fit Tom and Jerry's default and usual hijinks.
In overall, these series of poorly animated, horrifying, disturbing, sickening, and gross cartoons is the ONE you can LARGELY skip. Want something better? Put the modern Tom and Jerry, Hanna-Barbera Tom and Jerry, Chuck Jones Tom and Jerry and even Filmation Tom and Jerry cartoons to tame of your minds with the sickly disturbing Gene Deitch cartoons, with the exception of 'The Tom and Jerry Cartoon Kit'.
Ratings:
5% Z+
© Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.
© Furrysael_Returns
O Gene Deitch, what have you forsaken us? This franchise of 12 cartoons, isn't good. Why? Let's find out...
THE GOOD:
The only good one is 'The Tom and Jerry Cartoon Kit'.
THE BAD:
Where to start? The animation in the H-B and Chuck Jones cartoons are great, simple, and crisp like a cookie. But in Gene Deitch's take on normal Tom and Jerry is poor, awful, wretched, and terrible. Tom Cat and Jerry Mouse is wonkily drawn, and Gene's direction style does NOT fit 'Tom and Jerry'. The music on the Filmation (an improvement over the Gene Deitch ones), H-B and Chuck Jones' cartoons were good, well paced and (for the Filmation ones) well synthesided. But on Gene's cartoons were creepy, horrifying and very sadistic. Heck, Filmation's synth music is better than the Gene ones, because is tamer, but this type of music is horrifying. The sound effects in the HB, Filmation and Chuck Jones cartoons are good, and a feast to your ears, but here is bizzare, somewhat horrifying, ear-bleeding and could your stomach churn. Also, some of these sounds are very poorly placed, especially the pirate's peg-leg on one short. And, all 12 stories does NOT fit Tom and Jerry. Tom and Jerry on a safari? Tom and Jerry in space? Jerry spoofing the MGM logo? Tom and Jerry in Greek? Tom and Jerry performing 'Carmen'? WHAT?! Also, in all of these 12 abominations, you'll be sorry for poor ol' Tom. Jerry's behaviour is not good, because he treats Tom Cat like his owner, and sometimes sadistic, cruel and mean to him. The gags and violence are not funny. It's sickening, and disturbing, like in the 'Sorry Safari' (sure is sorry, all right!), witch has a lion roaring in the beggining, with one of the most FRIGHTNING roars you'll ever hear. And all of the 12 stories, like I said, does NOT fit Tom and Jerry's default and usual hijinks.
In overall, these series of poorly animated, horrifying, disturbing, sickening, and gross cartoons is the ONE you can LARGELY skip. Want something better? Put the modern Tom and Jerry, Hanna-Barbera Tom and Jerry, Chuck Jones Tom and Jerry and even Filmation Tom and Jerry cartoons to tame of your minds with the sickly disturbing Gene Deitch cartoons, with the exception of 'The Tom and Jerry Cartoon Kit'.
Ratings:
5% Z+
© Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.
© Furrysael_Returns
Frosty Returns Review
Posted 9 years agoPeanuts meets Frosty the Snowman!
From the company that brought to us the Peanuts specials and the first 2 Garfield specials, comes a painfully boring, shallow, and idioticy special featuring FROSTY THE SNOWMAN.
THE GOOD:
The animation is still unchanged, like most other Lee Mendelson-Bill Melendez specials, but is good, and simple.
THE BAD:
Ok, what's with the designs? They looked more like Charles Schulz designed them! First, the designs are mediocre, especially that nerdy boy looked like Marcie and Peppermint Patty's brother-in-law. Second, the designs looked more like the designs from the 'Peanuts' comics, and it felt like, what I've said before, that Charles Monroe Schulz designed them. The music is bearly (at times) repetitive, with a few BGM looking out-of-place. And, there are TWO lines of dialouge that make no sense.
In overall, this bland and wonky sequel to a classic Rakin/Bass cartoon, is TWO of Lee Mendelson-Bill Melendez Productions' wonkiest fails, first being 'It's the Girl in the Red Truck, Charlie Brown!'. Skip this wonky special, and put the Rakin/Bass one, or, put the PEANUTS christmas specials, for more holiday fun!
RATING:
55% F+
© Lee Mendelson-Bill Melendez Productions.
© Furrysael_Returns
From the company that brought to us the Peanuts specials and the first 2 Garfield specials, comes a painfully boring, shallow, and idioticy special featuring FROSTY THE SNOWMAN.
THE GOOD:
The animation is still unchanged, like most other Lee Mendelson-Bill Melendez specials, but is good, and simple.
THE BAD:
Ok, what's with the designs? They looked more like Charles Schulz designed them! First, the designs are mediocre, especially that nerdy boy looked like Marcie and Peppermint Patty's brother-in-law. Second, the designs looked more like the designs from the 'Peanuts' comics, and it felt like, what I've said before, that Charles Monroe Schulz designed them. The music is bearly (at times) repetitive, with a few BGM looking out-of-place. And, there are TWO lines of dialouge that make no sense.
In overall, this bland and wonky sequel to a classic Rakin/Bass cartoon, is TWO of Lee Mendelson-Bill Melendez Productions' wonkiest fails, first being 'It's the Girl in the Red Truck, Charlie Brown!'. Skip this wonky special, and put the Rakin/Bass one, or, put the PEANUTS christmas specials, for more holiday fun!
RATING:
55% F+
© Lee Mendelson-Bill Melendez Productions.
© Furrysael_Returns
Super Duper Sumos Review
Posted 9 years agoPeace! Honor! Truth! Let's get PHaT!
Big Bottom Bros! Sumo Squeeze! They got guts and BUTTS! Will this show succeed? Probally not...
Anyway, let's talk about the STUPIDEST thing DHX Cookie Jar has given us: 'Super Duper Sumos'. A half-hour cartoon show focusing on three sumos members of the PHAT: Mamoo, Kimo and Booma, who goes on adventures using their primary weapons: Their BUTTS. Will this show EVER be a success? Let's find out...
THE GOOD:
EMation provided the animation, it was okay. The audio (including the voices) is crisp, it was also okay. The music is by Allaman, it was once again okay. It also has a nice theme song though.
THE BAD:
This series is aimed at kids and children. But, not for all ages, but for kids and children who likes FAT and BUTTCHEEK jokes. It also plays like a cheerful version of 'Ren and Stimpy'. Also, 'PHAT'? ('I'm Johnny! (PHAT!)') What kinda name is that anyway? That's stupid, really!
In overall, if you like butt, sumo and fat jokes, watch this one, but I WON'T recommend it. Skip it and put season 1 of 'Johnny Test'.
Ratings:
65% D+
© Furrysael_Returns
Big Bottom Bros! Sumo Squeeze! They got guts and BUTTS! Will this show succeed? Probally not...
Anyway, let's talk about the STUPIDEST thing DHX Cookie Jar has given us: 'Super Duper Sumos'. A half-hour cartoon show focusing on three sumos members of the PHAT: Mamoo, Kimo and Booma, who goes on adventures using their primary weapons: Their BUTTS. Will this show EVER be a success? Let's find out...
THE GOOD:
EMation provided the animation, it was okay. The audio (including the voices) is crisp, it was also okay. The music is by Allaman, it was once again okay. It also has a nice theme song though.
THE BAD:
This series is aimed at kids and children. But, not for all ages, but for kids and children who likes FAT and BUTTCHEEK jokes. It also plays like a cheerful version of 'Ren and Stimpy'. Also, 'PHAT'? ('I'm Johnny! (PHAT!)') What kinda name is that anyway? That's stupid, really!
In overall, if you like butt, sumo and fat jokes, watch this one, but I WON'T recommend it. Skip it and put season 1 of 'Johnny Test'.
Ratings:
65% D+
© Furrysael_Returns
Teen Titans Go in: The Return of Slade Review (1st Journal!)
Posted 9 years ago'I think the question everybody's asking at the time is 'What where you thinking'?'
I liked the Teen Titans original series. I will still reccomend the original series. But, when TTG came out, the first 4 'Teen Titans Go!' episodes are good, up until the show got downhill, spatted the characters, action and drama, and came this...the one what everyone's talking about...'The Return of Slade'...the worst 'Teen Titans Go!' episode of all time.
THE GOOD:
The Adobe Animate CC animation is colourful and clean. That's the only good one. But...
THE BAD:
...the whole thing is VERY misleading. With a plot of Cyborg and Beast Boy putting a clown for the Titans' party, rather than The Titans (not be confused with LittleBigPlanet 3's 'Titans') fighting with Slade. The 'Teen Titans Go!' AND 'Teen Titans' fans wanted to see Slade, but as soon they gave their fans the middle finger, they maded this non-sensical, bad, middle fingered episode. The writing is very bad, it focused on modern Cyborg and modern Beast Boy putting a clown for the Titans' party, until they make some adjustments, and goes out-of-control and wrecks havoc Jump City. The gag of Starfire afraid of clowns is annoying and repetitive, thanks to her loud scream.
In overall, fans of modern and classic 'Teen Titans' wants to see Slade, but they gave the middle finger, and it should had been scrapped. Weak, misleading, non-sensical and a annoying, repetitive gag (Starfire being afraid of clowns), skip this one, and watch the original.
© Furrysael_Returns
I liked the Teen Titans original series. I will still reccomend the original series. But, when TTG came out, the first 4 'Teen Titans Go!' episodes are good, up until the show got downhill, spatted the characters, action and drama, and came this...the one what everyone's talking about...'The Return of Slade'...the worst 'Teen Titans Go!' episode of all time.
THE GOOD:
The Adobe Animate CC animation is colourful and clean. That's the only good one. But...
THE BAD:
...the whole thing is VERY misleading. With a plot of Cyborg and Beast Boy putting a clown for the Titans' party, rather than The Titans (not be confused with LittleBigPlanet 3's 'Titans') fighting with Slade. The 'Teen Titans Go!' AND 'Teen Titans' fans wanted to see Slade, but as soon they gave their fans the middle finger, they maded this non-sensical, bad, middle fingered episode. The writing is very bad, it focused on modern Cyborg and modern Beast Boy putting a clown for the Titans' party, until they make some adjustments, and goes out-of-control and wrecks havoc Jump City. The gag of Starfire afraid of clowns is annoying and repetitive, thanks to her loud scream.
In overall, fans of modern and classic 'Teen Titans' wants to see Slade, but they gave the middle finger, and it should had been scrapped. Weak, misleading, non-sensical and a annoying, repetitive gag (Starfire being afraid of clowns), skip this one, and watch the original.
Ratings:
SHOW: 49% F-
EPISODE: 0% Z-© Furrysael_Returns
25 journals skipped
