Fighting the good feral fight
Posted a week agoHoly crap, I've posted something on here for the first time in over a year! I'm alright; nobody worry 'bout me.
So lately I've been seeing a lot of discourse and controversy surrounding the use of "feral" characters in NSFW art. For those who don't know, a "feral" consists of a furry character that walks on all fours, or has a similar anatomy to that of a regular animal, with the added bonus of being able to talk, think, and emote like a human. As someone who likes ferals more than anthros in general, I believe that the "talking, thinking and emoting like a human" aspect is #1 when it comes to this sort of thing. Animals are dear to me. I love animals, but I'm not sexually attracted to real animals. Maybe to REALISTIC animals, but not REAL ones. They could look like a real animal (think live-action Disney), but as long as they are able to hypothetically appropriately consent, then there really is no issue to it, is there?
Alongside that, it is incredibly important to separate fiction from reality. Animals are weird. I love 'em, but there's nothing attractive about ANY type of animal -- except humans, I suppose, since we are technically animals. But I digress. When you create a fictional animal character, you are able to turn them into whatever you want. After all, they're just characters. But if you're gonna make NSFW of it, I will only support it if it passes the Harkness Test. And if it DOES pass the Harkness Test, I ask you, what's the trouble? If an anthro with a head that looks EXACTLY like the artist's pet dog is OK, what's wrong with a talking four-legger?
Be a furry. Not a zoophile. I'm open for discussion. See ya next year! :P
So lately I've been seeing a lot of discourse and controversy surrounding the use of "feral" characters in NSFW art. For those who don't know, a "feral" consists of a furry character that walks on all fours, or has a similar anatomy to that of a regular animal, with the added bonus of being able to talk, think, and emote like a human. As someone who likes ferals more than anthros in general, I believe that the "talking, thinking and emoting like a human" aspect is #1 when it comes to this sort of thing. Animals are dear to me. I love animals, but I'm not sexually attracted to real animals. Maybe to REALISTIC animals, but not REAL ones. They could look like a real animal (think live-action Disney), but as long as they are able to hypothetically appropriately consent, then there really is no issue to it, is there?
Alongside that, it is incredibly important to separate fiction from reality. Animals are weird. I love 'em, but there's nothing attractive about ANY type of animal -- except humans, I suppose, since we are technically animals. But I digress. When you create a fictional animal character, you are able to turn them into whatever you want. After all, they're just characters. But if you're gonna make NSFW of it, I will only support it if it passes the Harkness Test. And if it DOES pass the Harkness Test, I ask you, what's the trouble? If an anthro with a head that looks EXACTLY like the artist's pet dog is OK, what's wrong with a talking four-legger?
Be a furry. Not a zoophile. I'm open for discussion. See ya next year! :P
More details on Tucker's arrest
Posted a year agoEarlier today I broke the news that Tucker, my yellow fursona-esque character, was arrested for disorderly conduct. Here's the full story:
Tucker was just walking down the sidewalk, when he passed by this woman, whose identity and appearance will be kept anonymous for this case. He started shouting at her, making catcalls and inappropriate comments such as "You are one sexy mama" and "Isn't prostitution illegal in this state?". He also appeared to have followed her for a few seconds before she went running off. He did not continue to pursue.
About 40 minutes later, a report was made with the local police department. Tucker was lying underneath a tree in a public park when he was caught. He did not resist arrest, but asked several questions. He was compliant throughout the booking process, but has been largely antisocial throughout, having said very few words.
He is due for trial on June 1st. He is not expected to be released until June 23rd.
(Why am I making this event? Cuz I can, that's why!)
Tucker was just walking down the sidewalk, when he passed by this woman, whose identity and appearance will be kept anonymous for this case. He started shouting at her, making catcalls and inappropriate comments such as "You are one sexy mama" and "Isn't prostitution illegal in this state?". He also appeared to have followed her for a few seconds before she went running off. He did not continue to pursue.
About 40 minutes later, a report was made with the local police department. Tucker was lying underneath a tree in a public park when he was caught. He did not resist arrest, but asked several questions. He was compliant throughout the booking process, but has been largely antisocial throughout, having said very few words.
He is due for trial on June 1st. He is not expected to be released until June 23rd.
(Why am I making this event? Cuz I can, that's why!)
Remembering Sally. 2009-2023
Posted 2 years agoThis is a bit of a mini obituary for my beagle, Sally, who died earlier today.
We adopted Sally when she was four months old, for my 8th birthday. She was a quiet little puppy at first, but she quickly made herself known to the world. She loved to lick my hand and she wasn't afraid to stand up to anyone. She was loved and respected by everyone in the family.
She wasn't really all that healthy in the later years of her life, but she showed that she had a fighting spirit by pushing on for 14 years, even after going deaf and dementious. I thought she'd last forever.
My heart is broke and my soul is stinging. All I can do is hope that I'll reunite with her in the afterlife.
Thank you, Sally. Even though I may not have shown it much, I've always loved you.
We adopted Sally when she was four months old, for my 8th birthday. She was a quiet little puppy at first, but she quickly made herself known to the world. She loved to lick my hand and she wasn't afraid to stand up to anyone. She was loved and respected by everyone in the family.
She wasn't really all that healthy in the later years of her life, but she showed that she had a fighting spirit by pushing on for 14 years, even after going deaf and dementious. I thought she'd last forever.
My heart is broke and my soul is stinging. All I can do is hope that I'll reunite with her in the afterlife.
Thank you, Sally. Even though I may not have shown it much, I've always loved you.
New Discord username
Posted 2 years agoTo try and amend the fact that I use the same usernames everywhere, I changed my Discord username. Add me now under "wildboytucker".
birthday
Posted 3 years ago21st 9/13/22
God save the king
Posted 3 years agoMy heart is shattered learning about the death of HRH Queen Elizabeth II. I will join the world in 10 days of mourning. If you wanna contact me, I may still come on here occasionally but your best bet is my Discord: rtucker913#6085
Should I update old pictures?
Posted 3 years agoI have a lot of old drawings that I'm not necessarily ashamed of, but I'm considering the idea of updating them a bit to meet updated standards. For example: Smoothing out lines, replacing handwritten text with typed text, and updating Tucker's muzzle. Do you think I should do this, or would you prefer if I kept them as is to showcase improvement or whatever?
Significant weight loss!!
Posted 3 years ago6 weeks ago I weighed around 375 pounds (FAT) and now I checked myself a few minutes ago and the scale said 357.4 pounds (skinny boi!)
I'm still a lardbutt but progress is progress. I'll keep you updated on weight fluctuations and whatnot.
I'm still a lardbutt but progress is progress. I'll keep you updated on weight fluctuations and whatnot.
Let me make something clear
Posted 3 years agoFeral lovers are NOT necessarily zoophiles.
I am a feral lover and I like four-legged creatures and similar. But if the animal CAN'T appropriately consent then I am NOT interested. Any feral character I make is of legal age (Carol & Wendy are now 19 and 18) and any that isn't will never be put into inappropriate situations. I despise anyone who willingly wants to fuck a real animal.
I was just hoping that could be cleared up. Say NO to "zoo pride". God bless you.
I am a feral lover and I like four-legged creatures and similar. But if the animal CAN'T appropriately consent then I am NOT interested. Any feral character I make is of legal age (Carol & Wendy are now 19 and 18) and any that isn't will never be put into inappropriate situations. I despise anyone who willingly wants to fuck a real animal.
I was just hoping that could be cleared up. Say NO to "zoo pride". God bless you.
Review of "Chip 'n Dale"
Posted 3 years agoBefore I get into specifics I don't wanna try and spoil anything. I also have to remark that I have never actually seen the Chip 'n Dale Rescue Rangers show, or any of the original shorts where they were naked. Though I'd certainly like to at some point or another, especially after watching this movie.
Chip 'n Dale have split up after their show had ended. Dale had "CGI surgery" and is still trying to relive his glory days but Chip is trying to make a new life for himself selling insurance. After an incident where their old friend Monty gets kidnapped, they have to get back together and work hard to solve this case.
I thought this movie was quite grand indeed. And since I never saw the show I wasn't immediately sure if I wanted to watch the movie before watching the show, and I probably would've gotten a lot of references if I did, but I was still able to enjoy the movie anyway. I thought it was kind of weird seeing the two of them not having high-pitched voices but I suppose it would've been annoying if they did. They handwave this by saying they were putting on voices for their show. There are tons of references to many Disney and non-Disney properties, and sometimes they often become an important plot point to the story, which I thought was handled rather nicely. Jabs at other franchises were playful at worst, and they didn't waste too much time focusing on one joke or reference.
There are lots of things you'd expect from a Disney movie that's in this one, like a couple of fake deaths. They were smart enough to (mostly) do away with the fart jokes as well. There are a couple of surprises too, which I won't go into to avoid spoiling things for anyone who hasn't seen it.
All in all, while I'm not entirely sure if this review does the movie justice, all I gotta say is that it's definitely worth watching if you saw the Rescue Rangers cartoon way back when, or if you're just a fan of cartoons in general. I was constantly noticing things and mentioning them out loud. Chip and Dale themselves are also really cute, and their personalities clash very well with each other. I might draw them soon.
Chip 'n Dale have split up after their show had ended. Dale had "CGI surgery" and is still trying to relive his glory days but Chip is trying to make a new life for himself selling insurance. After an incident where their old friend Monty gets kidnapped, they have to get back together and work hard to solve this case.
I thought this movie was quite grand indeed. And since I never saw the show I wasn't immediately sure if I wanted to watch the movie before watching the show, and I probably would've gotten a lot of references if I did, but I was still able to enjoy the movie anyway. I thought it was kind of weird seeing the two of them not having high-pitched voices but I suppose it would've been annoying if they did. They handwave this by saying they were putting on voices for their show. There are tons of references to many Disney and non-Disney properties, and sometimes they often become an important plot point to the story, which I thought was handled rather nicely. Jabs at other franchises were playful at worst, and they didn't waste too much time focusing on one joke or reference.
There are lots of things you'd expect from a Disney movie that's in this one, like a couple of fake deaths. They were smart enough to (mostly) do away with the fart jokes as well. There are a couple of surprises too, which I won't go into to avoid spoiling things for anyone who hasn't seen it.
All in all, while I'm not entirely sure if this review does the movie justice, all I gotta say is that it's definitely worth watching if you saw the Rescue Rangers cartoon way back when, or if you're just a fan of cartoons in general. I was constantly noticing things and mentioning them out loud. Chip and Dale themselves are also really cute, and their personalities clash very well with each other. I might draw them soon.
I'm still here
Posted 3 years agoI don't know if anyone was worried or not about my presence (probably not), but I just wanted to announce that I am still here and I haven't gone anywhere. I am still actively viewing and masturbating to content on here, and occasionally commenting too. I just felt like I needed to remind people that I'm not inactive. Most of my furry life is currently on F-List though, if you really wanna find me (look for Peter Rabbit or The Three Chipmunks, my two most active characters).
No Nut November COMPLETE!
Posted 4 years agoI did it! I lasted the entire month without nutting! I hope you did too.
No Nut November, attempt 2
Posted 4 years agoOK, so I failed last year around day 5, but this year I will succeed, and I am not going to give in no matter how horny I get. You can tempt me with the sexiest stuff, but I will not and shall not nut until December 1st.
Happy Halloween!
Posted 4 years agoSorry, no drawing today, probably. Unless I get inspired. Hope you all have a great day, I'll watch the World Series and pass out candy to whoever knocks on my door.
A little question for anyone who sees this:
Posted 4 years agoIf I ranted about something that was controversial to you, or something you heavily disagreed with, would you block me? Or would you accept my opinion? I am a pretty controversial person, but I don't wanna lose any friends.
Another year older...
Posted 4 years ago...Another year of more of the same. Happy birthday to me, I suppose.
Peter Rabbit and Peter Rabbit 2 movie reviews
Posted 4 years agoI have absolutely no clue if anyone is going to even read this, but I'm gonna avoid spoilers in the off-chance that somebody DOES read it. There probably are a few accidentally though.
If you haven't already known, I am sort of a nut about Beatrix Potter and the world of Peter Rabbit. It hasn't been for very long -- I've really only gotten into it last February. But Peter Rabbit has helped me through a lot of rough times in my life already. But that's not what I'm here to talk about. I'm gonna give a review of the two Peter Rabbit movies, and share my opinion.
Peter Rabbit came out in February of 2018, but I only watched it last June. The plot is simple: Someone inherits Mr. McGregor's garden and he learns to like the rabbits, and the rabbits themselves learn a lesson by the end. There's sort of a two-way antagonist deal going on in this movie. Peter (voiced by James Corden) is just as much an antagonist as Thomas McGregor (played by Domhnall Gleeson). Reasons for disliking each other in the movie make sense, but friendly human woman Bea (played by Rose Byrne) is able to get them to meet in the middle in the end, due to a semi-sorta love triangle between Bea, Peter, and Thomas. But with Bea and Peter, it's more of an owner-pet relationship. It's a pretty simple story, but if you love the Peter Rabbit universe and their characters, I think it would be worth it. I liked it a whole lot myself. I adore the ending song, "I Promise You".
Peter Rabbit 2 came out last June and I saw it just a few days ago, so it is still fairly fresh in my memory. Another mostly simple plot. Peter and the gang are popular because Bea published a book, but people are seeing Peter as bad, so he runs off and joins a gang, but in the end realizes that family and friends are more important than being mischievous and rambunctious. Meanwhile Bea deals with executive meddling to try and make her rabbit pals more "hip" and "cool with the kids". There are much clearer, new antagonists in this movie, and as a result Peter and Thomas are more clear protagonists. Unfortunately there are no original songs in this one, instead the ending song being Supergrass's "Alright", partially sung by a squirrel voiced by Tim Minchin. It's a very tongue-in-cheek movie, often pointing out and making fun of several of the cliches that they go through. I thought this movie was really great too.
Now here's the part where I point things out that are part of both movies. The actors did a pretty decent job on their roles. The CGI for the characters is obvious, because real rabbits don't actually act that way, but it's realistic enough to blend in fairly nicely. Their personalities are largely changed from the books. Flopsy, Mopsy, and Cottontail all have a much bigger and prominent role than they did in the books. In the books, they were more background characters than anything else. The shining exemplar of being good in contrast to Peter's naughtiness. In the movies, they're often just as naughty as Peter is. Benjamin Bunny is the more level-headed sort, unlike in his book where he egged Peter into going back into the dangerous garden. There are a lot of pop songs in both of the movies, which sort of spoiled my enjoyment. I mean, I liked them, but I feel like for a story like this, a more traditional score would be appropriate. There are several running gags in both the movies, like a group of singing birds being knocked over in the first one, and Peter pulling stuff out of his ears and doing an annoying voice in the second one. The setting is beautiful, and was based directly off the Lake District in the UK, even if the movies are Australian.
If this sort of movie seems kinda typical for you, or you're faithful to the original books and don't like the idea of contemporary adaptations, then these are not the movies for you. But if you're willing to look past that and see the movie for what it is, I think you might enjoy it. They're nothing incredible to most. IMDb rates them mostly a 6/10. But as a big Peter Rabbit fan, I gave both of the movies a 9. I recommend them. Don't be like me though and try to find it online. Buy the DVD. But if you can't, I'm willing to DM you a link to a place where you can watch them online for free.
See you in another 6 months! :P
If you haven't already known, I am sort of a nut about Beatrix Potter and the world of Peter Rabbit. It hasn't been for very long -- I've really only gotten into it last February. But Peter Rabbit has helped me through a lot of rough times in my life already. But that's not what I'm here to talk about. I'm gonna give a review of the two Peter Rabbit movies, and share my opinion.
Peter Rabbit came out in February of 2018, but I only watched it last June. The plot is simple: Someone inherits Mr. McGregor's garden and he learns to like the rabbits, and the rabbits themselves learn a lesson by the end. There's sort of a two-way antagonist deal going on in this movie. Peter (voiced by James Corden) is just as much an antagonist as Thomas McGregor (played by Domhnall Gleeson). Reasons for disliking each other in the movie make sense, but friendly human woman Bea (played by Rose Byrne) is able to get them to meet in the middle in the end, due to a semi-sorta love triangle between Bea, Peter, and Thomas. But with Bea and Peter, it's more of an owner-pet relationship. It's a pretty simple story, but if you love the Peter Rabbit universe and their characters, I think it would be worth it. I liked it a whole lot myself. I adore the ending song, "I Promise You".
Peter Rabbit 2 came out last June and I saw it just a few days ago, so it is still fairly fresh in my memory. Another mostly simple plot. Peter and the gang are popular because Bea published a book, but people are seeing Peter as bad, so he runs off and joins a gang, but in the end realizes that family and friends are more important than being mischievous and rambunctious. Meanwhile Bea deals with executive meddling to try and make her rabbit pals more "hip" and "cool with the kids". There are much clearer, new antagonists in this movie, and as a result Peter and Thomas are more clear protagonists. Unfortunately there are no original songs in this one, instead the ending song being Supergrass's "Alright", partially sung by a squirrel voiced by Tim Minchin. It's a very tongue-in-cheek movie, often pointing out and making fun of several of the cliches that they go through. I thought this movie was really great too.
Now here's the part where I point things out that are part of both movies. The actors did a pretty decent job on their roles. The CGI for the characters is obvious, because real rabbits don't actually act that way, but it's realistic enough to blend in fairly nicely. Their personalities are largely changed from the books. Flopsy, Mopsy, and Cottontail all have a much bigger and prominent role than they did in the books. In the books, they were more background characters than anything else. The shining exemplar of being good in contrast to Peter's naughtiness. In the movies, they're often just as naughty as Peter is. Benjamin Bunny is the more level-headed sort, unlike in his book where he egged Peter into going back into the dangerous garden. There are a lot of pop songs in both of the movies, which sort of spoiled my enjoyment. I mean, I liked them, but I feel like for a story like this, a more traditional score would be appropriate. There are several running gags in both the movies, like a group of singing birds being knocked over in the first one, and Peter pulling stuff out of his ears and doing an annoying voice in the second one. The setting is beautiful, and was based directly off the Lake District in the UK, even if the movies are Australian.
If this sort of movie seems kinda typical for you, or you're faithful to the original books and don't like the idea of contemporary adaptations, then these are not the movies for you. But if you're willing to look past that and see the movie for what it is, I think you might enjoy it. They're nothing incredible to most. IMDb rates them mostly a 6/10. But as a big Peter Rabbit fan, I gave both of the movies a 9. I recommend them. Don't be like me though and try to find it online. Buy the DVD. But if you can't, I'm willing to DM you a link to a place where you can watch them online for free.
See you in another 6 months! :P
No more casual roleplaying
Posted 4 years agoI've gotten bored with simple glomps and snuggles and I'm only gonna do SERIOUS RPs from now on, whether normal or erotic. I want planning and a lasting story and period of doing things. Just keep this in mind.
Paruresis
Posted 4 years agoToday on my trip to the beach, I had to pee nearly the entire time I was there. I stopped at like five different locations, attempting to pee. No matter what I was able to do, I was physically unable to. I tried with all my might, doing all sorts of strategies, but nothing worked. I had to hold it until I got home before I finally peed. Does anyone else have this sort of problem?
New profile pic!
Posted 4 years agoAfter more people agreed that my old one gave off a "creepy vibe" more than not, I updated it with this new one that I think is very cute. Shoutout to
kalu for drawing it!
kalu for drawing it!Is my profile picture creepy?
Posted 4 years agoJust a few minutes ago, someone came up to me on F-Chat telling me that my profile picture gave off a "disturbing", "uncomfortable", and a "creepy stalker" vibe to it. They thought it looked like "A pair of pants with glasses and a vagina". I wasn't aware I would give off vibes like that, and I want to have a welcoming, wholesome, friendly, and potentially sexy vibe. I was always pretty satisfied with the artwork and I always thought using one's own art would be the best thing to do.
This might just be the thoughts of one person or it could be something that many people are hiding from me. If you are, please tell me. Do I give off an unpleasant vibe? Should I change it? If I do, I'm thinking of changing it to a cropped version of the gifted piece "Innocence".
This might just be the thoughts of one person or it could be something that many people are hiding from me. If you are, please tell me. Do I give off an unpleasant vibe? Should I change it? If I do, I'm thinking of changing it to a cropped version of the gifted piece "Innocence".
I got high for the first time last night, here's how it w...
Posted 4 years agoI have tried to smoke marijuana vapes for a while now to get that "high" feeling. I thought I got high before, or at least buzzed, but it was all small potatoes compared to what I experienced last night.
When I inhaled the fatal blow I tried my hardest to really get it down into my lungs, and holy moly did it do so. My lower throat was on fire. I was coughing a whole lot. The sensation of burning persisted through the entire session. After recovering, I was high. I saw the same colors, but they felt different. I struggled to walk. I was having giggling fits. It was crazy, but I didn't expect another wave to smack me straight in the face just a few minutes later. I couldn't focus. I couldn't type. My giggling was out of control and like hell I was gonna get up to go anywhere. There were two people waiting to RP with me on F-List and I felt bad about leaving them there, but I ended up just rambling on and on when talking to them. I felt like I wasn't even thinking of anything. I had extended periods where I just kinda laid there doing absolutely nothing. When the web froze or stopped responding, instead of getting angry, I was just vibin'. I thought I was living in slowed down time. About 2 hours in I started to get frustrated with it and decided to just lie in bed for 30 minutes. I managed to get back down shortly afterwards but I still feel like the hangover is with me. Will I do it again? Maybe, just not as strongly a puff.
When I inhaled the fatal blow I tried my hardest to really get it down into my lungs, and holy moly did it do so. My lower throat was on fire. I was coughing a whole lot. The sensation of burning persisted through the entire session. After recovering, I was high. I saw the same colors, but they felt different. I struggled to walk. I was having giggling fits. It was crazy, but I didn't expect another wave to smack me straight in the face just a few minutes later. I couldn't focus. I couldn't type. My giggling was out of control and like hell I was gonna get up to go anywhere. There were two people waiting to RP with me on F-List and I felt bad about leaving them there, but I ended up just rambling on and on when talking to them. I felt like I wasn't even thinking of anything. I had extended periods where I just kinda laid there doing absolutely nothing. When the web froze or stopped responding, instead of getting angry, I was just vibin'. I thought I was living in slowed down time. About 2 hours in I started to get frustrated with it and decided to just lie in bed for 30 minutes. I managed to get back down shortly afterwards but I still feel like the hangover is with me. Will I do it again? Maybe, just not as strongly a puff.
Life update! New apartment, gotta make a life for myself
Posted 4 years agoIn early April, I will be moving out of the house I was so familiar with for nearly 10 years and moving into a brand new apartment with my mother. In said apartment, I will need to make a life for myself, and learn how to live individually. I'm still a BB bird and I need to learn to spread me wings and fly. Or whatever the human equivalent is. All I ask is for the best of luck and unconditional support for my future.
In regards to the new logo and banner
Posted 5 years agoI think it's really neat! It'll take a bit of getting used to but that's with all things. I'm glad FA is independent again, I thought IMVU died loooong ago.
Just a friendly hello
Posted 5 years agoHope your day's going well.
FA+
