MOVED
Posted 10 years agoOKAY.
Posted 10 years agoHoppy roo year!
*clears throat*
Anyway. I'm gonna quit putting it off and make a New Years' Resolution right this second to move accounts. So I'm gonna be migrating over to
aceforte by uploading art of my most recent fursona, bringing along the descriptions, and deleting the reposts on this gallery.
I'll also re-follow some people, some people I won't. Just trying to get a move on.
So, out with the old, in with the new, and 2015 is getting a shiny new FA page for commissions, art, and just general furry socialization.
There will be one more journal on this page indicating my completed move. Hope to see you there. <3
*clears throat*
Anyway. I'm gonna quit putting it off and make a New Years' Resolution right this second to move accounts. So I'm gonna be migrating over to

I'll also re-follow some people, some people I won't. Just trying to get a move on.
So, out with the old, in with the new, and 2015 is getting a shiny new FA page for commissions, art, and just general furry socialization.
There will be one more journal on this page indicating my completed move. Hope to see you there. <3
This is too daunting.
Posted 11 years agoI should have known that 6000 faves would take ages to save on an external drive. I think I'm just going to make the account and move, and leave the faves here. If they get deleted they get deleted. x-x
Moving accounts
Posted 11 years agoDefinitely moving accounts soon. :3 I will let everyone know the username. Faves and old uploads will stay here, some are moving to the new account. However first I need to save all my faves on my external drive so it might take a little while.
How are you doing?
Posted 11 years agoBECAUSE I FEEL AWFUL, THANKS FOR ASKING.
On Compromising in Relationships (rant, opinions, blah)
Posted 11 years agoI'm only posting this here because I don't feel like I have anywhere else to post it.
Anyway, I just got done with a really weird conversation with a skype friend about our fetishes and compromising with them in a relationship. A lot was said, but the gist of it is that the friend was saying something along the lines of "If you have a fetish you like, but your partner wants nothing to do with, you ultimately need to decide if you value the other person more important than your fetish, or your fetish more important than your partner." Rather than 'quote' my position, I'll just talk about it.
I think compromises in relationships are stupid. In reality, little compromises, compromises that don't affect anything in the long run and better the relationship on all sides are fine. I'm talking about the ones where you have to change yourself to appease the other person. Examples of this: fetishes or sexual ventures you enjoy more than anything you could do with your partner, personality ticks you have always had that need to be worked out, and so on. If something is so integrally a part of you, that by removing it from your life to appease your partner, you would in turn be not being true to yourself and not enjoying life to its fullest, then it is my opinion that you shouldn't change that about yourself. Ever.
And let me be clear: I also think that whatever partner I may have should refrain from changing themself as well. If it's something they are, that they don't want to change that aspect of themselves, they should keep themselves that way. If you have to appease your partner for the sake of "love" then you're not being true to yourself. And that's pretty silly in my opinion.
An example of the previous paragraph: Let's say I had a partner. Reeeally awesome person, liked them a whole lot. I appreciated all their shortcomings and good stuff, but there was one thing I didn't like at all. Let's pretend this partner is a hardcore conservative. We gel on all other levels but politically they're extremely opposite of me. I would NEVER ask them to change that about themself. In reality, I'm gonna dislike their viewpoints and at some point will probably end the relationship for that reason to begin with. But there is no reason they should come over to my side or compromise somewhere in the middle, just to appease a relationship.
In the same way, if my partner doesn't want me to be doing one of my most important fetishes--one that I'm practically interested in turning into a lifestyle--just because it would make them appreciate me more, or make them /really/ like me, I don't think I should stop partaking in the fetish to keep the relationship going. Sure, they may find it gross. They may find it annoying, irritating, or time consuming. But it's a part of me. It's important to me. Why should I stop? Why shouldn't I ask that they try it out for themselves? Why shouldn't I want to be able to express myself in my own way? I shouldn't. It's not about what they think about me, it's how I feel about myself.
Confidence is weird. Other people can certainly help fuel confidence, but for the most part, confidence is something exuded by the self, and something that we have ourselves. Confidence comes from being able to take what people say, acknowledging it, and accepting the truth that you and you alone know and walking on with it. That's confidence. If I'm in a relationship, and I can't feel good about myself, then there's no point, even if the other person likes me. If I'm not truly enjoying everything I could be enjoying, then I, or my relationship, is holding things back. And I don't want to be held back. I want to have freedom within my own limitations, not ones outside of my own control.
The point of all this rambling is that I think that if you're in a relationship, and your partner doesn't like something MAJOR about you--be it a fetish, an ideology, a religion, a particular family member or friend, a harmless habit, whatever--then YOU SHOULD NOT CHANGE YOURSELF FOR THEIR SAKE. Obviously though, everyone's relationship is different. I personally am not extremely romantic. So I can't compare to someone who's super romantic. If you love your partner way more than you love something that is a small change then sure, change that about yourself if it makes you closer to your partner. Where I would draw the line is when it becomes a big enough change to something important enough to you that it drastically affects you internally, that you stop being true to yourself, that you can't be fully happy. In that case you shouldn't change yourself. But again, my opinion.
The way the skype conversation ended, the skype friend deleted me, calling me selfish for not being willing to compromise. Our particular discussion revolved around fetishes, wherein he pointed out some problems he had with aspects of diaper fetishes. Not all aspects. Just some. I personally, am wanting to wear diapers full time at some point. I like using them for anything, I like just about everything about them. And so admittedly I told him that I would not be willing to just -stop- doing it because my partner said they didn't like it. That's not being true to myself. He said that was really selfish, and that it would come across as them wondering "Is your diaper fetish more important than me?" and would ultimately force me to choose between two things I love: one which is a part of me, and the other which is not. I asserted my desire to stay true to myself again. He called me selfish again. And I agreed. Yeah. I'm selfish. I value myself above others. I'm generous and I care about other people too, but ultimately, I'm the most important person in my own personal bubble. And if I can't enjoy my life to the fullest, doing everything I want to do, whether or not my partner is involved, just because my partner doesn't like part of it, then they're not worth it to me. If that's selfish, then yes. I'm selfish. But I'm not gonna compromise for something that I don't think is necessary, and neither should my partner. Do what makes YOU and YOU ALONE happy first and foremost. If it makes others happy, cool. If it doesn't make them happy, but doesn't affect them, then do it anyway. It's you. Do you.
/rant
Anyway, I just got done with a really weird conversation with a skype friend about our fetishes and compromising with them in a relationship. A lot was said, but the gist of it is that the friend was saying something along the lines of "If you have a fetish you like, but your partner wants nothing to do with, you ultimately need to decide if you value the other person more important than your fetish, or your fetish more important than your partner." Rather than 'quote' my position, I'll just talk about it.
I think compromises in relationships are stupid. In reality, little compromises, compromises that don't affect anything in the long run and better the relationship on all sides are fine. I'm talking about the ones where you have to change yourself to appease the other person. Examples of this: fetishes or sexual ventures you enjoy more than anything you could do with your partner, personality ticks you have always had that need to be worked out, and so on. If something is so integrally a part of you, that by removing it from your life to appease your partner, you would in turn be not being true to yourself and not enjoying life to its fullest, then it is my opinion that you shouldn't change that about yourself. Ever.
And let me be clear: I also think that whatever partner I may have should refrain from changing themself as well. If it's something they are, that they don't want to change that aspect of themselves, they should keep themselves that way. If you have to appease your partner for the sake of "love" then you're not being true to yourself. And that's pretty silly in my opinion.
An example of the previous paragraph: Let's say I had a partner. Reeeally awesome person, liked them a whole lot. I appreciated all their shortcomings and good stuff, but there was one thing I didn't like at all. Let's pretend this partner is a hardcore conservative. We gel on all other levels but politically they're extremely opposite of me. I would NEVER ask them to change that about themself. In reality, I'm gonna dislike their viewpoints and at some point will probably end the relationship for that reason to begin with. But there is no reason they should come over to my side or compromise somewhere in the middle, just to appease a relationship.
In the same way, if my partner doesn't want me to be doing one of my most important fetishes--one that I'm practically interested in turning into a lifestyle--just because it would make them appreciate me more, or make them /really/ like me, I don't think I should stop partaking in the fetish to keep the relationship going. Sure, they may find it gross. They may find it annoying, irritating, or time consuming. But it's a part of me. It's important to me. Why should I stop? Why shouldn't I ask that they try it out for themselves? Why shouldn't I want to be able to express myself in my own way? I shouldn't. It's not about what they think about me, it's how I feel about myself.
Confidence is weird. Other people can certainly help fuel confidence, but for the most part, confidence is something exuded by the self, and something that we have ourselves. Confidence comes from being able to take what people say, acknowledging it, and accepting the truth that you and you alone know and walking on with it. That's confidence. If I'm in a relationship, and I can't feel good about myself, then there's no point, even if the other person likes me. If I'm not truly enjoying everything I could be enjoying, then I, or my relationship, is holding things back. And I don't want to be held back. I want to have freedom within my own limitations, not ones outside of my own control.
The point of all this rambling is that I think that if you're in a relationship, and your partner doesn't like something MAJOR about you--be it a fetish, an ideology, a religion, a particular family member or friend, a harmless habit, whatever--then YOU SHOULD NOT CHANGE YOURSELF FOR THEIR SAKE. Obviously though, everyone's relationship is different. I personally am not extremely romantic. So I can't compare to someone who's super romantic. If you love your partner way more than you love something that is a small change then sure, change that about yourself if it makes you closer to your partner. Where I would draw the line is when it becomes a big enough change to something important enough to you that it drastically affects you internally, that you stop being true to yourself, that you can't be fully happy. In that case you shouldn't change yourself. But again, my opinion.
The way the skype conversation ended, the skype friend deleted me, calling me selfish for not being willing to compromise. Our particular discussion revolved around fetishes, wherein he pointed out some problems he had with aspects of diaper fetishes. Not all aspects. Just some. I personally, am wanting to wear diapers full time at some point. I like using them for anything, I like just about everything about them. And so admittedly I told him that I would not be willing to just -stop- doing it because my partner said they didn't like it. That's not being true to myself. He said that was really selfish, and that it would come across as them wondering "Is your diaper fetish more important than me?" and would ultimately force me to choose between two things I love: one which is a part of me, and the other which is not. I asserted my desire to stay true to myself again. He called me selfish again. And I agreed. Yeah. I'm selfish. I value myself above others. I'm generous and I care about other people too, but ultimately, I'm the most important person in my own personal bubble. And if I can't enjoy my life to the fullest, doing everything I want to do, whether or not my partner is involved, just because my partner doesn't like part of it, then they're not worth it to me. If that's selfish, then yes. I'm selfish. But I'm not gonna compromise for something that I don't think is necessary, and neither should my partner. Do what makes YOU and YOU ALONE happy first and foremost. If it makes others happy, cool. If it doesn't make them happy, but doesn't affect them, then do it anyway. It's you. Do you.
/rant
Probably gonna move accounts soon
Posted 11 years agoProbably moving accounts in the near future cause this profile is old and I want a new name. One which matches my Weasyl. And doesn't imply the wrong species. And all that.
What possesses people to be shitheads to others?
Posted 11 years agoLately it's been pretty obvious that FA seems to be letting most anyone on the website get an ad for the website provided they have legitimate content they're trying to sell or what have you. Now it's more than the same four con ads rolling at random, and you get a bunch of smaller artists getting ads. This is wonderful. Kudos.
So then what exactly is it that would make a person see an ad for something they don't like, and don't want, and immediately run to their page and tell them how much of a piece of shit they are for making it. Like, no one required you to click the ad in the first place, that's stupid. The artist paid for the adspace in hopes that someone (iirc not you) will want to pay for their art. That's their right and clearly you need to deal with that fact.
I just don't get why someone would feel obligated to do that. Telling someone off for PAYING FOR AN AD to SELL A PRODUCT that YOU DON'T WANT AND DON'T HAVE TO BUY is like this:
Imagine being in line at the grocery store. You like Pace salsa. You buy Pace salsa. It's sitting on the conveyor of the checkout machine. Someone comes up behind you and starts to wait in line behind you, but then sees that you have Pace salsa on the checkout stand. Pace salsa is pretty cheap and tastes very generic but it's what you like. The guy behind you turns up his nose and goes "Pace? AW HELL NO." And proceeds to leave the checkout line and check out on the other side of the store.
People don't do that IRL because it's fucking stupid. It makes no sense. It's disrespectful. It proves nothing. Just like you're not required to like or pay for Pace salsa, you're not required to clickthrough, purchase artwork from, or comment on someone's ad that they paid for themselves. Can't you just leave them alone?
So then what exactly is it that would make a person see an ad for something they don't like, and don't want, and immediately run to their page and tell them how much of a piece of shit they are for making it. Like, no one required you to click the ad in the first place, that's stupid. The artist paid for the adspace in hopes that someone (iirc not you) will want to pay for their art. That's their right and clearly you need to deal with that fact.
I just don't get why someone would feel obligated to do that. Telling someone off for PAYING FOR AN AD to SELL A PRODUCT that YOU DON'T WANT AND DON'T HAVE TO BUY is like this:
Imagine being in line at the grocery store. You like Pace salsa. You buy Pace salsa. It's sitting on the conveyor of the checkout machine. Someone comes up behind you and starts to wait in line behind you, but then sees that you have Pace salsa on the checkout stand. Pace salsa is pretty cheap and tastes very generic but it's what you like. The guy behind you turns up his nose and goes "Pace? AW HELL NO." And proceeds to leave the checkout line and check out on the other side of the store.
People don't do that IRL because it's fucking stupid. It makes no sense. It's disrespectful. It proves nothing. Just like you're not required to like or pay for Pace salsa, you're not required to clickthrough, purchase artwork from, or comment on someone's ad that they paid for themselves. Can't you just leave them alone?
New FA Change
Posted 11 years ago>.>
I'm all for a change but sometimes the repercussions of your actions need to be evaluated before carrying out the plan.
Because the tame and mature tags were merged, and also because FA has never had more than a "babyfur" category, now there is no way to browse diaperfur, or more adult-centric diaperfur art. Now I get a nice face full of cubs when I click browse.
BF and DF are preeeeeetty different, FA...
I'm all for a change but sometimes the repercussions of your actions need to be evaluated before carrying out the plan.
Because the tame and mature tags were merged, and also because FA has never had more than a "babyfur" category, now there is no way to browse diaperfur, or more adult-centric diaperfur art. Now I get a nice face full of cubs when I click browse.
BF and DF are preeeeeetty different, FA...
Selling my big snow leopard tail and ears set!
Posted 11 years agohttp://www.furbuy.com/auctions/1057908.html
Take a look at it if you're interested <3 It's huge and awesome!
Take a look at it if you're interested <3 It's huge and awesome!
Closed Species???
Posted 11 years agoI just don't get them. Why are closed species a thing? For starters, a lot (not all, but many) of the closed species I see tend to be something that's still furry, and looks like a hybrid of some sort. I mean, there's nothing wrong with hybrids in furry (as a kangaroo sheep), so if you chose some animals which hybridized to look like your closed species is that stealing? And then there's the way they are off the radar. A lot of closed species come from furs who are not exactly in the spotlight in some form or fashion. If that's the case, then is it entirely necessary to make your species closed, if only like 5000 people (or less!) ever see it? Or suppose two different people who never see each other's art make two similar (or similarly named) closed species, but never see each other's work. Is that stealing or coincidental? Can one really get frustrated about that?
And like, what about fanart? The whole point of fanart existing is being a fan of a something and producing art of it. Suppose a fan liked your closed species. Is it wrong for them to want to make a character within that species? Or perhaps draw it? They could even credit it back to you who made the closed species! And it's possible they could ask first. Say "hey, you've got an awesome/adorable/badass species there. Can I make a character of it?" And then you could be like "hey yeah sure" or "Okay, but first here's what you must know about the species so you stay true to it" And then everything would be fine and dandy! I mean, popular non-real species exist all over the place in furry. What if Pokemon or Digimon were/contained closed species? What if MLP were closed species? What the Na'vi were closed species?
The fact of the matter is they're not, and fans of them will draw them if they want to. Almost unanimously without asking the creators first. They might draw art of characters in uncharacteristic scenarios as well, because that's how they are motivated by art, and that's how they express themselves artistically. It seems to me like you can't stop someone from vocally, or silently, going "awww, that's a cute species *scribbles up a drawing*". And if not, wouldn't it be a compliment to you? Like hey, I love your species so much that I WANT ONE OF MY OWN. That's a compliment to me, for sure.
It just seems silly to me for someone to draw a thing and go "ONLY I CAN DRAW THIS, NO ONE ELSE!" With the exception being if they PAY MONEY FOR IT THROUGH AN ADOPT AUCTION or something of that ilk. Suppose I went into MS Paint and drew a circle. And I posted it on FA saying that it was a closed species/shape. Called it a roundy or something. And sold the rights to draw it for 5 dollars. Suppose I did that, and then fussed at people who drew it without asking me first. I mean Circles are integral to drawing anyway, so I could get mad at a loooooot of people. Like if someone draws a species based on doge, and then calls it closed, I'm sorry, but it's art, and I don't think you can close it off all that much. Unless you don't want to vocalize it. Make a private species, keep it private. Don't want people to draw it, don't act like you have some sort of copyright on it after posting it online. Maybe instead of closed species we could say "this is a xyz, it's a species I made up that's like this" and if people want to fanart it they can fanart it?
This is a silly rant of course but I'm just saying. I don't think it's necessarily possible, or really appropriate in general, to make a closed species. If you do make your own species and someone copies you and claims it as their own, then you could either operate on the assumption that it's coincidence, or politely ask that they give you credit for creating the species. And even then, it's just art.
And like, what about fanart? The whole point of fanart existing is being a fan of a something and producing art of it. Suppose a fan liked your closed species. Is it wrong for them to want to make a character within that species? Or perhaps draw it? They could even credit it back to you who made the closed species! And it's possible they could ask first. Say "hey, you've got an awesome/adorable/badass species there. Can I make a character of it?" And then you could be like "hey yeah sure" or "Okay, but first here's what you must know about the species so you stay true to it" And then everything would be fine and dandy! I mean, popular non-real species exist all over the place in furry. What if Pokemon or Digimon were/contained closed species? What if MLP were closed species? What the Na'vi were closed species?
The fact of the matter is they're not, and fans of them will draw them if they want to. Almost unanimously without asking the creators first. They might draw art of characters in uncharacteristic scenarios as well, because that's how they are motivated by art, and that's how they express themselves artistically. It seems to me like you can't stop someone from vocally, or silently, going "awww, that's a cute species *scribbles up a drawing*". And if not, wouldn't it be a compliment to you? Like hey, I love your species so much that I WANT ONE OF MY OWN. That's a compliment to me, for sure.
It just seems silly to me for someone to draw a thing and go "ONLY I CAN DRAW THIS, NO ONE ELSE!" With the exception being if they PAY MONEY FOR IT THROUGH AN ADOPT AUCTION or something of that ilk. Suppose I went into MS Paint and drew a circle. And I posted it on FA saying that it was a closed species/shape. Called it a roundy or something. And sold the rights to draw it for 5 dollars. Suppose I did that, and then fussed at people who drew it without asking me first. I mean Circles are integral to drawing anyway, so I could get mad at a loooooot of people. Like if someone draws a species based on doge, and then calls it closed, I'm sorry, but it's art, and I don't think you can close it off all that much. Unless you don't want to vocalize it. Make a private species, keep it private. Don't want people to draw it, don't act like you have some sort of copyright on it after posting it online. Maybe instead of closed species we could say "this is a xyz, it's a species I made up that's like this" and if people want to fanart it they can fanart it?
This is a silly rant of course but I'm just saying. I don't think it's necessarily possible, or really appropriate in general, to make a closed species. If you do make your own species and someone copies you and claims it as their own, then you could either operate on the assumption that it's coincidence, or politely ask that they give you credit for creating the species. And even then, it's just art.
Survey for school project!
Posted 11 years agoHello! I'm taking a sociology of sex class this quarter and I am performing a survey of furries and sexuality in the fandom. If you have a few minutes to fill it out, it would be very helpful! Thanks!
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/VFP93QW
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/VFP93QW
Stuff I'm Waiting On
Posted 12 years agoThis is just a journal to remind myself of what all I'm waiting on right now.
Oddisyn 1 Full Body and 1 Chibi
RabidHarlequin Free art thing mentioned a little while back
thatcatzoey YCH
This is all. Not important to any of my followers, most likely.



This is all. Not important to any of my followers, most likely.
Profile Update
Posted 12 years agoYep.
Whenever I get around to getting an external hard drive I'll probably be streaming (or more likely uploading to Youtube) Let's Plays.
Also I'm up to meeting people on IMs and talking/RPing if that strikes your fancy.
Whenever I get around to getting an external hard drive I'll probably be streaming (or more likely uploading to Youtube) Let's Plays.
Also I'm up to meeting people on IMs and talking/RPing if that strikes your fancy.
Free Kigurumi Pajama Raffle :3
Posted 12 years agoI love kigurumi pajamas, don't you? Go here http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/4362109/ and enter a raffle to get a custom pair which will not cost you a thing except for shipping. (They looks really soft and awesome, too, why pass it up?)
Pimping a Free Wolf Hat Raffle by Oddisyn!
Posted 12 years agoFree Icon Raffle by Sparrow~
Posted 13 years agoEven though I have lots of stuff by Sparrow~ already, I could always have something more cause she's great. So you all should go and watch her and enter the raffle and stuff. Because those icons are adorable, let's face it.
http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/3619695/
http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/3619695/
Friend is doing story commissions
Posted 13 years agohttp://www.furaffinity.net/view/7980287/
Evidently they are an emergency for an eye exam and new glasses. I don't know much else about it. It is my understanding he will write almost any story/kink/sexuality into a story you want, so I'd give it a shot if you have a few extra dollars. Do it for my friend... Even though no one does anything for me anyway. :P
Evidently they are an emergency for an eye exam and new glasses. I don't know much else about it. It is my understanding he will write almost any story/kink/sexuality into a story you want, so I'd give it a shot if you have a few extra dollars. Do it for my friend... Even though no one does anything for me anyway. :P
Trade Music for Art/Reference Sheet?
Posted 14 years agoSo yeah... I'm broke, I have virtually no more interest in writing, and my fursona still has yet to have any artwork, reference, or anything drawn of him yet. So rather than paying to commission an artist, I want to see if anyone would be willing to do a trade with me. Based on the quality of your artwork, time it takes for you to do it, and such, I am willing to trade a song or two (or three if it's really high quality) for a reference picture or reference sheet of my character.
The details of my fursona will be given should you choose to draw him. I am willing to try and write any song, though I most enjoy the stuff that I write already. (Chiptunes, electronic melodic techno, stuff like that) The picture can be colored or not; I just really want a visualized reference of my character for payment in music. Comment, PM, or send me a message if you're interested. :3
The details of my fursona will be given should you choose to draw him. I am willing to try and write any song, though I most enjoy the stuff that I write already. (Chiptunes, electronic melodic techno, stuff like that) The picture can be colored or not; I just really want a visualized reference of my character for payment in music. Comment, PM, or send me a message if you're interested. :3
Updates
Posted 14 years ago...It's been a while since I've put anything in the way of journals or updates up here, SO! For those of you who I don't talk to regularly, I've moved along to college now. Wish I knew some more furs in the northern-LA area, but I won't complain until then.
As far as my "art" goes, I've pretty much eluded and given up on the writing scene. Mostly because I am incapable of satisfying myself with my words, and I get easily distracted when I write things that are interesting to me. This leads me to what most of my watchers are watching me for, and that is the story about Zip. It's over. Done. Kaput. I really wish I could continue it, but a formatted hard drive, a new computer, and a long time between parts that I've left it out. There's no chance of the current Zip story to be completed, but that doesn't mean there can't be a new one.
I've slowly eased myself back into RPing, and though I am a bit rusty compared to how I used to be, I am still fully capable of doing it, and if anyone is genuinely interested in restarting and continuing Zip's story, then be my guest and send me a message or comment here.
And even if you don't want to RP the Zip story, I would still like to RP with anyone who is interested, or just meet some new furry friends online, so say hi or message me or something... I don't bite. o-o
As for the music, I'm still working on it. Got a few new songs that need to be uploaded; just need a moment when the internet is fast enough.
So yeah, talk to me. Loneliness is no fun!
As far as my "art" goes, I've pretty much eluded and given up on the writing scene. Mostly because I am incapable of satisfying myself with my words, and I get easily distracted when I write things that are interesting to me. This leads me to what most of my watchers are watching me for, and that is the story about Zip. It's over. Done. Kaput. I really wish I could continue it, but a formatted hard drive, a new computer, and a long time between parts that I've left it out. There's no chance of the current Zip story to be completed, but that doesn't mean there can't be a new one.
I've slowly eased myself back into RPing, and though I am a bit rusty compared to how I used to be, I am still fully capable of doing it, and if anyone is genuinely interested in restarting and continuing Zip's story, then be my guest and send me a message or comment here.
And even if you don't want to RP the Zip story, I would still like to RP with anyone who is interested, or just meet some new furry friends online, so say hi or message me or something... I don't bite. o-o
As for the music, I'm still working on it. Got a few new songs that need to be uploaded; just need a moment when the internet is fast enough.
So yeah, talk to me. Loneliness is no fun!
Not available for RP
Posted 15 years agoBecause I have been loaded down with the classes on my schedule this term, and have had more interest in talking to the furs I know in real life, and because I am on my iPod and too lazy to update my profile... I don't feel like rp, or chat much for a while. I'm having a block, and it's just not as fun to me at the moment.
On Zip's chapter 2... It'll show up sooner or later. When I get around to it.
On Zip's chapter 2... It'll show up sooner or later. When I get around to it.